the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a J.D. and earned his B.S. in Professional Chem- istry (with a Biology minor) at Sam Houston State University. Mr. Hamby has practiced law as both a transactional attorney and a litigation attorney in California and Texas; he can be reached at bruce- hamby@hambylaw.com. Page 22.1556.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Tweaking Product Design and DevelopmentAbstractNew faculty faced with preparation for a course in product design and development must addressa wide range of topics ranging from
Carolina University. Page 14.281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Bioprocess Engineering Curriculum Development and AssessmentAbstractEast Carolina University’s new general engineering program is built around the goal ofexcellence in undergraduate education. The faculty of the program are encouraged to pursuenovel approaches to engineering education in order to achieve this goal. The newly createdconcentration in bioprocess engineering provides an excellent opportunity to develop andimplement a novel curriculum based upon proven pedagogical approaches designed to engagethe students and improve their mastery of
design process were evaluated in both the pre andpost-assessment. The questions were developed by the IMD INSPIRES team (which consisted ofengineering faculty, graduate students and high school technology education teachers).Examples of the questions asked can be found in Appendix A. Past data has shown that thismodule has been successful at increasing the students understanding of the underlying scientificprinciples and the engineering design process. Science Concepts Engineering ConceptsFigure 1: Student learning data for Engineering in Health Care module during 2006-2007school year. Mean assessment scores ± standard error of the mean (n=158
Systems• AR VR SM program faculty was leveraged to achieve broader engagement and acceptance of the SM• Data Visualization program in a Hispanic workforce. The registered participants included nine from Industry• Data Analytics (representing seven companies), five from Government/Economic development, and two from Education and Workforce Development. TWO WORKSHOPS • Introduction to PLC and Robotics Figure 3. SM Specific Webinars • Introduction to Sensors, IO Link, and Node Red for Use The local MEP center worked with the local workforce solutions organization that conducts in Industrial Settings special training and workforce development programs for underserved
Technology Program Development Ray Miller, Max Rabiee and Elvin Stepp University of CincinnatiAbstract:A major issue in the electric power industry is the staffing of the electric power infrastructure. Asthe Baby Boomer generation retires over the next decade as much as 75% of the current industrystaff will have retired. This will affect hourly operations and maintenance personnel,engineering design staff and transmission and distribution professionals. The impending demandfor power engineers has spurred the utility companies to work with the College of AppliedScience to develop programs for new Engineering Technologists in Power Systems. A majorgoal of this paper is to describe and
Paper ID #8040Engineering Students’ Development as Lifelong LearnersDr. John C. Chen, California Polytechnic State University John Chen is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, which he joined in 2008. Prior to that he was an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering for 10 years at Rowan University. His interests in engineering education include conceptual learning, conceptual change, and lifelong learning.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently
structural engineering approaches such as the “Slope-Deflection Method” and“Moment-Distribution Method” methods have also been developed and documented. Moresupport in terms of faculty time for completing these modules are needed.Bibliography1. Navaee, S., Das, N.K., “Utilization of MATLAB in Structural Analysis,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2002.2. Hibbeler, R.C., Structural Analysis, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, 1995.3. McCormac, J., Elling, R.E., Structural Analysis, Harper Collins, 1988.4. West, H.H., Fundamentals of Structural Analysis, John Wiley, 1993.5. Laursen, H.I., Structural Analysis, Second Edition, McGRaw Hill, 1978SHAHNAM NAVAEEShahnam Navaee is currently an Associate Professor in the Engineering
Quality Assurance Scaling up of Undergraduate, Postgraduate and PhD capacity; and resultant Challenges Emerging Global Engineering Challenges and Opportunities – as, for example, represented by NAE Grand Challenges and Millennium Development Goals 17 2 Page 17.29.18 SOME POINTS FOR DISCUSSION Major Reforms in Higher Education in India and China Joint Activities – Exchange of Students, faculty, Academic Leaders; Conferences, Workshops Faculty and Leadership Development 18 2 Page 17.29.19
Engineers without Borders. They hold up similarvalues – meeting basic human needs through engineering, working closely with communities in apartnership in which communities retain autonomy to define and control the project. They workfrom similar models, where students raise money for and become involved in the technical workfor a developing community (sometimes in the United States, but often in a developing country),and spend a small amount of time in that country doing some of the work.. A team ofprofessional engineers and a faculty advisor work with the students, but there is usually noformal classroom component required. Many engineering education-based projects do notinvolve social scientists or economists or others with significant cultural
of whom also had some engineering work experience, and two recentprogram graduates working as new engineers. The investigation of the schooling phase centeredon four core courses identified by program faculty as central to the development of the students’use of mathematics in engineering problem solving: Calculus (Year 1), Statics (Year 2), Strengthof Materials (Year 3), and Reinforced Concrete Design (Year 4). These courses were targeted forobservations and the solicitation of student participants, although students reported on their othercourses during interviews. From the students who volunteered for the study, I selected those bestrepresenting the typical student at that point in the program in terms of prior courses, age, andwork
AC 2009-84: NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN ENGINEERING FOR NONENGINEERSJohn Krupczak, Hope College Page 14.905.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 New Developments in Engineering for Non-Engineers: Functional Analysis as a Framework for Understanding TechnologyAbstractThe National Academy of Engineering recently published: “Changing the Conversation:Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering.” The NAE states that capable andconfident participants in our technologically dependent society must know something aboutengineering. However the means by which engineers can explain engineering to non
Technology. She is currently lecturer of Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. She teaches graphics and design classes in Mechanical Engineering, as well as consulting with students and faculty on 3D solid modeling questions. Ms. Leipold’s area of expertise is the new product development process. Ms. Leipold’s professional experience includes three years spent as a New Product Development engineer at Pactiv Corporation in Canandaigua, NY. She holds 5 patents for products developed while working at Pactiv. Ms. Leipold’s focus at RIT is on CAD and design process instruction. She is a Certified ASME Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Professional
Paper ID #10526Curriculum Development for Embedded Systems SecurityDr. Janusz Zalewski, Florida Gulf Coast University Janusz Zalewski, Ph.D., is a professor of computer science and software engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Prior to an academic appointment, he worked for various nuclear research institutions, including the Data Acquisition Group of Superconducting Super Collider and Computer Safety and Re- liability Center at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also worked on projects and consulted for a number of private companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris, and Boeing. Zalewski served as a
Technology, Rolla, MO in 2014. Her research interests are optical fiber sensors, harsh environment sensors, embeddable sensors, structural health monitoring, and engineering education. Dr. Kaur is a senior member of IEEE and also an active member of ASEE. She has held several leadership roles within the ASEE Midwest section and the ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineering Division. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Poster: Engineering Electromagnetics Laboratory Development Narangoo Tumur and Amardeep KaurDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville
the University of Portland in Portland, Ore- gon. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Measurement, Statistics, and Research Design from the University of Washington. An elementary school teacher at heart, she now teaches educational research and STEM methods to undergraduate and graduate students. Her research fo- cus involves bringing active learning strategies to STEM, best practices of research-practice partnerships, and applied research in partnership. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Connecting Entrepreneurial Mindset to Software DevelopmentAbstractThe purpose of this research was to develop
complexissues of our future. Students in the program had different areas that they were the lead on, butstudents met as a group every morning to discuss the challenges and accomplishments of theprevious day. Many days began with a collaborative goal such as removing the weeds from anovergrown garden bed so that the work on multiple fronts could begin. If students from differentdisciplines had an interest in any of the projects of the day (DNA extraction from plants, hookingup irrigation system) they were encouraged to work in an area outside their comfort zone. OnFridays we had a pot-luck lunch together where all 11 students and 2 faculty ate lunch together.We also had several professional development activities during Friday meetings
and how it is appropriate for the topic to beintegrated into the engineering curriculum. The extreme relevance and importance of thistopic was first brought to the attention of faculty at Middle Tennessee State Universitylast year during an upper level course called Pollution Control Technology. This courseis required for students majoring in Environmental Science and Technology, which is aninterdisciplinary major in which students are required to take classes from a variety ofdisciplines, including biology and chemistry. Last year one student gave a presentationon intercropping techniques for sustainable development during the last two weeks of thecourse that are reserved for special topics. The class got into a heated discussion aboutthe
Paper ID #30280Industrializing Your Web Application Development ProjectDr. Gregory Kulczycki, Virginia Tech Dr. Kulczycki has extensive experience in research and development both in academia and industry. He received his doctorate from Clemson University in 2004 and began working as a professor at Virginia Tech shortly thereafter. In 2011 he went to work for Battelle Memorial Institute as a cyber research scientist, while continuing to be involved in teaching. He is currently back in the computer science department at Virginia Tech as a professor of practice, where he teaches, designs courses, and develops online
credits per year to engineering students for more than 25 years. His specific areas of expertise are in active learning, faculty development, and learning community development. He has been awarded the 2012 Progress Minnesota award, 2012 Labovitz Entrepreneurialism award, and 2012 Innovator of the Year award from the Rural Community College Alliance all for his work in developing the Iron Range Engineering program. His degrees are in civil engineering (B.S., University of North Dakota), and mechanical engineering (M.S., University of Central Florida). He is licensed as a professional engineer in the state of Minnesota.Dr. Dan Ewert
GC 2012-5640: COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS IN DEVELOPING THE PHDIN ENGINEERING EDUCATION PROGRAM IN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGIDr. Khairiyah Mohd Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Dr. Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering, Uni- versity Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). She is the Director of the UTM Regional Centre for Engineering Education (RCEE), which promotes meaningful research and scholarly practice in engineering education, and manages the PhD in Engineering Education program. Since 2011, she is the Secretary of the Society for Engineering Education Malaysia (SEEM). Prior to becoming the Director of RCEE, Dr. Khairiyah was the Deputy Director at the Centre for Teaching &
feedback of returning participants, the committee agreed to expand funding toinclude twenty undergraduate students, multiple faculty members and graduate students. Thestudent leadership skills and outcomes developed by this opportunity led to student internships,graduate program positions, and summer research jobs. In this case, leadership funding wasparticularly important in that it allowed young women in engineering to meet and listen todifferent role models and mentors in their desired field.The Grace Hopper Conference trip has demonstrated longitudinal impact on female students atthe Schulich School of Engineering, primarily through the past participants taking leadershipwithin the campus community and sharing their experiences. The 2016 trip
soft skills and (3) Toincrease the employment rate in the field related to one’s major. This paper introduces theWIE program developed in Kunsan University in Cheonrabuk-do and summarizes theoutcome of the first 5-year programs in terms of improvements in psychological correlates,retention rate, and employment rate. 2. Program DetailsThe programs in the three sub-areas are listed in Tables 1-3. The inclusive environmentprograms include programs for faculty and students, as well as research programs to developeffective teaching pedagogies for female students. The competency enhancement programshave both technical and non-technical programs. Employment support programs includevarious training programs related to employment preparation.Table 1
obtained a B.S. in Mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for
five courses,attend a leadership seminar series, and complete an international work-based, research-based orstudy-based experience. The minor courses are taught by faculty in the College of Engineeringincluding in-house communications faculty; the School of Public Policy; the Institute’sLeadership Education and Development (LEAD) Program, and executive-level engineeringpractitioners. The pedagogy model integrates leadership instruction into the broader context ofglobal societal grand challenges such as water availability and quality, air quality, urbanization,megaprojects, disasters, transportation, cities and sustainable development. A number of courseshave embedded study abroad experiences to foster global awareness, cross-cultural
Paper ID #7423Leadership Development in Tight Times: Scaling up courses without water-ing them downMr. Chris Carlson-Dakes, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Carlson-Dakes is a faculty associate in the College of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Madison and is on the faculty in the School of Business at Edgewood College in Madison, Wisc. He has industry experience as director of Organizational Development for an architectural engineering firm where he worked at an executive leadership level on individual and group leadership development. Dr. Carlson-Dakes’ formal training in technical disciplines, and his
research interests, in collaboration with the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), include developing clinical applications of functional mag- netic resonance imaging, including presurgical planning and evaluation of rehabilitative outcomes after injury or pathology. Ropella is co-director of the Functional Imaging Ph.D. program, jointly offered with MCW. Ropella has twice received the college’s Outstanding Teacher Award (1994 and 2002), the univer- sity Faculty Award for Teaching Excellence (2002) and was named the Wisconsin US Professor of the Year by The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Council for Advancement and Support for Education (2007). Among other honors, she was the recipient of the
Abstract This paper is based on the results of a national survey of ASEE Engineering LeadershipDevelopment Division (LEAD) members to compare and contrast the innovative componentsthat have been implemented within various engineering leadership development programs. Datawere collected from participants (University Faculty) from 30 North American, African, andEuropean Universities. The following components were examined: cross-cultural education,team-based applied projects, mentorship, and corporate sponsorship. The main objective of thispaper is to examine these components, identify innovative practices, and promote the importanceand growth of engineering leadership education. Through presenting our preliminary findings,we hope to encourage
interviews. This was all in an effort tounderstand the context and the primary issues facing the centers. We visited eleven ERCs inperson and interviewed multiple representatives from those centers (ranging from graduatestudents to the ERC directors). We conducted phone interviews with at least one person fromevery other active ERC. We also attended three consecutive ERC annual conferences, in whichwe spent a great deal of time attending sessions, presenting our own research and ideas,attending discussion groups, and talking with individuals one-on-one. We used information from these experiences to develop an online survey withapproximately 120 items. We sent invitation emails to approximately 2300 research faculty,center directors, industry
of the struggles that were faced by the program and its leadership. Following theEngineering Curriculum Committee and Faculty Senate approval, the Leonard Center hadliterally weeks prior to the start of the inaugural semester to transform a set of overarchingobjectives into a set of integrated, fully developed deliverable courses that would satisfy adiverse array of stakeholders. Many views and theories of leadership existed, making it difficultto achieve agreement on the learning objectives and pedagogy. For example, if one searchesAmazon Books for “leadership”, over 129,000 hits return. Searching Bing on “leadership”returns 24,000,000 hits. Fortunately, the minor had the unwavering support of two keyindividuals – Dr. Larry Burton, the Head
metrics and general progress to the class professor on a weekly basis. This paper willpresent an overview of the program, a description of the roles and results, as well as lessonslearned in helping provide tangible leadership experiences to developing engineering leaders.IntroductionThis paper discusses the details of in-progress effort to design and execute a practical andrigorous leadership experience for engineering students in a leadership development program.As outlined very well by Warnick et al. and Pitts et al., the use of experiential learning inleadership education for engineering students presents many logistical problems. [1,2] “Hands-on” learning requires significant investment in student and faculty time, faculty resources