, recognizing their responsibility to protect the health and welfare of the public, and to be accountable for the social and environmental impact of their engineering practice.4. To establish an educational environment in which students participate in cross- disciplinary, team-oriented, open-ended activities that prepare them to work in integrated engineering teams.5. To offer a curriculum that encourages students to become broadly educated engineers and life-long learners, with a solid background in the basic sciences and mathematics, an understanding and appreciation of the arts, humanities, and social sciences, an ability to communicate effectively for various audiences and purposes, and a desire to seek out further educational
knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a
real world engineering, and which are so critical to the responsible and ethicaldirection of technological progress, are omitted. Students also have little or no connection to realapplications and the impact their decisions might have on others at the community, social, andcultural levels.EIC problems are those that combine engineering design and decision-making with real worldcontext. The context may be based on historical fact, as for traditional case studies, or may beartificially created or virtual. The application of analytical skills, disciplinary knowledge andteam and project management are emphasized in a cultural, organizational, and technologicalcontext. Design decisions are evaluated not only for their contribution to technical
(d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems Page 13.995.3 (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
presentations, individuals summarize group positions and statetheir own conclusions in writing. This activity led one former BME 102 student (author CM) toobtain a VaNTH summer research appointment with a leading bioethicist and to pursue careergoals conditioned by her summer experience.INTRODUCTION“Then you’re at a state of conflict. Because look. Here’s how it lays out. If you’ve got vitalinsider stuff that the American people for their welfare really need to know and you feel impelledto disclose it and violate your (nondisclosure) agreement (with the company) in doing so, that’s Page 7.283.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American
better in the short term format. As aconsequence, the grades of the students in the mini-session term were above what studentsusually get in fall and spring semesters. This is consistent with what have been reported inliterature [6].In an effort to explain the above finding, the following comments are made. Generally speaking,the students taking these courses registered for one course at a time, and this made them focus ononly one task. That may explain their high performance. It is highly possible that only excellentstudents take such courses for various reasons. First, they are more responsible. Second, theyare more conscious about their education. Thirdly, weaker students may be afraid to engage infast pace intensive classes.Conclusions and
across-section of information sources for the reader interested in pursuing the topics further, butmay also be read without attention to the footnotes.IntroductionA few years ago when concerns were being raised about the impact of the global marketplace onthe employment of US engineers, the authors drafted a paper entitled “Are current engineeringgraduates being treated as commodities by employers?” 1 We questioned whether engineering inthe United States was still an attractive profession offering productive and satisfying careers andlifestyles. One of the important problems we noted was the churning in engineeringemployment, with more experienced engineers living under the constant threat of being replacedby younger, more recent graduates, and
modeling, visualization and fabrication a“common knowledge” for middle school, high school and community college students.What is nanotechnology?According to the Encyclopædia Britannica¹ (2008), nanotechnology is defined as “themanipulation and manufacture of materials and devices on the scale of atoms or small groups ofatoms.” Nanotechnology is the creation of materials, components, devices and systems at theatomic or nanometer level. Given this structural modification, products designed and createdwith materials at this scale will perform exceptionally. Nanotechnology as a buzz word iscurrently viewed from two major perspectives, science and technology. From the scientificperspective, it concerns a basic understanding of physical, chemical, and
beprepared to help students plan for these types of careers, particularly through course selection.Therefore, it is important for us to not only understand the role of counselors, but to have a bettergrasp of their KAB regarding gender and STEM, and how this may potentially influence howthey counsel and engage with students. This paper examines the results of a five point Likert scale assessment tool developed usingthe KAB framework. The survey was administered as a pre and post assessment from a two hourprofessional development workshop on STEM occupations in November of 2010. Participantsincluded 120 counselors from a large Southwest school district. Eleven out of the original 45survey items are reviewed in this paper and N=71 participant
applied tothe user by a motorized device as part of the human-computer interface. The main goal of thisproject is to design haptics-enabled rehabilitation exercises to help post-stroke patients regaintheir fine-motor skills. The different approaches taken by the multidisciplinary teams arepresented, and feedback from students are analyzed. This project familiarized students with theMatlab/Simulink based software platform for the implementation of hardware-in-the-loopsystems, and improved their understanding of the social impact of engineering solutions.1. An overview on haptics and its relation to undergraduate engineering educationHaptics, originating from the Greek word “haptikos” meaning “able to touch”, refers to workingwith the sense of
while retaining eachdiscipline's individual identity [3]. In other words, it lacks the integration between fields anddisciplines [10]. Multidisciplinary learning and teaching include an opportunity for students tolearn about multiple disciplines related to a topic, with no synthesis or integration [11].Interdisciplinary on the other hand requires integration between different fields and conceptualsynthesis [12], [13]. The integration between knowledge and disciplines allows one to addressproblems which cannot be addressed using a single discipline [14].Transdisciplinary not only includes the integration of two or more disciplines but also involvescollaboration with external stakeholders [3], [15]. “Integration becomes the purpose ofeducation
or experiments on the final concept, as appropriate.IntroductionConcept development projects are a concerted effort to strategically develop informationgathering, filtering, organization, and synthesis skills in students1. These projects are alsointended to foster creative thinking in the realm of soon be realized research. Students work inmixed graduate and undergraduate student teams to develop a novel concept via independentreading, discussion, and on-demand mini-lectures. Nearly all of the content in the course isstudent-driven and is developed dynamically based on the technologies that the student pull intotheir projects. This work is based on the premise that engagement of students in critical thinkingand independent information
education, and among five institutions: Colorado School of Mines,Howard University, Stanford University, University of Minnesota and University of Washington.We are combining our forces in a three-pronged approach to focus on a Scholarship on LearningEngineering, a Scholarship on Teaching Engineering, and a series of Engineering EducationInstitutes. These three elements of our work are briefly described in Table 4.Table 4. Overview of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) CAEE Goals are: • Understand and enhance the engineering student learning experience • Integrate the needs of diverse faculty and diverse students into engineering education • Strengthen the engineering education research base • Expand the community
project, 3. To mold them as independent/collaborative researchers and effective communicators, 4. For them to learn to ask the right questions, formulate plans, pragmatically interpret data, 5. To inspire and enable them to pursue advanced study and related STEM careers.Organizational Structure:In lieu of the typical exclusive one-on-one mentoring of undergraduate students, this site utilizedand extended the vertically-integrated team framework for a more realistic, meaningful andeffective engagement of undergraduates in research. Initiated by Georgia Tech in 2009,Vertically-Integrated Projects (VIP) unite undergraduate education and faculty research in ateam-based context, where students earn academic credits and/or a research
Thermodynamics Courses through Problem-Based Learning and Entrepreneurially Minded Learning ModulesAbstractThis paper presents problem-based learning and entrepreneurially minded learning modulesfocused on fluid power applications in undergraduate Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamicscourses. This effort focuses on creating awareness and engaging students in the area of fluidpower, and challenging them to apply the concepts and theories in class to analyze and designreal-world fluid power systems. Therefore, the course modules target both technical andentrepreneurial mindset objectives. Assessment methods and results are detailed and discussed inthe paper. Preliminary results indicate positive student learning in the area of
problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.The Outcomes must also be related to the Program Educational Objectives. AdditionalOutcomes can be applied for a particular program.While not being quite as proscriptive, AACSB Standard 16: Undergraduate Learning Goals
engineering students, (although the numbers have increased in the last few years.) Thesefigures, in and of themselves, mandate that we do more to encourage an international experienceon the part of our own undergraduate engineering students. This is particularly important sincetechnology has been a (if not the) dominant driver for development in the United States bothfrom a technological as well as financial point of view. Information Technology specifically hasdramatically shrunk our world and made it a virtual work place with telecommuting and distancelearning. Multinational companies have become the rule and not the exception. Consequently,the impact of technology is felt both in a cultural and societal sense overall, especially in thepervasive
testing courses and research allow students to use the knowledgegained in the classroom and apply it to a practical project from the ground up, which in turngreatly enhances both theoretical and practical understanding of the covered subjects andconsiderably improves learning and retention. Therefore, many universities have incorporatedthis type of hands-on work through either a dedicated course or a student organization wherestudents can design, build, and fly small remote-controlled aircraft. The aim of these courses is tonot only enhance the understanding of critical aerospace objectives, but also to improve designskills and encourage communication and teamwork18. The American Institute of Aeronautics andAstronautics Design, Build, Fly
part of your future, whether you are addressing technical or non-technical audiences. Anything you can do to improve your communication skills will pay off. No doubt about it.Student FeedbackThe students appeared to appreciate the opportunity to help their lowest test grades even thoughsome were not particularly excited about doing an extra assignment. But when they finished,most admitted that they got something out of it in one way or another. Here are some typicalcomments: Page 8.1318.5 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003
), andMjøsa Tower (Norway). The purpose of the activity was to inspire students and evoke theirbeginner's mindset.Each class (or chapter) starts with a short activity that is 5-10 minutes in length. The activity tookthe form of a presentation of an impactful example and a high-level discussion of a need to framelearning, see the engineering relevance, and motivate students. Such activities are often notreadily available in textbooks and require instructors to dig into their experiences, engineeringsuccesses, and failures. For instance, a bridge is an excellent illustration to introduce trusses. Theclass can engage in a discussion on the benefits of a bridge. They will realize the time and fuelsaved - benefits to the humanity. A further presentation
technological literacy [3]. These are intended for K-12students. The ITEA is also working to develop program and assessment standards andcurriculum materials for the K-12 audience [4]. The engineering community has respondedenthusiastically to the need to increase the awareness and understanding of engineering as acareer, by initiating a number of programs aimed at the K-12 students. Page 13.1188.2To achieve widespread impact, standard classes must be taught at many institutions around thecountry. To accomplish this, standard models of technological literacy courses must bedeveloped. As a beginning to this process, a workshop was convened at the NAE
) tools come online, technical writing instruction is poised tocreate new applied projects, teaching students to use ML constructively, objectively evaluate MLoutput, and refine final products faster. STEM researchers are already publishing their use ofChat GPT-adjacent language tools in high impact scientific outlets like Nature. Engineeringstudents need exposure and to develop competency in using these tools. ML can supporttechnical writing by proofreading content; suggesting novel syntactic structures; producingusable content faster; and upskilling writers in the process. This paper presents the use of fourML tools, applied in service to a series of technical writing and communication projectsappropriate for sophomore-junior level students
ability to communicate effectively;h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context;i. a recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning;j. a knowledge of contemporary issues;k. an ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice;l. an ability to apply advanced mathematics through multivariate calculus and differential equations;m. a familiarity with statistics, linear algebra and reliability; Page 7.396.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for
• Goals of ASEE Advocacy – Conducting outreach to Congress to support funding and sound policy for engineering research and education – Supporting ASEE Councils to enhance advocacy goals of deans and other constituencies – Engaging the Administration and federal agency officials to inform future programs and create new opportunities – Elevating the role of ASEE within the Washington, DC-based scientific, STEM, and higher education advocacy communities and ensuring community advocacy reflects ASEE prioritiesAdvocacy: What’s the Point?Why Advocate?• Advocacy: The process by which ordinary citizens make their interests known to Congress• You can help Members of Congress make informed decisions on key policies impacting engineering research
) Educational Research team and a few fellow STEM education graduates for an obtained Discovery, Engagement, and Learning (DEAL) grant. Prior to attending Purdue University, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E in Engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation, where she worked on a team conducting research on how students learn LabVIEW through Disassemble, Analyze, Assemble (DAA) activities.Bryan W. Boudouris, Purdue University, West LafayetteProf. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process
are usually experienced, more senior, or engineering/science-major students. Inschool classes, primary mentors most often assume teaching responsibility, while secondarymentors take on an assistant role as classes go on. They can rotate as secondary mentors gainmore experience. This way, both mentors can learn from each other, especially the lessexperienced mentors. More importantly, this peer-to-peer relationship supports student mentors'persistence, success, and "sense of belonging"[9], fostering engagement, collaboration,communication, and mutual support. Also, as school science teachers take on the first 40 minutes 9of the class, student
. These labs utilize thefull spectrum of immersive technology, from 3D models and simulations to fully interactivevirtual environments, providing students with a hands-on experience that is both engaging andeducational.As we delve into the details of immersive virtual labs and their impact on education, it isessential to explore how these technological advancements align with pedagogical theories,contribute to improved learning outcomes, and could shape the future of education. This paperaims to discuss the potential challenges and future prospects of these innovative learning tools.This paper begins by examining the Intermediate Experimental Physics (PHYS 303) at OldDominion University, forming a basis for an initial version of virtual
diminishment of students’ desire to do good in the world.Students’ interest in public welfare considerations of engineering work decreased over the courseof their education. Bielefeldt [40] performed a detailed study of a related phenomenon: “sociallymotivated students leaving engineering at disproportionately higher rates,” a particular concernsince societal and caring motivations have gendered and ethnoracial variations. Bydecontextualizing engineering knowledge in the curriculum, engineering education pushes outstudents motivated to use engineering for social good.When students are encouraged to work on local or global community-based projects, their sense(reinforced by their educators) that social and cultural contexts are irrelevant to – or, at
-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 2009. 98(1): p. 27-38.29. Weinstein, C.E. and D.R. Palmer, User's Manual for those administering the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory, 2002, H&H Publishing Company, Inc. .30. Shell, D.F., J. Husman, J.E. Turner, D.M. Cliffel, I. Nath, and N. Sweany, The Impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Communities on High School Students' Knowledge Building, Strategic Learning, and Perceptions of the Classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2005. 33(3): p. 327-349.31. Prosser, M. and K. Trigwell, Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. British
tools and Python scripting to streamline key steps in lecture preparation.This approach aims to shift the focus of faculty from the logistics of content creation to theirprimary role in teaching.Why Transcriptto?The development of Transcriptto was motivated by the necessity to address the specific needs offaculty who were transitioning from traditional face-to-face teaching to online formats. Thischange highlighted the inadequacy of conventional classroom materials, particularly lectureslides, for online teaching that primarily relies on voice-over PowerPoint presentations. This gapnecessitated a solution that would adapt these materials to engage students effectively in anonline setting.Our team initially began by manually transcribing