communications, power systems and propeller/motor design. The research waspresented by the students during a poster session held on the last day of the course.Participants spent ten days on campus as a part of the year 2 summer experience. Students exploreddrone technology research and continued to engage in extended learning opportunities. Thepreliminary knowledge of drones gained in the course allowed students to delve deeper into dronetechnology research, including exploration of the current state of the technology, applications ofthe technology and the impact of drones on our society. Student teams examined the effect ofcomponent mass on the battery life of drones. Each team created a PowerPoint presentationhighlighting their findings at the end of
followedin calculus as well as in the students’ other academic arenas. [6]On the order of 500 institutions nationwide are currently engaged with some form ofcurricular learning community. While the actual designs vary a great deal, these programs all re-form the curricular structures to make explicit linkages among courses, and to intentionally build communities of students and teachers. Even more importantly there is a range in what we would refer to as teaching teams. Joining faculty members on teaching teams are librarians, computer center staff, advisors, residence life professionals, and quite frequently students as peer facilitators in the communities. So learning communities are not merely
Technology to Actively Engage Students in the Learning ProcessAbstractOnce every decade or so, a disruptive technology appears that has the potential to revolutionizeelectrical and computer engineering (ECE) education. This paper considers the impact of one ofthe most recent examples: a USB-powered instrument called Analog Discovery that is cheapenough for students to own personally. Students are no longer bound by the constraints of fixedspace, equipment, and schedules in their institution to conduct experiments. Instructionalmaterials are posted for free and advice is provided by early adopters, working engineers andhobbyists in forums on the internet to simplify the adoption of this pedagogical approach. Thepaper outlines the
professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include faculty development and evaluating con- ceptual knowledge and strategies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for mate- rials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback and internet tool use affect conceptual change and impact on students’ attitude, achievement
remain in their chosen field, contributing to a competitive workforce [6].The importance of social engagement in this context cannot be overstated. As Tinto suggested,involvement and integration within the academic life of college significantly enhance thelikelihood of student persistence [7]. He elucidated that in order to increase student retention infirst-year students, there is a need to incorporate early social and academic communities andgroups. His emphasis on early integration underlines the critical role of social engagement,particularly in the formative first year. Recognizing the significance of social engagement forfirst-year students, it becomes imperative to delve deeper into understanding the dynamics of thisengagement and its
Paper ID #31372S-STEM Lessons Learned: Supporting Community College Transfer Path-waysand Access to High Impact Practices during Transfer TransitionDr. Rebekah Dupont, Augsburg University Dr. Rebekah Dupont is Director of STEM Programs at Augsburg University in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Dr. Dupont’s disciplinary background is in applied mathematics. She is committed to helping STEM students attain academic confidence and financial security by connecting them with resources and helping to remove barriers. Recent projects have focused on broadening participation in STEM through scholar- ships, professional development
technical information to an audience of their peers, 3. creating and delivering an engaging educational short video that illustrates one of the course-related topics.To assess the value of the pedagogical approaches employed during the video creation process,students were asked to complete a survey using a 5-point Likert scale. The survey consisted ofquestions intended for students to reflect on how the assignment impacted their learning, creativity,confidence, and communication skills. This study was approved under the IRB Umbrella Protocolfor Standard Pedagogy Experiment at Rice University.Results and DiscussionOver the course of 3 semesters (Fall 2020, Spring 2021 and Fall 2021), students created a total of71 videos on a variety
-time on a PhD in engineering education. Page 24.404.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Developing Leadership Skills and Creating Community in Engineering StudentsAbstractThe goal of the program Identifying and Developing Engineers as Leaders (IDEAL) was toimprove retention of students with demonstrated financial need (based on the FAFSA) during thefirst two years of their engineering studies and to develop their leadership skills. The goal wasaccomplished by increasing engagement in both curricular and extracurricular activities. Theobjectives
account for only about 12.5 percent ofbaccalaureate degrees awarded in engineering. The President’s Council of Advisors on Scienceand Technology (PCAST) Report Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional CollegeGraduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics states a criticalneed to dramatically increase the number of STEM graduates by addressing the retention problemin the first two years of college. One of their recommendations was to engage students in researchexperiences within the first two years of college. Through a grant from the Department ofEducation Minorities in Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP), CañadaCollege, a Hispanic-serving community college from Northern California developed
prior to, and thenthroughout the teaching experience. Because language was a known perceivedimplication, the lessons were first written in English with a practice of using symbolicrepresentation of content as much as possible. The theory was that graphicrepresentations of content such as schematic symbols, drawings, pictures, programmingicons, flow charts, mathematic equations and hands on demonstrations were cross-cultural means of communicating and should be incorporated as much as possible.Finally, the lesson plans and other curricular materials were translated into Spanish bythose student teachers with Spanish fluency. During the actual teaching experience, the student teachers found that the use ofgraphic representations of content
, academic engagement, and sense of community.The following sections of this paper engage with existing literature and provide background onthe program and its development since 2015. In order to document and measure the impact ofour integrated pedagogy over the last 2 years, we have collected and analyzed student data fromboth integrated and non-integrated sections of the courses involved. Our analysis andcomparisons encompass Fall 2015 and Fall 2016 sections as well as integrated and non-integrated sections from Fall 2016. Following this analysis, we discuss the implications of ourfindings and plans for future research.Existing Research on Assessing Integrated PedagogyIntegration among and across engineering and other disciplines has been studied
225 Transferring students are interviewed in depth about how the program has impacted theiracademic and professional development.4. Student Involvement in Program ActivitiesThis section summarizes the results of the implementation the program undertaken during thefirst two years of Cañada College’s NSF S-STEM program. Table 7 summarizes the participationlevel of students in the various program activities designed to keep them engaged. Academicsupport services include the Math Lab, tutoring, MESA study groups and faculty office hours inthe MESA Center. On-campus workshops include resume writing, applying for scholarships,applying for internships, writing personal statements, applying for transfer, financial planning,time management, the
, andwere conducted after the students had resumed their regular class schedule. As they had receivedmost or all of their midterm grades when the surveys were conducted, it was expected that astudent’s midterm performance could have an impact on their perceptions of the fall break. Theresults below discuss in detail their responses of time spent during the break. From theinterviews, it is possible to gain a richer picture of how students who remained on campusperceived the break, and what impact it had on their connectivity with their peers and the widercampus community. The term “on campus”, was used rather than “in Waterloo” in an attempt todistinguish between students who remained engaged with the university from those whose homewas in Waterloo
go to seek help in resolving team problems.A new how-to reference, IPPD Professional Guide10, was created as a result of the followingcircumstances occurring in the Fall of 2011: • the class meeting structure was changed from 3 one-hour meetings a week to one 3-hour meeting a week • additional active learning opportunities were incorporated into class time to reinforce core IPPD technical elements • the number of lectures were reduced, as were the length of the lecturesWith less class time available, it was determined that certain technical and professional learningactivities would have to be accomplished outside of regular class time. Further, throughobservation of student engagement during lectures, feedback on
ETD 445and at service organizations such as Urban League; Legacy Foundation; and United Way. As aresult of such partnerships and PNW’s commitment to innovation and entrepreneurship, twocenters have been established, Center for Commercialization and Manufacturing Excellence(CMEC), and David Roberts Center for Innovation and Design (CID). One of the purposes ofCMEC center is to foster innovation in the Northwest Indiana region through commercializationof innovative ideas and products. Further, to scale up such activities, recently PNW hasestablished the impact lab through state and private support. The CMEC produced the followingoutcome till date by engaging PNW faculty, students, and staff.College of Technology faculty and students have been
experience a very lownumber of female students that decide to study engineering. For example, at the Oregon Instituteof Technology (OIT) during the past 5 years, the percentage of first year females in theorientation classes for engineering has been less than 10%. To understand better how thesetrends and statistics can be changed, tools must be developed to help gather, organize and studythe factors that influence and impact K-12 age group girls. The purpose of this poster/paperproject is to describe a model developed by OIT professors and students based on the ICAMDefinition (IDEF) graphical language that can be used to record data and responses collectedwhile working with local K-12 students on a Department of Defense (DOD) youth programcalled
of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors related to equity and diversity in engineering student populations
also sent to the community and is accessible on the website [22]. Lastly, theLearning from the BME Podcast was least attended. This event was led by undergraduatestudents who recently graduated from their biomedical engineering program and weredeveloping a podcast to engage students on industry positions and internships.The last section of the survey results include an evaluation of impact by asking the participantshow these events have added value to their professional development, teaching, and overallcareer. These results indicate some areas of improvement, with only 47% of participants showingvalue added to either their education or professional development, and 10% strongly disagreeing.This indicates that there needs to be better
design and build the cages. The paper also describes the lessons learned and the benefits to students, Community College faculty, and the company. Finally, the paper discusses future collaboration with the company and broader impact on programs at the college. Introduction Numerous studies have been done on the benefits of experiential education and student participation in relevant internships. Community College students, however, often face several challenges in finding and being able to participate in typical experiential learning opportunities, such as internships and co‐op experiences. Internships in a technical field, such as manufacturing and engineering are often only available to upperclassmen moving to their third year of college
Board Journal to Page 6.103.7 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2001, American Society of Engineering Education“recognize local school boards for taking bold and innovative steps to improve school districtgovernance and make a positive impact on student learning.” 23Most recently, the ETL was awarded the 2000 Michigan Campus Compact Faculty/StaffCommunity Service-Learning Award. This award is given to recognize exceptional programs atthe 31 participating Michigan colleges and universities, that “engages or influences students tobe
Engineering Deans National Award for Engineering Education (High Commen- dation) and in 2007 she received the ”WICked Woman of the Year” award from the Canberra Women in Information and Communication (WIC) for her contribution to developing, encouraging and mentoring young women in industry and at university. Page 21.53.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 What effect does an academic’s concept of curriculum have on their engagement with its design and development?AbstractThe undergraduate curriculum is one of the most important products higher education
member self evaluation, andopportunities for small amounts of extra credit. Course grades were based on a 90%-A, 80%-B,70%-C, 60%-D, <60%-F scale, allowing the WebCT discussion points to represent a one-lettergrade value.Active classroom strategies were used to keep the classroom lively and the students engaged.Students who were actively engaged in class discussions, asked especially deep, well thought outquestions or participated to a clearly higher degree than their classmates were awarded a smallindex card. The students placed their name on the card and turned it in at the end of class. Thesecards were part of their participation grade in the course with each card being worth a minimal 0.5points. This gave the students a tangible reason
format to dig deeper into students’ thought processes. As such, we held a focus groupto understand their perceptions of the following:Overall experience with active learning: What expectations do students have surrounding activelearning in graduate courses? What factors impact whether students are willing to engage inactive learning?Sense of community: What strategies employed in the course did students feel contributed to asense of trust and community? Do students feel that having a sense of community within theclass is important for active learning to take place?GSRSs: Did the use of GSRSs at the beginning of the class period increase students’ likelihoodof speaking up later on in class? Did these exercises help students to feel more confident
have been developed with guidance from KEDA and the CorporateAdvisory Board. These teams were developed to solve mutual issues on campus and within thecommunity, as well as to achieve similar goals by jointly implementing outreach activities thatpositively impact precollege and undergraduate students, as well as faculty. These unique teamswere able to be formed because of our unique and rural small community.Sample Teams:Dual Career Committee: This committee was formed to address the needs on campus and in thecommunity to attract talented and diverse human resources to the area.Presidential Community Council: This roundtable style group is designed for the President ofUniversity to interact and become engaged with the community.Cherry
statistical methodology to characterize the impact of professional development and educational programs on teacher effectiveness and student learning, and she collaborates with others in the mathematical and educational sciences to create innovative approaches for teacher development in grades K-12 and in higher education.Leila Belle Sterman, Montana State UniversityKent Davis c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 STEM Storytellers: Improving the Oral Communication Skills of STEM Graduate StudentsAbstractMembers of the STEM workforce are notorious for lacking the ability to describe their work topeople outside of their narrow fields. This primarily
STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-18. Dec. 2018. 6. E. Marquez and S. Garcia, “Creating a Learning Environment that Engages Engineering Students in the Classroom via Communication Strategies,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15, 2019. 7. L. G. Perks and J. S. Turner, “Podcasts and productivity: A qualitative uses and gratifications study,” Mass Communication and Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 96-116, Jan. 2019. 8. M. Watson, K. Corbett, K. Prather, J. Carpenter, and S. Cronk, “Fostering dissemination skills in STEM doctoral students: Tips for the Ph. D. student and the general impact on STEM undergraduates,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2010. 9. W. W
to work in such complicatedsettings[2, pp.162]. If these challenges could be overcome, creating curricula that allowsstudent engagement with underserved communities could satisfy ABET criteria 3h,which is “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context” [7].In summary, the course curriculum should enable its students to appreciate thecomplexity of the problem space without feeling overwhelmed to address the problemand arrive at a solution in collaboration with the community. As such this requirementalso lends itself to arriving at one way to evaluate such course offerings. A metric couldbe developed that would measure how well students navigate the
communication skills with studentsfrom other disciplines. The Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone allows students to workwith other disciplines on a real-world engineering problem which can have multiple solutions.Allowing the students to be exposed to the program, helps the students understand the need tolearn modern engineering techniques as well as the managerial side and the organization behinda project. Figure 1 below indicates the students’ understanding of the importance of lifelonglearning while in the program and the significant importance while in their careers.Figure 1: Question 5/6(j) - Recognize the Need for and Engage in Lifelong Learning Responses (in Percent)By incorporating different colleges
to include broader issuessuch as social justice and respect for autonomy as well as in the diversity of participants of thatconversation. These changes raise an important question for engineering educators: “How do webest prepare engineering students to participate in the changing conversation about the socialcontext and ethical impacts of their profession?” Developing an answer requires a rethinking ofparadigms and pedagogies for teaching about professional responsibilities and communicationcompetence. In this paper we propose that the four principles of a common morality couldprovide a rigorous framework for engineers to engage with a diverse range of stakeholderperspectives on the social contexts and impacts of engineering. This
Paper ID #12198Determining Reliability of Scores from an Energy Literacy RubricDr. Chad M Gotch, Washington State University Chad Gotch’s interests center on maximizing effective and proper use of educational and psychological measurements. To this end, he studies assessment/measurement literacy among teachers, score reporting, and building validity arguments from both technical and non-technical evidence. These complimentary lines of research inform the life cycle of assessment, from development to use and policy.Quinn Langfitt, Washington State University Quinn is a PhD student in the School of Civil and Environmental