GraduatesAbstractStudent engagement in Experiential Learning Activities (ELA) is typically correlated withimproved post-graduation outcomes. Our School categorizes ELA into four areas: global (e.g.,studying abroad), industrial (e.g., internships, co-ops), undergraduate research, and teamprojects. This study aimed to evaluate ELA participation and investigate the impact on post-graduation outcomes such as full-time employment and graduate school admissions.Additionally, a statistical analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between ELAparticipation and starting salary in industry placements. Our results show starting salariesincreased with the number of ELA (i.e., students completing two or more ELA have highersalaries than those completing a single ELA
andchange based on the needs of the society.Questions are raised that whether the introduction of an Anglo-American system will bethe solution that many Germans believe is needed (considering that the BritishEngineering Council is currently attempting to restructure the engineering degrees inBritish technical universities). The objective there is to offer two degrees in parallel(Figure 3). After three years of successful study, students will graduate with a Bachelorsdegree as an Incorporated Engineer. A new four year degree will allow students tograduate with a Master’s degree, and, after four years of qualified industrial experience,they would receive the title of Chartered Engineer. The new system proposed foradoption in Britain closely resembles
understanding of basic entrepreneurialconcepts. Our first research question asks: (Q1) Does the introduction of entrepreneurial concepts into a core engineering curriculum diminish the learning of core engineering concepts?As engineering students prepare for a post graduation career, they consider several factors.Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) posits that career interests develop overtime as afunction of self-efficacy and the expected outcome related to a career choice15,16. While we arenot proposing this research as a test of the social-cognitive model, the elements of SCCT can behelpful in structuring our questions. For example, the case study method can help students buildentrepreneurial self-efficacy by showing how their engineering
Paper ID #41495Decoding Determinants: An Intersectional Exploration of Students’ Decision-Makingfor Graduate Engineering EducationDr. Najme Kishani, University of Toronto Najme Kishani (najme.kishanifarahani@utoronto.ca) is a research associate at the University of Toronto to advance gender analysis and equity in engineering. Najme did her PhD at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests involve the role of education in enhancing young people’sagency to transform social conflicts and build peace and democracy. In her careers in international development at
citizens and permanent residents, and 6.3% for international students 3.To date, much of the research regarding the recruitment and retention of doctoral students hasfocused on examining student characteristics and factors external to the university, such asundergraduate GPA, gender and marital status 4, 5. While these quantitative studies have yieldeda broad overview of possible factors that influence the decision to leave doctoral study, we haveyet to fully conceptualize the engineering graduate student experience. Additional studies havefocused on the interaction between the student and the department or discipline, but did notincorporate engineering students 6, 7. Previous studies have included a broad range of disciplines,examining the
AC 2009-1477: DEVELOPING AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY ABROADPROGRAM THAT IS SUSTAINABLE FROM BOTH FACULTY AND STUDENTPERSPECTIVESE James Nelson, Brigham Young University Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University. Teaching and research focus in hydrology and hydrologic modelingRollin Hotchkiss, Brigham Young University Rollin Hotchkiss teaches hydraulics and stream restoration courses and has a research focus on sedimentation and ecological connectivity in the design of transportation systemsLourdes Manley, Brigham Young University Graduate Research Assistant Brigham Young UniversityOscar Dzul, Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas Professor of Civil Engineering with a
areoffering financially rewarding jobs. While graduates in the College of Science are formost part committed to pursuing post baccalaureate degrees, undergraduate enrollmentrates remain low. Meantime, Biology graduates frequently enter into medicine orveterinary school.I. IntroductionA plan initiated by the UTEP Model Institution for Excellence (MIE) is underdevelopment to increase the percentage of SEM graduates who enroll in graduate school.The main objectives of this task force are to identify and recruit cohorts of junior studentswho have the potential and desire to pursue careers in research and development, and topromote summer external research activities among SEM undergraduates. Eachparticipating student in the cohort will receive a research
andgraphics for mobile applications (for artists), Android App design and project management (forbusiness majors), and directed independent study (for anthropology majors). The first courseemphasizes a software component-based top-down system design approach for Appdevelopment. The second course deals with tools for asset (graphic and animation) buildup andthe aesthetic aspects in mobile application design. The third course focuses on business theories,marketing strategies, project management, and work breakdown. The fourth course advisesanthropology students on research methods to observe, document, and (occasionally) advise theproject teams. Students meet regularly, separated by disciplines, and a few times together duringthe class hours across the
]. Given the fact that disciplinary doctoral students conduct studies with theiradvisors and, thus, within domain-specific labs and/or programs [8], we hypothesize studentshave similar research domains as their advisers and faculty within the same discipline.Discrepancies outside of common disciplinary research domains between students and facultycould be evidence to support that students are successfully crossing the disciplinary boundaries.Therefore, assessing such disparities could potentially provide quality indicators of theinterdisciplinary graduate education program.For this study, participants were recruited from the materials design studio where students arerequired to complete an interdisciplinary research project. The participants were
universities such as big cultural differencesand language barriers. A step-by-step approach will help ensure the success of collaborating with Chinese universities.Collaborative research of educational issues at the faculty level helps both sides understandeach other better, and leadership of collaboration can be established. Subsequently, small-scaleexchange at graduate student level may be initiated to further explore and understand potentialproblems that may emerge during the collaboration process. Through thorough investigation andtrial run practice, a good planning will eventually lead to s successful collaboration. References 1. H.P. Jensen and M. Gundstrup, ”International Experience During Study: A Way of Preparing EngineeringStudents for
engineering study abroad programs concentrates onundergraduate students. Statistics data shows that the number of graduate-level visitingscholars rises significantly in these years. The teaching strategy for undergraduate students isnot proper for them because the education for graduate students requires both advancedcourses and research. The students must learn the research methods, like literature review,computer-based simulation techniques, and analytical skills.This paper introduces two teaching models for graduate level visiting scholars in semester-long and year-long programs in ASU respectively. In the following parts, Section IIintroduces the motivation and goal of two visiting scholar programs. Section III describes theeducational model we
".11Further studies of student behavior using technology, however, reveal that many students holddifferent convictions or values about what constitutes cheating or plagiarism. Dr. DonaldMcCabe, Professor at Rutgers University and founder of the Center for Academic Integrity,contends that “most students have concluded that ‘cut & paste’ plagiarism—using a sentence ortwo (or more) from difference sources on the Internet and weaving this information together intoa paper without appropriate citation—is not a serious issue.”12 Dr. McCabe’s interviews withmany of the students reveal that the students genuinely believe they have done nothing wrongbecause they are doing ‘research’. Many students do not think a citation is necessary because ofthe belief
Paper ID #18538Relationships Between Engineering Faculty Beliefs and Classroom PracticesLydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University. She is a second year student in the Educational Policy and Evaluation program. Her research interests focus on higher education access, equity, and inclusion.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. He also serves as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women and
study abroad programs have become a more dominant model of study abroad in highereducation in recent years2 and several studies have demonstrated the benefits of the short term program Page 14.588.2model3, there are few studies that report on learning outcomes several years after students have participatedin such programs. The researchers were interested in assessing what the impact of a short term study abroadprogram was on students two to three years after they had participated in the program, both in terms of howthey report what they learned and in terms of the subsequent activities and choices the students made tofurther
Session Using Case Studies to Teach Engineering Design and Ethics Larry G. Richards, Michael E. Gorman University of VirginiaAbstract:At the University of Virginia, we have developed (researched and written) a set of case studiesfor teaching engineering ethics, engineering design, and environmental issues. These cases havebeen used in a course on Invention and Design, and in other courses offered by our Division ofTechnology, Culture, and Communications (TCC). Many of these cases have been published inbook form 1. Others are available through the course website for
work focuses on mentorship, mental health, and retention for STEM students and faculty. He was awarded the 2020 NAGAP Gold Award for Graduate Education Research to study engineering faculty perceptions of graduate student well-being and attrition. Before studying education at UIUC, Joseph earned an MS degree in Physics from Indiana University in Bloomington and a BS in Engineering Physics at UIUC.Karin Jensen Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Associate Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a
Recruiting and Retaining Students from Underrepresented Groups for Graduate School at the University of Nebraska Stephanie G. Adams Assistant Dean of Research College of Engineering and Technology Associate Professor Department of Industrial and Management Science Engineering University of Nebraska, Lincoln Lance C. Pérez Director of Graduate Studies College of Engineering and Technology Associate Professor and Associate Chairman Department of
international students who must navigate additionalchallenges, such as visa restrictions, language barriers, and cultural transitions. In addition,demanding coursework, competitive research environments, and the pressure to secureinternships or employment exacerbate their stress levels. Male students often report stress relatedto academic performance and career expectations. In contrast, female students face additionalchallenges, such as gender discrimination, underrepresentation in STEM fields, and balancingprofessional aspirations with societal expectations. However, few studies have explored thestressors and coping strategies of international graduate students in engineering programs, orhow these may differ by gender.Within the broader engineering
innovations atHBCUs. Little Research has been done to investigate the level of awareness of engineeringgraduate students at an HBCU. The purpose of this study is to assess the level of awareness ofengineering graduate students at an HBCU about innovation commercialization.In this study, we conducted a survey using a questionnaire-based data collection method thatfocused only on engineering graduate students at the University of the District of Columbia. Weused both binary and ordinal scales, where we ask questions first using a binary scale, such thatIf an answer is “Yes” then we follow it with another question using an ordinal scale that iswhether awareness level is low, average, or high. The study population of interest includes 15engineering
-sectional self-reported survey; hence, it could not draw causalinferences for the proposed relationships. The relationships among self-reported variables couldalso be inflated due to the common method bias. Finally, the present study did not allow for follow-up with all the students who had already obtained job interviews to see if they ended up receivingjob offers after graduating. It is possible that with more time, the data would have supported thesecond half of the fourth hypothesis. For future research, this model should be tested again,however, using a larger sample size and a longitudinal study following students from before theybegin their job search through the completion of their respective job searches. This would allowfor improved data
perspectives of Finnish versusU.S. graduate interdisciplinary engineering and design students.The findings of this study shed light on similarities and differences among engineering anddesign graduate students’ conceptualizations of interdisciplinary education. By gaining theseinsights into these conceptualizations, we inform international engineering educators seeking toprovide support for interdisciplinary graduate students across global contexts. Furthermore, ourbroadened understanding of students’ perspectives supports the need for a conceptual andterminological alignment in the interdisciplinary education research field.IntroductionIn the context of engineering and design education, the call for graduates capable of navigatingthe intricate
thinking, adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering educaton projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID. Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. In addition, he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses for the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University.Dr. John S. Gero, University of North Carolina, Charlotte John Gero is Research Professor in Computer Science and Architecture at UNCC, Research Professor in Krasnow Institute for
Page 9.552.5“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education"possible ethical issues they might face and provide solutions along with the concrete steps theywould take to resolve the problem.2It is clear that the library has a significant role providing supporting material for the engineeringethics curriculum. Students are required to participate in essay writing, ethical case studies,debates and research on the topics assigned to them. In order to successfully complete theirassignments, students must collect sufficient materials from a variety of resources to provide theevidence to
theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes tointerpret meaning from the content of textual data. In trying to confirm the previous resultsfrom the interviews with the focus groups, this works moves the philosophical underpinningsof this work away from its interpretivist home to a space slightly closer to positivism.Critical Perspective. The focus of this particular study on the lived identity experiences ofengineering graduate students indeed aligns with an IPA methodology. The adaptation to IPAthat is in question is how the research team analyzed data that was collected from both focusgroups and interviews. While the decision to collect two forms of data was a sound one inresponse to realistic study constraints, the
/2016 Qualtrics Survey Software Default Question Block CONSENT FORM The purpose of this research project is to identify gender perceptions related to the trends, challenges, and opportunities for women in industrial distribution. This research project is being conducted by Alicia Lehmann at Texas A&M University. You are invited to participate because you are currently engaged in a career in industrial distribution or are currently enrolled in an academic institution with an industrial distribution graduate program. Your participation in this research study is voluntary. You may choose not to participate. If you decide to
a lowerretention rate for these genders. In this paper, we examine the motivation ofundergraduate students for graduate studies and compare their learning and researchexperiences in the Department of Electrical and Computing Engineering at the Universityof Illinois Urbana-Champaign by their gender identities.To gain insight on gender differences in research-related opportunities and experiences, aninstitutional review board–approved digital survey was conducted in the Department ofElectrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in2022. The survey assessed the research interests and experiences of undergraduate studentsand the accessibility of relevant information within the department.A total of 276
because they provide unique and detailed insights into howepistemological beliefs are shaped within a student. Moreover, the stories told in qualitativestudies help researchers understand how epistemological beliefs develop for students andunderstand the reason that such development occurs. Although culture and personalepistemology seem to be related and essential to the study, a starting point would be to examinethe personal epistemology of graduate Middle Eastern (ME) students. The personal epistemologyof ME students’ needs to be studied to understand how those beliefs are shaped and developedand what may influence that development.This research is part of a more extensive study that focuses on the personal epistemology ofgraduate Middle
population, Nguyen and Nguyen (2018) note “theproclivity of [FGS] studies to draw conclusions about a widely heterogeneous population” (p.156) is problematic for researchers. In short, intersectionality is crucial for scholars andpractitioners to understand and develop interventions that will impact FGS persistence andgraduation outcomes. First-generation Student LiteratureFGS-focused studies are important for higher education practitioners who focus on persistenceand graduation outcomes. A meta-analysis of the STEM FGS literature, clustered into fourpredominant categories, will be examined: family and sociocultural determinants; financial andcareer determinants; academic determinants; and noncognitive variables.STEM FGS
viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Mr. Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University Matthew Bahnson is a doctoral student at North Carolina State University in Applied Social and Com- munity Psychology. His research interests include engineering identity, diversity, bias, stereotypes, and STEM education. He works with Dr. Cheryl Cass at NCSU.Ms. Marissa A Tsugawa, University of Nevada, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research interests
, cultural, economic, and symbolic capitals. According tofindings from the same study, professional non-traditional students have better-formed habits andsignificant capital, which prepares them well for their graduate program and thus has a majorimpact on their engagement during their Ph.D. program (Strutz et al., 2011). Given thispreparation, further exploration is needed to understand what in their experiences within theseprograms is causing lower levels of engagement.Purpose While persistence, retention, and graduation rates remain key topics of discussion acrossseveral graduate-level studies, there is limited research on part-time students, particularly thosefully employed. With the rise in the enrollment of these professional non