freshman engineering programs aimed at increasing experiential learning andpromoting student success 1-4. The primary goal of these efforts are generally to improve studentunderstanding, confidence, performance, and retention. These programs have proven to belargely successful in achieving the desired ends and are often very popular with the student body;however, it has also been found that a significant portion of students (~20% or more) may stillstruggle when leaving these freshman environments and entering the more traditionalengineering courses later in their curriculum 2, 5. This may be especially true for courses centeredon the thermal sciences such as thermodynamics, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics, the coreconcepts of which have been
prototypes.By the end of the course, students disseminated their project and finding through a writtenfinal report, presentation to industry representatives, faculty, and a general audience, as wellas a poster session that is disseminated to the school of engineering. For the final report, thestudent groups submit full engineering and business documentation the course learningoutcomes described in Table 2 that are directly related to ABET’s Criterion 3 studentoutcomes13 (Table 1).Mentor and Student SurveysA student survey presented during the course was provided as part of an assignment to assessthe level of meeting availability for guidance, equipment and fabrication support, as well aslevel of student support provided by the mentors as perceived by
Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community Col- lege. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college students about career opportunities in electronics technologies. Dr. Alaraje is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), a member of the ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing Division, a member of the ASEE Engineering Technology Division, a senior member of the Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department Heads Association (ECETDHA). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Seven Years Study on the
, innovation suffers and emergingengineering students are left with a skill gap which employers are limited by their resources tofill4, 7-8. Therefore, in order to fill gap and create the next generation of innovative engineering,universities must adjust current engineering curriculum and find a balance between engineeringdisciplines and practical experience. Over the past decade many universities have adjusting curriculums to develop studentsinto T- Shape professionals, professionals who are highly trained in a single discipline, but havethe capability of communicating, understanding, and working with people from a variety of otherareas3-4, 9. Figure 1 represents a diagram that clearly defines the qualities of a T-shaped
our gamification platform,GamerCard, which was used for four semesters in an upper-level game design course at ourinstitution. We found that some gamification elements that are often thought to be motivatingfor participants had little to no effect on our course, while elements that specifically targetedmaking the student’s standing in the course more transparent were the most effective.1. IntroductionGamification is becoming an increasingly popular methodology for improving motivation andinterest in many domains [1]. Gamification involves the application of game mechanics to taskstypically considered to be void of fun. In the classroom, this often materializes as a set ofmechanics meant to motivate students to learn more effectively. For
. Generally, sessions were divided into two parts. During the first half of eachday, students participated in problem-based learning (PBL) engineering activities and seminars given byvarious faculty members, with the second half of the day typically spent in different labs around thecampus. The following sections describe in more detail the different elements of the two week program. Academic ContentDuring PBL activities, students worked in small groups, facilitated by different members of theinstruction team, to solve open-ended engineering problems. The problems were designed to addresscontent identified by faculty and students as important for success in subsequent graduate coursework(e.g., programming, heat transfer, solving linear
included in the Common Core Mathematics Standards15, the Standards for K-12Engineering16, and the Next Generation Science Standards17 (Table 1). 21st Century Skills (Trilling, et al., 2009; Binkley, et al., 2012) Ethnically Matched Experiential Learning Mentorship (Kolbe, 1984) (Syed, et al., 2012; Blake-Beard, et al., 2011) Academic Success
emulating nature’s time-tested patterns andstrategies. The goal is to create products, processes, and policies—new ways of living—that arewell-adapted to life on earth over the long haul.” [2] Biomimicry differs from the nature-inspired approach in that, in general, it doesn’t seek a deeper understanding of the mechanisms;rather it tends to presume that nature’s solution is “best” without accounting for the differentgoals and context of natural and technical issues to address. However, despite its inherentlimitations, biomimicry has been used as both a source of technological innovation, and aplatform for student motivation in engineering education [3-6]. For example, the specific valvesystem inspired µMist® spray platform technology was developed
engineering literacyor other introductory course. This approach promotes engineering literacy by organizing coursematerial around the underlying structure common to technological systems.Major ThemesA set of major themes was developed which serve as a framework for describing the engineeringof technology. A main goal was to establish a relatively small set of general concepts which canbe elaborated upon in greater depth throughout the course and used in the analysis of particularexamples. These major themes are summarized below. They are explained in more detail in alater section. The term Function-Component-System-Domain (FCSD) attempts to convey themain focus of the framework.1.) Technology created for a function accomplished through
the one-evening-per-week class session inthe past. The instructor also incorporated two items from the ASEE National Effective TeachingInstitute (NETI-1) summer 2015 offering. The first new element is detailed learning objectives,which are presented as study guides, amounting to six full pages of objectives for the course. Thesecond new element is a “scaffolded” handout for each class, encouraging students to activelycomplete content and take notes. In addition, the instructor has added animations using theANSYS Maxwell software that serve as demonstrations for students during the software labs.Students also complete short online quizzes before class to promote preparation. Thus, our fall2015 class has assumed a blended classroom format, in
. Page 26.634.3Summary of Engineering Leadership Programs ReviewedInitially a list of over 40 engineering leadership programs was compiled, which was reduced downto the final eleven programs that were included in the review, as summarized in Table 1. The threemain criteria for reduction and the associated rational are described in the following paragraphs.Firstly, only programs whose main focus was leadership were analyzed. Some programs in theinitial list were focused in other areas, such as project management or entrepreneurship, with amodule on leadership. Secondly, the programs had to be based out of the engineering faculty orspecific to engineering students. There are many leadership development programs available thatare general to the
/4. Campbell, C., Senior Mechanical Engineer, iRobot, Email Correspondence, 20165. Chester, I. (2007). Teaching for CAD expertise, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 23-356. Devine, K PhD., Illinois State University, Telephone Interview, 20167. Gaughran, W. F. (2002). Cognitive modeling for engineers, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.8. Harris, S., Co-Founder and VP of OnShape, Telephone Interview, 20169. Hinkle, K., Senior Designer, Senior Aerospace, Email Correspondence, 201610. Krish, S. (2011). A practical generative design method, Computer-Aided Design, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 88- 10011. PTC. (2011
confidence in their electronics skills. The remainder of this paper provides further detailson the project and the results of the assessment.MethodsThe Biomedical Electronics class is 15 weeks long and incorporates topics that are typical of anelectronics class. The general timeline and topics are shown in Table 1.There are 7 formal labs during the semester, and each lab involves the development of one ormore circuits. Typically, the lab involves a BME application, such a measuring humanmovement using a sensor, such as a force sensitive resistor or infrared photodiode. In each lab,students also collect data from their circuit using myDAQ data acquisition module (NationalInstruments, Austin TX), and these data are then displayed on a computer using
Redesign and Delivery. i. Defining Course GoalsThe overall goal of the course was to provide Master’s students with a real-world designexperience. The specific educational goals were similar to Senior Design, with greater emphasison development of teamwork skills and understanding the business opportunity, and were asfollows: 1. Design a novel biomedical device. 2. Demonstrate knowledge of all aspects of product design, from problem definition through solution/idea generation to prototyping, verifications and validation via development of a design history file (DHF), outlining each aspect of the design process, explaining design decisions, and prototype planning and evaluation. 3. Demonstrate
26.351.2 • Increased student engagement in STEM, as evidenced by an increased rate of student interaction with course material and students’ willingness to participate in future courses that offer similar projects.RationaleThe United States’ global competitiveness and the future of innovation in this country depend onthe strength of its workforce and the workforce of the future. Numerous reports generated by thegovernment and the private business sector have articulated the essential skills needed by today’sworkers and those of the next generation.1- 5 Since the Commission on Achieving NecessarySkills (SCANS) Report 6 in the early 1990s, there has been overwhelming consensus that theseessential skills can be categorized into three
PEO Mapping Between Sandbox Outcomes and Sandbox PEOs I II III IV An ability to understand technology trends and the intersection with 1 societal trends. X An ability to communicate to a wide audience using appropriate 2 technical vocabulary. X 3 An ability to articulate project goals and build an appropriate team. X X An ability to physically realize
addition to Foroudastan’s teaching experi- ence, he also has performed extensive research and published numerous technical papers. He has secured more than $2 million in the form of both internal and external grants and research funding. Foroudastan is the faculty advisor, coordinator, and primary fundraiser for EVP teams entering national research project competitions such as the Formula SAE Collegiate Competition, the Baja SAE Race, the SolarBike Race, the Great Moonbuggy Race, and the Solar Boat Collegiate Competition. For his concern for and ded- ication to his students, Foroudastan received MTSU awards such as the 2002-03 Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005-06 Outstanding Public Service Award, and the 2007 Faculty
resources,and their application to academic research workflows.Keywords: Information Literacy, Game-based Learning, Online LearningIntroductionThe “digital natives” (applied to those born after 1990) constitute the first generation to havegrown up with the Internet and various forms of digital technologies(1). As the most networkedgeneration ever enters higher education, smartphones, text messaging, and various social mediaplatforms pervade their daily activities. Despite their unquestionable technological savvy, anexpanding body of information literacy studies indicates that most of these students lack (2-5)fundamental information literacy skills upon entering higher
Page 26.173.2junior years, within the chemical engineering profession survey, materials and energy balances,thermodynamics, fluid and heat transfer, and reactor design. The project during freshmen year isspecifically an analysis of a Chemical Safety Board completed investigation including futurerecommendations to companies working with similar hazards. Each team is given a differentincident which occurred within the last fifteen years. The students present their findings in aposter session where seniors attend and provide written feedback on both technical aspects andcommunication skills. Self-reflection is required following the poster presentation in an attemptto foster an intrinsic motivation to critically think about the integration of
each year.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is a Research Associate Professor in The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Ambassadors Network (EAN): Goals, Successes and Challenges in Growing the EAN The engineering field is facing a crisis. In order to solve today’s engineering challenges,we need a diverse workforce with strong technical and leadership skills. Unfortunately,workforce studies have shown that the number of students being educated in STEM (science,technology, engineering, and math) cannot meet projected demands.1 In addition
, manufacturability, and sustainability • D: Ability to function on multi-‐disciplinary teams • E: Solve problems • G: Ability to communicate effectively • H: Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context • I: Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-‐long learning It takes anywhere from several weeks to several months to clarify the project intent, and makesure it serves the needs of both the client and students. The program defines the type of workexplored in IMPD as Horizon 2 (Figure 1), which is defined as the next generation of product
self-generated ‘symbols’ while he/sheperforms a given task16. This vocalization occurs at three different levels: vocalization of covertarticulatory or oral encodings, description/explication of the thought content, and explanation ofthe thought processes or thoughts17,18. Usability in essence is the ability of a user of a product todo what he or she wants to do with the instrument the way he or she expects to do it withouthindrance, hesitation, or questions16. The key components of usability examined during the thinkaloud sessions were usefulness, efficiency and effectiveness16. Satisfaction of the components ofusability is key to pilot testing, rigorous data collection and results of PosSES. During think aloud session, participants
: (1) traditional engineering and technology accreditation standards donot require students to take enough general education courses, (2) faculty may use theseprescriptive standards as a reason not to change or update course materials, and (3) individualfaculty members have a difficult time integrating non-technical/engineering concepts into theircourses.6 This points to the important and direct role liberal education can play in the educationof engineers.Surveys of working engineers also help to elucidate skills important to the profession. A 2012survey asked recent engineering graduates to rank the ABET student outcomes from “extremelyimportant” to “not at all important” in their professional experience.7 The top cluster of alumni-ranked
generation to a grid designed for fossil fuels raises important technicalquestions that many times are bounded by guidelines from policymakers. Thus, the door wasopened and motivated new courses to address these issues.Two graduate courses were taught at UPRM’s electrical engineering department that providednew ways to connect “technical” content with the social context in which engineering is practiced.A course on energy policy was taught twice (2008 and 2009), to graduate and undergraduateelectrical engineering students. The course was synchronously delivered to law students at anotherUPR campus in San Juan. A law professor participated at the other campus, teaching lawconcepts, while Dr. O’Neill taught the engineering topics. Invited lectures
as professional engineers (Criterion #5).In these programs, renewable energy lab exercises have become an essential part. Severaleducators have highlighted the importance of lab activities in teaching renewable energymanufacturing. According to their observations, the students can better comprehend complexconcepts and theories through a series of lab experiments and projects in other universities13-18.Teaching Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency in the project presents the general challenges ofteaching an application rather than a discipline. The class was taught for 10 weekly lectures of 3-hour each which represent 11 weeks on a regular quarter. The course learning outcomes are: 1.Understand the main sources of energy, energy efficiency, and
text, of energy research agendas and energy company portfolios, but also we need to ask this of ourselves in the classroom.” [15, p. 1-7].The way in which ES curricula were created and defined makes SJ relevant, yet SJ dimensionsare inherent in ES courses for another reason: though abstract, the models, systems, andmathematical equations that are the focus of ES courses generally have corollaries in the realworld. Feedback and control systems, for instance, exist in driverless cars, wind turbines, insulinpumps, and many more real-world applications. The same is true for concepts, models, andsystems in other ES courses. Thus, these courses do not focus exclusively on technical artifacts,as such artifacts do not live in a vacuum. Rather
on apaid 9-month internship at one of our partner institutions. During this internship, studentscomplete a project related to regenerative medicine or stem cell biology in a rigorous R&Denvironment under the guidance of an Internship Mentor. Though individual projects vary, allinternships facilitate the mastery of broad technical skills, critical thinking & problem solvingskills, current primary literature, and presentation and communication skills.When the program first began in 2009, we partnered with 4 academic partners and 1 industrialpartner. Interest and awareness of our program has grown over the years, and we have been ableto expand our internship opportunities to 5 additional industrial partners. Our internship
. These projects create opportunity to save thecompany significant costs and improve profitability. For those students who cannot getthe problem from their company, the instructors can help find the external sponsors. Inthe event external sponsors are not available, the students will be working on their owntopic of interest. However, such topics have to be approved by the advising faculty beforestudents begin the work. During residency week, on day 1 (Monday), in the morning, the students will begin thesession by learning the business research process. In this session, they learn how they cantranslate a management dilemma to an executable research question(s). The afternoonsession covers literature review and referencing styles. Since many
ways to apply thesuccess of Flow Vis to other subjects, we developed a new course, Aesthetics of Design (AesDes), with all the pedagogical practices except the heterogeneity of students. Specifically, weemployed resource teams, choice, aesthetics, creativity, and public presentation and critique.Course DescriptionAesthetics of Design (Aes Des) is a three-credit technical elective, offered for the first time in thesummer of 2014. It was held during a compressed, three-week summer session that metMonday–Friday for 3.5 hours a day. Students designed and built projects while developing adesign aesthetic. Three instructors offered insights from multiple disciplines, including thoseoutside mechanical engineering, such as electrical engineering
order to improve their communication skills, I ask them to prepare a technical report for eachassignment. The report should be prepared based on the technical report preparation guidelinethat I give them and should include: A table showing all main information of all streams for each case, A table showing all main information of turbine and compressor, The net work and efficiency of each system, A comparison of the results for cases 1 and 2, Discussion on the results.Compressor:Type: IsentropicPressure ratio (P2/P1): 10Isentropic efficiency: 80% and 90%Mechanical efficiency: 75% and 85%Turbine:Type: IsentropicPressure ratio (P1/P2): 10Isentropic efficiency: 80% and 90%Mechanical efficiency: 75% and 85%Three cases for compressor