for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her research seeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 100 technical publications including twenty-three journal papers, five book chapters, and she holds two patents.Dr. Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University Director of the Sketch Recognition Lab and Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University, Dr. Hammond is an international leader in sketch recogni- tion, haptics, intelligent fabrics, SmartPhone development, and computer human interaction research
performing, these toolscan be an asset to their communication and information management process. The programexplored a number of existing low cost methods for REU students to connect with each other.Although some unique alternative tools were explored, the leadership converged on encouragingstudents to use “native” technology, that is, technology they might already have some familiaritywith. Table 1 represents an organized list of technology used for this project. Other researchers Page 26.1704.6present a more generalized list of tools with more descriptions of their potential for supporting ateam’s process, workflow, and information management(2
Program to Integrate Technical Communication Habits (PITCH) initiative.Mr. Brian Harding, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center Texas A&M University Brian Harding is a PhD candidate at Texas A&M University. His advisor is Dr. M. Sam Mannan in the Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center. His main research topic is the use of Decontamination Foam for Chemical Spill Containment. He has also worked on a variety of different safety related projects such as the investigation team for the ammonium nitrate explosion in West Texas and the use of RFID for corrosion detection in pipelines.Mr. Peter C Montagna, University of New Haven Peter Montagna is head of the Henkel Corporation Adhesives Division Audits &
contour map.Fig. 3. Spectrum usage visualization, showing three radios or sensors on one floor with two waysof representing spectrum usage: line graph or color coded. (a) (b)Fig. 4. FDD-OFDM signal transmitted over the air and captured by a sensing node and repre-sented using different presentations: 3D spectral plot (a), where signal energy is plotted over fre-quency and time, and overlaid waterfall plot over frequency and time and line plot as a functionof frequency (b). Interference, and Quality of service (QoS).Below we describe three example interactive laboratory sessions that use our tools in the class-rooms.4.4.1 Session #1: Signals in the spectrumSynopsis—A
, thermal man- agement, and fuel cells: materials synthesis, fabrication, test and characterization of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). His research is currently focused on the experimental and analytical investigation, and the development of innovative SOFCs combined heating and power (CHP) system, ceramic membrane for CO2 recovery from combustion processes, all solid state Li-Ion batteries, and thermal transpiration based propulsion, pumping, and power generation. Currently, his research is conducted in the Combustion and Energy Research Laboratory (COMER) at SU. Prof. Ahn has published over 20 papers in peer-reviewed journals (including Nature and other high impact journals) and books, and made over 150 technical pre
from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Data Analytics for Interactive Virtual LaboratoriesIntroductionWe have previously described the development and implementation of a set of InteractiveVirtual Laboratories (IVLs) in thermodynamics.1 Each IVL provides a set of activities to addresstargeted threshold concepts2 via actively engaging students in a series of actions. The IVLsprovide a less
engineer.” They also felt thatempathetic and caring faculty were helpful in motivating students to learn, and felt that empathyand care were already included in engineering coursework.Research QuestionsThe goal of this study was to better characterize faculty who are engaged in LTS. The specificresearch questions being explored were: 1. How has the number and type of engineering faculty who are active in LTS changed over time? a. It is hypothesized that given changes in generational values, younger engineering faculty are more likely to embrace LTS. However, the typical model at research- intensive universities places more value on research as compared to teaching and service, which
and data products developed by Fujitsu. Along with Yau Chow Ching, Rodney conceived (and wrote the standards for), the SONET (Synchronous Optical Network) architecture, which served as the base for today’s North American telephone network. Rodney was Chairman of the T1X1 Technical Sub- Committee (the organization responsible for SONET standardization) from 1990 through 1994. He has been active in SONET’s National and International Standardization since 1985. In addition, Rodney has published numerous papers and presentations on SONET. Rodney began his career with Fujitsu Network Communications in 1989 as the Director of Strategic Plan- ning. He also held the positions of Director of Transport Product Planning, Vice
becomeincreasingly dependent upon defense Figure 1. The Hampton Roads region - markers in thespending over the past decade, with map show the location of different major military unitsDoD spending accounting for 45.6% of and headquarters, as well as the location of Old Dominionall regional economic activity University where the proposed program will be housed.(Chamber, 2016). Stern2STEM: Overcoming Barriers to STEM Education for Veterans Program This pilot/proof of concept program aims to advance STEM education and outreach toveterans, improving the next generation of the Navy’s STEM workforce. The proposed From Sternto STEM program, funded by Office of Naval Research, will prepare veterans to pursue
CarlMitcham suggests the major paradigms of engineering ethics before the end of the World War IIstressed: 1) engineers’ loyalty to their employers and clients; and 2) the efficiency of engineeringwork.5 As science and technology boomed over more than a decade following the end of the war,many engineers became sensitized to the complex role modern technoscience played in postwarsociety and, hence, advocated more stringent professional oversight of technoscientificdevelopments. As engineering historian Matthew Wisnioski notes, “environmental degradation,the Vietnam War, and a host of socio-technical concerns led reformers to pressure theirprofession to honor its social responsibilities.”6 In 1971, a group of engineers who weredetermined to “challenge
bioengineering students based on (1)admittance to bioengineering, (2) ACT score, and (3) interest in research indicated onadmission’s essay. A control group (average ACT = 33.92) of twelve students was also selectedand includes five females and three first generation students. As bioengineering is a veryselective program, the ACT averages for both CSP and control are also representative of the2014 incoming bioengineering population (average ACT = 33.86). The first CSP cohortcompleted the Frontiers in Cancer Research course and began their research experiences, basedon their interest/selection, in spring 2015.In summer 2015, the continuing CSP students completed a research boot camp and summerresearch experience. The CSP partnered with an existing
robots, and testedtheir ideas. Technical assistance was provided by current MET and EET students as well as faculty toexpedite solutions and overcome short term difficulties. On a more strategic level faculty’s participationwas viewed as coach / mentor, to produce and foster a working environment centered on collaboration,trust, active learning, and enjoyment. The next generation of students will come from a heavy digital andinformational world. From the beginning PMTM and faculty involvement was designed to providesimplified elements of each. The robots required digital programming while tasks could not be completedunless constant communication amongst all participants occurred. Students were trusted to becourageous, creative, and innovative in
each. Anexamination is given at the end of segment 1 and segment 2. Finally, after the last six weeks acomprehensive final exam is also given to all students. In this first iteration of the 3D technologyimpact research, the 3D printing projects and exercises were only included on the second sixweeks of the course.Class Content Research - First Six WeeksFor the first six weeks of the course, the first part of the experiment was to teach the four classeswithout the 3D printer projects and then compare their performance. This was done to generate abaseline for the differences in comprehension of content between the classes. At this point, forsimplicity, the class where the 3D printer was not used will be referred to as “class A”, the classeswhere
rural locations and did Page 26.973.5homestays in rural communities. They got to both interact with each other and with local ruralNicaraguans. A picture of the Villanova and UNI students at the entrance to a Solar Center inTotogalpa is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1. Villanova and UNI students at the entrance to the Solar Center in Totogalpa, NicaraguaAt the end of the week, a debriefing session was held to discuss the potential projectopportunities that had been uncovered and a total of almost thirty projects were proposed.Another important consequence of this visit was the development of close relationships betweenthe UNI students and the
have developed a set of modules covering ethical, legal, and societal issues in computer science that we have integrated into our yearlong 1senior capstone program. According to other studies , a lack of technical knowledge and sophistication are often seen as barriers to student engagement in ethics courses taught in lowerlevel courses. Thus, one of our reasons for covering ethical considerations at the senior level is to help make ethics more concrete and tangible for students by leveraging their experience and maturity in software development (gained through coursework, internships, and in thinking about their own careers). Further, the approach of integrating ethics modules into
education staff and partner organizations, including the Disabilities,Opportunities, Internetworking and Technology (DO-IT) Program which supports students withdisabilities.During the program’s first two years (2012, 2013), recruitment was mainly conducted by Centereducation staff making direct contact to local high schools. In service of the National ScienceFoundation’s broadening participation in STEM initiative9, recruitment strategies were refocusedand realigned for the 2014 session. A partnership was formed with the University of WashingtonMath Science Upward Bound program, a federal TRIO program that serves low-income,potential first generation college students from three local high schools. Recruitment efforts werefocused on these same three
also asked to list thespecific contributions of each teammate. The specific list was included to help them betterestablish their rating by identifying specific items and for the instructor to evaluate theengagement of each evaluator - the assumption is that more engagement results in more details.A weighted score was calculated for each metric, effort and productivity, for each evaluationround. For the calculation the number of responses for a given expectation value was weightedand all were summed. For weights, exceeds = 2, meets = 1, unknown = 0, and below = -1. Forexample, a student who received 1 exceeds, 2 meets, 1 below, and 5 unknown received aweighted score of 0.75 = (1(2) + 2(1) + 5(0) + 1(-1))/9. A general assumption that
Engineering and Science (writing.engr.psu.edu), which receives more than 1 million page downloads each year.Ms. Christine Haas, Engineering Ambassadors Network Christine Haas brings ten years of experience working in marketing and communications with a focus on the science and engineering fields. She’s held positions as the director of marketing for Drexel’s College of Engineering and director of operations for Worcester Polytechnic Institute - Engineering. Now, as CEO of Christine Haas Consulting, LLC, Christine travels around the world teaching courses to scientists and engineers on presentations and technical writing. She has taught clients across gov- ernment, industry and higher education, including Texas Instruments
, engineering technologyIntroduction Monte-Carlo methods have been used in examining nuclear interactions since theManhattan Project. Today, the Los Alamos National Laboratory Monte-Carlo N-Particletransport code (MCNP) is perhaps the most widely used nuclear engineering tool in academiaand industry. For example, the American Nuclear Society (ANS) annual meeting last summerincluded 16 talks having MCNP in their title and a special training session sponsored by theDepartment of Homeland Defense [1]. MCNP allows for 35 source particle types and a varietyof calculations to include flux, dose, heating, criticality, and detector response [2]. Theopportunities for educational use bridge major subjects taught in the Nuclear Engineering (NE
GrowingOverall, the engineering occupations are projected to add 136,500 jobs through 2022. They willcontinue to be needed to design, build, test, and improve manufactured products. However,during this time, increasing employment of engineers in service industries, research anddevelopment, and consulting should generate most of the employment growth [1].The 2015 National Science Foundation’s Survey of Graduate Students and Post-doctorates inscience and engineering [2] found that from 2008 to 2013 STEM graduate students in the U.S.who were U.S. citizens or permanent residents rose 3.1%. Of these, 25.8% were Hispanic and7.8% were African-American.“Finding Your Workforce: Latinos in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)” [3]2015 report found
, Page 26.1286.2and how student resistance to topics perceived as “not engineering” can be a positive learningopportunity.IntroductionSustainability has emerged as an acceptable theme in many engineering education contexts overthe past two decades, with an earlier history dating back to the 1960s.1 While environmentalengineering was the logical home for sustainability and has driven a great deal of the movementfor sustainability education in engineering, disciplines like chemical engineering and mechanicalengineering have also risen to the challenge to incorporate sustainability considerations inteaching their discipline to undergraduates.However, definitions of sustainability in engineering have been more technical in nature thandefinitions
, 1 USB Host, 1 Mini-USB Client, 1Peripherals 1 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, RPi 10/100 Mbps Ethernet camera connectorThe overwhelming advantage of BBB over RPI is the availability General Purpose I/Os (65) vs.8. This is significant for System Design around it for interfacing transducers and controlelements.The rich interconnectivity offered by BBB vs. RPI along with storage and speed make us selectBBB for our System Design class and is the subject of this paper.BBB Interconnectivity and buses: 3 I2C buses CAN bus SPI bus 4 timers 5 serial ports 65
consensus that federal mandates of 120 credit hours for our BS Engineeringstudents coupled with the need for enhanced professional development skills poses significantchallenges for our current methods of education of students at all levels. The Panel presentationsand discussions at the 2015 ASEE Conference underscored these points. 1 We were encouraged bythis session and feel that the conceptual framework offered here may help close the gap identified.Furthermore, the workplace skills identified as necessary revealed opportunities for improvementin the region we serve — www.workreadycommmunities.com. 2 Exhibit 1: Strategic Alliances for Enhanced Experiential Learning Output Metrics for Each Stage
recently moved out of the team’s shared office space and wasconsequently absent for many informal but important discussions.Overall, team members were generally consistent in the recognition of the above behaviors withleadership. Recognition of the remaining leadership attribute categories was less consistent, andin some cases marked differences between the two teams emerged.Training & Mentoring behaviors include those directed toward helping team members developrelevant technical and administrative skills that would enable them to accept greaterresponsibility. Items in this group included task-oriented training and coaching, sharing mistakesand lessons learned with the team, and apprenticing students identified as potential leads for thenext
-based prepreg manufacturing process on thesmall scale. Prepreg is the term used for a fiber reinforcement that has been pre-impregnatedwith a resin matrix.1 The manufacture of prepreg is of interest for both research and teachingpurposes, although thus far usage of the prepreg treater has not been incorporated intocurriculum.Throughout the development of the treater and its ongoing usage, safety has been of the upmostimportance to the involved students, faculty and staff. The engineering curriculum at WesternWashington University places an emphasis on hands-on technical experiences, yielding researchstudents well prepared to recognize the physical hazards associated with industrial machinery.Students, as well as faculty and staff, have found
innovative solutions to the world’s most difficult problems.Indeed, as reports by both the National Academy of Engineering and ABET have concluded, thechallenges that must be addressed by the next generation of engineers are becoming increasinglycomplex as society continues to grow more interconnected [1-2]. To be effective engineeringleaders in a global workforce, engineers need strong communication skills that will allow themto interact with a wide-ranging audience, including entrepreneurs, policy makers, communityleaders, and the general public—most of whom do not necessarily have a background inengineering, science, and technology.This study explores four specific communication capabilities—writing, creating and deliveringoral presentations
groups producetheir own codes of ethics, after all, and do not rely on some general moral code applicable acrossevery member of society. But if we want to fully understand the role of engineering in society,we must also recognize that that which appears to require control derives from notions of elite Page 26.1723.5status on the part of code proponents.This is an ontological perspective that somewhat counters Michael Davis’ description ofengineering ethics as representing a moment in which “knowledge moves to action.” 1 We wouldinstead say, following Dewey7 and in hopes of articulating even more aspects of engineeringactivity, that knowledge is
the learning outcomesassociated with participants associated with this project in particular. Table 1. VTC involvement in Design-and-Build ProjectsProject Title DescriptionRainwater Catchment and Design and installation of two 4,000 gallon rainwater tanks, withSmart Irrigation appropriate transfers, filters and pvc conduit. Develop solar- generated pumping infrastructure for moving water from storage to irrigation and greywater uses regulated by moisture sensors in garden beds supported by wireless data feeds.Solar Tube Design and Luminance testing in the classroom to gauge optimal placement ofInstallation 12 tubular
STEM FacultyABSTRACTWomen faculty are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) disciplines.The ADVANCE Institutional Transformation project at a large private technical university (supported byNSF Award No. 1209115), referred to as AdvanceRIT, aims to increase the representation andadvancement of women STEM faculty (which includes social and behavioral sciences, SBS, faculty) byremoving barriers to resources that support career success and by creating new interventions andresources.This paper reports on the development of efforts to activate change for STEM faculty in the form of aninternal grant program, Connect Grants, as part of the AdvanceRIT project. The grants supportleadership and career development for all
Figure 3 was used by the researcher togive an example for each expression of leadership. The researcher then determined from theinterviews when a Maker expressed one of the leadership roles.In their Making, this person:___ 1. Listens to the problems of team members/subordinates. (Mentor)___ 2. Reviews and/or reflects upon project achievements. (Monitor)___ 3. Influences decisions made at higher levels. (Broker)___ 4. Does problem solving in creative, clever ways. (Innovator)___ 5. Clearly defines areas of responsibility for team members/subordinates. (Director)___ 6. Displays a wholehearted commitment to the job/project. (Producer)___ 7. Facilitates consensus building in work-group sessions. (Facilitator)___ 8. Protects continuity in day-to-day