participation rates and effects of experiential learning vary acrossdifferent undergraduate engineering student populations (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, discipline,socioeconomic status)?Employing a narrative literature review approach, this paper synthesizes current research inengineering education and higher education on experiential learning for undergraduate students,and proposes areas for future research. This review illustrates the challenges in measuring aspectsof student involvement, suggesting salient characteristics of involvement that future researchmight investigate, and identifies types of mechanisms that have been attributed to the influence ofinvolvement, including developing skills, networking with peers, fostering sense of belonging
outreach activities, the DSTR robots engineering undergraduate students in the Electronicare being used in the Introduction to Engineering course at Systems and Manufacturing-Mechanical programs workingBlinn College and in the Freshman Engineering curriculum in the Mobile Integrated Solutions Laboratory (MISL) atat Texas A&M University. DSTRs have also been selected Texas A&M University. Mr. Hebert Baumgartner, now anby NASA scientists as a low-cost lunar sample collector. The entrepreneur following his graduation, was lead mechanicalpaper will also discuss the newly developed DSTR-E (DSTR designer of the mobile platform. Mr. Colby Ryan and Ms.Engineering) unit which requires students
alarger project to integrate design concepts throughout the chemical engineering curriculum atSouth Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSM&T).IntroductionTraditional undergraduate laboratories in chemical engineering provide students an exposure toconcepts of engineering science learned in the classroom, but do not provide open-ended, designexperiences similar to what graduates might face as chemical engineers in industrial positions.The traditional experiments in a unit operations laboratory tend to be created around fixed piecesof equipment. The procedures, data collection and analysis, and presentation of results tend to benearly identical for every team of students assigned to conduct a particular experiment, resultingin students
Proceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1) Laboratory Experiments for Enhanced Learning of Electromechanical Devices Tomislav Bujanovic and Prasanta Ghosh, Senior Member, IEEE new smart grid workforce. In the Department of Electrical Abstract— In advanced Power Engineering and Smart Grid Engineering and Computer Science we have developed smartLaboratory environment students get opportunities to grid laboratory to support both undergraduate and graduatedemonstrate their ability to design and conduct experiments
Using Multi-Disciplinary Design Challenges to Enhance Self- Efficacy within a Summer STEM Outreach Program Tony McClary, Jacqueline A. Zeiber, MA, Patricia Sullivan, PhD., Steven Stochaj, PhD. New Mexico State University 1025 Stewart St., Las Cruces, NM, 88003 mamcclar@nmsu.edu Abstract Additionally, participating in STEM programs leads toResearch regarding STEM programs has shown that increased self-confidence, satisfaction, and interest inparticipating in these programs leads to increased engineering [2]. Current
awards) and presentations by three awardees of the 2018-22 cycles.Engineering technology educators should benefit by discovering a new outlet for seed moneyand learning about innovative, creative teaching practices and research.IntroductionSince 1980, the Engineering Technology Division has offered its members the possibility ofseed money for projects directly related to the larger engineering technology community.Initially, funding was limited to $100 per project and later increased to $250 [1]. Over theensuing decades, funding has increased dramatically, up to $2,500 per project, with requiredsupplemental institutional or departmental matching funds.The first projects were, of necessity, small in scope and utilitarian in nature, including
Education.Stephanie S Ivey (Associate Dean for Research)Craig O. StewartDavid J. Russomanno (Dean)Danny King (Director, New Student Academic Advising Center)Katherine Goodman Katherine Goodman is an assistant professor (teaching track) at the University of Colorado Denver. She serves as curriculum lead for Inworks, an interdisciplinary innovation lab within the College of Engineering, Design and Computing. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She is the past division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy / Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE).James T. Campbell (Professor)Tom Altman Dr. Tom Altman – Professor Tom Altman received his B.S. degrees in Computer Science and in
manufacturing-related programs by providinginstitutions, companies, and students a way to work together both onsite and online in a cost-effective, practical way. The distributed-hybrid instructional delivery method uses face-to-facemodular activity-based instructional materials, developed under previous NSF-ATE grantsincluding most recently the Completing the Curriculum: Modular Manufacturing EducationModel for Advanced Manufacturing Education DUE 0071079. The Completing theCurriculum grant focused on the development and testing of the curriculum for an AAS degreein Manufacturing Engineering Technology in nine subject matter clusters[1]. What is the urgentneed for this new approach to delivery? The Society of Manufacturing Engineers has
others. This paper begins with a discussionof EE coursework pertinent to renewable energy/energy efficiency. The creation andearly experiences with a Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (RE^3) advisoryboard are reported. The role of the EE department in leading the campus efforts in theRE^3 area and in helping to shift campus culture are discussed. The paper concludeswith a summary and suggestions for future efforts.Electrical Engineering Specific CourseworkThe EE department has a hands-on approach from early on in the curriculum, whichlends itself well to directed studies and special topics RE^3 coursework. The coursesequence in the freshman and sophomore years culminates in an “Embedded ControllerDesign” course in which the students learn
compression parallel to the grain test,which requires the greatest compressive force of all three types of tests in this study, the peakload did not exceed 25,000 pounds, which indicates the testing could have been accomplished onmost test frames found at other institutions. Test apparatus, such as the static bending test loadhead and support platform and the direct shear device, were already available by their use inother courses in the civil engineering curriculum at USAFA. So no new equipment was requiredfor this study. The ASTM provides detailed specifications for these apparatus, facilitating theirpurchase or fabrication if an institution does not have ready access to them. The instructordeveloped the testing algorithm in the test frame
Session 2526 Meeting ABET EC 2000 Criterion 3 Outcomes with a Laboratory Course Drs. R. H. King and J. P. Gosink Engineering Division, Colorado School of Mines1 IntroductionColorado School of Mines (CSM) is a public research university devoted to engineering andapplied science that has distinguished itself by developing high-quality graduates andscholarship. The U.S. News and World Report Inc. rated CSM 26th in the Top National PublicUniversities and 50th in the Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs with Ph.D. Programs in20011. The school’s mission as written in the Colorado statutes
inspiration, enablers, and challenges for innovation. In addition,issues related to innovation institutionalization (or sustainability) and to evidence gathered by thepanelists to assess and evaluate the institutionalizing process are discussed. Themes andcommonalities of the responses are presented and related to literature on the diffusion ofinnovation.1. IntroductionInnovation "is an idea, practice, or object that is perceived as new by an individual, [even if it isnot] objectively new as measured by the lapse of time since its first use or discovery."1 To gain asense of how innovation is occurring in current engineering education environments in thiscountry, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (hereafter referred to as
Session 3247 Out of the Box Elaine L. Craft South Carolina Advanced Technological Education Center of ExcellenceHow does a state-wide system of two-year technical colleges produce enough engineeringtechnology graduates to meet the needs of high-tech employers? South Carolinians are thinking“out of the box” in addressing this challenge. The South Carolina Technical EducationSystem’s Advanced Technological Education (ATE) Initiative is taking an innovative, faculty-first approach to foster systemic reform in engineering technology education.The SC ATE Initiative is being
AC 2011-1715: 3RD GRADERS EXPERIENCE ON USING AN AUTODI-DACTIC PROGRAMMING SOFTWARE: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL PER-SPECTIVEAikaterini Bagiati, Purdue University, West Lafayette Having acquired a Diploma in Electrical Engineering and a Masters Degree in Advanced Digital Com- munication in the Aristotle University in Greece, and after having worked as an educator both in formal and informal settings for 10 years now, I have, since January 2008, started the PhD Program in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. My research interests are : Developmental Engineering; Engineering in PreK-3; Early Engineering Curriculum Development; Use of Art to enhance Engineering Design; Educational Software; Educational
at a distance[6].The University of Toledo operates a successful distance learning program. According to statisticsprovided by The University of Toledo distance learning office, for academic year 2002-2003,there were 530 distance learning courses offered at The University of Toledo. The total number ofenrollment in The University of Toledo’s distance learning courses for the academic year 2002-2003 was 10570.A summary of approaches taken by The University of Toledo distance learning division for Page 8.832.2satisfying the “Good Practices” requirements is presented [7].Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education
, the role of the virtual laboratoryas an effective curricular tool can be constructed.Laboratory DescriptionThis study analyzes students’ perceptions of their own learning in three laboratories in the firstquarter of the capstone laboratory sequence in the School of Chemical, Biological andEnvironmental Engineering at Oregon State University. Of the two physical laboratories, thespecific content in the Ion Exchange laboratory is new to most students, although it draws uponconcepts well grounded in the curriculum; on the other hand, the Heat Exchange laboratorydraws from material in the core junior level heat and mass transfer sequence, TransportPhenomena II and III (ChE 332 and ChE 333). Of the virtual laboratories, the content in theVirtual
Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton, Michigan 49931 mattila@mtu.edu (906) 487-2523 phone (906) 487-2943 fax 4 Todd Scholz, Assistant Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton, Michigan 49931 scholz@mtu.edu (906) 487-2804 phone (906) 487-2943 faxABSTRACTIn the fall semester of 2000 a student program was established at Michigan TechnologicalUniversity in which significant team projects and business elements replace part of thetraditional engineering curriculum for a project-based approach to learning. Scholarships areavailable to students who participate in the Pavement Design
. Page 26.171.113. Phase, I. I. (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academies Press.4. Hicks, N., Bumbaco, A. E., & Douglas, E. P. (2014). Critical thinking, reflective practice, and adaptive expertise in engineering. In Proceedings 2014 American Society of Engineering Education Conference5. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design studies, 24(3), 275-294.6. Ahern, A., O'Connor, T., McRuairc, G., McNamara, M., & O'Donnell, D. (2012). Critical thinking in the university curriculum–the impact on engineering education. European Journal of Engineering
Interdisciplinary training can benefit both undergraduates and graduate students, but theeffectiveness of the training is enhanced when the students possess the in-discipline technicalmaturity resulting from completion of a B.S. engineering degree and when a graduate researchproject creates problems requiring interdisciplinary solutions. The goal of interdisciplinarytraining should be to develop specialists who have interaction skills, not to develop generalists.Engineers in a given discipline must be aware of the constraints and needs of the otherdisciplines. For instance, a load test on a new bridge element could involve civil, electrical,manufacturing, and mechanical engineers. The civil engineer needs an appreciation for sensornoise and processing
classroom activities and curricula to broaden their students’awareness of engineering education and career pathways [1].In 2024, the College of Engineering at the University of Alabama (UA) launched an RET sitefocusing on the applications of sensing technologies for physiological and environmentalmonitoring. The selection of this theme reflects the importance of measuring the physicalquantities of materials, devices, tissues, and the environment to address research questions acrossall engineering domains. This approach aligns projects with national and state goals ofintegrating engineering design and practices into science content creation. For the first iterationof this RET, projects from electrical engineering (measuring biological tissue
Architectural Education , vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 16-25, 1984.[15] H. West, "A Criticism of an Undergraduate Design Curriculum," Design Theory and Methodology, vol. 31, pp. 7-12, 1991.[16] L. N. Green and E. Bonollo, "Studio-based teaching: history and advantages in the teaching of design," World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 269-272, 2003.[17] Y. J. Reimer and S. A. Douglas, "Teaching HCI Design with the Studio Approach," Computer Science Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 191-205, 2003.
specializes in optimization algorithms, formal language theory, and complex systeDr. Michael S. Jacobson, Professor of Mathematics for over 40 years, with a keen interest in STEM Education.Craig O. Stewart, University of MemphisProf. Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado, Denver Katherine Goodman is associate professor at the University of Colorado Denver, and curriculum lead at Inworks, an interdisciplinary innovation lab. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She has served as program chair and division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhE) Division. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
,economic, and political environment. In addition, a drastic culture change was needed. Thementality that students “sink or swim” still lingered, there was considerable skepticism about thecost/benefit of student support programs, and students were accustomed to a competitiveenvironment that awarded individual rather than team success. In addition, limited resourcesmeant that whatever was implemented needed to be credible, sustainable, and productive.Hence, several “student learning communities” have been implemented that are designed toprovide a successful learning environment, which attracts and retains qualified students.IntroductionThe Lee College of Engineering Learning Communities programs focus on activities thatpromote the formation of
enthusiastic participant in the activities of the Teaching-Learning Centre at IIT-M.Dr. Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Jeffrey E. Froyd is a TEES Research Professor and the Director of Faculty Climate and Development at Texas A&M University. He served as Project Director for the Foundation Coalition, an NSF Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized their undergraduate engineering curricula, and extensively shared their results with the engineering education community. He co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathe- matics at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, which was recognized in 1997 with a
, focusing on new trends in supply chain management and logistics technology.One solution being employed by a number of special-interest groups and states with similarproblems is to develop educational pathways that combine formal and informal educationopportunities. This approach is designed to better prepare workers to enter high-technologysupply chain, logistics, and manufacturing operations careers and to secure employment forthose already there. Consequently, workforce development is at the center of a rapidly growingpartnership between Ivy Tech and Purdue University’s College of Technology. Developing apathway for high school students to enter Ivy Tech and finish a 4-year degree at Purdue is at theheart of this effort.National Science
, fixed, and definitive ofmost academic program criteria. The evident shortcoming of that model was its “static”character. The dynamically changing technology and “environment” both had very limitedinfluence on program and graduate’s competencies. Page 6.1084.5 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationA new accreditation philosophy consists of a two-fold approach comprising minimumaccreditation standards and continuous improvement process through self-evaluation and qualityimprovement, illustrated
biochemical engineering.It is obvious that the successful commercialization of the developments in biochemicalengineering depends on the technical advance in biochemistry and biology as well as theeducation of those who will implement such advances. We believe that the biotechnology andpharmaceutical industries benefit best from chemical engineers who have been trained andeducated on how to implement and expand chemical engineering knowledge to biologicalsystems. One way of achieving this is by adding new experiments in biochemical engineeringto the undergraduate chemical engineering laboratory curriculum 1 (unit operations laboratory).The overall objectives of this endeavor are: 1) to familiarize the students with the operation ofequipment used in
efforts – from university, industry, and federal sources – and for his efforts has received departmental, college, and national teaching honors including the Farrall Young Edu- cator Award (2004) and the Massey-Ferguson Gold Medal Teaching Award (2016) given by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. He has also been an invited participant in the National Academy of Engineering’s 2013 Frontiers in Engineering Education Conference. Raman chairs the ABE Engineering Curriculum Committee and in that role oversaw the successful 2012 ABET accreditation visit for both the Agricultural Engineering (AE) and Biological Systems Engineering (BSE) degree programs. Upon arriving at ISU in 2006, he led the development of the
the College. ABET’s accreditation was requiring departments to address arelative lack of multidisciplinary elements in their curriculum. The proposed multidisciplinaryprogram launched at an auspicious institutional time. Page 10.785.5Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &ExpositionCopyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”In 2001, the University of Arizona was tasked with exceptionally deep budget cuts, which placedthe program in jeopardy. A business model was proposed such that the program would be selffunding through the budget cycle, which allowed the program to continue
Opportunities and the CEAS Dean’s Office. Theprogram content and curriculum were designed to prepare underrepresented ethnic minoritystudents for success in the CEAS at ASU. The curriculum focused on engineering design,technical communications, and included a design project. Academic scholarships were awardedto all participants based on a team design project competition. The competition included thedesign of web pages, documentation in individual design notebooks, and a presentation toindustry representatives and parents.During the summer of 1996, 44 students participated and completed the program. As arecruitment tool, the program was an overwhelming success with 43 of the 44 studentscompleting the academic year (one chose not to because of the