alignment of the mirror (directionality), teaming up with othergroups (consolidation), similarity (similar triangles approach), and experimentation. Anotherimportant feature of this project is the better understanding of the “no right or wrong” and “nounique solution” concepts.b2.2) Electrical Engineering exampleA team of students gets light-emitting diodes (LED’s) and logic gates integrated circuits. Using apower source, a breadboard and wires they need to solve the following problem:An ENGINE in a new car can be turned ON if:(The KEY is ON) AND (BATTERY is ON) AND (The A/C is OFF OR The LIGHTS are OFF)Use smallest number of NAND and NOT Gates to implement the “ENGINE ON” function.This example relates to dimensionality, modification, similarity
even tofunctional models.In short, what is missing is an holistic approach to teaching engineering design where all steps ofa typical design process are completed in an environment promoting synergy between thevarious stages of design. In this paper, we describe an ongoing effort at Kettering Universityfocused on dealing with the stated challenges. This effort is supported by NSF grant DUE-9851147 and several interested industrial partners. It is stipulated that teaching design can beelevated to a new level of effectiveness by utilizing the technologies described and thecurriculum changes proposed herein. Page 5.670.2II. Proposed SolutionTo
others. Thepurpose of this embedded mixed-methods study was to document student perceptions of learningwhile on co-op and provide student-centered language for these learning experiences.IntroductionThere is a high demand for well-trained engineers that can create innovative solutions tocomplex world problems [5]–[9]. To solve the National Academy of Engineers GrandChallenges [6] or other engineering problems of today, we need the current and next generationof engineers to quickly transition into their full-time roles, work efficiently and respectfully withothers on a multidisciplinary team, be comfortable with large-scale, open-ended problems, andhave a strong understanding of fundamental material that they can map to new problems in
department was to employ standards explicitly given byABET. Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering EducationMission, Objectives, and OutcomesA mission is often a qualitative statement of direction for a college, ordepartment. Objectives are characteristics of graduates of the program. Outcomesare capabilities demonstrated by students enrolled in the program. Whendeveloping the set of objectives for the program of study, the MET ABET teamadopted a top-down approach. Mission statements of the college and thedepartment were incorporated into the self-study. They were able to ensure thatthe department mission was well aligned with those of the college. Programobjectives were written based on the
adjunct associate professor in the Technology, Engineering, and Design department at NC State and earned her doctorate in Technology, Engineering, and Design in the College of Education at NC State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Evaluation of collaborative REU exploring the energy spectrum from body-heat harvesting to smart grid technologyEngaging in research is one of the few and critical project-based learning experiences of theundergraduate engineering career. Typical students are rarely exposed to authentic applicationsof engineering design, research, and/or multidisciplinary content until the capstone course at theend of their undergraduate curriculum
; Exposition, 2008, pp. 13.1151. 1-13.1151. 11.[7] E. Tempelman and A. Pilot, "Strengthening the link between theory and practice in teaching design engineering: an empirical study on a new approach," International journal of technology and design education, vol. 21, pp. 261-275, 2011.[8] M. Andriychuk, Numerical Simulation: From Theory to Industry. BoD–Books on Demand, 2012.[9] J. Červeňová, "OPTIMAL BALANCE OF ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL METHODS IN TEACHING OF ELECTROMAGNETISM," DISTANCE LEARNING, SIMULATION AND COMMUNICATION 2013, p. 27, 2013.[10] A. J. Hughes and C. Merrill, "Solving Concurrent and Nonconcurrent Coplanar Force Systems: Balancing Theory and Practice in the Technology and Engineering Education
students marketable skills, servedlocal industry by providing lifelong educational opportunities for employees, awarded university credit for thesecourses, and generated income for the college. These outcomes have helped to foster an expanding andadvantageous relationship between industry and engineering technology. New Horizons considers this a novelapproach to a strategic partnership with the University of Hartford. New Horizons the World’s Leader in IT andApplications training across the globe has worked with the University to establish an ongoing relationship. Inmoving forward with our partnership we only hope we can add new programs to enhance the attendance and givestudents proper certifications to increase their earning potential and make
component of theCivil Engineering undergraduate curriculum, the Introduction to Environmental EngineeringLaboratory. The laboratory manuals for the two classes will have a similar interface and layout.The long-term goal of the project is to use the style and approach developed on this project as atemplate for other civil engineering laboratory courses. Common elements to all of theselaboratories include modules on laboratory safety, report writing, statistics and proper use ofunits. This work is being done as a collaborative NSF-funded project between the Civil Engineeringand the Interactive Multimedia Department at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Partialsupport for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation's Course
Preparing a Diversity Statement- An Introduction to Diversity Issues for Future Faculty Raluca I. Rosca Engineering Sciences and Mechanics Department, Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractWhile the diversity in engineering classrooms strives to mirror the diversity of the society atlarge, our future engineering faculty are not explicitly prepared to deal with it. Using a mixeddata approach, this paper describes how a writing exercise (preparing a diversity statement) andthe associated peer-review discussion expanded the definition of diversity and the plans toaddress it in academia for two groups of participants in the Engineering Teaching PortfolioProgram at
Preparing a Diversity Statement- An Introduction to Diversity Issues for Future Faculty Raluca I. Rosca Engineering Sciences and Mechanics Department, Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractWhile the diversity in engineering classrooms strives to mirror the diversity of the society atlarge, our future engineering faculty are not explicitly prepared to deal with it. Using a mixeddata approach, this paper describes how a writing exercise (preparing a diversity statement) andthe associated peer-review discussion expanded the definition of diversity and the plans toaddress it in academia for two groups of participants in the Engineering Teaching PortfolioProgram at
(1), pp. 85-101.[34] J. C. Chen and J. Chen, “Testing a new approach for learning teamwork knowledge and skills in technical education”, Journal of Industral Technology, Feb 2004, 20(2), pp. 1-10.[35] K. A. Smith, “Strategies for developing engineering students teamwork and project management skills”, 2000, Proc., ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1630.[36] K. S. Kim and L. D. McNair, “Self-managed teaming and team effectiveness in interdisciplinary capstone design”, 2010, Proc., 40th FIE Conference, Washington DC, Session F1F.[37] J. S. Collofello and M. Hart, “Monitoring team progress in a software engineering project class”, 29th FIE Conference, 1999, San Juan, PR, Session 11b4.[38] J. H. Andrews and H. L. Lutfiyya
/5). Additionally, they felt that seeing projectsacross both disciplines throughout the semester improved their engineering learning (Mean =4.3/5) and improved their own team’s project (Mean = 3.8/5). These results suggest that theintended objectives of this course structure were largely achieved within this initial pool ofstudents.IntroductionFrancis Marion University, a small primarily undergraduate university, is home to twoengineering programs in industrial and mechanical engineering. As part of the curriculum, eachprogram requires an engineering senior design course in their respective disciplines. Teams ofstudents are assigned a unique project, which is sponsored by a local industry partner.Traditionally, the senior design courses for
racing. As an important part of the solar carteam, the instrumentation team not only learns technical skills, but also the soft skills ofplanning, managing, and working with others to reach a common goal.IntroductionFocusing engineering education on projects and competitions is a popular approach togiving students experience with real open-ended design problems, teamwork,communication, and leadership1,2,3,4. ABET requires engineering programs todemonstrate that their graduates have fundamental knowledge and know how to apply itworking in teams. Student teams participating in solar car racing develop not onlytechnical skills, but also communication, project management, and teaming skills. TheCenter for Advanced Manufacturing and Production (CAMP
, access, and diversity for broadening participation and reducing systemic barriers a Gregory E. Triplett and aRachel L. Wasilewski a Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VAThe lack of equality in the traditional American educational system [1] poses an imminent threatto American innovation and global competitiveness. As the United States experiences changingdemographics [2] and a greater shift towards a technology-driven society [3], it is not tappinginto the entire talent pool, as the rest of the world is moving to more inclusive pedagogicalmodels [4]. Given the quality of the future engineering
students to study transportation engineering and equip themwith the knowledge and capability to come up with creative, systematic, and sustainable solutions. It isintended to provide conclusions to inform other peers in engineering education in the U.S. and othercountries. The program included 40 high school students recruited from 30 schools across SouthernCalifornia, and was designed to include a multi-modal inter-disciplinary curriculum. With detaileddescription of the pedagogical approach, assessment methods, and learning outcomes, this paper aims tosystematically review the successful implementation of the NSTI program at CPP and the lessons learned.In general, the program was very well received by all parties: high school students, parents
education and thepractical skills required by the thermal systems industry. By introducing a comprehensive two-week moduleat the end of the semester, we aim to better align educational practices with the needs of modern industrialenvironments, helping students to become better prepared for professional engineering roles.Our proposed applied learning strategy addresses the identified gaps in the existing curriculum byintegrating cutting-edge thermal management technologies, such as TPMS, topologically optimizedsurfaces, and advanced manifold-microchannel heat exchangers, alongside practical design experiencesusing INSTED software. This approach not only deepens students' understanding of both fundamental andadvanced thermal system concepts but also
increased because they have been recognized as a useful external attributes accurately such as reliability, availability instrument for managing software process effectively. …etc. The following section focus on current used metrics and Software metrics allow to use a real engineering approach to their limitations. software development, providing the quantitative and objective base that software engineering was lacking. In fact, II. SOFTWARE METRICS their use in industry is becoming more and more In this section, we will discuss software metrics concept and widespread.[2] As regards the research in software metrics [2], classification along with their advantages
perABET’s new Engineering Criteria 2000.Focus of ABET’s EC2000ABET’s periodic review of engineering programs is well accepted as a form of programassessment and quality assurance. Since its enactment, Engineering Criteria 2000 have beenwell publicized in various sources, and effective Fall 2001, all programs coming up foraccreditation review, are being evaluated for compliance against these criteria. These essentiallyconsist of eight criteria with a goal of continuous program improvement as opposed to the earlierfocus on rigid quantitative inputs5. These criteria encompass: (1) Students, (2) ProgramEducational Objectives, (3) Program Outcomes and Assessment, (4) Professional Component,(5) Faculty, (6) Facilities, (7) Institutional Support and
M SD M SD (a) Engineering/computer science self- 32.38 4.73 32.73 4.36 efficacy (b) Computer use self-efficacy 27.67 4.23 27.46 3.84Note. Items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (StronglyAgree). There were no significant differences in pre- and post-test results.4.0 DiscussionOverall, the iterative process outlined in Figure 1 has provided a robust approach (a) fordeveloping a Theoretical Framework, (b) for eliciting feedback from industry professionalsabout specific industry needs, (c) for using results to inform subsequent research, (d) for makingdecisions about curriculum and instructional practices, and (e) for assessing whether
increasingly employed over the years asproviding a means to overcome the shortfalls of traditional “chalk and talk” delivery of engineering content.Engineers in their profession must not only be technically excellent in the fundamentals of their discipline,but they are also in an environment which is full of uncertainty, has a series of competing demands andethical dilemmas, necessitates excellent communication skills to work across multiple disciples and requireskeeping up with continual changes to technology and the workplace. In recognition of the ways in whichthe traditional approaches were not preparing students for success in this environment, in 2003, Mills &Treagust [1] defined six critical issues that needed to be addressed in changing
, to thelack of a smooth implementation path. A major roadblock to implementation of active learningtechniques is the lack of "ready-to-use" active learning products (ALPs) and procedures. Toremedy this, over 25 active learning products have been created for engineering mechanics. Inaddition, a general and repeatable approach for developing the active learning products, thePHLIpS Method (Producing Hands-on Learning to InsPire Students) and associated assessmentinstruments were created for application across STEM programs. The workshop overviewedmany of the activities and focused on providing participants with the tools needed to implementand evaluate active learning in their classrooms. A post workshop survey provided participantsevaluation of
) under the program called, AdvancedTechnology Education. One of the project goals is to develop curriculum in the field ofalternative energy technologies both for four-year and two-year degree seeking students whoare pursuing BS and AAS degrees respectively. The department of Electronic Systems atASU’s Polytechnic campus is in the process of launching a new degree concentrationbeginning fall 2007 within the existing TAC of ABET accredited BS degree program. Thispaper focuses on a new undergraduate course “Application of Nanotechnology forBatteries, Solar, and Fuel Cells”, one of the targeted courses that will be developed tohighlight the potential of nano-materials in the energy area. The Electronic Systems Department (ESD) recently
assessment, development of computer-aided environ- mental analysis and management tools, environmental performance measurement, international project management and education, and sustainable development. She has published peer-reviewed journal and conference papers on the life-cycle environmental implications and LCA of construction methods and materials, extended producer responsibility in the construction industry, environmental decision support tools, and integrating service-learning and sustainability in coursework. She has developed construction management curriculum for Egyptian, Palestinian, Tunisian, and US university students. Her research in- tegrates concepts in economics, engineering, management
interests include Web caching, Web Prefetching, Web data mining, Biometrics, and digital watermarking. He is the author/co-author of over 10 papers in refereed journal publications and over 10 papers in conference proceedings. He is also associated with many international conferences like ICICT 2014 at Chengdu, China, ICICT 2013 at New Delhi, India, and DNCOCO 2007 at Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago as a Session Chair and Program Committee Chair. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Is the industry hiring fresh graduates with life-long learning competency?IntroductionThe engineering profession is undergoing major changes at an incredible pace. Newer challengesare emerging and newer
, R.J. Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership 60(1): 40-43, 2000Dierick, S, Dochy, F, “New lines in edumetrics: new forms of assessment lead to new assessment criteria,” Studiesin Educational Evaluation, 27: 307-329, 2001.Horwitz, P., Christie, M.A. Hypermodels: embedding curriculum and assessment in computer-based manipulatives.Journal Education. 181(2): 1-23, 1999.Lohman, J.R. EC 2000: the Georgia Tech experience. J. Eng. Educ. 88(3): 305-310, 1999.Owen, C., Scales, K., Leonard, M. Preparing for program accreditation review under ABET engineering criteria2000: Creating a database of outcomes and assessment indicators for a variety of engineering programs. J. Eng.Educ. 88(3): 255-259, 1999.Olds, B.M., Miller, R.L. A measure
computing have facilitatedthe development of cloud computing services. Cloud computing is an approach for deliveringapplications and services, on demand, over a private or public network, by leveraging efficientresource pooling of virtual infrastructure. Using virtualization and cloud computing technologiesin education could help lessen hardware costs, increase the availability of resources, andaccelerate deployment of new curriculum material [4] - [8]. Some studies indicated that studentsconducting virtual labs performed as well as students using physical labs in a traditionalenvironment [9], [10].In a decentralized, individual approach, the virtual environment is hosted on students’ personalcomputers. Examples of software we used include VMware
session for ourstudents. The object is to have either graduate students or our adjunct to be available to helpstudents in lower level CS classes.ConclusionThis paper provides a summary of approaches adopted by SETM from the design, developmentand implementation of assessment plans for its CS degree program to prepare the program forthe ABET CS accreditation. Steps taken to make the program compliant with ABET criteria arepresented and some factures to enhance the online program are discussed.Bibliography1. Uhlig, R., and Viswanathan, S. (2006). Effective design, instruction and assessment of an on-line engineering course. Presented at the ASEE Mid – Atlantic Conference.(28-29) New York City, New York.2. Koile, K. and Singer, D. (2006
understanding of thelecture material and prepare them better for a rewarding engineering career. To achieve this, a proposal was recently submitted to the National Science Foundation’sCourse, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement Program1 for the establishment of a state-of-the-art Dynamic Systems and Controls instructional laboratory at UTEP. The proposal was funded,this laboratory was developed and it is now being used by both Electrical and MechanicalEngineering undergraduate students at UTEP. Its main goals are to:a. prepare students to be multidisciplinary in their thinkingb. introduce students to a model-based simulation-oriented approach to control systems designand developmentc. let students gain experience with the actual equipment
work for a “renaissance engineer”,bridging the gaps between the extremely specialized engineers that were at the root of rapidtechnological development4. Others also acknowledge the need to broaden what have become thetraditional boundaries of engineering5. The subject of materials is naturally at a crossroads,bridging science and engineering. It feeds science with design requirements that drive researchinto new materials and at the same time enables breakthrough designs with new materials. It isprecisely these characteristics that make the teaching of materials extremely important to thenext generation of engineers1.As engineering education in general and materials teaching in particular become broader inscope in todays’ higher education
another.7So how do we as engineering and technology educators, practically provide our students with aneducation that includes the approach fostered by a liberal education in addition to technicalcontent? How do we provide technical content and perspective for students pursuing a liberaleducation? Although there may be a myriad of approaches to the problem, an obvious tactic thatwould reach all students is to focus on the core curriculum (courses required of all students) andalso on courses required in the technical major. By focusing on these two elements of thecurriculum we have the potential to provide learning opportunities that can impact and broadenperspectives of both technical and non-technical students.Within curricula of the College of