Division Service Award. Estell currently serves as an ABET Commissioner and as a subcommittee chair on ABET’s Accreditation Council Training Committee. He was previously a Member-At-Large on the Computing Accreditation Commission Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assessment processes and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing
their courses. In the research-to-practice cycle, instructors would informthemselves about innovative practices emerging from others’ research, improve teaching plansdrawing on new information, and assess student outcomes and feed back successful practices(and lessons learned) to the research community. This paradigm has a historical root in modelingengineering education after traditional sciences that have greater consensus on theories andmethods, with the goal of elevating engineering education practice to “research” that isgeneralizable and transferable [1]. Research in the wider institutional context, such as in themandate for institutional review boards (IRBs) in the US, is further understood as “a systematicinvestigation […] to develop or
students’ disciplinary writing skills and grasp technical knowledge with hands-onlab experience [8], [9], [10].However, barriers to teaching writing-intensive labs remain. For example, writing-intensiveengineering labs have high enrollment, high grading load for instructors and teaching assistants[11], [12], and limited resources to teach technical writing in an already densely packed labcourse [9], [13]. In “In Approaches to Assessment that Enhance Learning in Higher Education”,Wingate [14] stated that iterations and formative feedback is a central and inevitable process forstudents to improve their writing skills. Unfortunately, the reality is that most engineeringstudents are not comfortable with iteratively editing their writing assignments
sessions:overview of program and session-specific objectives; individual reflections on recentexperiments, followed by share-outs in trios and then with the full group; delivery of newcontent, including the research base and practice activities; and finally action planning, in whichparticipants identified takeaways and concrete next steps.Methods of Data CollectionEnd-of-Program Evaluation: At the conclusion of the program, both faculty and staffparticipants were asked to fill out an anonymous, online evaluation, with Likert scale andopen-ended questions. 34% of the overall participants completed this assessment. On average,the respondents attended 5 of the 6 sessions. (See Appendix D for quantitative results.)Budget Narratives: As a means of
and constructed by schools.Inequalities in the opportunity to learn essential content that has lasting effects on students’ academicand career trajectories are not just unique to the United States. Results from internationalassessments, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science (TIMSS) and the Program forInternational Student Assessment (PISA), reveal that there are differences in performance betweenand within countries with respect to gender 9, race and ethnicity10 and socioeconomic status11. Sincethis is a global phenomenon, scholars and practitioners around the world can contribute to a viablesolution by collaborating in co-developing and testing educational programs aimed at providingyouth with opportunities to learn.Middle
].Recognizing that there is a significant relationship between ventilation systems in the builtenvironments and their effects on health, comfort and productivity, an academic project withinOSHE-341 “Industrial Hygiene Field Evaluations” was tasked to students to undertake it as aterm paper project. As building ventilation rates have historically evolved from the 19th centurythrough improvements [36], student projects involved measuring ventilation rates or studies onthe preliminary assessment of technical performance of the mechanical ventilation systems andimpacts on the indoor air quality of a newly built and commissioned building on campus.Students' activities involved measurements of the incoming air through the diffusers, duct sizes,and other key
to harness thispowerful technological wave for the betterment of academia.Universities have long been cognizant of the transformative potential of technology, recognizingits capacity to reshape the landscape of teaching, learning, and assessment. Embracingtechnological disruption is not merely an option for modern universities; it is imperative fordistinguishing their student offerings, boosting admissions, enhancing retention rates, andultimately delivering the desired educational outcomes [11]–[14].Preparing students for success in the ever-evolving world of work is a multifaceted endeavor. Itdemands robust academic leadership, access to a high-caliber curriculum and educationalmaterials, and the cultivation of students' proficiency in
Study Sample Selection, (3) Data collection, (4) Dataanalysis, and (5) Assuring quality.Designing the multiple case studyInitially, researchers need to assess the suitability of employing a case study methodology toinvestigate the research problem. As it was mentioned in the last section, multiple case study issuitable when the investigator can clearly define distinct cases with delineated boundaries, aimsto offer a comprehensive understanding of these cases and compare multiple cases [6]. Merriamrecommends that to design a multiple case study, it is important to start with a literature review,construct the theoretical framework, and identify the research problem [9].In conducting a multiple case study, establishing a clear boundary delineating
the learners’ specific experience orthe achieved learning outcomes. Learning outcomes such as test performance [8] andtechnical skill development [9] have also been assessed to measure the efficacy of VRlaboratories with positive results observed. Concerning the learners’ experiences, priorstudies have focused on learning motivation [10], satisfaction [11], and perceived usefulness,[8, 11] among others. These student-focused factors have been described in the existingliterature to play significant roles in the successful implementation of VR laboratories forengineering education settings [12].However, contextual factors such as physical, social, and instructional environments also playhuge roles in the learning process [13, 14]. Hence
if used in sequence. These produced materials are currently usedin several courses across the curriculum at Duke University including first-year design and agraduate design course; to date, direct assessment on the modules is limited. Most createdmaterials are used during a summer internship when teams are tasked to identify problems andwrite cogent needs statements. To date, feedback has been positive, especially on the exerciseswhere students practice observing and interviewing to identify unmet needs.IntroductionAs discussed by Howe and Goldberg, design-focused education can cover topics ranging fromproject management, design constraints and requirements, prototyping, search for prior art, andidentification of customer needs [1
efficacy of content screening methods, and concerns aboutacademic integrity. This paper also provides essential firsthand information for the forthcoming research onacademic strategies and countermeasures.This study includes a survey distributed to 110 students from two writing-intensive courses in theDepartment of Construction Management at East Carolina University. The aim is to assess their use ofChatGPT and their ability to screen AI generated content. The results validate concerns about thereliability of information extracted by ChatGPT, noting a considerable number of inaccuracies. Theresearch also points out the difficulty in recognizing AI-generated texts in construction writing,emphasizing the urgent need for detailed guidelines on the
Family Studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her prior work experiences include product management, consulting, tutoring, marketing, and information technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work-in-Progress: Updated Progress towards Understanding Perspectives among Neurodiverse Undergraduate Researchers in STEMAbstractIn this work-in-progress research paper, we update the community on the assessment tool wehave been developing to assess Thriving in STEM undergraduate researchers acrossneurodiversity. Neurodivergent students are often marginalized and stigmatized to the point offeeling pressure to "normalize" or "camouflage" their behavior to appear
semester typically encourages students to seek out advice atthat time. Some students will also find themselves on academic probation at the end of asemester and will need to formally meet with an advisor to come up with a plan to return to asuccessful trajectory. Motivational tools in cases like these are to discuss other students whohave found themselves in academic distress who then went on to become successful in theirendeavors. Exploratory activities may include finding the right expertise on campus to helpstudents move past problems include seeing a psychological counselor, meeting with legal staff,or seeing evaluators for assessment of learning disabilities that may have emerged over time.Advising activities designed to foster self
motion, a topic known as wearability18. Anotherresearch team developed a collaborative role playing design game for concept generation andenhancement of portability17. The article demonstrates the method on design of a communicationdevice. A third research team has undertaken to assess the portability of components during themanufacturing process20,22. There are also a number of articles, relating to the design andimplementation of inflatable structures29-37. A large body of this research is spawned from thescience and engineering revolving around the recent development of deployable spacestructures29-35. Such space structures include inflatable antennas, re-entry cushions, domiciles,and satellites. The relevant articles are related to
describesone of these interdisciplinary freshman projects. The project, known as Analytical andExperimental Evaluation of a SMARTBEAM, combines elements of civil, mechanical andelectrical engineering in the study of flexural behavior of expanded wide flange steel beamsknown as cellular beams. The project combines finite element analysis, flexural stress concepts,strain gauge instrumentation and experimental investigation into a unified experience. Detailsrelated to course development and structure, lecture content, method of delivery, outcomes, andlearning assessment are presented.1. IntroductionEngineering analysis, design and research investigation must rely on theory, computationalanalysis and experimental evaluation. In order to effectively
regress in their conceptual understanding, regardlessof their academic performance within the class.1 Students frequently fail to understand how toapply mathematical concepts to real problems.Within mechanical engineering curriculum, heat transfer is considered a notoriously difficultcourse for students.2,3 Concept inventories have been developed to assess students’ level ofconceptual understanding; reported student scores on these inventories have been quite low, withaverage performance in the range of 50%.2,4 The incorporation of active learning approacheswithin classes and programs have been shown to increase conceptual understanding of corecontent,5 but are infrequently utilized in core content engineering courses such as those in thethermal
AC 2010-1897: DESIGNING SUCCESSFUL DESIGN PROJECTSAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State University Page 15.371.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Designing Successful Design ProjectsAbstractThe importance of design is increasing in undergraduate engineering programs. Design is seenby proponents as a vital element of learning engineering. Compared to courses which focus onengineering analysis, design courses emphasize application of a broad spectrum of knowledge innarrow contexts. The importance of design courses is magnified by their impact on students andtheir disproportionate importance for assessment and accreditation. One element of designcourses
-learning projects, yet wefound that many students did not see how their projects were related to them and in some casesengineering more broadly without some reflection. The second reason reflection is so critical isthat students exposed to genuine community needs and issues do not always understand theissues and need assistance in processing their experiences. Participants can have theirstereotypes actually reinforced rather than challenged. For example, one young man, during theseminar pilots, participated in assessments of substandard housing. He stated that what he hadlearned from the experience was that he was glad he would be an engineer who could live in thesuburbs where housing is not an issue. This was clearly not what we had intended for
introduced for the Spring Term of 2005. In addition, the author willprovide an assessment of learning outcomes as well as student attitudes toward the procedure andperceived value of “peer review” as a learning tool. The author found that after two semesters ofusing Peer Review 56% of the students indicated that peer review had a positive effect on theirlearning and another 28% provided a response that indicated that it was only the mechanics ofthe process used that limited their success; largely due to their peers not being able to provide atimely review. When asked if they would use peer review for other assignments (when notrequired), 61% indicate they would and another 22% said they would some of the time, only17% indicated they would not. In
why knowledge is alwaysimprovable – never final. Page 10.873.1 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Despite the importance of scientific thinking, it continues to be an elusive educational goal.Many students, even advanced students, do not grasp how scientific theories arise and themanner in which evidence is used to support or call those theories into question. Experts such asBarr [5], Scharmann [6], and Kracjik [7] and most assessments agree that students tend to viewscience as a
why knowledge is alwaysimprovable – never final. Page 10.874.1 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Despite the importance of scientific thinking, it continues to be an elusive educational goal.Many students, even advanced students, do not grasp how scientific theories arise and themanner in which evidence is used to support or call those theories into question. Experts such asBarr [5], Scharmann [6], and Kracjik [7] and most assessments agree that students tend to viewscience as a
completed anexperiment to measure the effects of personality type on engineering students’ academicperformance. Felder purposefully modified his instructional approach in a five course series tofavor learning styles that are typically neglected in a formal lecture. For this study, Felderapplied the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality assessment and required all Page 10.1165.8participating students to complete the Myers-Brigg test. Within the Myers-Briggs “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition” Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering
, sampling andanalog to digital conversion. 2. Reverse Engineering of Automated Blood Pressure Monitor – (Freshman Clinic II): Alsocommon to all engineering students, this class introduces engineering devices and mechanismsthrough reverse engineering20. Students reverse engineer and comparatively assess competingautomated blood pressure monitors. They learn how various components work individually aswell as how they are integrated to work together. These components include pressure sensor andtransducer, liquid crystal display, microprocessor, inflating pump motor, and the solenoid valve.Engineering topics that are introduced include basic circuit concepts, total cost of ownershipthrough power consumption analysis, pressure sensors, motor
Session 3430 An Empirical Study of Student Interaction with CD-based Multimedia Courseware W. Burleson, W. Cooper, J. Kurose, S. Thampuran, K. Watts Department of Computer Science / Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Massachusetts AmherstAbstractThe CD-MANIC project is developing a multimedia courseware system that combines the use ofCDs for bandwidth-intensive content with periodic Internet connections for updates, logging,assessment and access to Internet resources. Class materials distributed by CD include asemester's worth of lectures (recorded
calculations, and the professional results theyachieved. Since the pilot course, students have been encouraged to use an electronic spreadsheetto prepare laboratory reports, which include tables for data and calculated values and incorporategraphs when appropriate. Text boxes are used for the written portions of the reports.In addition to laboratory reports, I used quizzes to reinforce some of the concepts of individuallab exercises and tests–including the final examination–to measure student progress. Blackboardoffers a number of ways to assess student performance, one of which is a quiz or test. Questionscan be anything from multiple choice or fill-in-the-blank to open-ended responses by thestudents. The former can be machine graded, while the
Likert-type and open responsequestions. Many students responded to some, but not all, of the open-ended questions. Abreakdown of the students who completed the survey and who responded to at least some of theopen-ended questions can be found in Table 1. Table 1. Student Sample Course Total Female Male BR200 15 7 8 ES220 19 6 132.2 Survey and AnalysisThe pilot survey was adapted from two previously-vetted instruments, using 28 Likert-type itemsfrom the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment (EPRA) tool [35] and 23 Likert-type items from an
principles for teaching technical material. Guidedself-assessment in both courses is fundamental to building students' capacities forcontinued independent improvement.At USC, these elective courses have been positively received in the past two decadesof their offering, garnering extremely high ratings in student evaluations. Students,however, have also indicated that they need additional communications support thatthey can access outside of the time limits of the formal courses and that extendsthroughout their years of graduate school [1]. In fact students often time theirenrollment in these courses to match with submission deadlines so that they canreceive instructor assistance. In response, the Hub was created to provide suchsupport. Despite some
overview of this course is presented Table 2. In this course we purposefully cover avariety of applications and math with the intent of keeping the interest-level high, while alsoallowing a variety of mathematics topics to be encountered. Application areas include civilengineering, blood/fluid flow, education (grading, assessment/evaluation and educationresearch), genetics, electronics, finance (time value of money), measurement, mechanics,ballistics/dynamics, biology, and chemistry. Math/quantitative topics covered include large &small numbers, trigonometry, units analysis, probability & statistics, structured programming(Excel), rates-of-change and exponential functions. A substantial amount of time is spent onlearning Excel since this
electronics, power systems, communication, control and power electronics, electric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods and data analysis, space and atmosphere physics, and physics. His research interests included power system stabil- ity, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, power electronics and electric machines for wind energy conversion, radar and remote sensing, wave and turbulence simu- lation, measurement and modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published several papers in referred journals and in conference pro- ceedings in his areas of the research interests
-basedrobotic/mechatronic design projects. We expect that the integrated laboratory experiences in ourfirst-year mechanical engineering classes will improve the students’ understanding and retentionof fundamental engineering principles through the coupling of hands-on laboratory learning withdesign-based learning. We will assess this outcome by comparing final exam scores acrosssemesters (i.e., before and after the curricular changes). We also anticipate increased studentretention, which will be assessed by tracking which students eventually register for theMechatronics course in the junior year of the program.1. IntroductionOur overall curriculum has a very strong “hands-on” component at all levels with semester-longdesign projects in both semesters