Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE), an accurate and validatedtool that measures engineering self-efficacy.In regard to student preferences and interests, Arcidiacono determined that the choices of aparticular major are not closely associated with the ability of a particular student, but align morewith the interests of the student. The majors studied were aggregated fields holding dozens ofmajors. The National Longitudinal Study (NLS72), analyzed by Arcidiacono, only includesnatural science as a major while today this might be further broken down into natural and appliedscience or even further into the constituent fields that make up this über-major.10 Although thedata analyzed were collected in 1972-1986, this study provides
some cases the opinions for areas of improvement differed, and that is noted in the description of the tip or trick. Tips and tricks focus on program planning (9.19.3), program implementation (9.49.6), and program assessment (9.7). 9.1 Start Planning Early Both programs suggested that early planning (about two months before the event date) was necessary for a successful program. By contacting people early to start scheduling speakers, tours, and presentations, the facilitator was able to prevent scheduling conflicts with other camps and missed opportunities. ● Contact [the person in charge of making the camp happen] early.(UNIV) ● Start contacting department heads before the end of the school year. They tend to go on
‘learn by doing’ philosophy. Students in the Cal Poly Pomonaengineering program receive both technical and practical skills to prepare them for the engineeringworkforce. Small class sizes and the integration of a multitude of labs in the engineering curriculumprovide for a robust experience for the student in preparation for a career as an engineer. The student-centered philosophy of the institution supports student involvement and programmatic efforts thatincrease student success and learning. The College of Engineering is the largest college at Cal PolyPomona serving approximately 5,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The student populationconsists of a large number of first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented racial minorities
provide additional academic assistance, as needed, with year-round/start-to-finish program support from academic success mentors to help ensure degreecompletion. Students veterans are matched with advisors who have experience working withveterans; tailored academic advising has been provided to forty veteran and active duty studentsduring Fall 2015 through the program. (4) Partnering with the Navy and the naval engineering community to facilitatestudent career placement in the Navy STEM workforce. Assist students to start their newcareers in Engineering and Technology through directed mentorship. The large community ofNavy partners can encourage veterans to pursue their interests, work to their potential, enhancetheir abilities, and help
Design Experiences with a Student Satellite Program J.C. LaCombe, E.L. Wang, M. Nicolescu, P. Rivera, and B. Poe University of Nevada, RenoAbstractThe NevadaSat program began in 2002, and is an ongoing, multi-faceted program, providingstudents with high-impact exposure to the aerospace fields. The program includes activities inscientific ballooning, rocketry, and robotics. These are conducted for their own merits, but eachprogram also moves us closer to our long-range goal of producing and operating a studentsatellite in Earth orbit, for the purpose of preparing students for the aerospace-industryworkforce.The student experience is largely based in design projects, and design
performance.Thus, the concept of over 90% of the freshman class believing they are failing is supported bythe student responses. The positive result is the students felt our intervention programs arehaving a large impact on helping the students. In fact if you ignore the Academic issues andonly analyze the Family and Personal issues, for these two years, 93% and 89% of the studentsstated they had issues with at least one of these transition areas. Page 15.343.9 TABLE 4STUDENTS THAT EXPERIENCED PROBLEMS AND THE MENTORS HELPED WITH THE SOLUTIONAcademic
University of Arkansas and New Mexico State University. Page 12.1019.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Lessons Learned: Our First Engineering Study Abroad Program in IndiaAbstractThe outsourcing of engineering work overseas is dramatically increasing, especially to India.U.S. universities are also experiencing large increases in graduate students from India. Manyengineering graduates will eventually manage, work with, or work for people in/from India.The University of Arkansas, College of Engineering created the Engineering Study Abroad inIndia Program beginning summer 2006
, approximately 30 percent of the senior mechanical engineering classopted for the interdisciplinary project instead of the departmental program. This raised a concernwhether the interdisciplinary class was viewed as “an easier option” or if the draw was therelevance of the project. A comparison of the term reports suggested that the courses arecomparable in rigor but very different in content. The interdisciplinary course required far morecoordination and planning and less detailed design. The assessment of content is continuing.Funding the field trips is a continuing issue. The transit field trips were funded by adiscretionary fund available to the course professor. The gas field trip was funded by theUniversity of Wyoming, School of Energy Resources
Paper ID #36735Reinforcing Design Intent with a Computer GradingProgramSteven Joseph Kirstukas (Professor) Steve Kirstukas is a Professor at CCSU, where he teaches courses in solid modeling, MATLAB programming, and engineering mechanics. He is exploring the use of computer-aided assessment of CAD files to give consistent, accurate, and quick feedback to students so that they can design parts and assemblies that incorporate design intent. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reinforcing Design Intent with a
articlesummarizing the impact of ChatGPT on a variety of engineering assessments, the authorsconcluded that introductory-level programming assessments can be very accurately solved byChatGPT, and that instructors must add complex features to their assessments to deter studentcheating [7].However, there is no published research on the usage of generative AI to offer customizedquestion banks and explanations of course concepts based only on course materials, for anintroductory computing course, within the learning management system, thereby providing apersonalized learning experience tailored to each student’s needs. The primary innovation in ourstudy lies in ensuring that the generated questions remain entirely focused on the course content,strictly avoiding
sociotechnicalframeworks to inform their design decisions and processes, they can assess multiple aspects ofengineering challenges beyond just the technical and quantitative. While these questions weredeveloped for the content of UVA's FYE program, they could be adapted to the needs of otherinstitutions.Introduction and BackgroundIn recent years, sociotechnical knowledge has become an increasingly prominent area of study inthe engineering education community [1], [2]. Twenty years ago, the National Academy ofEngineers [3] laid out a plan for what the “Engineer of 2020” would be defined by: leadership inmoving the world forward in an ethical, sustainable manner. However, as a more recent surveydemonstrated, ethical and sociotechnical considerations have remained
with faculty,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 47, no. 4, 2018.[12] R. Nazempour, H. Darabi, P. C. Nelson, R. A. Revelo, Y. Siow, and J. Abiade, “Execution details and assessment results of a summer bridge program for engineering freshmen,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[13] C. Greer, C. Chi, and N. Hylton-Patterson, “An empirical evaluation of a summer bridge program on college graduation at a small liberal arts college,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, p. 1521025120960035, 2020.[14] K. Schubert, X. D. Solorzano, L. Massey, C. Gattis, J. Popp, C. Cao, T. Carter, and D. Muralidhara, “A successful 2-week innovation- and student success-focused
their understanding so that they maintain control, creativity, anddecision-making agency within the engineering design process. This activity fills that need byproviding a guided, hands-on experience where students leverage AI to help brainstorm, generateideas, and iterate on design choices, all while focusing on client needs and preferences.Further, accessing real-world clients in the first-year can be difficult, especially with constrainedresources and scaling client-interactions to large numbers of students. Generative AI provides anopportunity for students, early in their engineering education, to practice the steps of conductingclient interviews and incorporating client feedback into their engineering designs. Doing sowithin the context of
AC 2011-36: STRENGTHENING THE STEM PIPELINE THROUGH ANINTENSIVE REVIEW PROGRAM FOR MATH PLACEMENT TESTINGAmelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of engineering and mathematics at Canada College. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other under- represented groups in mathematics, science and engineering. Page 22.1328.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Strengthening
course.Many institutions of higher learning have a standard multi-course sequence that covers thefundamentals of computer science/programming. The general introductory course is usuallyreferred to as “CS1” in the literature; the second course usually covers data structures and isreferred to as “CS2” in the literature.A large CS2 course at the University of Michigan has four options for a student to meet the CS1prerequisite: credit for a college-level CS1 course at the home institution, transfer credit for acollege-level CS1 course at different institution, a diagnostic test for competency, and AP credit(score of 5) for placing out of the CS1 course prerequisite requirement. These prerequisiteoptions can represent four fundamentally different paths
and the general evaluation assessments,an evidence-based research study is yet to be conducted to investigate student experiencessystematically. Therefore, we initiated a long-term study to qualitatively analyze students'experiences using the construct of engineering self-efficacy by asking: What are the students’perceived engineering self-efficacy beliefs as a result of participating in Take Responsibilityto Understand Engineering (TRUE) projects? We present our ongoing efforts in this long-term study as a work-in-progress to highlight initial findings from a small sample size (3interviews) to gather critical review and feedback from the field of engineering education.We begin by reviewing relevant literature on capstone design programs in
programming for these assignments, as describedpreviously. Instead, our emphasis is on using the simulation, interpreting the results, andcommunicating the conclusions. This is likely to be more appealing to students in non-engineering majors, so this also supports the “engineering for everyone” goal of the class.We have not yet undertaken a formal assessment of how the class is achieving its objectives.However, we have some indirect measures that demonstrate that the class is appealing to bothengineering and non-engineering students. For example, interest in the class is high and there is await list to get into the class each semester. We initially offered only 1 section per year of theclass and we have increased that to three sections, which
about their DYP process experience, as well ascollection of more data sets [9-10]. References[1] Landis, R.B., Mott, J., and Peuker, S. “Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a RewardingCareer.” Discovery Press. Los Angeles. 2013.[2] National Academy of Engineering. “Grand Challenges - 14 Grand Challenges forEngineering.” http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx.[3] Peuker, S. "Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: A Four-YearLongitudinal Assessment of the DYP Program," American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference. 2017.[4] van der Meer, J., Jansen, E., and Torenbeek, M.. "‘It’s Almost a Mindset that Teachers Needto Change’: First‐Year Students’ Need to
letting students take 3 1CR seminarsFocus on imparting success strategies to studentsResolve classroom shortages and keep small class sizeReferences[1] C. J. Maker, “Identifying Exceptional Talent in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Increasing Diversity and Assessing Creative Problem-Solving,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 161–210, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1932202X20918203.[2] G. Ragusa, E. L. Allen, and G. B. Menezes, “Impacts Resulting from a Large-Scale First- Year Engineering and Computer Science Program on Students’ Successful Persistence Toward Degree Completion,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Conference: American Society for Engineering
Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She is also the Director for the Engineering Plus program, which is in the process of being renamed to Integrated Design Engineering. Bielefeldt also serves as the co-director for the Engineering Education and AI-Augmented Learning Integrated Research Theme (IRT) at CU. She has been a faculty member at CU since 1996, serving in various roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018
, surveys from the firstyear did not include questions concerning RAMP-UP’s impact on the fellows’ career plans. Thefellows’ responses to open-ended questions on these surveys indicated an unanticipatedinfluence. To capture this and other unforeseen results, we adapted the survey questions. Thesechanges are reflected in variations in question content, structure, and rating scale. This paperfocuses on the development of the fellows as quantified by pre- and post-surveys; through theuse of these surveys, we quantify and support our claims as well as those of previous research.Due to the inclusion of undergraduates and to the growth of the program over the first threeyears, the RAMP-UP sample size is quite large compared to currently published work
toprovide further insight into how to effectively design and deploy EC in introductory engineeringcourses.A survey, consisting of a mix of five-point Likert items and short answer questions, wasdistributed to a large introductory electrical and computer engineering course across twosemesters gaining 105 responses. The Likert questions related to: 1) students’ motivations forcompleting the extra credit, 2) perceived learning gains from extra credit opportunities, 3) interestgenerated in the topics EC assignments covered, and 4) the relationship between anxiety and thepresence of EC in the course. Survey responses for a set of short answer questions were analyzedwith multiple rounds of inductive coding. In cases where a large number of related
individualorganizations. The survivors will be determined by which supply chain you belong to.” Aseducators in the Industrial Distribution Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&MUniversity the authors of this paper have discovered that information gained from readingassignments, and listening to lectures, and problem solving activities creates awareness, but oftenfalls short of helping students to fully understand the importance of relationships among memberof supply chains.Buck Institute for Education (BIE) defines project-based learning as “a systematic teachingmethod that engages students in learning knowledge and skills through an extended inquiryprocess structured around complex, authentic questions and carefully designed products andtasks
for Engineering Education. She has presented at local and national conferences, most recently on topics related to assessment and STEM graduate programming and outreach. Her research interests include as- sessment, scholarly communications, graduate student outreach, instruction, and emerging technologies.Alex Vincent Jannini, Syracuse University Alex Jannini is a fourth-year PhD student at Syracuse University in the Biomedical and Chemical En- gineering Department. His current research consists of developing tough and elastic double network hydrogels that have adhesive, self-healing, and biomimetic properties. His Master’s research focused on implementing pharmaceutical engineering concepts into lab-based
presentations. His publication record includes articles related to academic program development and assessment of academic programs. Dr. Latif was the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Technology.Mr. Aco Sikoski, Ivy Tech Community College Mr. Sikoski completed his Bachelors of Science in Electrical Engineering at the University of Kiril I Metodi in Skopje, Macedonia. He continued his education at Purdue University where he obtained his Masters of Science in Engineering. Intermittently, Mr. Sikoski has consulted for various institutions and organizations. In 1997, he started his career at Ivy Tech Community College where he has stayed until present. He served as a professor, program chair, dean, and the campus
dedication to both his profession and his community makes him a respected and valued member of Greenville University.Prof. Natalie Schleper, Saint Louis University Natalie Schleper is an instructor in the Department of Chemistry at Saint Louis University. She holds both a B.S. and an M.S. in Chemistry from Southern Illinois University Edwardsville and researched student misconceptions and their effects on student understanding of chemistry. Natalie is dedicated to fostering a deep understanding of chemistry among her students. At SLU, Natalie is known for managing large class sizes averaging between 600-800 students per semester. She has taught various classes such as Fundamentals of Chemistry lecture, General Chemistry 1
working as an Assistant Professor. His research interests are engineering education, and in the area of optics; he specializes in developing optical fiber-based sensors for monitoring harsh environments.Dr. Irene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. She has experience teaching programming, design, entrepreneurship, and sustainability topics, and is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the University of Pittsburgh. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: A Comprehensive Study on The Effect of Diversity Composition on Engineering Teams
E. Toubassi, "A mathematics placement and advising program," in B. Gold, S. Keith, and W. Marion (Eds.), Assessment practices in undergraduate mathematics, Washington,DC, Mathematics Association of America, 1999, pp. 181-183.[2] J. Cederberg, "Administering a placement test: St. Olaf College," in B. Gold, S. Keith, and W. Marion (Eds.), Assessment practices in undergraduate mathematics, Washington,DC, Mathematics Association of America, 1999, pp. 178-180.[3] S. Britton, D. Daners and M. Stewart, "A self-assessment test for incoming students," International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 861-868, Oct. 2007.[4] M. Lucas and N. McCormick, "Redesigning mathematics curriculum for
lack thereof, on student expectations and mindset.Finally, the research team will explore the correlations between responses at the student level, todetermine if there are patterns. If patterns are found, the team will develop “personas” ofstudents to describe the types of students enrolling in engineering at the university, as well as thedistribution of these personas. Such work would not only inform the structuring of the first-yearengineering experience but would also be of interest to the wider college of engineering.These results will be combined with other data to assess the initial impact of this program,informing future refinements. Regardless, the instructors will continue this activity both to get aglimpse into their students
-efficacy orself-confidence, inadequate high school preparation, failure of engineering course material tocapture student interest, and obstacles students may encounter related to gender, race, orethnicity. More recently, Seymour and Hunter led an updated comprehensive investigation ofstudent attraction to and retention in STEM, with data collection spanning large researchinstitutions to small liberal arts colleges over the 5-year period from 2012-2017 [10]. This workis a follow-up study to Seymour and Hewitt [7] cited above. The updated findings showed thatwhile many driving forces of attrition noted in the earlier 1997 study remain in effect, markedchanges were noted in other factors including a large upward shift in students’ negative reactionto