their course content, they are less aware of effectiveteaching practices. This weakness was particularly detrimental to our large enrollment gatewaycourses, undermining student persistence and subsequent academic success. Consequently, inaddition to providing funding, the SIIP initiative attempted to provide on the fly faculty andcommunity development. In this paper, we will discuss our observations and reflections onsuccessful and halted reforms and will describe modifications to our approach to administratingand leading this pedagogical change effort.IntroductionIn February 2012, the College of Engineering (COE) allocated an unprecedented level of fundingto solicit proposals for the Strategic Instructional Initiatives Program (SIIP) – a new
implementationof in-house system that maintained internally. The advantage of the second approach is that thecloud service provider provides the required support to maintain the big-data system in additionto provide new services as they evolve. However, the disadvantage of this approach is its highcost and the obligation to renew the system cloud resources on fixed (e.g. annual) basis.3.3 Analytics ToolsThe last component of the integrated lab environment is the analytics component. Regarding thiscomponent the challenge mainly found in the integration of the big-data repository and theanalytics tool. Two main analytic tools were tested within this lab environment, the first tool isR® (The R project for statistical computing) and the second tool is the SAS
design tasks were performed through manual calculations by followingtraditional lecture notes. The conceptual design was followed by more sophisticated three-dimensional design tasks using computer-aided techniques. Finally, the students were assessedcontinuously with respect to their technical contribution, working techniques and interactionwith their peer group at national and international level. They were also probed regarding theiropinion on various aspects of the project using interviews and forms. These surveys have beenevaluated together with the opinion of the academic staff in order to form future directions. For the planning the students had to consider the engine as a whole before distributing the tasksindividually. This enabled
, he and colleagues at Project Zero have been working on the design ofperformance-based assessments, education for understanding, and the use of multipleintelligences to achieve more personalized curriculum, instruction, and assessment.(http://www.pz.harvard.edu/PIs/HG.htm)Principles of Good PracticeGardner’s seven principles help in developing Intellectual Curiosity in any given group ofindividuals. It is important to recognize that some learners may be curious to learn whenthey ‘see’ something interesting (Narayanan, 2007). Some others may be inclined todevelop curiosity when the ‘read’ about a new subject matter. Gardner suggests thatone should consider all the types of ‘intelligence’ if one wants to observe an individual’spotential
executable file also suffers from platform dependencies; in addition, there isan element of risk associated with running this type of file on one’s own computer as the codecould contain a virus.Java Applets and Interactive Portfolios The Java programming language provides a new design paradigm for programmers: writeonce, run anywhere. This object-oriented language was designed to maximize portability byspecifically defining many of the details of the language for all implementations, from the sourcecode all the way down to the byte code for the abstract machine language into which Java code istranslated2. Java programs can be executed on any platform that has a Java Virtual Enginewritten for it; this engine is usually incorporated into all
international research team, I had the opportunity to work with senior leaders at Nazerbayev Univer- sity, KIMEP University and Kasipkor, a holding company establishing 2 new colleges (Astana) and 4 interregional centers (Atyrau, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Ekibstuz and Shymkent). My research team Technical Vocational Education Training (TVET) focused on examining the technical education system that is seen as a catalyst for the country’s ambition to be an international leader in the emerging green economy. My doctoral research explores the similarities and differences of physical and virtual place making, and the extent to which the approach may impact the learning experience for students and/or the shape of online learning spaces in
teachers. Over 700 teachers from schoolsalong the Interstate 4 Corridor that runs from Tampa on the west coast through Orlando toDaytona Beach on the east coast have attended the camp. The two-day camp has a basicschedule that allows for variations to fit the local community where it is offered. The intendedaudience is primarily high school mathematics, science, computer science and technology teachersand curriculum specialists. The overarching goal of the event is to provide the teacher withinformation about the electronic microchip industry from the background science, themanufacturing or fabrication processes, employee qualifications for technical staff includingtechnicians, operators, engineers, etc., and career opportunities and business
funded by the National Science Foundation Combined Research- Curriculum Development program (CRCD) aimed at producing instructional lab modules for new and emerging techniques in robotic vision. VVL uses an integrated multi-media presentation format that allows the student to learn about robot vision techniques from textual sources, runtime algorithm codes, live and canned digital imagery, interactive modification of program parameters and insertion of student developed code for certain parts of the tutorial. It aims to translate a research paper in robot vision into a usable and understandable laboratory exercise that highlights the important aspects of the research in a realistic environment that combines both simulated virtual
Paper ID #31526The CAHSI INCLUDES Alliance: Realizing Collective ImpactDr. Elsa Q. Villa, University of Texas at El Paso Elsa Q. Villa, Ph.D., is a research assistant professor at The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) in the College of Education, and is Director of the Center for Education Research and Policy Studies (CERPS). Dr. Villa received her doctoral degree in curriculum and instruction from New Mexico State University; she received a Master of Science degree in Computer Science and a Master of Arts in Education from UTEP. She has led and co-led numerous grants from corporate foundations and state and
one of the main challenges for studentspursuing Mechanical or Civil Engineering Degrees at our Institution. Historically, there has beenresistance by Faculty to deliver this course online due to the idea that in face-to-face courses, theinstructor has more tools to teach the challenging concepts. With the new and emergingtechnologies, communication networks and powerful computers, the concept of distance learninghas evolved and redefined the learning process [1] .The Dynamics course is taught by the Mechanical Engineering Department, represents a maincourse for the Mechanical Engineering curriculum and is a service course for the CivilEngineering Department and the Electrical Engineering Department. This course is taken yearlyby more than 400
PLM. Dr. Miller has presented over fifty papers at professional conferences in North America and Australia. He has been a co-author for the McGraw-Hill Graphics Series and has authored papers in journals on engineering and technical graphics curriculum development and implementation, CAD, PDM, PLM, instructional systems design and training, interactive multimedia, and visualization research. Page 13.236.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Assessment of a Blended Product Lifecycle Management Course Utilizing Online and Face-to-Face Delivery
students areforced to identify the appropriate stakeholders, interview these stakeholders, and analyze theproblem from the stakeholders’ points of view. Another approach was taken by Korach andGargac [8] where they re-vamped first-year curriculum by incorporating active learning exercisesinto the existing curriculum. Korach and Gargac [8] found that both instructors and studentsbenefited from the addition of entrepreneurial mindset activities. Instructors found the activitiesbetter engaged students in the course and generated excitement around the engineering field whilethe students developed beneficial skills for a successful career. There is no one size-fits allapproach to re-vamping and incorporating innovative thinking into curricula, but the
-ware testing techniques and tool support, in both university and industrial settings. They list thedifferences encountered between teaching undergraduate students and training software profes-sionals from industry.Another teaching experience is presented by Harrison7, where undergraduate students are con-fronted with software testing from two complementary viewpoints: as developers and as inde-pendent testers. A project is developed in which students have to play both roles.Chen, Zhang and Luo3 proposed a new teaching approach for software testing based on diversityprinciples, where different behaviors of the software are exercised as far as possible. This ap-proach was used in an advanced undergraduate course on software testing.The use test
of open-ended lab experiences and contributes to thegrowing conversation on innovative engineering education strategies by demonstrating the valueof experiential learning approaches, particularly the integration of entrepreneurial mindsetlearning (EML) into laboratory experiences.Why open-ended labs?The decision to introduce open-ended labs into our curriculum was inspired by the insightsgained from the Summer 2024 Engineering Mechanics in Lab and Design workshop series,hosted by the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and supported by the Kern FamilyFoundation. During this workshop, we had the opportunity to explore in more depth the conceptof open-ended labs, engaging with experts and educators who have successfully implementedsuch
specifically designed for use in the classroom, with special emphasis on exposingstudents to critical foundational components of Computer Engineering curriculum.3. Transforming CBS: The ApproachWhile the questions listed in Section 1 are the driving force behind course content, the pedagogyand delivery of the course is driven by research on how people learn. Figure 1 shows a pictorialview of the overall process. The approach was guided by the instructor‟s experience, variousnational and regional workshops on effective teaching including the National Effective TeachingInstitute (NETI)[16] and OSU‟s Institute for Teaching and Learning Expertise (ITLE)[17]. It wasalso driven by inputs from faculty in the college of education who are co-PI‟s on the grant
Session 2313 A Portfolio-Based Assessment Program Barbara M. Olds and Michael J. Pavelich Colorado School of Mines Introduction In this paper we describe the process, successes, and pitfalls of the decade-old portfolioassessment program at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). We will also discuss how we anticipatebuilding a new version of the assessment program into our current campus-wide curriculum reformefforts. CSM has agreed on its overall educational goals and has articulated them in a Profile of theCSM
such asenvironmental monitoring, quality assurance, energy efficiency, food safety, and homelandsecurity. Therefore, there is much incentive to integrate these new digital imaging technologiesin modes and formats to gain quantitative data such as chemical detection in the engineeringcurricula, and also to leverage their affordability and power for sustainable STEM education.This paper provides a survey of various imaging modalities, especially those suitable forundergraduate laboratories and projects, that have been developed over the past decade. Much ofthis work has been reported in the chemistry education literature, and may not have gainedsufficient attention for engineering education, or may sometimes be dismissed by
industry, a Master’s degree in post-secondary and adult education, and over fourteen years’ experience in curriculum development and delivery. He applies his education and experiences to his posi- tion as a Technical Trainer II at the Alamo Colleges District in San Antonio, Texas where he is responsible for assessing the needs of the academic community and the manufacturing partners and developing and delivering competency-based training around those needs. He is also working with AMTEC and Purdue University as a Subject Matter Expert, advising on educational and technical materials in the creation of a virtual troubleshooting simulation program. c American Society for Engineering Education
, there is a concomitant needfor changes in design and manufacturing pedagogy. It is important for engineering education to have the multi-and cross-disciplinary approaches expected of practicing engineers. Design education needs a perspective ofproduction-related topics while manufacturing education needs an emphasis on manufacturing response todesign changes. The Design & Manufacturing course introduced at R.P.I. in Spring 1995 combined elements of bothdesign and manufacturing education in a new way. This upper-class Mechanical Engineering course gives avertical exposure to elements of the design-to-production process. It gives the opportunity to combine and applymaterial from engineering science courses to working a unified set of
difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies-new edition. 2008: Princeton University Press.5. Kets, W. and A.J. Sandroni, Challenging conformity: A case for diversity. 2016.6. National Center for Science and Engineering Statisitics, National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. 2019: Alexandria, VA.7. National Academy of Sciences, et al., Expanding Underrepreseted Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline. 2011, National Academy Press.8. Roy, J
prepare parts to be machined in a lathe machine and then in a millingmachine. Students will have better understanding of the complete process tomanufacture parts.4.3 ROB 270: Robotics Systems Engineering.The class is systems engineering for variable sequence, playback, numericalcontrol, and intelligent industrial robots. The students examine economicjustifications, applications, safety, maintenance, and programming. Theyexperience a hands-on approach to programming the individual educational andindustrial robots in the current laboratory. In the innovative laboratory exercises:(1) Robotic Programming. These laboratory exercises introduce variousprogramming and playback systems available with current industrial robots in thelaboratory
survey data on the effectiveness of the module is alsopresented.I. IntroductionHands-on laboratories have been an integral part of the engineering curriculum since itsinception1. Their importance has been recognized by the Accreditation Board of EngineeringEducation (ABET) and its predecessors by creating criteria requiring adequate laboratorypractice for students2-6. During the last three decades, engineering laboratories have becomemore complex, including simulation tools and computer-controlled test and measurementequipment7-8. This increased sophistication has also led to more expensive equipment. Theinclusion of such laboratory courses in the undergraduate curriculum is challenging due to thelarge number of students and the increased demand
departmental unitto assemble the expertise necessary to offer an integrated curriculum, interdepartmentalcooperation in the development of fuel cell related courses and curricula is beneficial. At ASU,the introductory fuel cell course is taught by a team of three faculty made up of an electricalengineer, an electrochemist, and a mechanical engineer.10 Each faculty member teaches thematerial appropriate to their background. The goal of this course is to provide technically maturestudents with broad based understanding of fuel cell physics and technology at an introductorylevel.The philosophy of the ASU programs is based on the recognition that fuel cell technology will bedeveloped by teams of experts, and that few individuals will attain a depth of
ones strengths and weaknesses, makethose known to the group, and choose tasks accordingly. As some people have a greaterknowledge in one technical area than another it is important to recognize and apply thatstrength to maximize the student potential. The PASSat project also required that those involved become much moreproficient in certain technical areas. Within the aerospace group, numerous otherdisciplines were consulted as the knowledge required extended well beyond anyundergraduate aerospace engineering curriculum. Concepts from not only aerospace butelectrical, materials, mechanical and software engineering as well as computer sciencewere employed which required a significant amount of research and study. Overall, the
level. These teaching experiences require novel approaches to conveying knowledge to students, thereby encouraging creativity in a Fellow’s own research objectives.• Academic Efficiency: A graduate student’s skill at time management strengthens through Page 9.980.15 time spent with students - both inside and outside of the classroom. Most graduate Fellows Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering
curriculum for teaching an introductory course on data science in flipped classroom format. An earlier grant dealt with designing the aforementioned visualization software. He has taught various courses in the computer science curriculum, including one that he developed and im- plemented called ”Databases for Many Majors.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Formative Self-Assessment for Customizable Database Visualizations: Checkpoints for LearningAbstractA formative self-assessment opportunity has been added to database visualizations, which aredesigned to introduce students of many majors to fundamental database concepts. Instructors cancustomize the example and
the research gap. We conceptualize it as students' overt behavior,not limited to the use of technology in the classroom, and how it is associated with instructional Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of North Texas, Denton, TX Copyright 2023, American Society for Engineering Education 5activity types used for students' cognitive engagement based on the ICAP framework. Research DesignWe designed a correlational study, where data were collected using quantitative approaches andanalyzed using machine learning algorithms.ParticipantsThe data
curriculum delivery modes by engineering and technology educators.Promising strides continue to be made by innovative educators to mitigate the silo effects. The verynature of information exchange today presents fundamental challenges and, based on one's point ofview, opportunities. As business and industry assimilate IT tools to enhance digital globalizationthe factory-silo model loses its relevance and is not flexible enough to accommodate innovations ina timely fashion. Increasingly, IT is used to define next generation manufacturing where worldclass firms do a better job of engaging groups outside the firm. Another emerging issue is thatstudents have access to a computer in their cell-phones. These students are increasingly tech-savvyand use
: Page 4.411.9http://galileo.harvard.edu, 1997.7. Riding, P., Fowell, S. P., and Levy, P., “An Action Research Approach To Curriculum Development,”Information Research News, 5 (3) pp.7-11, 1995.8. Odin, J. K., “ALN: Pedagogical Assumptions, Instructional Strategies, and Software Solutions,” Published on theWWW at URL: http://www.hawaii.edu/aln/aln_tex.htm, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1997.9. Morse, L. C., “Using Interactive Strategies in Distance Learning,” ASEE 1998 Annual Conference Proceedings,Session 3147, ASEE 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle WA, June 28 – July 1, 1998.10. Askeland, D. R., “The Science and Engineering of Materials,” 3rd edition, PWS Publishing Company, Boston,MA, 1994.David AlexanderDavid Alexander is a doctoral student
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Fair Senior Capstone Project Teaming based on Skills, Preferences, and Friend GroupsIntroductionCapstone design courses are critical pedagogical components of any engineering curriculum asthey allow students to complete open-ended projects in a team setting, often while interactingwith industry customers. Equitably teaming students for these courses can be a difficultchallenge. Each team must have the technical and leadership skills necessary to complete theproject, and industry sponsors prefer to have high performing students for recruiting purposes.Moreover, students often have strong preferences based on which