AC 2012-3049: FACULTY BELIEFS OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DE-SIGN EDUCATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY COMPARING ENTREPRENEUR-SHIP AND DESIGN FACULTYDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. In this role, she provides support to faculty in trying innovative ideas in the classroom. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis in applied testing and measurement. Her current research interests include integrating creativity into the engineering curriculum, development in- struments to measure the engineering professional skills, and using qualitative data to enhance
is the Associate Director of CRLT at U-M where he focuses on external and university-wide initiatives. He has served on the executive board of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (POD) and has edited two volumes of the POD journal To Improve the Academy. He has written on issues of teaching evaluation, multiculturalism, and the use of interactive theatre for faculty development.Vilma Mesa, University of Michigan Dr. Vilma M. Mesa is Assistant Professor and Assistant Research Scientist of Mathematics Education at U-M’s School of Education. Her research interests include undergraduate mathematics teaching, curriculum theory and evaluation in mathematics
StudyAbstractResearchers have theorized that having a strongly developed identity as an engineering studentcontributes to persistence within engineering. Even so, there are no empirically supportedmeasures of engineering student identity. The purpose of this study was to provide structuralvalidity evidence for one such measure, the Engineering Student Identity Scale (E-SIS). Thispaper explores findings and implications of multiple investigations into the structure of the E-SIS. The data collected in this study do not support the current interpretations of the E-SIS as aunified measure of identify with 11 subscales derived from multiple approaches to measuringidentity. The results do provide important information regarding revising the E-SIS to align morewith
Applied Science (AAS) Degree Program to include Wireless Communications, thedevelopment and implementation of new Wireless Communications AAS and credit certificateprograms articulated from high school, through community college, and to the university level.With multiple entry and exit these new programs will incorporate work-relevant, industry-drivencurricula that integrates “best practices” in IT education with industry skills standards andcertifications, preparing technicians for the wireless communications industry. The projectcomponents include curriculum development and adaptation, program development, professionaldevelopment for high school and community college faculty, and development of a 2+2+2articulation. As a part of a network of
to implement the robotics-enhanced learning in their schools. The project team developed a methodology for designingrobotic-embedded learning and teacher education program based on a methodology developed atthe beginning of the project. The curriculum and learning materials developed for the teachereducation program were pilot tested and revised. The final PD program provided teachers withopportunities to learn about robotic technology and its use to promote a constructivist approach tolearning.In a joint effort,41 Northeastern University, Tech-Boston—a part of the Boston Public Schools,and Tufts University’s Centre for Engineering Education Outreach developed a LEGO roboticsPD program for middle school teachers who taught robotics-embedded
Faculty Development Engineering Dean’s Institute 2012 H. Keith Moo-‐Young, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, F. ASCE Personal Leadership Training1. Leadership Training A. NSF sponsored workshop for early faculty development in late 90’s B. Anderson Consulting Faculty Fellowship i. Innovative Teaching Methods from Consulting ii. Developed Goal Based Learning for implementation into Engineering Curriculum C. AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellows Program AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellowships1. Categorized by program area, the executive branch agencies listed below anticipate hosting and
Paper ID #19612The Impact of Academic Staff Development on Their Approach to Teachingand LearningStaffan Andersson, Uppsala University Staffan Andersson is a senior lecturer in physics at Uppsala University, Sweden. His primary research interest is cultural aspects of teaching and learning in science and engineering.Dr. Arnold Neville Pears, Uppsala University Arnold Pears holds joint professorships in Computer Science with specialisation in Computing Education at Uppsala University and Technical Science Education with specialisation in Engineering Education at KTH (The Royal Institute of Technology), both in Sweden. He
received significant sponsorship from Army Research Office, NSF, ED, and industry.Dr. Deniz Eseryel, North Carolina State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19123 Deniz Eseryel joined North Carolina State University as a Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program clus- ter hire in the Digital Transformation of Education. She is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Counselor Education specializing in Digital Learning and Teaching. She is also a Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. The important
Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1800 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral student and graduate research
, transportation, environmental, surveyingand project/construction management. While as many as one third of graduating civil engineersgo to work in the land development industry (University placement statistics, 2001-2005), fewcivil engineering programs in the country have any course or emphasis in land developmentwithin their curriculum. This paper describes an ongoing initiative that brings togetherundergraduate CEE students and faculty with industry professionals in an effort to improve landdevelopment design education.Prior to this initiative, the CEE Department had one course titled “Land Development Design”,taught once per year and it was available for more than 10 years. Historically, this course wasalways taught by an adjunct instructor, usually
curriculum.A recruiting and retention plan is also being developed as part of the new curriculum design. Thedevelopment of this plan is considered to be a crucial and fundamental component of the overallEE program. One of the biggest concerns is the recruitment and retention of underrepresentedgroups in the engineering field.This paper describes the planning and development of the new Electrical Engineering program atEWU including the significance, infrastructure, goals, objectives, laboratory needs, programrequirements, and curriculum.IntroductionThe EE program was conceived on the basis of three factors: industrial demand within the regionand state, the small number of qualified graduates available to enter the workforce, and theincreasing pool of
Number of TRI* Reporting Facilities 1 1 1 * Toxic Release InventoryTraining Requirements: Based on the anticipated growth rate and Ohio’s ranking inenvironmental conditions, individuals entering the environmental technology and science fieldswill be in growing demand. Sinclair Community College in cooperation with the Tech Prep Page 5.207.3Consortium has taken the lead role in developing fully trained graduates that can meet thegrowing demands of the community. The three major steps in this endeavor included: • determining the competencies required by industry, • developing a curriculum that includes all
Paper ID #17347Developing Master’s Program in Logistics & TransportationDr. MD B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi Dr. Sarder is an associate professor and graduate program coordinator of the Logistics, Trade and Trans- portation program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). He is also an assistant director of the center for logistics, trade and transportation. At the USM, he revamped his program by developing as many as fourteen new courses, implementing hands on experience in courses, and delivering online courses for distant students. Dr. Sarder is very active in engineering and technology
engineering. In particular, her work focuses on bacterial adhesion to physiological surfaces. In addition, she maintains an active research program in curriculum development with a focus on workforce development. She is also the 2007 recipient of the ASEE Sharon Keillor Award for Women in Engineering Education.Taryn Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Taryn Bayles is a Professor of the Practice of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department at UMBC, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on
done so in the construction industry. In order to meet this anticipated demand for construction managers, Lamar Universityhas decided to introduce a B.S. in Construction Management Program into the curriculum. It’sgeneral mission will be to provide a quality program for preparing nationally competitiveundergraduate students for a successful career in construction. The paper will describe the administrative details of developing the program. The Deanof Engineering, a chemical engineer, originally recommended the course requirements developedby a theoretical structural engineer. This program was found unsuitable by the UniversityCurriculum Committee after consultation with individuals involved with construction. Afterconsiderable
data relevant to those outcomes; development of conclusions based onthe data collected; and program modifications, when deemed appropriate toimprove the program.The Construction Management program at AAMU has been designed to meetaccreditation board of the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) Page 15.376.4which is the predominant accreditation agency for construction managementprograms. The curriculum, objective and learning outcome has been developed asper ABET model accreditation criteria1. The most recent criteria effective forevaluations can be found at ABET’s website www.ABET.org.The criteria allow some flexibility in program emphasis but are
Session 2530 Developing the Field of Children’s Engineering M. David Burghardt Hofstra UniversityAbstractEducational requirements for grades K-6 are increasing, students and teachers are being held tohigher standards with inherent increased expectations learning. Because this is a time ofchange, the engineering profession has an opportunity to link with the K-6 science curriculum,complementing an existing science curriculum that finds itself challenged. Engineering alsoprovides a contextual situation to reinforce important mathematical concepts. As the field ofchildren’s
Mexico (UNM) Online has been offering an MS degree in Computer Engineering with a specialization in IoT [6]: o The program is consisted of 31 credits of 8 week long courses. The curriculum has good IoT content relevant to computer engineering. However, only one course is labeled with IoT in its title. o “Students will learn how to develop the software and hardware systems that allow devices to collect and exchange data on a massive scale”. o Students who successfully complete the curriculum will be prepared for entry into the computer industry or related fields of study such as autonomous and electric vehicles, smart grid, situational awareness for
students graduating from engineering programsmust have an understanding of how ethics work in the real world and how ethical problems canaffect an engineer’s entire professional career. This course will focus on the ethics of engineeringpractice. As part of the course students will be expected to consider the effects of their actions(and failure to act) including the economic, environmental, political, societal, health and safetyconsequences of their work, while also keeping in mind the manufacturability and sustainabilityof their structures and products.This course was originally developed in the context of a curriculum design course. It was createdwith the intention of further development using the results of a program of rigorous research
technology is changing so rapidly.3 Figure 1 shows the ring-like structure of this nationwide effort to train solar instructors.The National Administrator is the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC), which has along involvement in the solar field and administers solar credentialing programs through theNorth American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners (NABCEP). IREC’s role on thisproject is to convene solar experts and educators who will contribute to the development anddissemination of a nationally normed model curriculum for a variety of solar technologies.Figure 1. An administrator leads the implementation of a nationally normed solar curriculum. The second tier of Figure 1 is the Regional Resource & Training Providers
systems), Computer Networks, and Operating Systems. Page 14.738.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Innovative Network Security Course DevelopmentAbstractNetwork security courses become increasingly popular in colleges (including communitycolleges) and universities. This paper discusses about developing the novel course of networksecurity using laboratory activities. It elaborates innovative projects that are suitable forlaboratory work in network security curriculum. It explores both hardware and softwarecomponents that are now being used for practical exercises in network security courses. Mostoften these
support staff), and laboratoryand instruction programs and tools. The participation of the different engineering faculties hasbeen allowed through a competitive proposal process involving open review and assessment withpeer-review involvement. In earlier papers 1,2, the process of proposals submission and selectionfor funding was described at length. The selection process was repeated in cycles of six monthseach at the beginning of which proposals were submitted and by the end of which some proposalshad been approved for funding. The implementation of approved proposals commencedimmediately thereafter by initiating the process of curriculum development ,the preparation orrefurbishing of the site of newly approved equipment, the design of staff
another organization without somemodification. There are too many variables, including the nature of the curriculum, the widevariety of alternatives and choices, and the preferences of the faculty. By writing your ownassessment process, you will be forced to understand all of the possible ways that outcomesassessment can be carried out, and you will have to weigh the alternatives, involve your facultyin the planning process, and tailor the process to your programs and faculty. Unless themembers of your faculty are wiling to jump into uncharted waters and adapt each time theyconfront a hurdle, we recommend that you develop your own process first.One of the causes of the complex nature of outcomes assessment is the multiplicity of ways thatit can
seeking to enter four-yearinstitutions through a two-year college pathway or through military service find additionalbarriers in how previous work is credited or recognized, and how the transition to the newcampus is facilitated and supported.22To broaden participation and engage underrepresented groups in EWD, our pre-college strategyfocuses on developing curriculum, competency and inclusive pathways that leverage teachernetworks, school guaranteed admission agreements, and informal education partnerships alongwith creating high-quality curricula, scalable teacher professional development models, andviable access pathways for students to engineering.Our professional development centers on empowering K-12 teachers as partners in EWD byincreasing
AC 2008-1235: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTES ONALTERNATIVE ENERGYMichael Pelletier, Northern Essex Community CollegeLori Heymans, Northern Essex Community CollegePaul Chanley, Northern Essex Community College Page 13.1003.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Professional Development Institutes on Alternative EnergyAbstractThis paper describes three Professional Development Institutes for middle and highschool teachers exploring the science, technology, engineering, and math behind thegeneration of electricity by wind, water, and solar power.Each institute was organized and delivered as a Web-companion course. All lecturenotes, assignments, and required
9.414.8Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education To develop further the leadership skills faculty need to sustain long-term writing across the curriculum projects and the evaluation and assessment skills they need to determine these projects’ effectiveness [25]The perspective available from the LCI is used to target the specific barriers to studentlearning that have been identified.Methodology All chemical engineering students had completed the Learning CombinationInventory (LCI) prior to beginning the Junior/Senior Clinic. The students met with
these interactions.IntroductionThe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University has recentlyrevised its curriculum. In particular, the Department reduced the number of credits in thecurriculum by consolidating several related topics into a few key courses. One of these courses,Civil Engineering Fundamentals, is taught in the fall semester of the sophomore year and servesas an introduction to the engineering program. The course includes three 50-minute lectures andone 3-hour laboratory session per week over a 14-week semester. There are two sections of thecourse, each of which has between 20 and 30 students. Fundamentals is designed to helpsophomores develop many analytical, interpretive and field-based skills and
. Exam scores were improved when measuring studentsability to create use cases, especially clarity and completeness. Student performance was greatlyimproved when writing use cases, especially clarity and completeness which was reflected inimproved projects. Quantitatively, the same mindset objectives were assessed in other coursemodules as part a larger curriculum wide effort in Engineering. The numerical results indicatethat the modules in this course outperformed other modules in the curriculum for most of themindset objectives. Ultimately, the results indicate these types of modules may play an importantrole in entrepreneurial mindset development for computer science students.IntroductionThis paper describes a set of modules designed to
similar to that used to specify any other type of software product. However, unlikemost software products, games have an entertainment dimension. People play computer gamesbecause games are fun.8The International Game Developers Association (IGDA) proposed a curriculum framework foruniversity level training in game development.5 The core topic areas from the IGDArecommendations appear in Table 1. Many of these topics involve the application of skills taughtin software engineering courses. Page 11.660.2 Table 1: IGDA Curriculum Framework Core Topic Key Elements Critical Game Studies game
Technology Program Development Ray Miller, Max Rabiee and Elvin Stepp University of CincinnatiAbstract:A major issue in the electric power industry is the staffing of the electric power infrastructure. Asthe Baby Boomer generation retires over the next decade as much as 75% of the current industrystaff will have retired. This will affect hourly operations and maintenance personnel,engineering design staff and transmission and distribution professionals. The impending demandfor power engineers has spurred the utility companies to work with the College of AppliedScience to develop programs for new Engineering Technologists in Power Systems. A majorgoal of this paper is to describe and