Approach to Empathetic Electrical Engineering CoursesAbstractBackgroundThe ability to empathize provides the basis to understand others, an often-overlookedprofessional skill in engineering curriculums. Studies have shown that engineering students haveless empathy after completing their degree than when they had entered. Having low amounts ofempathy in engineers can result in less concern for public welfare and social considerationsduring the engineering design process.PurposeIn this work, we consider when engineering students are entering an empathetic cycle. Moststudies develop a model based on an educators’ perspective and how empathy is a teachable andlearnable skill. This study examines how engineering students can
, introducing an overlapping analogy process along with a new knowledge domain they mayor may not find preferable can lead to potential cognitive dissonance or strain [7, 32], potentiallyimpacting their self-efficacy [33,34]. Thus, it is essential to explore the impact of a BIDengineering curriculum on students' commitment to persist in engineering and their changes inself-efficacy related to engineering, as this curriculum may play a crucial role in shaping theireducational journey and future careers.Theoretical Framework: Self-Efficacy TheoryThis study is grounded in Bandura’s [35] self-efficacy theory. Bandura (1986) defined self-efficacy as an individual's assessment of their abilities to accomplish specific tasks or goals. Helater refined this
AC 2010-822: EXTREME EXPERIENCE INTERVIEWS FOR INNOVATIVEDESIGNS: CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT OF A NEW NEEDS-GATHERINGMETHODMatthew Green, LeTourneau University Dr. Matthew G. Green is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at LeTourneau University, Longview. His objective is to practice and promote engineering as a serving profession, with special interest in improving the quality of life in developing countries. Focus areas include remote power generation, design methods for frontier environments, and assistive devices for persons with disabilities. Contact: MatthewGreen@letu.edu.Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Carolyn C. Seepersad is an assisstant professor of
. Johnson-Laird, P. N.; Girotto, V.; Legrenzi, P. (1998). Mental Models:A Gentle Guide for Outsiders. Retreived from http://www.si.umich.edu/ICOS/gentleintro.html3. Schoenfeld, A. H. How We Think: A Theory of Goal Oriented Decision Making and its Educational Applications; Routledge: New York, 2011.4. Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1983.5. Mental Models; Gentner, D.; Stevens, A., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale. NJ, 1983.6. Heywood, J. Engineering Education: Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction; Wiley
find general information about theproduct development process and the product design topics that students would learn in eachcourse in the sequence.The product design process selected is based on existing references [1,2] and is well-suited for Commented [MKKH1]: Include the referenceproducts of low to moderate complexity that are engineered, discrete, and physical. The coursesequence includes courses at the freshman, sophomore, and junior levels, and culminates with acomprehensive capstone senior design project that is conducted over two semesters. In some ofthe courses in the sequence students are introduced to basic systems thinking and systemsengineering concepts to help them pursue a holistic approach while conducting design tasks
. Shafer, “Intervention for college attendance program: 2015-2016 report.” Minnesota Office of Higher Education, 2017. Available:https://www.ohe.state.mn.us/pdf/ICAP_Report_15-16.pdf[3] B. Smith, Mentoring at-risk students through the hidden curriculum of higher education.Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013.[4] A. Fornari et al., “Mentoring program design and implementation in new medical schools,”Medical Education online, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 24570, 2014.[5] M. Polmear, A. Bielefeldt, D. Knight, C. Swan, and N. Canney, “Hidden curriculumperspective on the importance of ethics and societal impacts in engineering education,” in ASEEAnnual Conference, On-line, 2019.[6] I. Villanueva, “What does hidden curriculum in engineering look like and how can it
Session 2342 The Role of Masters degrees in Technology & Business to promote CPD for Engineering Professionals B R Dickson Department of Chemical & Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.AbstractThere is an increasing realisation that the MBA approach to career development is not the mostrelevant form of education & training for engineers. During the mid 1990’s, the UK’sEngineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) funded over 20
project and teammanagement skills while applying their disciplinary knowledge to robotic applications. The lastfour semesters involve open-ended design projects conducted by multidisciplinary teams withME, EE, CE, or Business students.Initiated in Fall 2017 and accredited since 2021, our PPL-RE program is graduating its fourthcohort in December 2024. This paper outlines the structure of our RE program, explains the PPLteaching approach, and provide an overview of the new robotic courses developed specificallyfor the program. It also presents both quantitative and qualitative assessments, such as thenumber of applicants, retention rate, and feedback from students, alumni, and employers.BackgroundIn universities around the world, robotics is mostly
integrate growth in these competencies into future experiences. Due to the lack ofshared curricular requirements across the eighteen engineering majors offered at U-M,incorporating a bookend approach seemed to be a potentially effective strategy. Updating anexisting course in the first year, where some shared curriculum does exist, and implementing anew course in the senior year when most students are completing their senior design experienceand preparing to enter the workforce, proved to be the most feasible.This practice paper primarily provides information regarding the design of these two courses,including explanation of the motivations for implementing these courses and the research basisthat informs the course design. Additionally, we analyze
technological changes [1]. Engineering educators are working to address the challenges facingengineering education. For example, they are developing new curricula and teaching methodsthat are designed to improve student retention and diversity. They are also working to developpartnerships with industry to ensure that their students are learning the skills they need to besuccessful in the workforce [2-4]. The rapidly changing industries in our current era arecontinuously seeking for a flexible and dynamic workforce that can quickly adapt to changes inthe markets and technologies [5].Over the years, there has been a lot of research into the causes of the gap between whatengineering students learn in school and what they need to know to be successful in
resources available, 4. To provide an opportunity for students to develop relationships with full-time faculty and other students in an academic area of interest to them, 5. To excite students about the building industry with its vague coverage of field and emerging trends, and 6. To expose students to the various career paths and options within AE that they may want to focus on.Development of the AE FYS Framework Using the field of architectural engineering as a central point to leverage collaboration, arevitalization of the AE FYS to meet both university and department goals was possible. Thenew FYS structure established a new responsive, replicable, and theoretically-informed approachby following the
Gaining International Competence: A Multi-Faceted Approach to International Engineering Education M. B. Eljamal, S. W. Pang, and S. J. Edington College of Engineering The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109AbstractIn direct alignment with Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology criteria totrain engineers who should be globally competent, the International Programs inEngineering office in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan hascreated a broad palette of international program activities that
AC 2009-510: GROWING PAINS: MANAGING RAPID GROWTH IN AGRADUATE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMJoy Colwell, Purdue University, Calumet Page 14.661.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Growing Pains: Managing Rapid Growth in a Graduate Engineering Technology ProgramAbstractThe School of Technology at Purdue University Calumet offers a newly approved Master ofScience degree in Technology. The Master’s program has experienced dramatic growth, withthe enrollment of graduate students rising in a few short months from 28 in Spring 08 to 69 inFall 08. This paper will explore the growth in enrollments, and discuss the challenges andmethods
quizzes that summarize thesereadings. The lecture period is used to clarify misconceptions revealed in the students’ responsesto the online quizzes, as well as to present new material. As a result, classroom activities becomemore efficient and more closely tuned to the students' needs. The essential element is feedbackbetween the web-based and classroom activities.While JiTT system is commonly used in the physics educational community, there has been littleevidence of its use in the engineering classroom. This paper describes the JiTT approachincorporated in Structural Analysis, a required junior-level course in the civil engineeringtechnology curriculum at Georgia Southern University. Presented in paper are the concepts andplans for developing a
Paper ID #18477Building Trust in Robots in Robotics-Focused STEM Education under TPACKFramework in Middle SchoolsDr. S. M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University Mizanoor Rahman received Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Mie University at Tsu, Japan in 2011. He then worked as a research fellow at the National University of Singapore (NUS), a re- searcher at Vrije University of Brussels (Belgium) and a postdoctoral associate at Clemson University, USA. He is currently working as a postdoctoral associate at the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, NY, USA. His research
course and the new multidisciplinary course. In addition, eachdepartment had to decide on its own how the course would be counted in their curriculum, i.e.fulfilling their senior capstone design, senior project, or technical elective requirements.Once the Fall quarter started, the projects had already been chosen, and information on theprojects was distributed to the students. Presentations from the sponsors detailing their projectswere given the first week of class. The faculty teaching the course went to each department toadvertise the project opportunities and encourage students from all engineering majors to attendthe sponsor presentations. The desired enrollment in the multidisciplinary course was 24 – 36students, based on having 4 – 6
, while also serving as an instructor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engi- neering Department there. He expects to complete his Master of Divinity in 2023. His research interests include developing student self-efficacy and encouraging thinking across the curriculum in mechanical engineering, specifically in design contexts.Dr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kerry Meyers holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (B.S. & M.S. Mechanical Engineering) and is specifically focused on programs that influence student’s experience, affect retention rates, and the factors that determine the overall long term success of students entering an engineering program. She is the Assistant Dean for Student Development in
participants in the project were ableto realize their new curriculum modules using existing software or classroom technology, here wefocus on those teachers whose designs required a novel digital artifact, such as a new webapplication with specific functionality, customized content to work with an existing tool, or a newpiece of standalone software. By providing the developer support to produce these digitalartifacts, we empower teacher participants to embed CS content into potentially challengingclassroom contexts that are resistant to drop-in, ”one-size-fits-all” integration solutions. Usingthis approach, teachers can create more thoughtful and robust CS curriculum modules that bettercomplement their particular needs.This initiative promotes
AC 2007-734: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF AKNOWLEDGE SHARING SYSTEM (KSS) USED TO DEVELOP AND SUSTAIN ACROSS-DISCIPLINARY OUTREACH APPROACH TO ENGINEERING DESIGNBarry Cumbie, Auburn UniversityChetan Sankar, Auburn UniversityP.K. Raju, Auburn University Page 12.1016.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Lessons Learned from the Development of a Knowledge Sharing System (KSS) used to Develop and Sustain a Cross- Disciplinary Outreach Approach to Engineering DesignThe Capstone program is an opportunity for graduating senior students in engineering toapply their classroom knowledge to real-world problems. While the experience from
on their terms: in their dorms, in the cafeteria, in the student lounge, sitting outside. Ournew approach to laboratories is to give all first year students (or transfer students when theyarrive on campus) our version of the “Lab in a Box” plus a laptop loaded with required software. While the “Lab in a Box” concept is not new [1,2,3], our version is different in both thecontents and how we are using it. Our goal is to furnish a complete electronics workbench thatcan be used anywhere there is a computer. One of our key goals is to stress embeddedprogramming and use of sophisticated test equipment early in the curriculum and throughout thecurriculum. Our “lab in a box” consists of the following items: - parts kit (customized for
Paper ID #14534Developing a Comprehensive Online Transfer Engineering Curriculum: As-sessing the Effectiveness of an Online Engineering Graphics CourseDr. Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of Engineering and Mathematics at Ca˜nada College in Redwood City, CA. He received a BS in Geodetic Engineering from the University of the Philippines, his MS in Geode- tic Science from the Ohio State University, and his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female
Enhancements.” Proceedings, 2004 Frontiers in Education Conference, http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2004/papers/1672.pdf, accessed 24 February 2005.6. Triplett, C. and S. Haag, “Freshman Engineering Retention,” Proceedings, 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/events/news/conferencepapers/2004asee/triplett.pdf, accessed 24 February 2005.7. McKenna, A., F. McMartin, Y. Terada, V. Sirivedhin, and A. Agogino, “A Framework for Interpreting Students' Perceptions of an Integrated Curriculum,” Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=3052&pdf=00412_2001.PDF, accessed 24 February 2005.8. Pomalaza-Ráez, C.A., B.H. Groff, B.H
Paper ID #21976Alternative Approaches to Undergraduate Engineering Laboratory Experi-ence for Low-income NationsKimia Moozeh, University of Toronto Kimia Moozeh is a PhD Candidate, graduate research and teaching assistant in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. in 2013, and her Master’s degree in Chemistry in 2014. Her dissertation explores improving the learning outcomes of undergraduate engineering laborato- ries by bridging the learning from a larger context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Dr. Nadine Ibrahim, University of Toronto Nadine
Paper ID #41951Websites as Gateways to Inclusive Partnerships: Examining Diversity Representationfor Environmental Nonprofits and Engineering Programs in Buffalo, NewYorkDr. Monica Lynn Miles, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Monica L. Miles, Ph.D. is an early career Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo in the School of Engineering and applied sciences. Dr. Miles considers herself a scholar-mother-activist-entrepreneur where all her identities work in harmony as she reshapes her community. She is a critical scholar who seeks transformative solutions to cultivate
they taught to prioritize? Just as importantly, when they are given thesecritical opportunities, do they have the skills to think critically about what the “public good”actually means? Have they been taught to listen to members of the public and value the differentforms of expertise that diverse community members offer? While engineering, as a discipline,prioritizes public welfare, engineering curriculum often provides students with a technical skillset while neglecting to develop their aptitude in humanistic inquiry and critical listening.One pedagogical approach that encourages students to think through the complexities of serviceto the public good lies in community engagement projects. In such projects, students arepartnered with local or
curriculum redesign focused on incorporating content-based writing approaches. In the Department of English, Cat teaches in the Core Writing Pro- gram where her pedagogy incorporates creative writing approaches to professional and technical writing and collaborative writing projects in online platforms.Dr. Yan Chen, University of New Mexico Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Departments of Organization, Information & Learning Sciences and Chemical & Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Her research interests fo- cus on computer supported collaborative learning, learning sciences, online learning and teaching, and educational equity for multicultural/multiethnic education.Dr. Sung ”Pil
Paper ID #11389An Innovative Redesign of Statics: Approach and Lessons LearnedDr. Yufeng Hu P.E., Western Michigan University Yufeng Hu is an assistant professor in the Civil and Construction Engineering Department at Western Michigan University. Dr. Hu received his Ph.D. degree in Structural Engineering from University at Buffalo, the State University of New York. Dr. Hu is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of California. He teaches engineering fundamental mechanics, including statics, mechanics of materials, and fluid mechanics.Javier Martin Montefort, Western Michigan UniversityDr. Edmund Tsang, Western
. That’s why I want to expose them to new ideas and let them know that it’s alright to go to school and have your own ideas, own decisions. You know, you don’t want to just follow your parents. You want to be better than your parents. I think it [engineering] is a wonderful career for them. I work in a school that is in a low income area—we have 93 percent on free lunch– and it makes me a little bit sad to see some of our students are painting houses, mowing grass, or whatever. I believe in going to college and learning engineering is much, much better. They usually are working construction…. they like working with their hands… but [a hands on approach] is something that can make them
UC Berkeley coordinating cross-campus design activities at the Cal Design Lab, and launched the College of Environmental Design’s first ever Design Frontiers Workshops. Since receiving her PhD from Stanford in 2008, Wendy has been innovating curriculum at the intersection of technology, design and the arts. At CDR, Wendy aims to increase awareness and appreciation for the role of Design Research and to make the Bay Area the epicenter for design intellectualism and discourse. Page 24.1004.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Press Play: A Course
). Electronics I, logicdesign and its laboratory are taught by the electrical and computer engineering (ECE) departmentwhile BME540/541 are taught by the BME department. Before the curriculum reform of 2005,electrical concentration students finished their electronics coursework with the electronics IIcourse and a microprocessor course, both taught by the ECE department. The BME departmentaccessed that the students required additional training to close the gap between college andprofessional practice. The department decided to replace the microprocessor and electronics IIcourses by the lecture/hands-on course BME540/541 which takes the basic concepts from thetwo ECE courses and introduces new professional elements of medical electronics in a realistic