recent research includes development of innovative finite element tutorials for undergraduate engineering students and vibrational analysis and measurement of human skeletal muscles under stress using Page 15.1110.1 laser holography. V-mail: 209-946-3091; E-mail: abrown@pacific.edu.Christina White, Columbia University Christina White is a doctoral candidate in the Curriculum and Teaching Department at Columbia© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 University. Her research focus is in engineering education with particular emphasis in both engineering diversity and humanitarian
months over the summer recess). Dataindicates that, when presented in an effective manner, correct answers on I.I. questions increasefrom roughly 50% to between 80 and 100%. Those questions showing less significantimprovement are also discussed. Not surprisingly, P.C.I. data is more varied, as questions on theP.C.I. require algebraic notation or computation. These results require additional interpretationthat accounts for mentees’ levels of mathematics education and abilities. Results from both willguide more effective future implementations of DREAM.In the fall 2009 AHS College Preparatory Survey, all but one senior that had previouslyparticipated in DREAM (seven of eight) indicated that they were interested in pursuingengineering. The last
Mechatronics Engineering from Kocaeli University, Turkey.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Cornell University Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University.Andrew Whitehead, Andrew Whitehead received his Master’s of Science from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education in Fall 2022. His research interests include diversity, equity, and inclusion and empathy within the engineering pedagogy.Sri Sowmya Panuganti, Purdue Engineering Education ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Promoting Research Quality to Study Mental Models of Ethics and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in
promotes student self-efficacy in engineering has positive effectson student persistence in engineering, thus supports national efforts to broaden participation inengineering.After attaining IRB approval, a purposive sampling strategy was used to identify participants forthis study. The study focused on gaining the perspective of white full-time faculty in engineeringsince white faculty make up approximately 63% of all engineering, computing, and sciencefaculty members [47]. Based on a broader interest in using the data gained from this study toinform engineering student success and faculty development practices at a mid-sized, PhDgranting, private, 4-year institution in the Midwest, this was the primary site for this study.Additionally
counselling and awareness, learning centers, workshops and seminars, academicadvising, financial support, and curriculum and instructional reform [9]. Research on the effect of SIPs suggests that many help improve academic preparation,self-efficacy, STEM identity, sense of belonging, and ultimately persistence in STEM [10]–[12].While investment in these focused interventions is important for mitigating the effects ofsystemic inequity within education and society more broadly, the structure of higher educationinstitutions contributes to a patchwork of student support programs that are difficult to sustainand often operate in parallel [13], [14]. The lack of consistent coordination and collaborationacross efforts can lead to redundancies and gaps
coordination, curriculum devel- opment, assessment and instruction in the Pavlis Global Leadership program. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technological University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Mrs. Abby Lammons Thompson, Mississippi State University Abby Thompson is the Entrepreneurship Program Coordinator in the Office of Entrepreneurship and Tech- nology Transfer at Mississippi State University. Through her current role at the University, Thompson works to cultivate a culture of entrepreneurship
located14. Using PeerSES and State SES, we compute a Relative Peer SES by subtracting State SES from Peer SES.Relative Peer SES measures the gap between the poverty status of a high school and that of astate where the high school is located. Computing Relative Peer SES in this way measures towhat degree each state public institution is serving the state’s population. Also, Relative PeerSES controls state influences on Peer SES, because the percentage of students not eligible forfree lunch in an individual high school (Peer SES) is related to the percentage of students not Page 23.1194.7eligible for free lunch in a state where the high school is
create a self-designed degree program in the emerging field of Engineering Education Research via the Graduate School’s interdisciplinary Individual Ph.D. Program. Ryan holds an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Republic of Korea, and a B.S. in Engineering Science from Colorado State University, Fort Collins. Ryan’s research interests include: engineering education, ethics, humanitarian engineering, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Elizabeth BurpeeMs. Mee Joo Kim, University of Washington- Seattle Mee Joo Kim is a Ph.D. student in College of Education at University of Washington. She received her M.Ed. in Social Foundations (2009) from the Curry
., “Evaluation of Computer-Based Methods for Engineering Courses,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, June 12-15, 2005.6. Marks, B.P., “Web-Based Readiness Assessment Quizzes,” Journal of Engineering Education, 97-102, January 2002.7. Bloom, B.S., Evaluation to Improve Learning, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY, 1981, pp. 191-209.8. Chase, C.I., Contemporary Assessment for Educators, Addison-Wesley Educational, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 113-129.9. Ebel, R.L., and Frisbie, D.A., Essentials of Educational Measurement, Fifth Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, pp. 154-177.10. Gronlund, N.E., How to Make Achievement
. (2015). Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: A case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Systematic Reviews, 4(138). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0Institute of International Education. (2022a). “International Student Enrollment Trends, 1948/49 -0 2021/22”. Open Doors: Report on International Educational Exchange, retrieved from http://www.opendoorsdata.org.McGee, E. O., Griffith, D. M., & Houston, S. L. (2019). “I know I have to work twice as hard and hope that makes me good enough”: Exploring the stress and strain of Black doctoral students in engineering and computing. Teachers College Record, 121(4), 1
advancing understanding of Minority- Serving Institutions.Mr. John Albert Avila Sr., Texas A&M UniversityDr. Karen L. Butler-Purry, P.E., Texas A&M University Karen Butler-Purry is the Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies as well as a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Her research interests include computer and intelligent systems applications to power distribution systems and engineering education. She can be reached by e-mail at klbutler@tamu.edu.Dr. Shannon Walton, Texas A&M University Shannon D. Walton, PhD, is an Assistant Dean for the Graduate and Professional School and the Direc- tor of Educational
. Eddington, Kansas State University Sean Eddington (Ph.D., Purdue University) is an assistant professor of Communication Studies at Kansas State University. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersections of organizational communi- cation, new media, gender, and organizing.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Pur- due. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in
of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Gray receieved his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2000. He then earned a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech in
majors. Below, we describe Adriana’sinitial latent diversity profile and present her restoryed case narratives focused on her third year inengineering. Then, we describe how Adriana’s narrative informs our understanding of latentdiversity and highlight our future plans to continue data collection and dissemination to theengineering education community.Restoryed Case Narrative for AdrianaAdriana is a mathematics and electrical and computer engineering student at a private ChristianUniversity in the Southwest. Prior to pursuing an engineering degree, Adriana lived abroad inseveral countries. Although Adriana repeated an academic year (i.e., was retained) in seventhgrade, she attributed this year as the catalyst that sparked her interest in math
11 4.4 Chemical Engineering 40 15.8 Civil Engineering 8 3.2 Computer Engineering – CS Track 2 0.8 Computer Engineering – ECEN Track 12 4.8 Computer Science 7 2.8 Electrical Engineering 27 10.7 Electronics Systems Engineering Technology 8 3.2 Industrial Distribution 18 7.2
President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant
Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the
guitar.Mr. Daniel Allen Henderson, Pennsylvania State University While a student at Penn State, Daniel Henderson earned both his M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction (Secondary Science Education) and his B.S. in Engineering Science (with Honors). Currently, he works as a research assistant and will later pursue a full-time high school physics teaching position.Ms. Jennifer Bracken, Pennsylvania State University Jennifer is a mechanical engineering graduate student at Penn State. She is interested in design, prototyp- ing, teams, and advanced manufacturing. Currently she is studying design teams for her PhD work. Her MS work involved designing and prototyping a robotic inspection system for nuclear waste storage cylin
an M.S. in Geotechnical Engineering from Stanford University in 1984 and a Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from Kansas State University in 1993. Prior to his coming to FGCU he was a Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University and an Associate Professor and Director of the Civil Engineering Analysis Group at the United States Military Academy. Dr. O’ Neill is a retired Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He has been active at the national level with ASCE’s Technical Council on Computing and Information Technology (TCCIT), Committee on Faculty Development (CFD) and Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative. Dr. O’Neill is a licensed Professional Engineer in California
Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue Uni- versity. Prior to her PhD, she worked in quality assurance and logistics roles at Anheuser-Busch and GE Healthcare, where she was responsible for ensuring consistency across processes and compliance with federal regulations. For four consecutive summers (2011-2014), she worked in the National Science Foundation’s Division of Undergraduate Education on research and evaluation projects related to the use of technology in STEM education. Dr. London masters mixed methods and computational tools to address complex problems, including: science policy issues
the impact of coaching on preparation for this transition, thefollowing research questions were explored: (1) How does student opinion about coachingtransform through this class? (2) What new or revised perspectives do students gain, as bothcoach and coachee? (3) How does coaching equip students for the transition to the workforce?MethodsCourse curriculum – brief overviewA future conference publication will cover the course itself as a model using the “FourFrames”.12 Relevant course components for this study are explained in this section. The classwas developed based on the premise that early understanding of and adapting to the culture andclimate of a new environment will improve our engineering graduates’ workforce experience,promotion and
,information systems or robotics, can be applied “as is” to the construction practice. Actually, some currenttrends (expanding use of the design-build method of project delivery, and a tendency for engineering designpractice to become a more rote process, based on codes, manuals and computer programs) are yieldinga contention that the managing of construction ventures may be the most challenging professional field withincivil engineering practice35.The construction industry, as always, is undergoing constant change. Increasingly, the industry is lookingto university construction programs to meet the need for entry-level, trained engineers and managers to
innovation, and the tension between design engineering and business management cognitive styles. To encourage these thinking patterns in young engineers, Mark has developed a Scenario Based Learning curriculum that attempts to blend core engineering concepts with selected business ideas. Mark is also researches empathy and mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 consumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter &
, educators attemptingto address the Collingridge Dilemma by better training engineers and designers in ethics needto take a more comprehensive approach to ethics beyond one-off courses in professional ethicsor generic humanities ‘liberal arts’ curriculum requirements (i.e. ethics is nonfungible withlanguage, history, religion, etc.).Additionally, to account for value dynamism, an approach to ethics is needed that is not onlyfocused on legal standards, regulatory guidelines, or ethical checklists. These approaches of-ten grow stagnant if they are not updated regularly, uphold hegemonic societal values anddominant images of user groups (see [27] for additional examples), inhibit critical reflection,and settle for very narrow definitions and
bilingual students. She has also contributed to the training and development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Edward
addressed by a service-learningapproach to globally-based humanitarian projects2-4. The importance of integrating bothglobalization and social needs into the engineering curriculum is acknowledged by the ABETcriteria. Human need is also a clear priority of the engineering profession, as indicated in theNSPE creedi. However, the majority of engineering students are not familiar with the contexts inwhich vast needs exist, such as among the physically disabled or the 4 billion people living onless than $2 a day (PPP)5. These conditions represent formidable frontier design contexts,environments and situations outside the experience and expertise of most engineering students. Currently taught design methodologies advocate gathering customer
for Public Service from the University System of Maryland Board of Regents, and currently serves as the Chair-Elect of the K-12 and Pre-College Division of ASEE.Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth A. Parry is the secondary contributor to this paper. She is an engineer and consultant in K-12 STEM Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and the coordinator of K-20 STEM Partner- ship Development at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past fifteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents and pre- service and in service teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and
Institute. Prior to this position, he was a professor at in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include robotics, nonlinear control, machine vision, and engineering education. Dr. Gans earned his BS in electrical engi- neering from Case Western Reserve University in 1999, his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering in 2002 and his Ph.D. in systems and entrepreneurial engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign in 2005.Mr. Jeff Glenn Edwards, University of Texas at Dallas Jeff Glenn Edwards is a doctoral candidate in the History of Ideas program at the University of Texas at Dallas. He has taught philosophy in higher
reports from the National Academy ofEngineering[6]. Their College of Engineering implemented curriculum that addressed sixactivities: undergraduate research, internship, study aboard, service-learning, leadership, andmultidisciplinary education. They sought to answer four major questions about service-learning:what is it, why is it necessary, how can it be incorporated, and how can it be assessed? Assessmentwas done by a series of reflections, similar to what this current paper will address.Compassion in the professional worldWe also examined the peer-reviewed literature beyond engineering education and service-learningand looked more specifically at compassion within professional preparation more generally. Indoing so, we see that there is some
Latin America. Steve has experience in multi-disciplinary collaborations, in addition to collaborations with businesses, non-profit organizations, and community- based organizations. Involved in efforts that engage communities in designing, implementing, and maintaining varied sustainable energy technologies and using them as vehicles for economic and community development.Ankita Kumar Ankita Kumar has bachelors degrees in Computer Science and English, and has experience working in education as a tutor. She is passionate about social justice, and is invested in bringing the compassion and empathy of the humanities into STEM.Mariam Tongelidis Alkattan © American Society for Engineering