” response wasassigned a value of 3, and indicates that the respondent neither agrees nor disagrees with thestatement and that there is no difference between graduates of accredited and non-accreditedprograms.The responses to each question were tallied and statistically analyzed at the 5 percent level ofconfidence (α=0.05) using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test to test the null hypothesis: H0 : µ = 3 (no difference between graduates)against the alternate hypothesis: H1: µ > 3 (graduates from accredited programs do exhibit the tendency).The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used because it does not require the assumption that thesampled population has an approximate normal distribution8. In this study, the researchers hadno basis for making
utilized a variety of otherresearch documentations to examine students’ learning capabilities in his classroom. Some ofthem are listed below. Ohio State University’s TELR Hunter Boylan’s research documentations Paul Nolting’s Math Study Skills Walter Barbe & Michael Milone’s ideas about Modality Robert Barr & John Tagg’s Learning Paradigm Ernest Pascarella & Patrick Terenzini’s Student Engagement Angelo & Cross’ Classroom Assessment TechniquesImplementation At Miami University, The author utilizes a variety of instructional tools to communicatewith students who may prefer to have different learning styles (Kolb, 1985
Retention of Recent Women Engineering, Mathematics, and Science Graduates in the Workplace Philip J. Parker 1 and Erin E. Ralph2 Technical Session #13921 IntroductionThis study was initiated in response to several conversations the first author, Dr. Parker,had with women who were either nearing graduation from the Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering (CEE) program at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville (UWP) or hadrecently begun working in the engineering workplace. These particular women wereabove average students, had had summer engineering internships, had above-averagecommunication skills, and
encountered various challenges along the way. Thediscussion that follows addresses the challenges that arise in the delivery of this type of graduateengineering program, based on Marshall’s experience during the previous five years.Program Description Marshall’s Master of Science in Engineering (MSE) degree program is interdisciplinary innature and designed to meet the specific needs of engineers employed in industry, government,and consulting. The MSE program offers a broad core curriculum with opportunities forconcentrated study in three areas of emphasis: Engineering Management, EnvironmentalEngineering, and Chemical Engineering. The mission of the MSE degree program at Marshall University is to provide multi-disciplinary, graduate
Institute of Technology 7 /Western Carolina University 8 AbstractThis is the fourth paper in the special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force onEngineering Graduate Education Reform to ensure a strong U.S. engineering workforce forcompetitiveness. Whereas research cultures have been built into the nation’s schools of engineering toenhance the educational experience of research-oriented graduate students, it is now evident that acomplementary but different culture is needed also to make professionally oriented engineering graduateeducation more relevant to the needs of industry and to further the advanced professional education of themajority of the nation’s engineers who are pursuing
AC 2008-628: NATIONALLY NORMED EXAMS FOR OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTOF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS AND CERTIFICATION OFENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY GRADUATESCarmine Balascio, University of Delaware Carmine C. Balascio, Ph.D., P.E. is an Associate Professor in the Department of Bioresources Engineering at the University of Delaware. He earned bachelor’s degrees in Agricultural Engineering Technology and Mathematics from U.D. He earned an M.S. in Agricultural Engineering and a Ph.D. double major in Agricultural Engineering and Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University. He teaches courses in surveying, soil mechanics, and storm-water management and has research interests in urban hydrology and water
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Lessons learned: A three-office partnership to engage graduate TAs with mental health trainingIntroductionOne in five adults age 18–25 in the U.S. has a diagnosable mental illness [1], and a recentinternational study suggests that graduate students are six times more likely than the generalpopulation to experience depression and anxiety [2]. These trends compel colleges anduniversities to improve how they prepare and support graduate students in managing mentalhealth challenges for themselves, their peers, and the students whom they serve as teachingassistants (TAs).We share lessons from the collaborative design and implementation of an interactive
Paper ID #7481Using a Graduate Student Developed Trajectory Generation Program to Fa-cilitate Undergraduate Spacecraft / Mission Capstone Design ProjectsMr. Martin James Brennan, University of Texas, Austin Martin James Brennan developed a passion for Science and Mathematics at Mississippi State University (MSU), where he met his wife Holly. In December 2008, he received a Bachelor of Science degree in Aerospace Engineering with an emphasis in Astrodynamics, a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics, and a minor in Mathematics. He began his graduate career in Aerospace Engineering with a focus in Orbital Mechanics in
The Learning and Teaching Experiences in a Graduate Level Stem Course for Teacher Educators Faculty Paper K-12 Education (Curriculum Integration) Buket D. Barkana1, Nelson Ngoh2, Allen Cook2 1 School of Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering 2 School of Education University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT 06604 E-mail: {bbarkana; ngoh; acook@bridgeport.edu}Abstract: It is essential that teachers understand the
Paper ID #13857Engineering Project Management Graduate Education in Integrated Soft-ware and Systems Engineering EnvironmentsDr. Radu F. Babiceanu, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Radu Babiceanu is an Associate Professor with the Department of Electrical, Computer, Software, and Systems Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, a M.S. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the University of Toledo, and a B.S. degree in Manufacturing Engineering from the Polytechnic University of Bucharest. His research
undergraduate team.7. ConclusionsThe integration of engineering management graduate students into an undergraduate capstonedesign course has been a unique challenge at all levels. The experience described in this paperwas the first offering of the senior design course that incorporated MEM students. It provided anopportunity to study the changes that were made and provide the feedback necessary to improvesubsequent iterations of the course. As in any significant change to a course, it is an on-goingprocess. However, during this process, the faculty members involved in the process have learneda great deal and are encouraged by the benefits this initial trial has brought to both theundergraduate and graduate students. While an insufficient amount of data
2006-1087: GRADUATE STUDENTS AS CO-INSTRUCTORS FOR ANUNDERGRADUATE COURSE: IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENTBarath Baburao, Tennessee Technological University Barath Baburao is currently working on his Ph.D degree in Chemical Engineering at the Tennessee Technological University. His research deals with thermodynamic modeling of aqueous hydrogen fluoride mixtures. He received his B.Tech degree from Annamalai University (India) and his MS degree from Tennessee Technological University.Donald Visco, Tennessee Technological University Donald P. Visco, Jr. is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and Undergraduate Program Coordinator at Tennessee Technological University. He received his Ph. D
”Intellectual Property Law for Engineers and Scientists,” IEEE and John Wiley & Sons, Publishers (2004) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Online Course on Intellectual Property for Undergraduates and Graduate Engineers and ScientistsIntroduction It can be said with a very high degree of confidence that all of the engineers and scientistsin our technology University classrooms at some point in their professional careers, will comeinto direct contact with the Intellectual Property Laws of this or other countries, and these lawswill have an impact on their extant projects. Whether using these Intellectual Property Laws toobtain exclusive rights covering their
Program An initiative to strengthen the Naval Warfare S&T community began with the desire expressedby the leadership of the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Warfare Centers to strengthenS&T in the WCs. A study team was formed in July 2000 to address the state of S&T work beingperformed in the WCs (Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Naval Undersea Warfare Center(NUWC), Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC), and Space and Naval Warfare SystemsCommand (SPAWAR)). This led to a series of discussions between the Chief of Naval Research(CNR) and WC leadership on developing a strategy for “S&T Revitalization.” CNR provided$5M in FY02, and the WCs contributed similarly to launch an initiative to develop the criticalcapabilities necessary
Graduates for theNineties”, 52nd Annual Meeting, Pacific Northwest Section, American Society for Engineering Education,University of Washington, Seattle, WA, May 17-19,1990.BIOGRAPHYRichard W. Wall received his BSEE in 1968 from the Pennsylvania State University and his MSEE and Ph.D.from the University of Idaho in 1980 and 1989 respectively. He was employed by Idaho Power Company for 18years as a development engineer in the communications, relaying and R&D departments. In 1989, he joined theDepartment of Electrical Engineering at the University of Idaho as an assistant professor where he teachescourses in industrial control and instrumentation. His research interests include networking distributed powersystem protection systems.Kathy Belknap
and in the Internet age. The site providesthem with tips on how to avoid plagiarism while still using other work, and guidelines on how toproperly cite and reference work by others.Concerns of Particular Relevance to Graduate StudentsInternational students frequently have several difficult adjustments to make on arrival in the Page 9.1356.3United States for their graduate studies. The educational system is different. In most cases the “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”language is different
AC 2011-2439: ANALYZING THE TRANSFORMATIVE NATURE OF EN-GINEERING EDUCATION PROPOSALSStephanie M Gillespie, University of Miami Stephanie Gillespie is currently an undergraduate student at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida studying electrical engineering with a concentration in audio. Expected to graduate in May 2012, her career goals include to obtain her Ph.D and teach engineering at the collegiate level. Her research interests include engineering education as well as signal processing for audio applications. In addition to her academic pursuits, Stephanie is currently president of the student chapter of the Society of Women Engineers at the University of Miami. Her research for this paper was
basic research. The seriousness of the effects of thedecline in the number of Americans pursuing graduate studies in engineering has frequently beenperceived differently by research academics in the nation’s universities and by the nation’s advancedengineering practitioners and technology leaders in industry. But the fact remains that a proportionatedecline in the number of Americans engaging in graduate studies in engineering, relative to foreignnationals, has occurred. However, as Barwise and Perry have pointed out: “Different organisms can ripthe same reality apart in different ways that are appropriate to their own needs, their own perceptualabilities and their own capacities for action.” 6 Whereas domestic graduate enrollments have
AC 2009-606: APPLICATION OF THE EXCEED TEACHING MODEL TOIMPROVE GRADUATE TEACHING IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGCOURSESAudra Morse, Texas Tech Page 14.223.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Application of the ExCEEd Teaching Model to Improve Graduate Teaching in Environmental Engineering Courses Page 14.223.2AbstractMany universities employ graduate teaching assistants to help reduce faculty teaching loads.However, the graduate teaching assistants may receive little to no training on teachingeffectiveness. Some universities may have programs to mentor graduate students in effectiveteaching strategies
Director for M.Sc. in Advanced Engineering Design at Brunel. He has published more than 50 papers in reputed journals and conferences. His research interests are Design Theory and Methodology, CAD and Applied FEA. Page 23.1370.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Whether to Cast, Weld or Bolt – Learning Design for Manufacturing through a Graduation Project Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, Aisha Abdulrahman, Shaikha ALDousari, Abeer ALShamsi and Aysha ALAmeri United Arab Emirates University
GC 2012-5641: JSEE ENGAGEMENT WITH AEESEAP TO SUPPORT IN-TERNATIONAL STUDENTS STUDYING IN JAPANProf. Masahiro Takei, Chiba University Masahiro TAKEI PERSONAL Born: August 20, 1965, Tokyo, Japan AFFILIATION Graduate Course of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Artificial Systems Science Chiba University, Chiba Japan WORK EXPERIENCES 1991-1992 Toyota Motor Company, Design Division 1995-2000 Research Assistant, Ni- hon University 2000-2005 Lecturer, Nihon University 2005-2009 Associate Professor, Nihon University 2007 Guest researcher of University Leeds in UK organized by the Royal Society UK 2009-2011 Pro- fessor, Nihon University 2011-Present Professor, Chiba University EDUCATION 1989 Bachelor Course of Waseda
approach addresses the who andwhat of high-quality, relevant program design. Then, the main section unpacks our signaturestrategy – the how of designing targeted, engaging, and demonstrably effective learningexperiences. This strategy, called “Learning Engineering,” offers a research-based, practicalapproach to creating effective learning experiences, avoiding common instructional designpitfalls. Finally, we discuss preliminary, work-in-progress assessment results.1. Online, graduate-level certificatesAmidst the burgeoning array of academic credentials, graduate-level certificates (also known as“micro-masters”) have several key advantages, especially for working engineers. First, they aresmaller and quicker to complete than a full Master’s degree
awareness seminars, science fairs and laboratoryvisits as well as summer intern programs for undergraduates, graduates, and postgraduates to encourage students to pursue science and engineering studies and careers.Application and Selection to the ProgramsOn average, each program receives about 125 student applications annually. Of those,about half of the applicants meet the standards of the programs. The qualificationsrequired for the programs include the following: the student must be beginning full-timePh.D. studies in a graduate program accepted by the company; must have demonstratedhigh potential for success in scientific research; and must be a woman or a member of aminority under-represented in the sciences in the U.S. Awards are given only
demonstratedthe importance of research experiences for the preparation of eventual graduate students. At thepre-graduate level, themes related to network access and the role of the institution in facilitatingintellectual experiences were important for the study participants. At the graduate level, identity-trajectory reiterated the need for careful design of the research laboratory, and the importance ofnetworks for graduate student success.Overview of literatureIdentity-trajectory, introduced by McAlpine 8,10 is a theoretical framework used to understand theprofessional development of graduate students and early career academics through threestrands11: network, intellectual and institution. Network focuses on the relationships andresponsibilities that
translational research development, strategic planning, and implementation of major projects. Ms DeChant is a dynamic leader with 20+ years of experience in higher education, and earned her MBA at Case Western Reserve University, her MS in Cell Biology at Cleveland State University, and her BS at Ohio State University.Dr. Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Eggleston is an Associate Research Professor with Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. A graduate of Purdue University, she earned a PhD in Language Science with a focus on language effects in spatial cognition, large language datasets, and conducted
conferences. Dr. Gong received 2014 NDSU Development Board of Trustee Endowment award and 2014 NDSU Centennial Endowment award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 WIECE: Women Undergraduates in Electrical and Computer Engineering Summer Research ProgramThe Women Undergraduates in Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECE) SummerResearch Program was an intensive eight-week research program for women undergraduates inElectrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). Our goal was to build distinctive experiences thatcan propel female undergraduate students to enter graduate school.1. Motivation.ECE is one of the largest engineering disciplines and it is also one of the oldest
," with University jobs and families. I was the new studentand they were the veterans guiding me through the treacherous shoals of committee selection,course selection, departmental politics, and my nearly paralyzing fear of statistics. Suddenly, Iwas the one graduating and they were left behind. "Why me?" I asked myself.The question haunted me in the days and weeks following my graduation. One major differencein the way I had handled my doctoral program was that I had identified my dissertation topic atthe outset, so I was able to work on it while I took classes, directing each paper toward someportion of my future research. There was no period when I suddenly found myself alone withmy dissertation, without the study groups and classes, without
. Undergraduate engineering education cannotdevelop all of these skills within a four-year curriculum. There is no doubt that undergraduateeducation can begin to develop many of these critical skill-sets for engineering practice.However, as Spitzer has pointed out: “It never has been possible to teach bachelor’s level individuals everything they will ever need to know although the educational system has behaved for many years as if this were a possible achievement.” But as Cranch, former Dean of Engineering at Cornell, has pointed out: • “Much of the attention given to graduate study in engineering has focused on doctoral research, with the master’s degree viewed as merely a
. Goldrein, “Review of Experimental Techniques for High Rate Deformation and Shock Studies,” Workshop NEM-2001 New Experimental Methods in Material Dynamics and Impact, Volume 1, 2001, pp. 89-149.BiographiesEUGENE F. BROWNEugene F. Brown is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech and a former Chair of ASEE’sGraduate Studies Division. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in thermodynamics and fluidmechanics and is the author of many papers and reports describing his research in the areas of computational fluiddynamics and aircraft propulsion. He can be reached at efbrown@Virginia Tech.edu.ROBERT KAVETSKYRobert Kavetsky is currently on a two-year assignment to ONR, where he is directing an ini tiative focused
engineering design, new product development and innovation in variety of industries, in large and small firms with an emphasis on design thinking, most recently in relation to sustainability. He also studies engineering education as a complex system, and the design and evaluation of next generation learning environments. This research is intrinsically multidisciplinary and draws on methodologies from the humanities, social and behavioral sciences and involves collaboration with anthropologists, learning scientists, librarians, designers and architects.Prashant Rajan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Prashant Rajan is a graduate student in the Department of Communication at Purdue University. He is interested in the