Paper ID #23833Incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a System Dynamics CourseDr. Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University Dr. DiBerardino is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in first-year engineering, dynamic systems, and musculoskeletal biome- chanics, and integrating curriculum with the entrepreneurial mindset.Dr. Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University Dr. Funke received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017. He is currently an assistant professor at Ohio Northern University.Dr
Paper ID #22163Partnering Strategies for Paired Formative Assessment in ProgrammingDr. Shanon Marie Reckinger, Stanford University Shanon Reckinger was a faculty in the department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Montana State University from 2015-2017. Before her position at MSU, she was a Clare Boothe Luce Professor at Fairfield University in the department of Mechanical Engineering for four years. She received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder in August of 2011. Her research interests include ocean modeling, computational fluid dynamics, fluid dynamics, and numerical meth
theirclassroom-oriented education. Moreover, this feeling materializes in the demands for hardware-oriented control courses1. As educators, we are sympathetic with these requests but find that theuniversity is generally unable to apply “hands-on” design experience with eventually leads to theproduction of a prototype. This problem has not gone unnoticed in the field of education today,and there have been great leaps in the creation of more “hands-on” teaching methods that lendthemselves to industrial applications2. Throughout schools and universities within the UnitedStates and internationally, there has been growing interest in the use of practical control conceptsin and beyond the classroom. This has been accomplished to a large extent through the use
of structures subjected to forces. Students are notexpected to have selected a major at the time of taking this course. Dynamics was a second-yearcourse taken by students in the mechanical engineering stream which introduced the conceptsof dynamics for particles and rigid bodies. Control systems was taken by mechanical engineeringstudents in their third or fourth year, and focused on modelling systems using transfer functionsand then using these to design simple feedback controllers. These courses were selected for thisproject given they introduce and then build upon challenging yet fundamental engineering con-cepts (Steif and Dollar 2005), have historically poor progression rates (Prusty et al. 2011), and havesignificant emphasis on
Strengthening 21st Century Skills in Undergraduate Students through Project-Based Design CourseDeeksha Seth, Gabriel Carryon, Dr. James TangorraDrexel UniversityAbstractThere is sufficient evidence to support that the need for innovators in the country appeals for amakeover in the engineering pedagogy at a K-16 level. Studies suggest that problem-basedlearning methods can aid in nurturing the development of 21st century (C21) skills namely: “(a)Creativity and Innovation, (b) Critical Thinking and Problem Solving, and (c) Communicationand Collaboration”. To that end, a project-based engineering design course is developed andtaught to undergraduate mechanical engineering students at Drexel University. The
the engineering classroom, research is most accessible at the level of design. It is easy forstudents to recognize the immediate benefits of design experience to their career goals. Thereare three ways that we have introduced research and design into the classrooms at our institution:embedded research, independent research, and travel-study courses.Classroom embedded research is usually the student’s first exposure to undergraduate research.Rather than cookbook labs (“Measure 3 g of sodium, stir briskly”) or projects (“Create a programto analyze thermocouple data”), where appropriate, labs and projects are refocused to allowstudents to explore the material in a way that becomes relevant to them.Independent research on the surface appears to
semesters have produced items as varied as dominoes,pancakes, steel saw horses, and dental floss. The best projects incorporate knowledge frommultiple courses in the curriculum including the courses: Computer Aided Manufacturing,Controls & Instrumentation, Fluid Mechanics, Design & Simulation of Manufacturing Systems,Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Design of Fixtures & Tooling, Production & OperationsManagement, Engineering Economy, Quality Engineering, Facilities & Material HandlingSystems Design, Material Removal Processes, Polymer Processes, Casting/Ceramics & PowderMetal Processes, Bulk/Sheet Forming Processes, Joining and Fastening, Coating/Finishing andPackaging, and Statistics.Since every project is different, they
certain concept, thestudent will take a formative assessment, which will identify the learning of suchcontent. In case some deficiency is noted in the conceptual symmetry, the student willbe sent to a higher level in order to develop the same concept, however in a differentway (incorporating more media and sub-concepts) than the one presented in theprevious level. This way, we are able to diagnose eventual flaws in the teaching-learning process. We have, then, implemented the Diagnostic evaluation. It should be understood that each concept has its own assessment form,presentation of educational materials and mediums. Therefore, in the computerimplementation of such a concept, it will be necessary to make it possible for theteacher to adhere
, operations management, sales, and marketing. Fred has alsoserved as visiting faculty for two years at a European graduate school, and for more than 15 years in outside sales ofadvertising, computer systems, and material handling systems. Email: fguzek@ksu.eduKATHY BROCKWAY holds a B.S. in Business Administration and a Master of Accountancy; is a CertifiedFinancial Manager, a Certified Management Accountant, and a Certified Public Accountant. Kathy has taughtmultiple courses in accounting, economics and finance, as well as operations management. She has worked inpublic accounting, consulting, and the health care industry. Email: kjbrock@ksu.eduTROY BROCKWAY holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a Master of Science in Aviation Safety
vary for K-12 engineering, typically the curriculadevelopment and materials themselves are the focal point of investigation and study. In thisproject, prevalent materials (Engineering is Elementary) were selected to serve as the curricularbasis for the structuring a data-informed elementary engineering model for grades 3-5.Project OverviewThe two-year National Institutes of Health funded project, Engineering Design Models inElementary Schools, uses engineering design as an integral part of the full educational day. Thisfully integrated approach merges technological knowledge and concepts, fundamental design-based content, and basic engineering associated processes with the comprehensive study ofmathematics, science, language arts, and social
innovatorsBiological design Computer science Computer Chemical engineering programs • Entrepreneurs and problem solvers engineering engineering • Global citizens who are the engineers Computer systems Construction Environmental and and technologists of the future engineering Robotics and Materials Science management
not adequate to generate skilled workforce tofulfil the industry needs. This work presents a case study where a learner-centered team-projectapproach is applied in a microprocessor based system design course that is intended for seniorsand graduate students of a College of Engineering. Team-project is introduced in this course sothat students can work in a lab as groups and enhance their hands-on experience. Because of thediverse backgrounds, each group is encouraged to find a topic of their interest within theobjective of the course. The pedagogy for this course is improved for the classroom andlaboratory activities so that the new approach helps increase students’ involvement with thecourse materials. Based on the final grades, this
having difficulties understanding the materials presented in Planning and Scheduling classes –options that weren’t really available in the past without the help of industry video materials. The complementary liveindustry-based educational model is intended to validate the concepts learned in class. Through a series of interviewquestions performed by students, SI and PM are imparting knowledge about major topics learned in class: projectdescription and details of activities with their durations, development of initial schedule, maintaining and updatingthe schedules during the project, schedule changes and their effects, technology usage in the respective companysetting. Using a reversed model (industry-based) will enable students to account
on different real-worldcontrol configurations. This adjustment to incorporate the more practical format into theclassroom has taken different forms throughout the academic world. In the TechnischeUniversiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands, the modeling of control systems is an important part oftheir Bachelor’s in mechanical engineering degree curriculum3. There is a gradual introduction toreal world systems that begins with a lower level course where the students are introduced tomathematical concepts and A/D conversion and ends with a final year project that incorporatesthe manipulation of various feedback controllers to accomplish a specific task. In this way thestudents are transported from the theoretical understanding to actual
Engineering Education Research Center. He holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Organizational Change from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in Student Development Administration from Seattle University, and a B.S. in General Engineering from Gonzaga University. His research interests include teaching and learning in engineering, STEM education policy, and diversity and equity in STEM.Mr. Brett Tallman P.E., Montana State University Brett Tallman is currently a Doctoral student in Engineering at Montana State University (MSU), with focus on engineering leadership. His previous degrees include a Masters degree in Education from MSU (active learning in an advanced quantum mechanics environment) and a B.S. in
propagation, novel materials for microwave application, and electromagnetic scatteringJohn DeLeon, Kansas State University-Salina Dr. John De Leon is Professor and Head of Engineering Technology at K-State at Salina. He worked 10 years in industry prior to joining academia where he served 11 years as a faculty member teaching in areas of computer aided design, quality control, industrial ecology and industrial safety. He has published several manuscripts on subject matter related to these curricula. His scholarly pursuits include securing extramural funding for assisting traditionally underrepresented students in engineering technology complete their education
offundamental ideas and presenting them at a concrete level that is immediately meaningfulto the students. To apply this theory, we had to radically change the order in which wecovered the topics. In fact, we now cover topics in exactly the reverse order in whichthey were covered before.This new "bottom up" approach utilizes an intensive regimen of laboratory exercises,which require students to add a new feature to an existing corpus of software. To add thenew feature, a student must first understand and then redesign (or refactor) the existingcode, which we designed for the purpose of illustrating the complexities that arise inlarge software. Each of these lab exercises gives students a basis in experience forunderstanding the lecture material, which
they worked on the problem and agreed with the solution. Allmembers of the homework team are expected to participate and work together in thehomework/study group. The motivation for forming homework teams is two fold. First, numerousstudies have shown that “collaborative learning” (i.e. working as a group) is an effective way tolearn material. Second, as students move out into industry they find that most engineering projectsare group projects and that they need to learn to work with people in a group or team setting. Istress to the students that the purpose of the working in teams is not to “spread the work around,”but to enable each team member to learn and benefit from the knowledge and perspective ofothers. All students are responsible for
to the adoption of automation and robotics,such as high initial costs, a lack of specialized workers, and resistance to transitioning fromtraditional methods. It hypothesizes that large-scale enterprises are more likely to successfullyintegrate these technologies due to their greater access to financial and technical resources,whereas smaller firms face more significant challenges due to inadequate infrastructure andregulatory frameworks. The study concludes with recommendations to overcome these barriers,promoting the broader use of automation and robotics in the construction industry to enhanceefficiency and overall performance.Keywords: Automation, Robotics, Mechanization, Workforce Shortages, Construction sector,Technological
revision cycle with their design work.The CEE curriculum allows students to pursue one of two emphasis tracks, infrastructure orenvironmental engineering. Students in either track take a minimum of two courses each in thewater resources, structures, and geotechnical areas as well as Surveying, Introduction toEnvironmental Engineering and common courses in statics, mechanics, materials science, andprofessional practice. There is also an eight-semester sequence of engineering clinics. Theenvironmental track also includes four additional courses in environmental engineering while theinfrastructure track has two additional structural engineering and two transportation engineeringcourses. The curriculum results in students with a broad view of civil
Paper ID #23898Detecting Plagiarism in SolidWorks CAD CoursesDr. Webster R. Johnson, California State University, Chico Dr. W.R. Johnson has been a researcher and university professor for the past four decades. He is currently a lecturer at California State University at Chico, lecturing in CAD, thermodynamics, numerical methods, material science and testing, dynamics, and heat transfer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Detecting Plagiarism in SolidWorks CAD CoursesAbstractThe mechanical engineering program at California State University at Chico requires twocourses
Session 1413 INDUSTRY AND ACADEMIA: A SYNERGISTIC INTERACTION THAT ENHANCES UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION Stephanie Farrell, Robert P. Hesketh, C. Stewart Slater, and Mariano J. Savelski Department of Chemical Engineering Rowan University Glassboro, NJ USAAbstractRowan University has developed a program that fosters synergistic interaction between industryand academia. This program provides a mechanism for performing industrially sponsoredresearch or design projects in an academic environment. One of the unique features of thisprogram is its
demonstrate that it is not that one metaphor is correct andthe other wrong; but that in certain situations and at certain stages in the development of a learner,one serves us better than the other. Cobb and Bowers 19 take a similar position.While there have been calls such as those by Sfard and Cobb & Bowers to adopt a balanced positionbetween the knowledge-centered and activity-centered approaches, there doesn’t seem to be anysystem that actually does so in an integrated and seamless manner, i.e., a system that effectivelyexploits IT tools and mechanisms and shifts the focus of the student at the right moments and ina seamless manner from knowledge-centered activities such as working on specific problems onspecific topis to such activities as
Session 1526 MECHATRONICS/PROCESS CONTROL REMOTE LABORATORY Hong Wong, Vikram Kapila, and Anthony Tzes Department of Mechanical Engineering Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NYAbstract Under an NSF—DUE sponsored laboratory development program, we have developed amultidisciplinary mechatronics/process control remote laboratory (MPCRL) consisting of anarray of experiments, which expose students to elements of aerospace, mechanical, electrical,civil, and chemical engineering. A new laboratory curriculum and manual have been developedto introduce students to PC-based
Performance Cash awards). Dr. Richard is involved in many outreach activities: e.g., tutoring, mentoring, directing related grants (for example, a grant for an NSF REU site). Dr, Richard is active in professional societies (American Physical Society (APS), American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), etc.), ASEE, ASME. Dr. Richard has authored or co-authored about 25 techni- cal articles (19 of which are refereed publications). Dr. Richard teaches courses ranging from first-year introductory engineering design, fluid mechanics, to space plasma propulsion.Dr. Tanya Dugat Wickliff, Texas A&M University Delivering significant results in pivotal roles such as Sr. Consultant to high-profile clients, Sr. Project
comparison with other forms of communication?Second, the experiment investigated possible adverse effects of IM use, as follows: • Does the use of IM foster excessive dependence on the instructor? • Does the use of IM foster excessive informality in the instructor-student relationship? • Does the use of IM place an excessive demand on faculty time?The experiment was conducted in two different undergraduate engineering mechanics courses atthe U.S. Military Academy at West Point, during the fall semester of Academic Year 2004-2005.The first, CE300 Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design, is an introductory coursein statics and mechanics of materials. During the semester in which the experiment wasconducted, 87 students (in six sections
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chemical Engineering Division in 2017.Dr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years as an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering and Experiential Engineering Education Departments at Rowan. Kaitlin has a BS in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University and an MS and PhD in Environmental Engineering in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois.Mr. Bruce Oestreich, Rowan UniversityDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces
currently the Pope Professor of chemical engineering at BYU, and is an Adjunct Research Professor in the Bioengineering Department of the University of Utah. During his 24 years at BYU, his teaching has been in the areas of materials, polymers, and transport phenomena. His research has spanned many disciplines, ranging from biomedical material surfaces and composite materials to his current work in controlled drug and gene delivery. With colleagues and students at BYU and other institutions, he has more than 110 peer-reviewed journal publications.Prof. Morris D. Argyle, Brigham Young University Page 25.78.1
of B and C.Statics is chosen as an exemplar because recent (c) Worked Example 2research has shown that students have severalmisconceptions about its content even after Figure 1. Prototype Views of the Adaptivecompleting a Statics course [27]. As the course is a Concept Map Cyberlearning Toolfoundational course that many other courses buildoff of, such as dynamics and mechanics of materials, conceptual understanding is particularlyimportant. Additionally, the domain has a valid and reliable evaluation tool that is capable ofassessing students’ conceptual
Paper ID #38221Supporting Engineering Graduate Students in ProfessionalIdentity Cultivation through Disciplinary StewardshipMegan Frary Megan Frary is an Associate Professor in the Micron School of Materials Science and Engineering (MSMSE). She also serves as the Associate Director for Undergraduate Programs in the MSMSE. Since 2013, Dr. Frary has also been the Coordinator for Graduate TA Support in the Center for Teaching and Learning; in this role, she works with graduate students to better prepare them for their current and future teaching work. Dr. Frary has been recognized for her teaching work with both