-generation category. Weanalyzed survey responses assessing sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and institutionalsupport. The survey explores three dimensions: 1) general belonging, 2) belonging ineducational interactions, and 3) self-efficacy, each with eight items. The survey coversvarious aspects of the institution's student services, including psychological support,academic planning, tutoring, health and well-being services, sports, and supplementary areaslike leadership, diversity, gender, and participatory meetings. It totals 29 items. Respondentsexpressed their views using a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly agree" to "stronglydisagree." Our findings reveal that all surveyed students exhibit a strong sense of belonging(both in general and
Paper ID #43932Evaluating the Impact of a Summer Engineering Program Using the NationalStudent Clearinghouse (Evaluation of Program)Dr. Edward Collins, Non-profit Edward Collins has experience and research interests in learning analytics, assessment, and college student choice. Edward obtained his doctoral degree from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, master’s from the University of New Orleans, and bachelor’s from Louisiana State University.Dr. Rochelle L Williams, Northeastern University Rochelle L. Williams, Ph.D. is the Chief Programs Officer at the National Society of Black Engineers. She is a former Chair of the MIND
model'sefficiency, the productivity levels it fosters, and the challenges and opportunities it presents. Byfocusing on the design-build approach as implemented in the MSU curriculum, our aim is togauge its impact on students' learning outcomes as well as any potential impact on theirexpectations and perceptions of the construction industry.Experimental MethodsThe current study utilizes a quantitative approach via a survey instrument to carefully investigatestudents’ perception of design-build as a learning model and assess its efficacy in deliveringconstruction management content to students. A multi-section survey instrument was developed,to first collect information on various demographic variables as well as various dimensions oflearning through
ethical standards, followsinstitutional policies, and adequately protects research participants, IRB approval was obtained forthe study. To obtain data, a convenient sampling approach was employed, and participants wererecruited through various campus classrooms and student events at XXX University (de-identified). The current paper reports on the second phase of the study which was conducted in theFall 2023 and Spring 2024 semesters. Participants were first asked to do the Morning EveningQuestionnaire (MEQ) test. The MEQ is a self‐assessment survey developed primarilyfor monitoring respondents for sleep‐related experiments to perform a quick assessment ofcircadian rhythm and sleep rhythm patterns in individuals. Having the MEQ result recorded
. During theweeding party, students selected a planting area and cleared this area of weeds. Students workedwith a faculty member to select and purchase plants from a local nursery, which were planted inthe cleared area during the planting party. Additional weeds were cleared during the plantingparty. During both weeding and planting parties, the faculty member taught students about thefunction of the green roof and the issues caused by lack of maintenance. Planting techniqueswere also taught during the planting party.Community Building Assessment. To assess whether these activities helped build community,students were asked the reason for coming during both years. A survey was given during year 2,which included the following declarative
outcomes. Scholarssuch as Felder and Brent have emphasized the importance of disciplined inquiry into teachingmethodologies to improve the learning experiences of engineering students especially related toactive learning [6], [7]. SoTL allows educators to systematically investigate effectiveinstructional strategies and assess their impact on student learning. Previous research hasunderscored the transformative potential of SoTL emphasizing its role in shaping curriculardesign and facilitating evidence-based teaching approaches [8]. Reflective practice and practicedissemination, two key components of SoTL, holds the potential to accelerate growth not only atthe micro (classroom) level but also at the meso (institutional) and macro (national
comprehensive introduction to the innovation process, encompassing arange of critical topics. These included (1) the generation of ideas, (2) principles of the lean startupmethodology, (3) project management techniques, (4) market analysis and assessment of uservalue, (5) fundamentals of intellectual property rights, (6) cost analysis procedures, (7)manufacturing processes, and (8) strategies for scaling operations from proof of concept, throughthe pilot phase, to full-scale production.During the fall semester, students were immersed in the innovation process through acomprehensive curriculum that included interactive lectures delivered by field experts, prescribedreadings, access to online videos from specialists, and case study analyses. As the
significantly enhance the support andopportunities offered to its scholars and to conduct meaningful research studies that includesignificant-sized intersectional populations.1.1. Implementation and evaluationThe program adopts a cohort-based model, wherein a new cohort comprising 15 students perinstitution is recruited at the beginning of each Fall semester. These students are providedfinancial assistance to alleviate their academic burdens, allowing them time to concentrate ontheir studies and actively participate in the program's various events and activities.For the overall program assessments, the external evaluators and the internal researcher teamhave used different methods, such as surveys, interviews, and observations. On the other hand
populations. some of our mentors already hadformalized training from their workplaces. All mentors were invited to a training that supportedthe mentors’ intercultural competence. To facilitate that, we utilized the InterculturalDevelopment Inventory (IDI) Instrument [12]. The goal of incorporating the InterculturalDevelopment Inventory (IDI) training was to equip mentors to successfully connect with andempower increasingly diverse mentees [13]. The IDI assesses mentors’ intercultural competenceacross a continuum from monocultural to intercultural mindsets. By first understanding their owncapabilities for cultural bridging, mentors can then develop the adaptability and skills needed toengage inclusively. With the help of a trained IDI facilitator, the
opportunities after completing the program.Therefore, the program’s objectives centered around assessing the development of the multi-tieredmentoring community and the impact it had on the students’ STEM identity development, theformation of mentor-mentee relationships between different levels of the community, skills neededto complete a STEM degree, and plans to seek additional STEM opportunities.3. Materials and Methods3.1 Mentor Training The program’s emphasis on mentoring relationships began with mentor training. The NSFresearch experiences and mentoring initiative provided mentor training to the PI and lead graduatestudents well in advance of students arriving for the program. This training focused on issuesexperienced by URM, first
Congress andExposition. Volume 5: Education and Globalization. San Diego, California, USA.November 15–21, 2013. V005T05A028. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2013-63930[12] Ermer, G. E. (2013, June). The Four Pillars of Manufacturing as a Tool forEvaluating Course Content in the Mechanical Concentration of a General EngineeringCurriculum. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1201).[13] Plouff, C., Pung, C. P., & Jack, H. (2014, June). Using the four pillars ofmanufacturing engineering model to assess curricular content for accreditation purposes.In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24-1350).[14] Pung, C. P., & Jack, H. (2014, June). Industry-Based Senior Projects and the FourPillars of Manufacturing
evaluating the finalreport, in-class quiz, exams, presentation, and survey. Learning Method of measurement Outcome Number [i] Conducted in-class quizzes after teaching each module of seven different AM process categories. Midterm exam and Final exam were given to assess the understanding of these process categories. [ii] Taught Fusion 360 CAD software for Generative Design Module and 3D printing part file preparation. Assignments were given to study the various printing parameters and design requirements for each AM process category. [iii] Trained students in three different commercial yet free-of-cost slicing software (IdeaMaker and Cura,) for the 3D
9 Black 5 2 1 Hispanic/Latino 2 4 2Limitations and Future workTracking long-term enrollment outcomes post-participation is a future focus, necessitating longerstudies and collaboration with more institutions. Assessment of the program's impact on students'academic and career choices through follow-up surveys or interviews is vital, however, ensuringscalability and replicability across diverse educational settings requires refining the program'smaterials and implementation strategies. The team is planning to employ a more comprehensiveevaluation methods such as pre- and post-program assessments and
-led projects that add value to their organization. • We have identified partners through internet searching, cold calling, meeting at social or professional events, connecting through peers, and accessing our personal networks.Once a partner is identified, we need to communicate to onboard them. Emails work well forinitial introductions, but we encourage phone or video calls to be able to share more details aboutthe course needs and the benefits we can provide. Key to this interaction is that we are partneringwith our community partner, building a shared agenda and seeking to truly understand their goalsand needs. • When onboarding a new partner, we assess the partner’s bandwidth (if they can mentor students or just
success lies in progression within acurriculum. Obstacles in curricular pathways can delay graduation and increase the likelihoodof students discontinuing their education. Thus, examining these interventions in the contextof their direct effect on degree progression is crucial. Our approach to studying student successtakes a reductionist stance, similar to how natural sciences interpret complex biological phenom-ena through underlying chemical and physical principles. However, this approach faces severalchallenges. One significant difficulty is quantifying the impact of specific interventions or re-forms on a student’s progress within their degree program. An example of this complexity isthe assessment of the effect of an internship program on
experience in teaching. She was an instructor in Ershad Damavand University, a visiting instructor in School of International Studies and Outreach at Oklahoma State University, and a teaching associate in School of Construction Management Technology at Oklahoma State University. She has also over 14 years of experience in industry.She has worked in Neyrperse company as an Engineering Expert, as a Technical Office Supervisor in Mapna group, as a Mechanical Engineering Supervisor in construction (Professional Engineer) in Iranian Construction Engineers Organization, and as a Consultant in Roll-2-Roll Technologies LLC in Oklahoma. Her research interests include sustainable project management, sustainability assessment
improve the sense of belonging and mitigate tokenism,” Clin. Imaging, p. 109987, 2023.[7] I. Anakok, J. Hess, S. Panuganti, and A. Katz, “WIP: Exploring Faculty Members’ Conceptualizations of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering Education,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.[8] M. S. Tooley and E. E. Umphress, “Work in progress - the ethics of diversity: Addressing diversity issues in undergraduate engineering ethics education,” in 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct. 2009, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350838.[9] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, C. Swan, D. Knight, and N. E. Canney, “Variations in Reflections as a Method for Teaching and Assessment of
Paper ID #42665Board 28: Work in Progress: Glucose Analyzer Learning Module for ChemicalEngineering Education TheoryRiley Jackson Fosbre, Washington State UniversityProf. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University (WSU) faculty for 41 years and for the past 27 years has focused much of his effort on developing, implementing, assessing and propagating use of hands-on modules and interactive exercises that can be
instructors to create and organize student groups and ex-ercises. Additionally, students interact with the web application to access tutorials for the exercisethey’re playing, answer assessment questions, and interact with the instructor via a real time chat.We also provide connection information for the virtual environments and an interactive in-browserterminal. The control framework for exercise deployment is managed via Terraform to allow in-structors to deploy pre-designed Docker containers on demand, depending on which exercise theyare running. This also allows designing new exercises to be a very flexible and streamlined pro-cess, since any Docker image can easily be turned into a new exercise [7]. As a result of usingDocker as our only
-specific application, and financial need assessment via the FAFSA. All PTG scholars had tobe Pell Grant eligible.For recruitment of the second and third cohorts, interviews were added as a final step in the PTGscholar selection process to better identify which applicants held the most promise of persisting inthe program. Each student’s 15-minute interview was held on the last day of an informational PTGrecruitment weekend paid for by the Honors College and the College of Engineering wherefinalists were accommodated in the residence halls and parents or guardians were provided withhotel accommodations. [13, 14]Student Success Focused ComponentsScholarships: PTG addresses financial challenges by offering scholarships, essential for
from the CNNLoc to pinpoint the user’s precise location, which will then be displayedon the map.Performance EvaluationTo assess the effectiveness of CampNav, we compared the number of steps required to locatea classroom using CampNav against the steps needed when not using it and when usingClassfind. The table below shows that CampNav requires the fewest steps and the leastamount of time. Table 1: Number of Steps Needed to Locate a Classroom by Methodology Steps CampNav Without assistance ClassFind 1 Open CampNav Open Browser Open Browser 2 Type on search bar
largerdataset collected as part of our National Science Foundation-funded research. Through thisreview, we aim to comprehensively assess the design, implementation, and evaluation of co-curricular programs for Latinx engineering students, gathering insights from variousstakeholders, including students, faculty, and administrators. Our study seeks to highlight thecultural significance of co-curricular programs at HSIs, aiming to foster the creation of moreinclusive and culturally tailored initiatives to support Latinx students. IntroductionHispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) play a crucial role in attracting and retaining Latinx andBlack, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) engineering students in higher
instructionaldesign in computational fluid mechanics: Student perspectives on learning,” Int. J. Mech. Eng.Educ., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 51–77, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/0306419020915725.[10] K. Moodley, “Improvement of the learning and assessment of the practical component ofa Process Dynamics and Control course for fourth year chemical engineering students,” Educ.Chem. Eng., vol. 31, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2020.02.002.[11] R. E. Stalmeijer, D. H. J. M. Dolmans, I. H. A. P. Wolfhagen, A. M. M. Muijtjens, and A.J. J. Scherpbier, “The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire,” Acad. Med., vol. 85, no. 11,pp. 1732–1738, Nov. 2010, doi: doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f554d6.[12] A. Godwin, A. Kirn, and J. A. Rohde, “Awareness Without Action: Student
corresponding tools will be includedwithin the school’s annual curriculum review. Evaluation of frequency of use of tools by studentteams and faculty will continue to be considered. Map adjustments can be made as a result of theannual reviews and evaluations.Student feedback is collected throughout the year and through end-of-semester studentevaluations. Data on the use of the subway map, from student and instructor perspective, will becollected and analyzed. We will assess whether and how the implementation of the subway mapenhances the overall effectiveness of the design curriculum.Our team believes this map concept could be useful for any program with an open-ended designproject within its curriculum, whether limited to the senior year or any
Polytechnic Institute and State University Huggins is a Research Scientist in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech. She holds a master’s in public administration from the National Experimental University of T´achira in Venezuela. In addition, she has several years of experience in research and practice at graduate education level in the engineering field, with special focus on assess based perspectives, minoritized students’ socialization, and agency in graduate education. Her strengths include qualitative research study design and implementation. Her dissertation examined Latinx motivation to pursue Ph.D. in engineering, minoritized engineering doctoral students’ socialization and the impact of the
understanding; and backward design. Culturalrelevance emphasizes the need to understand students’ linguistic, geographic, gender, racial, andgenerational, among other cultural, knowledge as assets that can be leveraged for curriculum andteaching [3]. Concept-based understanding prioritizes inquiry-based learning and application andtransferability of knowledge versus rote memorization of information or discrete skillacquisition. Backwards design provides an accessible structure for planning assessment andlearning activities in ways that center conceptual understanding and student inquiry [4]. Teacherskept reflective journals, analyzed science and mathematics state standards frameworks, and*1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
resort to using text and static images,which may potentially limit students' understandings of these complex topics.The primary goal is to fill the void in networking education by introducing an interactive 3Dmodel. This innovative approach is designed to empower educators with effective tools forconveying intricate concepts, enriching the learning experience through dynamic andcaptivating visualizations. Accessible via a user-friendly website, our 3D model makes thelearning process of computer networks knowledge immersive, smooth, and intuitive.To assess the effectiveness of our design in terms of users' overall experience whileinteracting with the animations and their improvements on knowledge requirements, a trialsurvey was conducted among
design an experiment to address the design brief. In addition tosolving the problem, students must ensure their solution is realistic through considerations ofcosts, safety, and regulations. Students then write a memo, design report, or white paper as theirlab assessment. They report both their technical results, individual interpretations, andrecommendations based on the results.Early labs in the sequence contain significant scaffolding for students through guiding questions,examples, and class discussions. This scaffolding is slowly removed throughout the coursesequence to help students develop independence. The sequence ends with an open-endedlaboratory in which students are given a mystery material and must determine the type ofmaterial and
reasoning. [5][6]The engineering of these systems will require the development of ethical frameworks capable ofsupporting these evolving technologies. A common theme in pondering the consequences ofdeveloping Self-Aware AI is the question: will the AI decide humans are unnecessary ordestructive to the planet and destroy them? Or might they decide to aid and enhance the life ofhumans? [7] Earlier studies exploring issues of trust have been measured indirectly throughgame play and the element of surprise elicited from Reactive Machines AI and Limited MemoryAI [8]. Assessing levels of trust might also be explored by studying to what extent AI exhibits“altruistic” behavior. Are cognitive, pre-trained AI truly capable of learning “altruistic”behaviors
applications, scholarship, and regional impacts. The study is on-goingthrough interviews and surveys of participants. The effort to examine faculty development gains andpotential is exploratory. We hope that we will be able to assess these impacts of the group in formative waythat allows us to increase research productivity in a place where teaching is historically predominant. Whatwe find may be directly applicable to engineering colleges and departments in similar situations wherefaculty may feel underserved and under supported in their research ambitions.REFERENCES(1) Huerta, M.; London, J.; McKenna, A. Engineering deans' perspectives on the current state of facultydevelopment programs in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering