feedback is currently our best mechanism for unpacking what works anddoes not work in terms of encouraging students to react to and learn from TA feedback. Theseresearch results are fed back in to the TA professional development with open-ended problems.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to express their appreciation of the staff and TAs who have participated inMEA training and grading. Their dedication has made a significant contribution to ourunderstanding of how to successfully implement open-ended problems in first-year engineeringcourses.This work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (EEC 0835873).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author and do not
engineers ingeneral, and few civil engineers in particular, seek or gain leadership positions outside of theirtechnical specialties. Only two Presidents have been engineers, Presidents Herbert Hoover(mining engineer) and Jimmy Carter (nuclear engineer), and currently, there are only twolicensed engineers in Congress—Rep. Joe Barton, P.E. (R-TX-06) who holds a B.S. degree inengineering from Texas A&M University and a Master’s degree in industrial administration, andRep. John Hostettler, P.E. (R-IN-08) who holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering fromRose-Hulman Institute of Technology.25 Furthermore, as will be discussed below, engineers arebeing passed up for executive and management positions, often for people with a Masters ofBusiness
schedule. In a similar way, separating the electronic design phase fromthe manufacturing and assembly issues may create costly problems that can be prevented.Therefore, it is crucial to make sure that the design is completely correct before the manufacturingand testing stages.To be able to produce graduates who are prepared for industry, engineering and engineeringtechnology programs should be aware of the latest industry design trends and ready to incorporateinto their curricula the relevant materials and techniques. While this paper mainly addresses Page 4.225.1electronic design, the concepts apply to other engineering and engineering
armature rotation • Develop an understanding of MOSFET applications and how H-Bridge configurations are used to manipulate current direction • Derive appropriate kinematic equations for a differential drive mechanism • Understand how a differential drive mechanism operates and how changing conditions influence the motion of the roverResources and Materials Required • Arduino Engineering Kit (AEK) components • Windows PC with MATLAB installed • A screwdriver to assemble the roverInitialization: Connecting the Rover to MATLABNOTE: Always ensure that the battery is off before connecting the rover to the PC using the USB cable.Before performing any operations while connected to USB, elevate the rover so that the
. Page 14.938.7Richard Martin, PhD, PE, Aztec Engineering.Design Project for Spring 2008: Develop a SolidWorks assembly for a steam locomotiveengine.Partial instructions: ≠ You should ignore all of the detailed piping on the boiler. ≠ All bolts may be omitted. ≠ Clear glass (set material) window panes must be used on the cab. They do not have to slide or open. ≠ The drive mechanism should be included, except the numbered items in the diagram on page 2 (Figure 3.) may be omitted. Note that part of the drive mechanism is missing from the train in the picture. ≠ The headlight may be a simple circular shape on the front of the tank, and need not be clear. Extra credit will be given for more
Mohamad Mustafa is a Professor of Civil Engineering Technology and the Chair of the Engineering Technology Department at Savannah State University (SSU). He has six years of industrial experience prior to teaching at SSU. He received his BS, MS, and PhD in Civil Engineering from Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.Dr. Mir M. Hayder, Savannah State University Dr. Hayder is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Savannah State University, GA. He received PhD in Mechanical Engineering from McGill University, Canada. His re- search interest lies in the areas of engineering education studies, robotics, fluid-structure interaction, flow- induced vibrations, syngas and blended fuel
focuses the impact of motivation on performance and persistence in mechanical engineering, design cognition and neurocognition, and manufacturing training in design courses. Elisabeth is an active member of ASEE, ASME, Tau Beta Pi, and Order of the Engineer.Dr. Alexander R. Murphy, Florida Polytechnic University Dr. Alexander Murphy is currently an Assistant Professor at Florida Polytechnic University. Before this position, he held a Research Associate appointment at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). He was awarded an ASEE eFellows fellowship funded by NSF for the postdoctoral research position at UTD. He completed my Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in July of 2021 at the Georgia Institute of Technology in
graded the laboratory reports. Students were aware that evaluation from anexternal instructor could affect their grade. Activities were established (i.e., icebreakeractivities) for meaningful and entertaining introductions between the individual teammembers prior to technical interactions.The intent of the icebreaker activities was to introduce a level of familiarity between teammembers that did not have the ability to meet in person. The icebreaker exercisesincluded some geotechnical engineering content and the performance on these exerciseswas included in the scope of materials being graded for the assignment. An elaborateinformation-based treasure hunt (in equation format) was used to promote sharing oftechnical and entertaining informational
AC 2012-3572: TINKERING TO INTRODUCE TECHNOLOGY, DEVEL-OPING AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE STUDENT’S PLAY PREFER-ENCESProf. Daphene C. Koch Ph.D., Purdue University, West Lafayette Daphene C. Koch is Assistant Professor in building construction management in the College of Tech- nology. She has more than 10 years of industry experience, which she brings to teaching. Her areas of research include mechanical systems in buildings and STEM outreach, recruiting, and retention.Dr. Mary E. Johnson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary E. Johnson is Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head for graduate studies and research in the Aviation Technology Department at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. Prior to joining
, almost all schools of engineering have programs in mechanical,electrical, chemical and civil engineering which are the four largest shown in this figure as well.Note the category of “other” includes a wide variety of disciplines not otherwise mentioned. Page 7.455.6“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Fig. 3. Fields of Study of US Students Who Study Abroad 90 80 77
programs at other universities.This work presents an indoor air pollution project that provides students an opportunity todevelop and test a hypothesis related to an indoor air quality issue that interests them. Themethods and materials required to implement this educational experience in environmentalengineering programs to meet ABET accreditation requirements are also presented. Preparationfor the project requires student teams (3-4 students) to develop a basic evaluation and samplingprotocol to test a potential indoor air pollution problem. Students identify a pollutant of concern,either a gas (CO, Cl, VOC, Radon, O3, etc.) or particulate matter, and identify a feasible and safelocation on campus for testing. Student teams are required to
Paper ID #24663Fostering Curiosity, Creating Value, and Making Connections in First-YearStudents Through Product ArchaeologyDr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering and Expe- riential Engineering Education Departments at Rowan. Kaitlin has a BS in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University and an MS and PhD in Environmental Engineering in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois.Mr. Bruce D. Oestreich, Rowan UniversityDr
forgathering both quantitative and qualitative data about our instructional activities. In summer2015, the team participated in a retreat at which a number of methods of data collection wereproposed. Four areas were selected for further development. A formal method for solicitingfaculty feedback via a post-instruction survey has already been deployed and will collectresponses throughout the fall 2015 and spring 2016 semesters. Three additional data collectionmethods will be launched in January 2016: a peer observation system, a rubric-based self-assessment, and analysis of student work products generated in the library instruction sessions.Collectively, these feedback mechanisms provide actionable information about the teachingeffectiveness of
Paper ID #20097Khan Academy Style Videos For Sophomore To Senior Aerospace Engineer-ing Courses (Work in Progress Paper)Dr. John Valasek, Texas A&M University John Valasek is the Thaman Professor of Undergraduate Teaching Excellence, the Director, Center for Autonomous Vehicles and Sensor Systems (CANVASS), the Director, Vehicle Systems & Control Labo- ratory, Professor of Aerospace Engineering, and member of the Honors Faculty at Texas A&M University. He teaches courses in Aircraft Design, Atmospheric Flight Mechanics, Modern Control of Aerospace Sys- tems, Vehicle Management Systems, and Cockpit Systems &
Letting the Course Follow the Topic William R. Peterson and, Guanghsu Chang Minnesota State University, MankatoAbstractThis paper builds on an earlier paper which chronicles an experiment in teaching a graduate levelseminar in engineering management. In the original experiment the students developed thesyllabus details to include which subjects to address and the grading scheme. Thus the courseaddressed topics of interest to the students and for which they were in turn required to findappropriate reading and research material. A different but similar course using this technique isreported as well as the use of the techniques in non-similar courses.Background
described above.Fig. 4 shows a breakdown of the disclosures made to the Office in fiscal year 2002 and divided byengineering discipline. Not surprisingly, the two largest departments, Electrical Engineering andComputer Science and Mechanical Engineering, comprise a significant majority of the activity. Biomedical Engineering Nuclear Engineering Miscellaneous Chemical Engineering Materials Science Industrial and Operations Engineering Mechanical Engineering
-track and non-tenure-trackacademics; from a diverse set of disciplines:mathematics, physics, biology, chemistry, astrophysics, Fig. 1 Workshop participants camemany areas of engineering, including chemical, civil, from varied disciplinary, ethnic and career level backgrounds.environmental, mechanical, biomedical, electrical,computer science, etc. Over the first two years, the participants were 63% engineers and37% scientists (including mathematicians). 91% of the participants were female, while9% of the participants were male, two thirds of those being spouses of femaleparticipants. 39% of the participants were from underrepresented groups in SEM(including Asian women
of effectiveness. Future iterations of the system will provide the teacherwith suggestions on what the student may be currently struggling with or what they might strugglewith in the near future. In addition, the DIME map will develop unique features for each studentbased on their feature network, which is determined by that student’s interaction with the DIMEmap and performance in the course (teacher feedback). Students and teachers can use the DIMEmap with any STEM material that contains mathematical expressions, making it a diverse tool formultiple subjects.Reference List [1] Ngo, C. C., and K. Gramoll. "A Web-based Electronic Book (eBook) for Fluid Mechanics."age 9 (2004): 1.[2] Learning with Python: Interactive Edition 2.0.http
systems is described inthe Department of Transportation's Systems Engineering Plan (SEP). It places a strong emphasison the lifespan perspective, making sure that every stage—from creation to disposal—ismethodically handled. Stakeholder involvement, requirements specification, risk management,and validation procedures are some of the important components of the strategy. It seeks toguarantee system safety and dependability while lowering expenses and improving projectefficiency. To continually enhance system engineering procedures, the SEP also incorporates bestpractices and lessons discovered. The Systems Engineering Plan used by the US Department of Defense is divided into sixphases: “User Needs, Material, Solution, Analysis,” Technology
Paper ID #10733Creating a STEM Identity: Investment with ReturnJanet Callahan Ph.D., Boise State University Janet Callahan is the Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at Boise State University and a Professor in the Materials Science and Engineering Department. Dr. Callahan received her Ph.D. in Materials Science, her M.S. in Metallurgy and her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut. Her educational research interests include freshmen engineering programs, math success, K-12 STEM outreach, and retention and recruitment of STEM majors.Ms. Patricia Pyke, Boise State University Patricia
. A detailed PowerPoint presentation is developed thatexplains the entire hands-on activity. All instruction materials were shared with the workshopparticipants. The authors carried all mechanical and electrical parts from the US to India forconducting this hands-on activity. In fact, they had to pay custom duty at the airport for takingthese parts into India. All faculty participants built the 2-wheel robot (see Figure 1) andappreciated the potential of hands-on learning. Details of this mechatronics activity are presentedin [4] and [5]. Figure 1: Faculty Participants Building a 2-wheel RobotSustainable Energy Design Project (SEDP): Engineering freshmen at Virginia Tech participate inearly design experiences in their
new pedagogical approaches. Implications for research and practice are provided.IntroductionThe blended flexible learning (BFL) is a pedagogy that proposes synchronous and asynchronousactivities allowing flexibility in time, physical location, and learning-teaching approach [1].Notably, BFL outcomes increased student engagement with the subject and thus maximizeslearning while teaching students to take on more responsibility [2]. BFL allow to adapt thelearning process to students’ needs and objectives. For example, if a student needsreinforcement, he can review recorded lectures or pre-design material. In addition, many toolsare available to practice each of the topics at the rhythm at which each student learns. Inaddition, it allows certain
materials and machine translation of text. He was instrumental in establishing the college’s freshman program. Page 11.1236.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Teaming Activities in a Freshman Engineering and Computer Science Course Aimed Towards Recruitment and RetentionAbstractOur university has an open enrollment policy. This means that any person with a high schooldiploma can enroll in engineering or computer science. As a result entering students have a rangeof abilities from being excellent in math and science to struggling to understand algebraconcepts. The current course, developed over the
of software pack- ages which have been used both inside and outside the University. He was awarded ’The 1998 Withrow Exceptional Service Award’, and ’The 2005 Withrow Teaching Excellence Award’. Dr. Esfahanian has published articles in journals such as IEEE Transactions, NETWORKS, Discrete Applied Mathematic, Graph Theory, and Parallel and Distributed Computing. He was an Associate Editor of NETWORKS, from 1996 to 1999. He has been conducting research in applied graph theory, computer communications, fault-tolerant computing, Information Technology, and databases.Daina Briedis, Michigan State University DAINA BRIEDIS is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at
collaboration on individual assignments. After this, studentsare most likely to use another student’s notes and/or exams for study material and, followingthat, another form of cheating is lying to the professor to receive an extension on an assignment.Students at MIT were asked to evaluate the seriousness of several acts of cheating. Thesestudents were asked to rank the situations as “not cheating”, “trivial cheating”, and “cheating”,instead of the obvious two, “cheating” and “not cheating”. “Trivial cheating” was defined bythe students as actions that do not preclude their learning of the material. These are practicessuch as working together or using other people’s notes and/or exams. However, cheating on atest or paper is seen as serious cheating
University.Robert Warrington, Michigan Technological University Dr. Warrington is currently Dean of Engineering at Michigan Technological University and Director for the Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. Dr. Warrington was the founder and Director of the Institute for Micromanufacturing at Louisiana Tech University. Dr. Warrington served in the US Army for two years and on the faculty at Montana State University for eight years, was the head of the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech University for 11 years, and was the Director of the Institute for Micromanufacturing from 1991-1996. Dr. Warrington serves on the Council on Engineering Education, was Chairman of
resulted in curriculum compression – sometimes to extreme levels.Faced with pressure to add material, reduce time, and satisfy the demands of the (sometimesarchaic) industry hiring practices, academe too often resorted to a balkanization approach incurriculum development.One possible solution to our overall dilemma is to make the entry level requirement forprofessional practice a 5- or 6-year program. This is at best only a partial solution to theproblem. While science and mathematics provide the engineer much of the basic tool andknowledge suite needed for practice, it is design, and more recently its abstraction into systemsengineering, that is the essence of our profession. In educating engineers for our future, we needto think in terms of a
Session 11-4 XXXX Homework or Quiz? Richard Bannerot Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Houston AbstractThe test performances of students in three classes of the second course in engineeringthermodynamics in a BSME program are compared on the basis on whether closed book quizzes(two classes) were used in place of the more traditional homework (one class). There were
and Computer Applications in Construction in a Construction Managementprogram, have recently been redesigned as blended courses, to address these resource constraintsas well as challenges caused by changing student demographics. The blended delivery courseformat was chosen because it has the potential to more effectively utilize classroom space and canallow students to learn material at their own pace. These two courses provide students withrudimentary computing skills using software applications that are germane to their respectivefields. Given that some of the topics of the two courses overlap, a team of five faculty membersfrom both programs collaborated to redesign the two courses for delivery in the fall of 2013. Oneof these courses was
providing explanations of and readings on each task. P2P motivates students by specifically describing how various tasks are often required for certain positions in academe and in providing reference materials on the role of ePortfolios in the job market. Since the motivation to create a professional ePortfolio (that will help participants get a job) is built in, scaffolding allows student volunteers to successfully complete a task they are already interested in undertaking. Page 25.1048.8Some of the tasks P2P