access or lower digital literacy,potentially skewing the sample [28]. Third, the small sample size of 39 participants may limit thegeneralizability of the findings to a broader population of graduate engineering students [29].Fourth, the incentive of extra credit points could have influenced the responses, leading topotential response bias [30]. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of the survey capturesparticipants' perceptions at a single point in time, which may not reflect changes in their viewsover time or because of long-term engagement with the case study material [31].4.4 Suggestions for future Research Future research should explore the longitudinal impact of case study activities on studentlearning outcomes and career
researching Hispanic population growth in the U.S. These studies predictpossible future demographic composition using profiles or generations to classify the differentHispanic groups. Our university system has used these studies to prepare for the educationalneeds of this Hispanic community. Currently we have noticed a change in the admission criteriafor state universities. Some students graduating from United States’ high schools encounter roadblocks when applying for state higher education because of questions regarding citizenshipand/or residency. The definition of citizen versus non-citizen presents a moving target in thestate universities. This may affect the predicted enrollment for the Hispanic community inhigher education. A report of
Paper ID #40681The Missing Misrecognition in Recognition and Engineering IdentityResearchDr. Annie Yong Patrick, Georgia Tech Annie Y. Patrick is a Post-Doctoral Fellow in the Studio for Transforming Engineering Learning and Research (STELAR) Lab in the Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech. She received a bachelor’s degree in Psychology from Mississippi College and an associate’s degree in Nursing from Holmes Community College. After a fulfilling nursing career working in a variety of specialties, she became interested in technology while studying Library and Information Science and completed a
-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial & Operations Engineering Department and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michigan. She earned her Ph.D. in En- gineering Education and an M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University; an M.B.A. degree from Governors State University; and a B.S. degree in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to her graduate studies, she worked as a professional in the areas of manufacturing, operations, technical sales, and publishing for ten years. She also served as an adjunct faculty in the Engineering Technology Program at Triton College in
Research Organization) Laboratory is created atKennesaw state university. The university currently offers a minor in Aerospace Engineering.Minor is available to students majoring in all disciplines of engineering and sciences. To earn aminor, students are required to take five Aerospace Engineering classes including a senior designcapstone project. By the time students finish their minor, they are well versed in Aerospaceconcepts and are on a path to either pursue graduate degrees in Aerospace engineering or a careerin the Aerospace industry. The AE minor has grown in popularity over the past few years. Tosupport this growth, the school established an AERO lab in the summer of 2019. This lab providesa platform for students and faculty to
Paper ID #42838A Cross-Institutional Study of Engineering Education Faculty ProfilesMr. Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida Gadhaun Aslam is currently advancing his academic and research career as a Ph.D. student in the Transforming Workforce by Interconnecting Structures of Training, Education, and Research (TWISTER) Lab within the Department of Engineering Education at University of Florida (UF). His research interests include conducting systematic literature reviews by extracting data from institutional websites, using multi-modal tools (e.g., eye tracking and physiological electrodermal sensors) and integrating
Paper ID #32539Classroom Practices that Support Minoritized Engineering Students’ Senseof Belonging (Research)Miss Arielle Marie Rainey, Colorado School of Mines Arielle Rainey graduated from the Colorado School of Mines in May 2020 with a Bachelor’s in Envi- ronmental Engineering and is currently pursuing a Master’s in Humanitarian Engineering at the same university. Her research focuses on belongingness, funds of knowledge, and engineering identity and how these factors vary among different demographics of first-generation college students.Dr. Dina Verd´ın, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dina Verd´ın, PhD
Is a successful r esear ch labor ator y possible with under gr aduate students alone? Roger V. Gonzalez, J uan Lopez, and Paul Leiffer LeTour neau Univer sityAbstractDeveloping a successful research laboratory with qualified graduate students is a demandingventure. Trying to accomplish this with undergraduate students alone, given the demandingacademic load and steep research learning curve is daunting. Nevertheless, during the past eightyears the Biomedical Engineering Faculty at LeTourneau University have managed to develop asuccessful undergraduate research program and secure multiple external funding sources.Laboratory research has
different attributes such asthe student feedbacks from classroom course, lab, materials, etc. The other attributes includedare grades, team/group achievements, research motive, etc. In this course, most of the studentsenrolled are first generation, the diverse background of students and the learning curves of thestudents are always challenging. Considering that, new techniques are adapted/upgraded everyyear to better improve the standards and outcomes of the course and also developing exercises inlab.Keywords: Project-based approach; student feedback; team-project; microprocessor-basedsystems; STEM education;IntroductionThe outcome of any engineering course and/or the graduated student should reach the standardsof industry and must capable to
AC 2009-218: CHANGING UNIVERSITIES IN EUROPE; A CASE STUDY FROMIRELANDKevin Kelly, Dublin Institute of Technology Page 14.317.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Implementing Change in Universities in Europe; A Case Study from IrelandIntroductionThis paper sets out to examine aspects of research recently undertaken in a highereducation institute (HEI) in Ireland. The research examined how stakeholders at alllevels in an engineering college in this HEI thought it should change in a rapidly anddramatically changing external environment. It was an exploratory case studyundertaken over three years between 2006 – 2008. It used
majority of the Page 22.1421.2undergraduate classes. More often their time is consumed by research activities to provide anincome source for the university, or to provide research opportunities for graduate level studentswho need thesis level work to publish and succeed. Indeed if the criteria for hiring tenure-trackeducators is doctorate level credentials, then why are the majority of the faculty contact hoursfocused on upper level students?In engineering the practice of the discipline provides as much knowledge, and maybe morewithin a focused area of study, than the same time within academia. In fact, students who haveno desire for an advanced
country-wide XO deployment in Paraguay and thesmall, experimental deployment in Wisconsin with the required technical support. The jointproject strives to utilize the skills and resources found on university campuses in the US tobenefit disadvantaged students both within the US and abroad, while providing qualityeducational opportunities for undergraduate and graduate learning and research. The researchconducted to-date that seeks to estimate the Total Cost of Ownership in computer deploymentsconsiders but does not include the voluntary contributions made by students. This paper strivesto exhibit and examine the value of student contributions from the academic perspective. Furtherresearch is planned to formally evaluate the value of the student
from the first year to graduate level. Of 17,660 studentsenrolled in those 539 courses, 13,441 students completed the survey. Results showed moreengagement in higher-level classes and also in those classes with fewer students. The study alsocompared results with the NSSE. Other instructors can use the instrument and the reportedresults to measure and compare the engagement levels in their classes.IntroductionEngaging students in the process of learning is one of the important goals of educators. Johnson1noted that providing all knowledge in a passive manner to students is the old paradigm. The newparadigm is to actively engage students with the material and one another. Physics educationresearch shows a two-sigma difference in understanding of
benefits realized by the Texas A&M System is the number of students who haveenrolled at System universities who may have gone elsewhere or not continued their education atall. The first graduates of RELLIS baccalaureate degrees came through the Blinn CollegeDistrict, having earned their associate degrees from Blinn.The second benefit is the ability to rapidly respond to evolving public and private needs anddevelop new programs of study and tracks collaboratively. This is very evident in thedevelopment of the baccalaureate degree program in cybersecurity.A third benefit for the faculty and students in the Texas A&M System at the regional universitiesis the ability to effectively collaborate on research and have access to facilities not
. WayneState University began using block tuition in 2023, citing a desire to improve graduation rates [9].There has been a study that found a measurable positive impact on four-year graduation rates;however, the study did not include information on five- or six-year rates, a demographicbreakdown, or any analysis on the programs’ equitability. [10].The economic and personal impacts of student debt is a growing problem [11] that has adisproportionately negative effect on marginalized groups [12]. For instance, federal Pell Grantsare awarded solely based on financial need and can typically be used to pay only a fraction of totaltuition as the maximum Pell Grant award for 2024-25 remains fixed at $7,395, the same as theprevious year [13]. Because the
- Advancing learning theory through classroom research models and practices - Developing and testing instructional materials to achieve optimal - Mentoring graduate students learning - Designing and implementing a program level assessment systemSite and Participant SelectionThis study involved research participants from two universities in India where EER is given equalimportance as engineering research. The participants who agreed to be a part of this study wereformally recruited into the study and provided consent over email. This study was approved by theInstitutional Review Board.Javeed, the first author, recruited participants at these two universities by sending them an
case study method to provide women STEM graduate students witheducational materials on how to recognize and confront discrimination, both interpersonally andorganizationally. Our skills-based program promotes the internalization of learning and thedevelopment of analytical and decision-making skills, as well as proficiency in oralcommunication and teamwork. The core of the training program is a set of ten peer-reviewed casestudies, with detailed facilitation guides, which explore issues related to gender-based bias,harassment and discrimination in the STEM workplace. Each case study is coupled with discussionquestions for individual and group reflection, for which the accompanying facilitation guidesprovides possible answers for those leading
Paper ID #11775Does Motivation Matter for Conceptual Change: Developing Effective Qual-itative Research ApproachesDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research
NNIN has a large and integrated education andoutreach program. The focus of the program is todevelop a workforce ready for the demands of therapidly developing field of nanotechnology as well as Figure 1 Distribution of NNIN sites Page 13.1038.2develop a nano-literate public. Our ResearchExperience for Undergraduates (REU) program is one part of the education mission to excite andencourage undergraduates to pursue education and careers opportunities in nanoscale science andengineering.Nanotechnology, which studies and uses the unique phenomena that occur at the nanoscale, is arapidly advancing area of research. It is an exciting
by the engineeringtechnology students to a research team including engineering student.9 Several authors noted variousbenefits perceived by the student researchers such as interactions between the students and thefaculty, increased confidence and improved resumes.9, 10, 11Reisel et al studied the average student who isn’t likely to be going to graduate school, butparticipated in an undergraduate research experience.4 This is typical of most engineeringtechnology students, who are primarily preparing for careers in industry. Though the authors of thisparticular study found that the undergraduate research increased teamwork abilities, they alsodiscovered that the students perceived an increase in their ability to work independently. Thestudent
evidence that research experiences for undergraduate students are important in enhancing learning, interest, and persistence in STEM fields [2]. Other studies also indicate that summer research experiences have a strong positive effect on subsequent entry to Ph.D. STEM programs [3]. In particular, research activities have been found to be important for retention of under-represented minorities (URM) and disadvantaged economic groups [4, 5, 6]. Other studies demonstrate the benefits of close mentoring of students [7, 8], and that this mentoring is especially important to URM students [9, 10]. Team size in SITE is limited to 10 students in order to create strong bonds between students and between students and faculty mentors. This is
months. Each group were supervised by the Professor In-Charge of the project(author) and a Graduate Research Assistant. The paper presents how the whole research programwas planned and conducted, the details of the projects selected for the students, procedures used toevaluate the impact of the project, and what were the outcomes of the program. This paper willhelp others in planning similar experiences for engineering undergraduates.I. IntroductionThis paper describes the experiences provided in a Site for undergraduate research in "StructuralEngineering" with a special focus on techniques to study the “Development of EnhancedMaterials and Structural Assemblages Used for Seismic Performance Evaluation Studies” in theSchool of Civil Engineering
materials like textbooks utilize well-structured problems,because they were considered to sufficiently prepare learners for more ill-structured and complexproblem solving tasks.These assumptions were challenged by a wide variety of researchers (see for example [14]),arguing that problems vary by nature, context, constraints, and problem solver characteristics[15,16,17]. That is, learning to solve story problems in schools does not enable graduates tosolve complex and ill-structured workplace problems. Different kinds of problems engage andrequire different cognitive processes [3].One of the recent and more influential classifications is the meta-theory of problem solving byDavid Jonassen [2,3], in which problems are mapped on multiple dimensions
. TheWARP-SPEED program incorporates opportunities for students to work through complexproblems and decision making while including and considering diverse perspectives. The programalso helps students to establish their STEM identity which in turn increases their sense ofbelonging. This supports retention efforts by engaging students in experiential learning outsidetheir traditional classroom experience.INTRODUCTIONNumerous studies have shown that the benefits of undergraduate research experience, theseinclude improved persistence, increased pursuit of graduate education, and higher gains thancomparison groups in areas including: ability to conduct research, ability to communicate,motivation to learn, confidence in their skills, understanding the
electronics.1. Introduction The merits of involving engineering undergraduates in research have been widelydiscussed in engineering journals. It has been suggested that such an initiative may help thestudent become more passionate about the subject, create appreciation for research processand practice, improve problem-solving skills or even serve as motivation for furthereducation in graduate school1-3. Furthermore, it allows advanced students an opportunity tobe exposed to challenging and realistic engineering problems they may encounter in postgraduation work. In some cases, the students participate directly in a funded research thatholds significant benefit to all participants – students, faculty, and the university4. Thegrowing recognition
a Master of Science in Computer Science from Florida Atlantic University in 2015 and has worked within the Engineering field since completing his degree. The objective of Mr. Terrell’s graduate research was to identify socioeconomic demographic risk factors impacting the life chances of minority groups within 100 of the top populated metropolitan areas in the USA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017A Case-Study Approach to Interlink Humanities with Engineering EducationAbstract:We have developed an executable case-study approach to expose engineering students to socialand community issues. Undergraduate engineering students can team up with social sciencestudents to identify, analyze
Aeronautical University. She is also actively involved in national level service through the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), serving on the advisory board for the Journal of College Science Teaching.Kelly A George (Professor) Kelly Whealan George is an Associate Professor with the Department of Graduate Studies at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Worldwide. She is the Graduate Curriculum Chair for all Graduate Programs in the College of Aeronautics. His research interests include online education, aviation and aerospace economics, aviation sustainability and impact studies. Dr. Whealan George is the lead Accreditation Faculty for regional and program accreditations. He received a Ph.D. in Aviation from
from the educational grant anddepartment resources to support their research activities. At the end of each semester, we will host ademonstration for all REU participants to showcase their projects. By fostering interdisciplinarylearning, mentorship, and a growth mindset, EZ-RA equips students with essential researchexperience that supports smooth transitions from college to careers or graduate studies, aligningwith UTSA’s "Career-Ready" initiative. Key metrics such as student participation, research quality,and post-graduate outcomes will guide the program’s continuous improvement as a sustainablemodel for experiential learning in engineering. IntroductionUndergraduate research plays a pivotal role
. • Interdisciplinary research: liberal arts education, such as music and design, and engineering education, such• Other activities: as engineering design, programming, and electrical • A TED-like talk presented by faculty members, engineering. • Workshop on applying for graduate studies, • Workshop on different fellowships, • The project result was presented at ASEE 2020 virtual • Workshop on research ethics, conference in the student paper section
globalization component, with theother majors soon to follow.The first faculty-led global study trip for academic credit offered by Aviation Technology iscurrently under development. The trip will be nine days in length and will be offered during springbreak 2003. Interest is high with 25 – 30 students expected to participate. The trip will visitaviation operations, manufacturers, museums, and places of cultural interest in England andFrance.Development to date has included considerable research and a trip by participating faculty inOctober 2002. The trip visited all potential sites, investigated transportation issues, and evaluatedthe overall environment for student participation. Two new courses were developed to supportthis type of travel. The first