program, specifically, werecommend checking out the 2022 paper by Reyes and colleagues.1Early successes from the PINC program have contributed to the development of seven additionallarge-scale, NSF- and foundation-funded projects that focus on increasing equity and diversity incomputing through the use of peer mentoring, career-building and professional development, andevidence-based teaching practices, including real-world applications of course material. Weoutline these grants and their goals below and explain their conceptual ties to components of thePINC program.Expansion and Sustainability EffortsGOLD: The Graduate Opportunities to Learn Data Science (GOLD) program (2019-2022) wasfunded by NSF Innovations in Graduate Education to support the
actively investing in one another, not just through the sharing of resources but also by committing time and energy to building the partnership. 3. Inclusivity: All voices are heard and considered in decision-making, and there are mechanisms in place to ensure that marginalized voices are particularly amplified. 4. Specific Outcomes: Partners have mutually agreed upon specific, measurable outcomes that they are working towards. 5. Communication: Communication is transparent, regular, and involves multiple channels to ensure all partners are informed and able to provide input. 6. Adaptability: Partners are willing to adapt and adjust their approach as needed, based on feedback and changing circumstances. 7
. Students present their team research project on Day 7. After presentationsstudents reflect on a) the content and how this experience has impacted their views onengineering, b) the mechanics of giving a good presentation, and c) on teamwork by completinga reflective writing assignment considering how they interacted as team members. Feedbackfrom these reflections is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the module. Page 26.915.5Results and DiscussionFrom an instructor’s perspective the module has been hugely successful. Inclusion of conationhas increased overall satisfaction with teamwork experiences, thereby creating positiveexperiences for students
description of the hardware andsoftware implementation completed to provide a usable robot chassis for the students isprovided.IntroductionThe use of robotic platforms as a teaching mechanism for mechatronics, artificialintelligence, motion planning and multiple degree of freedom actuators is fairly common inacademia. A robotic platform provides students with ample opportunity to explore thenon-ideal conditions of imperfect sensor accuracy, sensor noise, differences in actuatorperformance and other challenging design issues in an embedded system. Robotics, ingeneral, is well suited for exploring integrated system designs combining aspects of multipleengineering specialty areas. For these and other reasons, robot motion and sensing waschosen as a core
Engineering.Omer Farook, Purdue University Professor OMER FAROOK is a member of the faculty of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Tech- nology at Purdue University Calumet. Professor Farook received the Diploma of Licentiate in Mechanical Engineering and BSME in 1970 and 1972 respectively. He further received BSEE and MSEE in 1978 and 1983 respectively from Illinois Institute of Technology. Professor Farook’s current interests are in the ar- eas of Embedded System Design, Hardware Software Interfacing, Digital Communication, Networking, Image processing and Biometrics, C++, PHP and Java Languages. He has a keen interest in pedagogy and instruction delivery methods related to Distance learning.jai p agrawal, Purdue
SessionIntegrating cases into courses:Cases are commonly used in schools of business, education, and medicine. Fitzgerald 6 providesan introduction to the use of cases in engineering, and Richards et. al. 7 review the use of casesand the case method in business and engineering education. Engineering cases typically addresstopics in design, ethics, and entrepreneurship.Students study the case materials, seek to understand the problem or situation, and identify theoptions available to various participants. This may be done individually or in teams. Often,individual study and preparation are followed by informal small group discussion. The studentsaim to understand the perspective of each of the participants in the case. They may be asked tocommit to a role
in presenting class material. A series of interconnected tables plotsthe performance of each question in a test. By this means, with less effort than maintaining awritten grade book, it is possible to evaluate the degree of comprehension the class has regardingany area of the subject matter being tested. It is also a straightforward matter to determine whichquestions have “worked” on a test and which have failed to evaluate the level of knowledge ofthe students. The development of a grading curve can be shown with every graded assignment sothat the teacher always knows the degree of challenge to program into the next test orassignment. By apprising students of their standing at key points in the quarter,misunderstandings of grades and
alongside their human counterpartstowards the completion of a common task 1.In the context of engineering education, co-robots have the potential to aid studentsduring tasks that may require real-timeobservation and feedback 2. Figure 1presents a scenario that involves a student(left) and a co-robot (right) working togetherin an engineering design workshop. Here,the task to be completed is the design of anengineering concept/idea/prototype, created Figure 1: Student-Co-robot Collaboration towards the Successful Completion of an Engineering Prototypeusing tools such as a hammer, wood, andother engineering laboratory equipment and materials. The primary objective of the student is tocomplete
loadrefers to the number of interconnected ideas which are required to learn a new schema. Poorinstructional design can impose extraneous cognitive load, in which the instructional techniqueunnecessarily increases the number of interconnected ideas, making a schema harder to acquire.When intrinsic load is low, the additional extraneous loading has little effect on learning. However,high intrinsic loading combined with extraneous loading hinders learning. Therefore, instructorsshould strive to reduce extraneous load produced by their presentation of the material to improvestudent learning. LP supports instructor efforts by positioning student writing consisting of designdecisions, formulas, and figures in close proximity to the source code they are
power supply and a small load box thatsimulated the solar array for outputs into the monitoring sensors. Page 26.943.2As far as SCADA training materials availability, very little exists that is directed towardcommunity colleges. Most of the training materials are specific to vendor equipment and istailored toward working engineers in short courses offered by the vendor. Therefore, the trainingmaterials for this project were developed around the specific equipment we were using in ourlab. Also, the SCADA software selected was chosen to make the implementation of the trainingmodules as low cost and sharable as possible. As the project progressed the
Transforming a Microprocessors Course through the Progressive Learning Platform Sohum Sohoni, David Fritz, Wira Mulia Oklahoma State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes an innovative learning platform called the Progressive Learning Platform(PLP), and its use in an introductory microprocessors course. The discussion covers the overalltransformation of the course from the examination and modification of existing course objectivesor Be-Able-To‟s (BATS), to the development of laboratories and other curricular materials for ahighly collaborative active-learning approach. Decisions made by the instructors during thisprocess, and the reasons behind
Paper ID #29239Aligning the chemical engineering curriculum to a common problem-solvingstrategyProf. Nicolas Hudon, Queen’s University Dr Nicolas Hudon is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Queen’s Uni- versity (Canada) since 2016. His teaching activities are mainly concerned with second-year fundamental courses. He is the recipient of the 2019 Carolyn Small Award for teaching innovation from the Faculty of Applied Sciences and Engineering at Queen’s University.Dr. Louise Meunier P.Eng., Queen’s University Dr. Meunier studied mechanical engineering and worked for twenty years as an
Online Versus In Person Student Learning Outcomes Todd Easton Mechanical Engineering University of Utah todd.easton@utah.eduAbstractDue to the Covid-19 pandemic, many undergraduate students were forced to take courses onlineinstead of in person. This paper discusses the student learning outcomes of some courses that havesections with both an online and in person sections. A junior level industrial engineering courseshowed that the in person students performed significantly better, statistically speaking. Incontrast, a graduate course in an online graduate program had
beginning. In each course, students have opportunity to redesign/modify thesubsystem relevant to the particular course they are in. After completing these three courses in asequence, students will have design and testing experience with component, subsystems, andfinally an integrated system. Details of the platform project as well as individual course projectswill be described in this paper. The assessment method for course evaluation will be presented atthe end of the paper along with students’ feedbacks and course-exit survey results.I IntroductionTraditionally major courses in ECE four-year undergraduate curriculum are taught in relativeisolation with each course focusing on its own teaching materials and structure. It was found thateven the
, which can cause issues for PV installation. The Chapel building as well as the Victorianhotel have a roof with tiles installed, which give the buildings a beautiful roof texture as well asmakes the roof more durable in the long run, but it does not make a good source spot for the PVmodules to be installed. Theses tiles can add much weight to the roof since the material that isused is dense and may not be the best area to install the added weight of the PV modules (5). Alsothese tiles are expensive and are not easy to repair, thus the students determined that the gym, Copyright ASEE Middle Atlantic Regional Conference April 29-30, Farmingdale State College, SUNYkitchen, and the pool side lodge
foster inclusive practices in departments,regardless of whether underrepresented faculty are present, so that the departmental climate isinclusive.We designed a process called Dialogues to emphasize participatory departmental interactions byintentionally structuring iterative conversations and activities. Our work was embedded within auniversity wide initiative that engaged with gender and also with mechanisms to support womendirectly. However, Dialogues itself focused on gendered climate, and particularly on supportingthe types of climates that would appeal to underrepresented faculty, thus it did not explicitlyengage with information about gender or about women. Our approach represents a modificationof a dual agenda method, tailored to address
University Carl H. Hauser is an Associate Professor of Computer Science in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) at Washington State University (WSU). His research interests include concurrent programming models and mechanisms, networking, programming language implementation, and distributed computing systems. Prior to joining WSU, he worked at Xerox Palo Alto Research Center and IBM Research for a total of over 20 years.Robert Olsen, Washington State University Robert G. Olsen is Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Architecture and the Boeing Distinguished Professor of Electrical Engineering at Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. He
%), Biomedical Engineering (37%), Chemical Engineering(34.5%), and Industrial/Manufacturing Engineering (30.1%) and low rates in AerospaceEngineering (14.1%), Electrical Engineering (11.6%), Mechanical Engineering (11.5%),Electrical/Computer Engineering (11.3%), Computer Science (inside engineering) (11.1%), Page 24.1375.4Computer Science (outside engineering) (10.2%), Computer Engineering (9.5%), and MiningEngineering (9.4%). Overall, women earned 18.4% of bachelor’s degrees in engineering in 2010according to the 2013 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science andEngineering report published by the NSF.8Again, comparatively little
Paper ID #37754Board 246: Designing a Curriculum to Broaden Middle School Students’Ideas and Interest in EngineeringDr. Shawn Y. Stevens, WGBH Educational Foundation Dr. Stevens is the Director of STEM Curriculum and Instruction at GBH and serves as PI for Solving Community Problems with Engineering. Her research interests include instructional materials and assess- ment development for science and engineering to support student and teacher learning.Dr. Joshua Littenberg-Tobias, GBH Joshua Littenberg-Tobias is the Director of Education Research and Evaluation at GBH where he oversees research activities for all of GBH’s
skills. This was due in part to experience, assistance from other faculty members, andjust plain hard work. The beneficial effect was teaching became more fun and less drudgery.Preparation time was greatly reduced while the course materials were significantly improved.Many of the courses taught during the first year were also taught during the second. This offeredthe opportunity to refine and improve the course material. As a result, both the content andpresentation of lectures were more creative, interesting, and informative. Student interactiongreatly increased leading to many lively and rewarding discussions.Apparently the students also enjoyed and appreciated the teaching style utilized by a former
Paper ID #22515The Crux: Promoting Success in Calculus IIDr. Doug Bullock, Boise State University Doug Bullock is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Boise State University. He is currently serving as Associate Dean of Arts and Sciences. His research interests include impacts of pedagogy on STEM student success and retention.Dr. Janet Callahan, Boise State University Janet Callahan is Chair and Professor of the Micron School of Materials Science and Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Callahan received her PhD in Materials Science, MS in Metallurgy, and BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of
” the material, thus addressing our objectives 1 to 3. To that end we ask them ingroups of 3 to 4 to brainstorm an interesting plot (real or fantasy) for a story where three peoplereceive a spinal cord injury, one each at C3 (cannot breathe on own, totally paralyzed as a quad-riplegic), at C6 but incomplete (thumb okay, rest of body partially paralyzed and paresthetic) andat T8 to T10 (paraplegic, with full upper body use). Students then individually wrote a 2.5+ page,single-spaced short story. They were to put in ethical twists regarding resource allocations.The judgment criteria were as follows (and known to the students):Hx1 (1 pt): What 3 characters are involved? Sex? Age? Background (good/ bad)? Need really good character
following: • Understand a basic introduction to cybersecurity principles and best practices • Programming security scripts and compiled code based on open industry standards, and contributing to open source software projects • Understanding recent use cases in information security as a basis for future threat assessment • Hands-on experience with penetration testing environments and implementations using open source code and hacking toolsThe Computer Engineering curriculum at City Tech allows students to earn a two year Associateof Applied Science (A.A.S.) degree in either Electro-Mechanical Technology. After completingtwo years of additional coursework, students can earn a B.Tech. degree in Computer
studying mechanical engineering and doing research in engineering educa- tion—the perfect combination of her interests.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Dr. Sheri Sheppard is in the Design Group of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford. Besides teaching undergraduate and graduate courses on structural analysis and design, she serves an administrative role as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. Her research focuses on the study of educational and career pathways of people interested in technical work (and how to make K-20 education more supportive of these pathways).Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
reflection-in-action, the practitioner’sstance is particularly poignant. Schon argues that the practitioner’s values and views are, andshould be recognised as, necessary and unavoidable part of the solution-generating process.Of most interest to our argument in this paper is Schon’s [3] description of the culture of thereflective practicum: the environment in which skills and culture are transferred from practitionerto student: A reflective practicum must establish its own traditions, not only those associated with project types, formats, media, tools, and materials but also those embodying expectation for the interactions of coach and student. Its traditions must include its characteristic language, its repertoire of
Outstanding Experiential Education Program by the Society of Experiential Education.Dr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University William (Bill) Oakes is the Assistant Dean for Experiential Learning, a 150th Anniversary Professor, Director of the EPICS Program, Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University, and a registered ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #44053professional engineer. He is one of the founding faculty in the School of Engineering Education havingcourtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering and Curriculum andInstruction. He was the first
within their programs compared to the fields of Mechanical, Electrical, and ComputerScience. The ENGAGE 2BE program is based on a strengths-based model approach. Strength-based models are educational intervention methods which focus on enhancing the existingstrengths of a student and building upon these strengths as opposed to focusing on remediatingdeficiencies [10, 11]. The four factors embodied by a strengths-based approach are: (1) Academicand Social Integration, (2) Knowledge and Skill Development, (3) Support and Motivation, and(4) Monitoring and Advising. This model has been proven to effectively enhance minoritystudents’ success in the sciences, math and medical careers in programs such as the MeyerhoffScholars Program at the University
feedback, we observethat digital badges facilitate the engagement of students and help prepare them for relevant skillspertaining to life/career, innovation, technology, research, and core subject matter.1 BackgroundOver the years, emerging technologies in transportation have resulted in new modes oftransporting people and goods such as ridesharing, unmanned aerial vehicles, smart city sensortechnology, and connected and autonomous vehicles. Due to such advances in technology, manyjobs in the transportation industry require a high degree of technical skills and often necessitatedegrees in STEM fields such as civil, mechanical, or electrical engineering ortransportation/supply chain programs. Due to its interdisciplinary nature, jobs in
in design problem-solvingabilities and associated teamwork and communication skills in Northwestern University’s firstyear Engineering Design and Communication (EDC) course. Analyses of the survey data showsignificant gains in students’ confidence to apply specific design, communication, and teamworkskills. Results from our study provide valuable information about our students, and oneperspective for evaluating the effectiveness of design-focused learning environments.IntroductionMany factors need to be considered when creating and evaluating learning environments thatsupport design problem-solving. Learning environments include inanimate features such as theclassroom setting, course materials like textbooks, multimedia documents or other
most noteworthyexamples are telecommunications, material science, aerospace technology, generic research,pharmaceutical industry, and information technology. (For detailed examples of US-China jointventures, see: http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/aboutus/Boechina97.html, for Boeing in Chinaand http://www.sichuan-china.com/sichuan-china/scpages/IA_29.HTM for Motorola in China,http://china.com/ for China.Com, the Internet gateway to China).In spite of its fast scientific and technological achievements in recent years, there is still asubstantial distance between China and other industrial nations, such as America, with respect tooverall scientific and technological levels. The distance is even wider with regard to newscientific and