additional MatSEclasses into the SIIP program. In addition, we also have in place a mechanism for continuous re-vision and improvement of the existing computational modules through an end-of-year debriefand planning session, in which the SIIP faculty and teaching assistant conduct a “post mortem”of the computational modules. By identifying aspects of the material, delivery, and student re-sponses that were positive and successful, and those that were less so, the team identifies how andwhere to improve the material and its dissemination for the following year.The student surveys provide valuable information, but their utility as an assessment instrumentcan benefit from further improvement. The sample sizes in the senior level computational
women and underrepresented groups in ECE.With these elements in mind, we developed a design project with multiple goals: To have a meaningful purpose and realistic application, To utilize and integrate many course topics, To illustrate how to design a complex system from many simple components, To show an application of digital logic outside of what is likely to be perceived as its “common” application, and To be of interest to a broad range of students.The project we developed is an integrated health monitor. The health monitor provides twodiagnostic features. It can measure and display both a user’s heart rate and a user’s reaction time.While the usefulness of an integrated health assessment device is
County Shawnisha S. Hester is an Evaluation and Assessment Coordinator. She earned both her BA in Psychol- ogy and MA in Applied Sociology from University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She went on to complete her MSW from University of Maryland School of Social Work. Her research interests focus on using qualitative research methods that measure various phenomena and making connections via an interdisciplinary approach; qualitative evaluation and assessment measurements; increasing the number of minorities in STEM fields, and program development at the graduate level. She has had the oppor- tunity to present at a regional and national conference and she has conducted research internationally. In addition, Ms
throughout countless studies, all of which frequently refer to women andminorities’ lack of early exposure to computing as crippling factors in their disinterest in themajor. To address this gap, the NSF funds programmatic interventions that attempt to increasedemographic representation to an “equitable” level.A skeptical assessment of interventions of this sort is that they are really about enriching theexperiences of already privileged participants in the nation’s engineering schools by exposingthem to alternative perspectives. On the face of it, this is an important and laudable development.Exposure to alternative perspectives for engineers are valuable in and of themselves. However, ifinterventions that address the diversity challenge are only
students. The spring 2016 event attracted 141 students, a 143%increase. The spring 2016 event featured a 3D printed version of the Settlers of Catan41 boardgame, which was randomly raffled off to those who filled out a survey assessing the evening’sactivities. The fall 2016 semester featured a 3D printed Pokémon chess set42 raffled off to arandomly selected winner from the 115 student attendees, and the TRC again provided 3Dprinted prizes for the spring 2017 event. It is unclear if this promotion has resulted in any printrequests, but it inspired library staff to reach out and engage other campus student groups topromote the service. Unfortunately, the library has only had limited success reaching out tostudent organizations. The only student
momentumconservation and ideal gas thermodynamics theory. Among other metrics, the performance ofeach student team was assessed based on (1) the ability of the custom trigger mechanism to firethe cannon over a range of initial reservoir pressures, (2) a thoughtful comparison amongexperimentally-measured and model-predicted muzzle velocities, and (3) documentation of theresults of cannon design, realization, and operation.This paper discusses the implementation and relevant outcomes of the project. Based on studentfeedback, the project was well-received and anchored the often abstract thermal-fluid sciencesconcepts taught. The project also highlighted the challenges of applying theoretical equations toreal-world problems and the vital need for experiments to
, aerospace, physics, or chemical engineering. Teaching acourse in advanced thermodynamics to students with very diverse background is a challenge. Asurvey is conducted at the start of semester to gauge students’ perception of their knowledge inthermodynamics. The survey is followed by a quiz to assess students’ actual knowledge of thefundamental concepts in thermodynamics. Based on the survey and the quiz results, the lecturesare carefully adjusted to help students with weaker background to catch up without makingstudents with stronger background getting board. Selection of a suitable textbook for the courseis also another challenge. This paper describes the challenges faced in teaching an introductorygraduate course in thermodynamics, and how these
, as computer-logged data will have a data scheme that delineates what kinds of data is collected, the speed ofanalysis, comparability of subjects, and potential for greater automation (for example, see37)increases, thereby freeing resources for more advanced analytical approaches and allowing forgreater comparison of subjects within and across studies. However, as computer-logged methodswill rely on these data-schemes, some of the richness of protocol studies will be lost—thusmaking this approach a complement and not a replacement to protocol studies. Finally, byeliminating the need for a co-present researcher and opening up avenues of automated analysis,computer-logged methods may also be amendable to assessing design learning for
Paper ID #19346Creating a Psychological Profile of Successful First-Year Engineering Stu-dentsDr. Danielle D. Gagne, Alfred University Dr. Gagne is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Alfred University. Although her formal training is in discourse processing, her professional interests in learning and cognitive theory have provided op- portunities to serve as a consultant for classroom and program assessment across disciplines. In 2010 she served as Project Faculty for a U.S. Department of Education grant for Preparing Leaders in the Educa- tion and Training of the Next Generation of School Psychology Practitioners, and
-centered and learner-oriented [3], [9], [10].Bransford, Brown, and Cocking (2000) reported that an effective learning environment includesthe following four characteristics: (a) knowledge-centeredness, (b) learner-centeredness, (c)assessment-centeredness, and (d) community-centeredness [3]. A knowledge-centeredinstruction develops conceptual understanding and organization of the knowledge in the field. Ina learner-centered environment, students’ pre-conceptions and alternative conceptions areexplored prior to teaching, and the instruction focuses on what students know, what they want toknow, and how they will use the knowledge. Assessment centeredness provides frequentopportunities for formative feedback over the course of the learning, and the
influenced by the larger context in which our study was occuring. Theresults of this inquiry revealed a deep sense of depoliticization for many students, evenfirst-semester engineering students, and some concerns about lack of connection of engineeringcourses to the larger social context in which engineers must work.ParticipantsTwelve first-year undergraduate students enrolled in a semester long introductory engineeringcurriculum at a Western land-grant institution were recruited to participate in the study. Thesestudents were part of a larger study of students’ attitudes about diversity and experiencesworking in diverse teams (NSF number redacted). To create diverse teams, students weregrouped using the Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member
M.S. in Chemistry from Southern University and A&M College and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Applied Science from the University of New Orleans. She is Associate Dean for Accreditation and Assessment in the George R. Brown School of Engineering at Rice University, a Program Evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, a reg- istered Professional Engineer in Louisiana, a former Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation, and a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Dr. Pearson currently chairs ASCE’s Formal Engineering Education Committee, and is Vice Chair of ASCE’s Committee on Diversity and Inclusion.Logan C. Prickett
. However, the authors were able to utilize some simple strategies to maximize efficiencyin changing their respective geology courses from what had been mostly lecture format to aflipped format that was first implemented in fall 2016. At the time of this paper, the flippedformat has been in place for two years and student and faculty feedback regarding the change hasbeen positive. The reader should note that the purpose of this paper is not to assess the impact ofthe flipped classroom on student learning. Rather, this paper describes simple strategies and freeresources that were used to flip the course, which may be useful for flipping other courses, andprovides specific examples of how the flipped geology course was structured.Strategies UsedThe
Virginia Tech. She focuses on the teaching and implementation of Freshman Engineering courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21948Prof. Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech Tamara Knott is Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech. She is the Course Coordi- nator for one of the three first-year engineering courses offered by the department and also teaches in the graduate program. Her interests include assessment and pedagogy. Within ASEE, she is a member of the First-year Programs Division, the Women in Engineering Division, the Educational Research and Meth
student design problem would be advantageous. One way toevaluate direct evidence of systems thinking in design prompts is through a taxonomy of systemsthinking skills. Hopper [20] describes characteristics of systems thinking and maps them toBloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The first level is recognizing interconnections, in which a personwould be expected to be able to identify the components of a system and see connectionsbetween those parts. Assessment tools that may be appropriate to establish this level of systemsthinking include a list of system parts and connections shown through words or diagrams. Thisgives a framework for categorizing systems thinking tendencies directly in an engineer’s work,as opposed to indirectly through a survey. The
regional innovation system. A key point of emphasis is that it is these interactions, that is the network connecting the participants, which leads to an outcome greater than the sum of the individual pieces. Although higher education institutions pay more and more attention to the process and strategy of entrepreneurship education, there is a lack of specific information and tools in universities to monitor and evaluate the overall performance of university entrepreneurship (Wright et al., 2004). There are four main methods of assessing entrepreneurship ecosystems: GEM, PSED, Kauffman and attitude survey. GEM and PSED are mainly used at the national level (Parker and Belghitar, 2006; Parker, SC and Y
completed his undergraduate work at the University of Tulsa, also in Mechanical Engineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as various courses in Mechanical Engineering, primarily in the mechanics area. His pedagogical research areas include standards-based assessment and curriculum design, including the incorporation of entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum and especially as pertains to First-Year Engineering.Dr. Ziad Youssfi, Ohio Northern University My current research focuses on image processing, GPU, and optimizing computer architecture to reduce chip power consumption. Before joining Ohio Northern University in 2013, I taught digital circuit design for two semesters
. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering
degree program.The programs described in this paper have existed in different forms since 2011, beginning with a pilotprogram involving four participants and at one time including as many as 33. To measure the lastingeffects of these programs, we surveyed the participants and tracked their academic progress over severalyears. Results of these assessment efforts suggest that the program supported students’ success at BoiseState University through the development of lasting relationships with peers, faculty, and staff, andoverall was a positive experience with lasting effects on the participants.In addition to the evolution and outcomes of this program, we also describe how the funding model forthis program has changed over the years, beginning
(Bottom) 3D Printing and Microcontrollers sections. Student feedback was collected formally through a midway questionnaire, an individual reflection assignment near the end of course, and the University of Minnesota standard student evaluation of teaching survey. The overall student impression of the course was positive from these assessments. On the midway questionnaire, students gave feedback on the course, after the bulk of the individual learning activities were complete and just as the team projects were getting off the ground. The data in Figure 6 shows a very positive response for all items. In the second to last week of the course, students completed an individual reflection in which they answer specific questions
to agreements with the original content developer, this new module onpresentations was available to alumni and was even adapted by some facilitators for use at theirworkplace or to benefit local non-profit organizations. Like all Engineering Futures sessions,these trainings are offered at little or no cost to participants and Tau Beta Pi covers travelexpenses for volunteer facilitators, who donate their time to make these trainings available toengineering students and professionals.Identifying ChallengesIn 2015, three decades after the EF program emerged from chapter operations training programs,a new Director of Engineering Futures (DEF) was appointed by the Association. The new DEFwas charged with assessing the current status of the EF
characterize STEM careers as unworthy of literate andcreative individuals [2]. Does she have a good point? During the last two decades substantial efforthas been expended towards reconciling developing students with what can be broadly defined asSTEM identities. Considerable recent research broadly on STEM identities [e.g. 3-21], includingseparate considerations of science, engineering and math identities, has focused on the identitiesof groups and intersectionalities underrepresented in STEM disciplines and careers. But, someresearch also suggests that merely inserting a STEM label, e.g. science or scientist, into adiscussion unleashes implicit biases of gender, race and ethnicity in middle school children [14].Surveys to assess self-efficacy and
from the University of Waterloo. His research areas are in cryptography, digital watermarking, and combinatorics. He is the PI for the NSF IUSE grant (NSF-DUE 1430398) for STEM retention, and the co-PI for the NSF Federal Cyber Service grant (NSF-DUE 1241636) to create models for information assurance education and outreach. He is also the Project Director for Department of Education HSI-STEM Award P031C160080 (A Guided Pathway Solution to STEM Degree Completion), and two MSEIP awards. He has mentored various undergraduate student researchers as a faculty mentor for the LSAMP and McNair Scholars Program. He has extensive experience in curriculum assessment, undergraduate curriculum development, and student
Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences
Paper ID #26262Exploring the Learning Outcomes of International Engineering Students fromChinese UniversitiesMiss Guoyang ZhangJiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni- versity. Her primary research interests relate to the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, cognitive development of graduate and undergraduate students, and global engineering. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University in 2013.Mr. Yang Da Wei c American Society for Engineering
include papers discussing software tools to help students draw FBDs,papers on the assessment of FBDs, and papers on techniques to help students draw FBDs.Tools that have been developed to help students draw FBDs include an app [1], and animatedGIFs to guide students in a step-by-step procedure for drawing FBDs [2]. Free-body diagramerrors that have been reported include ones that demonstrate a misunderstanding of the physicssuch as forces drawn at the centroid [3], incorrect or missing friction forces [3, 4, 5], andincorrect direction of the weight [4, 5]. Other errors in drawing FBDs include missing arrows[6], missing axes [4], and misaligned or unlabeled vectors [7]. Davis and Lorimer [8] developeda rubric for assessing FBDs in six separate
to spark interest in a wide variety of engineering pathways. The paper discusses thetopics covered by the workshops, the scaffolding of the activities, and the assessment conductedon how the bio-inspired robotics activities may influence veterans’ attitude towards advancedmanufacturing careers.IntroductionFor the last few decades, some technical fields, especially the area of advanced manufacturing,experienced a gap related to the hiring of highly skilled technical personnel, in particularengineers who have high technical skills as well as hands on practical experiences. As a result,various efforts across the country are focusing on guiding veterans towards STEM careers, sincethey have practical technical skills developed during their
Engagement) team in Academic Technologies at the University of Miami, Coral Gables. Gemma partners with faculty members, academic units, and other university stakeholders to create and assess innovative, effective, and meaningful learning experiences, through learner-centered pedagogies, differentiated teach- ing, and emerging educational technologies. She has facilitated faculty development initiatives, communi- ties and events in online course design, formative assessment, narrative techniques and 3-D technologies in undergraduate education. Since Fall 2016, in partnership with the College of Engineering and the LIFE team, Gemma designed and supported faculty development workshops in active learning pedago- gies
. Experiences that utilize 3DP haveincluded teaching iterative design using turbine blades [2], demonstrating mechanical propertiestesting [3], assessing performance variability in mechanical properties [6], and introducingASTM standardized testing protocols [3], [4]. Furthermore, the introduction of 3DP technologiesin academic environments has allowed for educators to demonstrate how 3DP can be one part ina larger manufacturing design process [5] and highlighting the importance of waste,sustainability, and materials recycling [7], [8]. Complementary to this rise in 3DP inclusion inthe engineering education space has been the further incorporation of CAD programs to teachiterative design [2], and simulation analysis software (either standalone or
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing Boosters and Recognition to Promote a Growth Mindset in Programming Activities April 29, 2019AbstractWhen one first learns to program, feedback on early assignments can easily induce a fixedmindset—where one believes programming is a fixed ability you either have or you don’t.However, possessing a fixed mindset perspective has negative consequences for learning. Thealternative is to foster a growth mindset, where one believes ability can be improved throughpractice, effort, and hard work. However, automated grading tools used on programmingassignments currently focus on objectively assessing functional