Page 26.607.2UAVs include intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), battlefield damageassessment, and force protection. Civilian applications include remote sensing, scientificresearch, search and rescue missions, border patrol, surveillance of disaster-affected areas, aerialphotography, aerial mapping for geotechnical survey, vegetation growth analysis, crop dusting,precision agriculture, and assessment of topographical changes, etc.The UAV industry is the fastest growing sector of the aerospace industries and the use of UAVshas been growing significantly for civilian applications1. It is estimated that UAV spending willdouble over the next decade from current worldwide expenditures of $5.2 billion annually. Oncethe technology
, evaluator feedback and end-of-program evaluations were used to assess theprogram. As anticipated the majority of the students were very engaged in their inventioncreation. The potential to create something meaningful, relevant and fun inspired and motivatedthem. The students chose the topic, which in most cases had personal relevance to them (i.e.helping a loved one or themselves or cool toy with which they would want to play) resulting inhigh intrinsic and attainment value. The activities also took on a high utility value as they beganto identify markets for their invention and the potential to make money at little to no personalcost to them. The list of inventions created in table 5. Students identified different motivatingfactors for why they
Analysis from Stanford Uni- versity. His dissertation will focus on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineering change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community
conditions, and they are required to assess the accuracy andcorrectness of the output solution, but have little or no visibility to the mechanics of the problemsolving.As with all Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology programs, a broadand diverse curriculum in engineering science is required. As faculty, we are alwaysinvestigating better ways to introduce concepts, present correct approaches to problem solving,and then assess student mastery and performance against learning outcomes. It is very valuablein an educational setting, to not only present material and have students practice solutions, andlater be tested on those concepts, but to present information in alternate or unique ways so thatthe students can have the best
teachers were assessed throughout the project on their development andreflection of the implemented instructional strategies; attitudes towards the project; anddevelopment of communication skills with the engineering students and elementary children.Each student was responsible for planning a modified CoRe lesson which identified: the gradelevel expectations (e.g., state science standards); big idea for the lesson (e.g., life cycle of apenguin); importance for children learning the topic; background knowledge needed to for thelesson including identified common misconceptions children may hold; specific activities foreach of the engage, explore, explain and elaborate phases; and the assessment of students’understanding. After teaching the lesson
from traditional TTL devices in severalimportant ways. Students discover that for CMOS the transition region between logic high andlogic low is extremely narrow which causes a gate to be sensitive to noise present in a slowlychanging input. Given such sensitivity, this paper presents a feedback test circuit useful forinvestigating the transition region. Also, given that some CPLDs include Schmitt triggercapability, our students investigate how such capability reduces sensitivity to noise. Students alsolearn about propagation delay and static loading such as that with an LED.In performing our research we assessed our students' learning experience with our test benchtutorial content, and assessed how device characteristics should be included in
modify existing computer architectures.3 Evaluation methods The evaluation of the two IM course conversions relied on a mixed-methods design.Surveys were used to measure students’ perception of the course’s overall support for theirintrinsic motivation to learn. Interviews were used to develop deeper insights into how specificelements of the course impacted students’ intrinsic motivation to learn.3.1 Quantitative methods The Learning Climate Questionnaire (LCQ) measures the IM-supportiveness of alearning environment. The LCQ uses fifteen, seven-point Likert scale item to provide a singlenumerical rating of the learning climate. These items assess the instructor’s support of students’decisions (autonomy), affirmation of
Penn StateUniversity Park, the course instructor and the graduate student teaching assistant for theengineering economy course initially graded and judged the case studies based on the quality of Page 26.191.6writing/ presentation, the proposal/ explanation of the proposed solution, the cost analysis/justification, and the overall effort of the team. The case study competition grade was worth3.33% of the overall course grade in the engineering economy course. After the university teamcompleted their assessment of the case studies, all 29 case studies and a top 10 team list (in noparticular order) was passed on to the retailer’s employees. The
Page 26.282.6after 24 hours, they were also given the opportunity to create decorative bars as gifts andmementos.Sustainable BioproductsGiven the common misconceptions surrounding “green” and organic products, the bioproductsactivity was designed to expose participants to the many facets of these up–and-coming products.Firstly, a discussion of what it means to be “green” and organic was held to arrive at a consensus.At this point, several product demos and trials were convened to put these products through theirpaces. Some of the activities included a tasting of algal food products such as seasoning andchips and the synthesis of a biopolymer packaging peanut to protect an egg during an egg dropactivity. There was also a comparative assessment
meet thegrowing need for workers in the field.The ‘buoyant believers’ framework works like a key to help college educators interpret studentbehavior, assess student needs, and make decisions about actions that should be taken to ensurestudents succeed in STEM. In doing so, educators can have an impact on students by movingthem toward becoming buoyant believers. For instance, one might imagine a STEM advisor orfaculty member utilizing the ‘buoyant believers’ framework as a tool to help place strugglingBlack STEM students who appear to lack confidence or resilience in the typology. Subsequently,the advisor or faculty member could then consult our recommendations for the respectivetypology and decide on the appropriate interventions to move
approach to teaching professional communication, andintroduce our larger research project, which aims to assess the effectiveness of our program.Finally, we shall briefly reflect on whether the small communication class is really as inefficientas some have suggested. The purpose of this study is to develop the theoretical groundwork fora larger study we are just beginning to conduct on the efficacy of our professionalcommunication program. Using the investigative tools of narrative research and discourseanalysis, we hope ultimately to determine the degree to which our program, which maintainssmall classes and focuses on cultivating students’ rhetorical judgment, effectively graftsprofessional communication onto our students’ burgeoning
Electrical Engineering and Page 26.410.12Thermodynamics with Engineering Mathematics. Lower grades are dominating even in thethird semester. However, the number of students seems to be too small to draw conclusions atthis point.Figure 12: Engineering Mathematics grades versus Engineering Mechanics grades for the 2nd(left) and 3rd (right) semesterFigure 13: Engineering Mathematics grades versus Electrical Engineering (left) andThermodynamics (right) grades in the 2nd and 3rd semester respectivelyIn order to assess the conclusiveness of the correlation factors R and ρ of the gradecorrelations, all courses offered in the first three semesters were correlated
(Pencast). 6. Instructor-provided lecture notes are useful (PDF). 7. Lecture quizzes are useful. 8. Lecture worksheets are useful. 9. Discussion during lecture is useful.Qualitative Feedback 10. General CommentsResultsPerformanceOverall, 95% of students in the FC passed the core outcomes, while only 80% of the TC passed.This indicates that the FC leads to higher performance than TC by nearly 19%. However, due tothe Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), detailed student performance datafrom the TC sections was unobtainable. Therefore, the original goal to compare each coreoutcome and assess whether differences were significant was made impossible. Instead, a chi-squared test of independence was
engineering, support undergraduate students’progress along the academic pipeline and, to provide graduate students with opportunities todevelop critical professional skills to prepare them for the professoriate.The goal of this paper is to present the program details, assessment results, and implications forfuture programs and adaptations.Program DetailsThe 2015 SB4R team included two executive-level employees in the College of Engineering andApplied Science at CU Boulder and two engineering graduate student “leads”. The team wasresponsible for applying for funding for the program, advertising the program, developing pre- andpost-surveys for evaluating the program, selecting and matching students to participate in theprogram, paying the students a
for Teachers and Students. Journal of Pre- College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2012. 2(2): p. 4.56. Kapila, V. Research experience for teachers site: A professional development project for teachers. in American Society for Engineering Education. 2010. American Society for Engineering Education.57. Kukreti, A., et al., An Engineering Research Experience for Teachers: Implementation and Assessment. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Excellence in Education, 2006. 11.58. Coppola, S.M., L.A. Madariaga, and M.H. Schnedeker, Assessing Teachers’ Experiences with STEM and Perceived Barriers to Teaching Engineering, in American Society for Engineering Education. 2015: Seattle, WA.59. Conrad
Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 107124, 2001. [6] Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE) Project 2005. Sense of Community. AWE Research Overviews. [7] Y. Shen, B. K. Jesiek, and Y. Chang, “Cultural Orientation and Global Competency : A Comparative Assessment of Engineering Students,” Proc. ASEE, 2011. [8] A. Parkinson, “Engineering Study Abroad Programs : Formats , Challenges , Best Practices,” Online J. Glob. Eng. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, 2007. [9] US Agency for International Development, Excellence in Higher Education for Liberian Development Request for Applications 66910019, Available: http://liberia.usaid.gov/EHELD , Accessed 25 June 2013. [10] Rimer, S. P., Alfaro, J. F., Stadler, L. B., Davis, C. S. G., & Winful
Florida Comprehensive Aptitude, http://www.fldoe.org/accountability/assessments/k-12-student-assessment/results/2014.stml , Test (FCAT) a quick review is provided.Table 3: 2015 FCAT Science 2.0 Test Results82% of DLJ 5th graders scored at Level 3 or above.46% of DLJ 5th graders scored at Level 5. (This ranks D.L. Jamerson as thetop elementary school in the school district and in the top 5% in the State)The percentage of African-American students achieving level 3 or higherincreased from less than 5% in 2008 to over 65% in 2015.The FCAT is a set of Statewide tests in language arts, mathematics, and scienceconducted at the same times of year but administered at different grade levels. Table 2provides the 2015 Science FCAT score results. The use of
Paper ID #16917Understanding How a Culture of Collaboration Develops Among STEM Fac-ultyDr. Kelly J. Cross, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cross completed her doctoral program in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2015 and is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students at UIUC. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion, teamwork skills, assessment, and identity construction.Dr. Natasha Aniceto Mamaril, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
. Pintrich, P. R. A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. J. Educ. Psychol. 95, 667–686 (2003).18. Hagemeier, N. E. & Murawski, M. M. An instrument to assess subjective task value beliefs regarding the decision to pursue postgraduate training. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 78, (2014).19. Artino, A. R. & McCoach, D. B. Development and Initial Validation of the Online Learning Value and Self- Efficacy Scale. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 38, 279–303 (2008).20. Garcia, T. & Pintrich, P. R. Assessing students’ motivation and learning strategies in the classroom context: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Altern. Assess. Achiev. Learn. Process. prior
grading assessments also included MATLAB specific problemsto keep students motivated in their learning. In projects toward end of the course, studentsdemonstrated their grasp of programming constructs and also creativity in visual graphics.Part II of the paper provides a summary of this programming course objectives and the content; PartIII lists the specific project assignments done in C and MATLAB over several years; Part IV pondersupon the results of surveys answered by students in this and upper level follow-on courses todetermine the added value of MATLAB as a learning tool; and Part V states concluding remarks.Part II: course content and objectivesThe objective of the course and the assignments were to provide students with a skill set so
. In particular, the level of abstraction will be significantly less than typically found in Calculus I.Thematically the revised Calculus I class is focused on three outcomes: - Develop geometric and physical intuition for derivatives and integrals. - Master the standard rules for symbolic computation of derivatives and some basic integrals. - Apply both intuitive understanding and rules mastery to solve problems.The course design has the following pedagogical features: - Many short homework assignments with immediate computer driven feedback/assessment, typically due on a two-day cycle. - Each assignment designed along learning cycle principles to target one or two specific learning goals
, this paper aims to address attitudes towards teamwork that willinfluence the ability to succeed in a professional setting. These attitudes focus on previous teamexperience, team experience in the course, leadership of other team members, enjoyment ofteamwork, the importance of teamwork to the engineering profession, methods for collaboration,and equal contributions from team members.1,3,8,12 These concepts, related to engineering, wereincorporated into a survey used for this paper to determine attitudes of students in a first-yearengineering design course.Common methods of assessment for engineering education team experience include open-endedsurvey questions with text analytics and Likert scale survey questions.3,8 The CARE model andthe
obtained from autodesk.com for demonstration)AssessmentThe proposed framework has only been partially implemented in the author’s CM program, andas a result an assessment of the complete framework is not yet applicable. Student evaluation isavailable in five courses that have implemented BIM components based on the framework, andthe results from CM 33x Building Construction Methods and Systems are briefly discussed as anexample. The course was offered by the same instructor using the same materials during twoconsecutive semesters. Instruction was entirely based on the textbook in the first semester andwas incorporated with BIM contents in the second semester. A BIM model was first used toexplain how different building
55% 81% Interest in a career in engineering 38% 75% Interested in a career in mathematics 48% 63% Interested in a career in design 62% 94% Table 6: Initial assessment results of technology use and creativity MSU Pre-survey Post-survey 3D printer usage 21% 75% Mobile app development 0% 88% Imagine creating new products 59% 75% Table 7: Initial assessment results of
Engineering & Me- chanics department, serving as a professional academic advisor to over 550 students. In January 2012, she became the Program Manager for Assessment & Retention for the College of Engineering, coordinating accreditation efforts for 12 ABET-accredited undergraduate programs and an ACCE accredited program. She created the Academic Center for Engineers (ACE) in the Spring of 2013 to provide tutoring support for engineering courses. She was promoted to Associate Director for Assessment & Retention Projects in July 2015. Kristin has completed Drexel’s Supervisory Certificate Program and ABET’s IDEAL Scholar program and is currently working toward completion of an M.S. in Human Resource Development
involvement4, Sedlacek’s non-cognitive assessment model of students ofcolor5, social integration6 and various identity frameworks7, 8, 5. The review of this literatureprovides context for this study on the influence of NSBE membership on student persistence. Ithas long been argued that students’ social integration into a university is a predictor of theirsuccess at a university2, 9. Such integration is largely dependent on students’ involvement withinthe institution itself. While academic preparation and success are important and can be strongindicators of persistence, non-cognitive aspects of a student’s collegiate experience can outweighthese factors10. Tinto’s 2 theory of student departure anchored in social integration, defined astudent’s personal
SPL focus was added to the class.The authors also noticed a clear differentiation in the learning outcomes and ability to applytheoretical concepts to the project once the SPL concepts were emphasized in the course. Studentsnot only answered the basic questions about maintainability and testing, but they were able toapply the concepts more concretely in open-ended questions on quizzes and exams. This led to anoticeable improvement in grades on these specific assessments over the span of the case study.7. ConclusionsIn this work we presented the development and re-deployment over multiple years of an SPL fortransit systems software in a classroom environment. We also presented our adapted Scrum modelthat incorporates changes to the Scrum model
a few times and received a very positive feedback from students. A morecomprehensive assessment approach is planned for the near future.I. Introduction Learning styles of many students are reshaping [1], [2]. Due to the increase in preference forvisual media, and the fast growing use of information technology, instructors may notice that it isharder for students to understand difficult concepts when using traditional textbook-basedexplanations. Such a case is noted by Tyler DeWitt, a chemistry high school teacher and Ph.D.student at MIT [3]. He noticed that his students missed key concepts although they wereattending well planned lectures and completing assignments. To remedy this, he engagedstudents with a different style of teaching
Paper ID #18668A Methodology to Model the Integrated Nature of the Sustainable Develop-ment Goals: Importance for Engineering EducationMr. David Zelinka, University of Colorado, Boulder David Zelinka was part of the first official graduating class from Purdue University’s Environmental and Ecological Engineering Program. In his final year, he passed his FE exam focusing in environmental engineering. Following, he completed his MS in Civil Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver in the Environmental and Sustainability Engineering program with his thesis focusing on an environmental impact assessment of the
NoClassroomBellsCampus Yes No Yes Yes Yes YesNoise MapTable 1: Proposed Project/Need Matrix. Various projects were evaluated according to whetherthey satisfied our stated project goals. Note that the assessment of whether we would need IRBapproval or not was tentative and was confirmed by the relevant department once the final projectwas selected. The only proposed project which met all goals was the exercise machines project,which proposed placing devices on exercise machines in the campus recreation center.The selected project involved placing Shimmer3 IMU sensors, which include a gyroscope, ontreadmills. We verified that as long as sensors were placed on equipment in the SRC (rather thanstudents) the