will be offered in the spring of2020 and the assessments of these courses will be reported in the future.2. Data acquisition courses. The department combined the electrical engineering andinstrumentation courses into a single two-term sequence. In the past, students took a circuitscourse one term and an instrumentation course the next. With this approach, students do not seethe connection between the electrical engineering content and its application to mechanicalengineering. In the new sequence, the electrical engineering and instrumentation are taught side-by-side. Student learn an electrical engineering concept and apply it to a mechanical engineeringproblem in the same week. The course also incorporates labs from other classes. For example
ideation effectiveness is of key interest to stakeholders in engineering designeducation. While previous research has developed approaches for assessing the novelty ofbrainstorming outputs, less attention has been paid to the relevant factors that might influencethat novelty. The purpose of the present work is to explore the ways that brainstorming activitystructure and team gender composition might affect the novelty of brainstorming outputs. Toaddress this purpose, we recorded both structured (using the 6-3-5 method) and unstructuredbrainstorming sessions, while varying the ratio of men to women in each team. We adaptedShah’s (2003) novelty metric to assess the average novelty of design solutions generated inideation.We conducted quantitative
Sciences Joanneum Graz. Before he started his studies he worked as a car mechanic and gained some practical experience in the automotive sector.Mr. Christian J. Steinmann, Christian Steinmann has an engineer degree in mathematics from the Technical University Graz, where he focused on software quality and software development process assessment and improvement. He is manager of HMS IT-Consulting and provides services for SPiCE/ISO 15504 and CMMI for development as certified Automotive SPiCE assessor. He performed more than 100 process assessments in software development departments for different companies in the finance, insurance, research, automotive, and automation sector. Currently, his main occupation is a
project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Ms. Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New MexicoDr. Yan Chen, University of New Mexico Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Departments of Chemical AND Biological Engineering at the University
, Brownsville, and Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent School Dis- tricts Selected Publications Yanez, D. (2001). Implementing state-initiated reform: Mathematics TEKS. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. Watt, K. & Yanez, D. (2001). AVID: A comprehensive school reform model for Texas, Paper presented at 2001 AERA Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington. Yanez, D. & Wenrick, M. (2000) Improving Algebra I End-of-Course Exam Scores: Evidence from the field, [Website]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, The Charles A. Dana Center, Available: http://www.tenet.edu/teks/math/index.html. Yanez, D. (1999). Advanced placement capacity assessment tool (APCAT). Austin: The University of
tenure process began in the US in1915, it has faced both criticism and praise. This paper aims to highlight the variability inperceptions of tenure requirements among assistant professors in civil engineering, architecturalengineering, and construction programs, between universities of different research activityintensities and assess their perceptions of impediments towards obtaining tenure. Associateprofessors in the same programs were also surveyed in order to reflect and report theirperceptions of their requirements, and assess the impediments they faced towards their tenureprocess. The motivation for this research is to surface some of the concerns assistant professorshave regarding the tenure process, and to identify if these concerns are
skill sets in orderto remain competitive in these different job sectors. Recognizing the changing dynamics oftechnology and post graduate opportunities, BME programs should consider finding ways tointegrate the skills required of current professional practice in real time. Finally, as the field ofBME continues to develop, BME departments need to continually assess the knowledge and skillsneeded for BME students. By performing periodic analyses that leverage students and faculty toinform curriculum, departments can iterate on curriculum and support students for diverse careerpaths post-graduation. 13References[1] National Academy of Engineering
professionals (i.e. mechanical designengineers, product designers, industrial designers, etc.) from a variety of industrial sectors, anddifferent age/experience groups. Prior to creating the survey, the research purpose and logisticswere discussed, reviewed and approved by the research institution’s research ethics board. Thesurvey was specifically aimed at gathering non-specific demographic information, andevaluating whether there is a correlation between heuristics in CAD usage in the conceptualphase of design, and how these insights correspond to the designer’s perception of productquality and collaboration effectiveness. The insights derived from this survey will be discussedwith respect to the literature review to assess the recent state-of-art in
materials in the makerspace to manufacture their prototype (e.g., acrylic). Projectassignment handouts and grading rubrics are available online at EngineeringUnleashed.com [14].Research Questions & Assessment PlanThree sections of the EASC1107 course during the Fall 2019 semester included the makerspaceinitiatives, and three did not. The class sizes were capped at sixteen students, with a range of 11-16 students per section. Two different faculty facilitated the pilot sections using the makerspace,and three faculty facilitated the prior format in their sections.It was hypothesized the integration of the makerspace into the Introduction to Engineeringcourse would have both benefits and disadvantages. As such, the faculty leading the pilot
understanding, active learning, development of assessment tools, faculty development and studies in STEM. Genaro Zavala was appointed to the editorial board of the Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research journal of the American Physical Society for the period 2015 to 2018, vice president of the Latin American Physics Education Network (LAPEN) for the period 2013-2015 and is currently the coordinator of the Topical Group: Evaluation of Learning and Instruction of the International Group for Research and Teaching of Physics (GIREP by its French acronym). Dr. Zavala is a member of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) where he was vice president candidate, a member of the Committee on Research in
Paper ID #31992Development and Integration of Immersive 360-Videos in Surveying Engi-neering EducationDr. Dimitrios Bolkas, Pennsylvania State University, Lehman Dimitrios Bolkas, Ph.D., is currently an Assistant Professor of Surveying Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University, Wilkes-Barre Campus. He has a diverse geodetic and geoscientific experience that in- cludes terrestrial, mobile, and airborne laser scanning, digital elevation models, unmanned aerial systems, GNSS networks, geoid and gravity-field modeling. His main research interest is on building methods to increase, understand, and assess quality
designs in the limitedtime they were given. However, some student teams went overtime, some presentationswere purely qualitative. The project team, the professor and the student mentors, hasdecided that the students needed more guidance in oral presentation. Next time, studentswill be given a short training on how to present.Project ReflectionSeveral pieces assemble to complete the reflection process. A team assessment,reflection piece and an overall survey was issued to all students in order to gain a generalevaluation of the project.A team assessment document adopted from Felder and Brent [5] was issued to everystudent by the professor via email. The document was kept completely confidential,allowing each team member to honestly comment on
engineering, and other specialty topics. Laboratory experimentsthat test scaled models are included to assess the achieved performance of potential solutions.Need for Student-Centered LearningRecent changes in the ABET accreditation requirements for engineering education as listed inthe previous section have placed even more weight on the learning output on the student sidethan on the teaching input on the faculty side (13) during the didactic process. Othercharacteristics of this new educational paradigm are an emphasis on teamwork in working onprojects, as will be experienced by the engineering graduates upon entering the constructionindustry, and instilling an appreciation of lifelong learning in the students. Under this so-calledstudent-centered
engineering faculty use when making teaching-related decisions. The CDM builds on critical incident techniques5 by using a set of cognitiveprobes to determine the basis for situation assessment and decision making during criticalincidents. This approach is especially apt because it can be used to study people at different Page 12.441.3levels of expertise in a naturalistic setting by relying on interviews to examine recent cases ofinterest; in our case, it would be teaching-related activities.During the interviews we first ask the interviewees their background and demographics. Forexample, we ask them what their faculty status is and how long they
about the accuracy of self-reported skills, especially computing skills. In thequestionnaire, for each major software type, e.g. AutoCAD, OtherCAD, MathCAD, Excel,Word, etc., students must select one of four possibilities: 1) Expert, 2) Capable User, 3) LittleKnowledge, and 4) Never Used. While no hard data are available, it is the impression of theauthor from observing performance of students in this class that students tend to overstate theircapabilities especially in some of the more popular software such as Excel and Word, but forsome of the more infrequently used software such as AutoCAD, they tend to understate theircapabilities. It appears students rate self assessment of skills on familiarity and frequency of use
guidelines for safe RF emissionlevels from microwave ovens, and it continues to monitor exposure issues related to the use ofcertain RF devices such as cellular telephones and medical equipment. NIOSH conductsinvestigations and health hazard assessments related to occupational RF exposure. The EPA has,in the past, considered developing federal guidelines for public exposure to RF radiation.However, EPA activities related to RF safety and health are presently limited to advisoryfunctions. For example, the EPA now chairs an Inter-agency Radiofrequency Working Group,which coordinates RF health-related activities among the various federal agencies with health orregulatory responsibilities in this area. OSHA is responsible for protecting workers
students also completed the VARKlearning style diagnostic17 to help us determine if differences in learning or attitudes towards thesimulations can be attributed to differences in learning styles. We are also seeking to determineif differences in learning or attitudes can be attributed to differences in gender or ethnicity.In addition to evaluating the effectiveness of our first implementation of a simulation in the lab,assessment results are being used to improve the simulation and our ongoing development ofsimulations for other experiments and the next round of implementation scheduled for Fall 2007.Senior thesis projects are currently underway to develop simulations for a gas permeationmembrane unit and a fluid flow experiment.Preliminary
adequate communication skills, and ABET specifically requires this as part of the outcomes assessment criteria. Admittedly, some universities include their communication courses on a larger list of electives that were included as humanities electives. • B: Humanities – most programs had some breadth requirement that included courses in political science, economics, history, psychology, sociology, etc. • C: Math and Science – these courses included math (calculus, statistics, differential equations), basic science (chemistry, physics, biology, ecology), and computer science where the emphasis is on programming or computer theory rather than CAD drawing or computer applications. • D
• Weekly UPT- • ES honors Long Term: collaboration Objectives GTA meetings project • Demonstrably and funding • TAMU UWC • Interactive • ES contest improved • ES innovation • CPR website problems writing skills Program • TAMU STEP • Evaluation and Preliminary • Energy course Sustainability: • TAMU IAC Assessment research approved as • Mechanism in findings core curriculum place to sustain Recruiting • Overall writing course ENGR 101 for
venture. • Much of the grading for the entrepreneurship program is based on projects, Page 12.843.11 presentations, and teamwork. Students are encouraged to perform career self-assessments and get to know their abilities through courses and projects in entrepreneurship.Texas Christian University: • The entrepreneurship program at Texas Christian requires its students to learn outside of the classroom as well as through coursework. Students are encouraged in the program to contact entrepreneurs and interview them through their own initiative, or a “learn=by-doing” approach. • Students are provided with resources
additionalrequired education in a variety of ways, including the increasing use of distance education fromquality engineering institutions, and the use of in-house education programs in firms, agencies Page 13.1197.13and technical societies able to provide educational experiences which are documented to beequivalent in content, rigor, learning and assessment to current engineering education.It is time for engineering educators and engineering institutions consider a master’s degree ofprofessional engineering management, or PEM—a 30-hour degree program that requires awritten thesis, the subject of which is to be agreed upon by the student and the
hasexpertise in mathematics, education, assessment, engineering, water treatment, and curriculumdevelopment. Five of the investigators are tenured professors at Colorado School of Mines; oneis an instructor.Into Your Hands Into Your Hands is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. The mission of IntoYour Hands is “to empower children and families living in rural Uganda to rise above theconstraints of poverty and disease through education and enterprise development.”8A The NSFScholarship program works directly with two members of the Into Your Hands agency. One ofthese individuals is a certified engineer who provides direct support to the project teams. Theother member provides first-hand information, as she was raised in a rural
solution of problems in the lifesciences and medicine. A biomedical engineer involved in wound healing research can 1) designdevices to facilitate healing, 2) determine ways (including devices) to optimize the speed andcompleteness of healing, 3) model the healing process in order to understand the best ways tocontrol the process, and 4) develop or optimize techniques to better assess the healing process.This task relates to 3 and 4, which are being used to help design treatments and devices tooptimize the healing process (e.g. an electrical stimulation bandage is currently being testedclinically). A critical part of understanding the healing process is that it can be modeled as alinear healing rate. Currently many physicians and the FDA do not
that a lesson is already going on. The interpreter did a good job of avoiding such situations by consistently interpreting everything that was being signed and said by everyone present in the class.5. Evaluation and ResultsTwo forms of evaluation were performed at the end of the course, namely: formative and summativeevaluation. Formative evaluation is one where the subjects provide critical information that could beuseful in improving the program and enhancing results. Summative evaluation, on the other hand,involves an assessment of the success of the program and how well goal were met. In this section,the evaluation process is explained in detail, and results are analyzed based by relating thesummative evaluation questions with
thestudents had to compile an almost standard report. In the problem solving approach,however, the students had to assess independently the information relevant for thebeneficiary of the report, to structure the report such that it would be easy to read and tomake sure the report was technically sound. Stress calculation Gage technology 5 5 4.5 Fall 2005 - Survey 1/3 4.5 Fall 2005 - Survey 1/3 4 Average of 4 past semesters 4 Average of 4 past
. This was determined by percentage error testsand the two professors’ joint assessment of the E-teams’ software products. We considered thecourse a qualified success. However, issues such as differential experience in teamwork alongdisciplinary lines, and the need for more business communication skills will need to be morefully addressed in future course offerings.BackgroundMultidisciplinary and interdisciplinary concepts of teaching and learning have appeared inresearch literature since the early part of the 20th century10. Many college students have becomeaccustomed to taking a minor with their major or taking a double major. More recently, studentshave been increasing the number of majors and/or minors they take. Many employers
students felt that the hours of operation of the dining halls could not adequately accommodatetheir research schedules. These issues were taken quite seriously and efforts were made to bettermeet the students’ needs. In 2005, the participants received UVa “Plus Dollars” which could beused at a number of dining facilities that had more extensive hours than the dining hall.In addition, the ethics course received a lower score than many of the other components, in partbecause the scheduled time was considered inconvenient by REU participants. There have alsobeen concerns that the material covered in the class is not technically advanced enough andefforts are underway to assess the course’s structure and content. It should be noted that in spiteof
), and technologycorporations (such as hardware company Graphtec, and software companies Aspex andFableVision). The FSC mission is to facilitate integration of the instructional technologydigital fabrication into education -- within formal classrooms, informal learningenvironments, and preservice teacher education.The FSC has identified four concerns that need addressing for digital fabrication tobecome a scalable instructional technology. These are: (1) hardware and software, (2)curricula, (3) professional development and preservice teacher education, and (4)assessment.17 Of these four concerns recognized by the FSC, the present study focused onthe education of future elementary teachers. Specifically, this study investigated how
-process of faculty who haveconsidered adopting the AIChE Concept Warehouse, a cyber-enabled site for facilitatingconceptual learning in Chemical Engineering. We ask the following research questions: 1. Why do early adopters choose to implement the AIChE Concept Warehouse and how do they use the tool? 2. What factors contribute to the innovation-decision process and how can we minimize negative factors? 3. What ways can we increase awareness?For the purposes of this study, we count someone as “using” the tool if it has enabled him/her toteach in a way that he/she wouldn’t otherwise have employed.BackgroundTransportability is a broad topic that is difficult to research and assess. The ultimate question in
, were notrequired to attend the afternoon hands-on workshop, which impacted the design, implementation,and analysis of the surveys for this study.We designed three surveys, which included a pre- and post-survey (subsequently referred to asthe post1-survey) for attendees of the morning formal presentation. Participants who attended theafternoon hands-on workshop also completed a second post-survey (subsequently referred to asthe post2-survey). Both the pre-and post1-surveys included eleven questions addressing students’expectations for the workshop, five questions about students’ previous funding exposure andexperience, and twelve questions to assess students’ knowledge, skills, and abilities related toapplying for graduate funding. The post2