improve their own training or to pursue projects which would improvethe experience of students, and their experience was defined by learning engineering educationresearch (EER) methods and literature while working closely with their mentoring team. Acommon theme expressed by mentees concerned the identification of strong mentors as a barrierto their EER training, and in general, mentees on teams with multiple mentors reported a betteroverall experience. RIEF mentees were often faculty at institutions without formal EERprograms, lacking available mentors and thus paired with faculty at other institutions, leading tocomplicated schedules and a lack of consistent mentorship, in addition to other issues. RIEFmentees shared broad motivations to
faculty were ready to implement any new equity-focused practices and initiatives.Namely, we considered using the items that considered tasks demands, resource perceptions,change efficacy, change valence, and change commitment. In order to be mindful of length andcontext, we chose to only keep the change commitment, change efficacy, and resource 5perceptions items and edited them down appropriately. We initially provided the followingprompt: Next, we would like to gauge you and your graduate program’s readiness for equity-focused change. In this context, equity-focused change refers to a range of initiatives that all have the intended goal of
. In addition, faculty collaborated in several educationalcommunities that improved teaching pedagogies, resulted in real enriching experiences tofaculty and students alike, and significantly contributed to the betterment of education ofthe students.At College of Applied Science, faculty and students collaborations in the Honorsprogram took on various forms. Collaborative applied research with industry, like theformation of knowledge base that captured the experience of company professionals,provided new opportunities for enhancing students’ education. Faculty community“Problem Based Learning” enriched the cultural and educational experience of thestudents. Pilot programs like “Assessment with Portfolios” helped in developingformative and
another faculty or staff member you feel comfortable talking with, who could pass on your concerns to myself or my department chair. You are also invited to reach out to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Student Ambassadors on Instagram.Programs offered DEI-focused discussions and hosted external speakers. The Civil Engineeringprogram invited external speakers to discuss the sub-disciplines of civil engineering,emphasizing the value of diversity in the workplace and the need to include marginalized groupsin decision-making. Similarly, Computer and Electrical Engineering programs emphasizedethical responsibility and inclusive project work through discussions and case studies, whileMechanical Engineering included DEI-focused discussions
not deep 2.00 1.477 29. Open-ended problem 1.92 1.240 32. Acquire new knowledge 4.08 .900Table 3. Faculty responses of strong direction and low to moderate variance.The faculty group showed less disagreement as demonstrated by lower standard deviations onseveral measures. Faculty also exhibited stronger opinions, witnessed by more items with meanscores of greater than 4.00 (agreement) and less than 2.00 (disagreement). On the issue ofprevious senior project experience, none of the faculty had experience with supervising seniorprojects so no conclusion can be drawn on this issue
Session 1330 Understanding Our Students J. Paul Giolma and Diane Saphire Trinity UniversityIntroduction If we understand students’ critical need to find a niche socially and to experience early academic success and if we are aware of the difficulty the college environment can pose for freshmen, especially women, minority, and adult students, we are better able to become sensitive to student needs and concerned for the conditions necessary for their academic success. Faculty who understand what freshmen are going through are, in
29 in academic year 1987-1988 to 51 in academic year 1998-1999.However, a number of issues requiring attention have been identified in recent years.Most concerns revolve around the inability to involve all engineering students whoexpress an interest. This is a multi-faceted problem which is affected by increasedstudent interest, limited faculty participation, finite resources, and academic regulations.Each factor will be briefly discussed.Increased Student Interest:In recent years the students have received information about the EXCEL program as partof the College recruiting process. As a result, interest among both first year students (forparticipation in the summer between their first and second year) and sophomores hasincreased to the
Organizations (WFEO). The WFEO is an international,non-governmental organization representing the engineering profession worldwide.The WFEO was founded in 1968 by a group of regional engineering organizations,under the auspices of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and CulturalOrganizations (UNESCO) in Paris. WFEO is organized as a respectable and valuablesource of advice and guidance on the policies, interests and concerns that relate toengineering and technology to human and natural environment. Today, the WFEObrings together national engineering organizations from over 90 nations andrepresents 15 million engineers from around the world.Since its founding in 1968, the WFEO has spared no effort in addressing the issue ofengineering education
Page 14.87.7week stays used in the pilot may not be sufficient. Students need time to acclimate to a new timezone and to a new culture. If students have not acclimated to the time zone and the culture to atleast a small degree then the issues with presenting technical concepts to different cultures willnot be as noticeable to the students. The final issue concerns the interval between the face-to-facevisits (the previous three weeks between visits was too short). The next implementation willensure that there is a longer period between the visits. VI. Assessment MethodsThere are two types of outcomes that will be examined from this project: project results (design)and student learning. Overall student learning will be assessed in two areas: 1
tools was overwhelming,and the statement to “carefully integrate technology to enhance learning” became even morevalid. The COVID environment highlighted the importance of technology as the environmentitself went virtual, but it also became a challenge to keep up with the continuous stream ofapplication updates and new features. Just like the concern implied from the original statement,poorly integrated technology becomes a major distraction to learning.Collaborative learning was also found to be a challenge to implement. Students scattered acrosstime zones made finding meeting times difficult. Connectivity issues, equipment access, andsoftware features also complicated the situation. Much progress has been made to improvevirtual collaboration
Page 14.1193.6 Figure 1. Industrial Engineering Assessment Model at the Authors' UniversityArmed with an intimate understanding of the operational issues and concerns that faced thefaculty during the early years of Industrial Engineering program, the faculty presented theirconcerns about the IE 471 Internship course to the Industry Advisory Board (IAB). The IABencouraged faculty members to reexamine and reevaluate the IE program and decide how toimprove the program's curriculum. The resulting effort undertaken by the IE faculty curriculumcommittee determined that creating an effective alternate path for an improved industrialexperience would be beneficial to the success of the program, faculty and most of all thestudents. Taking this
assistance from a professional librarian is not required.At the same time, librarians face innovative new roles in the evolving information age, as our ILGroup demonstrates. Though they have served to educate students and faculty in the past, newemphasis emerges on librarians' responsibilities to prepare to become effective teachers in IL programs, support librarians, faculty, and administrators in assuming leadership roles in the development and implementation of IL programs develop new relationships in the educational community to foster IL curriculum development15.The goals of instruction in IL have been clearly described by The Task Force on InformationLiteracy for Science and Technology, which drew on several member
both from the students and themselves intheir classrooms.” While there is a high potential for improvement in academic integrity at theindividual faculty level, there are also some critical challenges. One of the biggest hurdles forimproving academic integrity appears to be the difference in how students and faculty viewacademic integrity and cheating [9], [4], [12]. This pervades all the way down to their differingdefinitions of cheating, with faculty typically perceiving unethical behavior to be inherently apart of cheating, while students see cheating and acting unethically as separate issues [4], [11],[3].This is a particularly concerning outcome, given that at least some students report that faculty aretheir primary source of information
particular areas of ethical concern requires that one compare this, as best as onecan, to that person’s general ability to be ethically sensitive. In this manner one can tell whetheror not a given individual or group of people is specifically more or less sensitive to researchethics than they are sensitive to everyday cases involving ethical dilemmas. Knowing this wouldallow one to begin to examine and diagnose whether and why one individual or group of peopleis more or less sensitive to RCR over and above the fact that they may simply be more or lesssensitive to ethical issues per se.In this paper, we describe the design of our instrument for measuring ethical sensitivity to RCRand examine the results of our pilot study of the instrument among a
from all four engineering majors. One of the Morals andEthics faculty also attended.In an effort to foster open discussions, the lunch was held outside of the classroomenvironment -- the Academy’s Alumni Center conference room -- with five to six roundtables set up with approximately 10 seats each. As the students arrived, they were askedto sit with only about 2 or 3 members of their major, thereby assuring “multi-disciplinary” discussions. Faculty volunteers then joined the students, ate lunch, andfacilitated the groups’ discussions on the readings and the ethical issues associated withweapons development.It is important to again note that at this stage, the lunches were optional and not actuallypart of any classes. The students were not
knowledge ina pluralist society should be part of their intellectual development - as per Perry. While in earliertimes this may not have been such an issue, it has real consequences for the profession as itattempts to engage with a more complex world. Moreover it limits the ability of new faculty,lacking this grounding in diverse modes of inquiry, to engage with people outside the disciplinein scholarship and research in engineering education.In order to move forward, we must first take a step back and critically examine theepistemological foundations on which engineering education research is based and develop amore exclusive base from which to operate. It seems evident that for engineering to remain trulyrelevant to the issues of import for the
Courses. One way of accomplishing the goal of improvingcommunication is through the support of C-I courses within the CoE curriculum. C-I designatedcourses meet specific criteria concerning communication, such as focusing on at least two of fourcommunication modes (spoken, visual, technological, and written), multiple iterations of writtenand/or oral projects, and concentrating at least 40% of the course grade on communication.Currently in the CoE, there are 31 C-I designated courses throughout the curriculum, rangingfrom introductory to capstone courses. All Engineering disciplines have at least one C-Idesignated course in their core curriculum. CxC provides several resources for faculty who areinterested in designing a C-I course.Faculty Summer
remoteinstruction. Preparation and peripheral work for lab classes are extensive, only to be made moreso with trying to replicate an authentic experience in a virtual environment.Successes are possibly the more important takeaway of any findings, as if ever a situation thatcreates similar circumstances were to happen again, examples exist on best practices. Facultywere forced to adopt alternative forms of teaching and new technologies.Open ended responses contained a variety of observations that are rich with implications andopportunities for further pedagogical development. Many were concerned about how distanceand online learning could become the new standard of delivering education.Feedback from participating faculty, and small numbers of anecdotal
progress towards realizing the disciplinary synthesis called forin these challenging times and (ii) can serve as a model for other design and engineeringprograms around the world. Rensselaer’s traditional strengths in its Schools of Engineering andArchitecture, when combined with its strength in the Department of Science and TechnologiesStudies (STS) in H&SS, serve as the foundation upon which to base a totally new approach toproduct design education. STS includes faculty from six disciplines—anthropology, history,philosophy, political science, psychology, and sociology—all of whom work on understandinghow science and technology shape society and how in turn society shapes science andtechnology. Supported in part by NSF, STS has also been
workshop included research on how unconscious bias affects equity andinclusion in academic policy and governance such as teaching evaluations and letters ofrecommendation that play a role in faculty evaluation and promotion, as well as who participatesin academic governance and in how voices are recognized and heard in the decision-makingprocess. The workshop described strategies for minimizing equity issues and promotinginclusion, using case studies to promote discussion and skill development. Workshop content andcase studies can be used to promote equity and inclusion with students involved in group workand/or student clubs. Evaluation results and lessons learned from the workshop suggest ways inwhich future workshops will be
University After earning my B.S. in Engineering Science at Penn State University (2007), I began working as an audio-video engineer/designer. I then made a career transition to teach high school physics. Having sparked my love for education, I went back to school to earn my M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering (2015) and my Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2016). My first faculty job was at Rowan University in southern New Jersey, where I had the honor of helping develop their first-year engineering and B.S. in Engineering Entrepreneurship programs. I’m now blessed to be at CCU contributing to what God’s doing through our Industrial & Systems Engineering program and university.Dr. Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman
foundations, pavement design & materials, and concrete durability. His interests also include: contemporary issues of engineering education in general, and those of the Middle East and the Arab Gulf States in particular. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018How may Adjuncts Enrich Engineering Education? Challenges and Opportunities for Bringing the Practice into the ClassroomAbstract: The paper examines the status quo of adjunct faculty in engineering institutions today,and argues for the positive contributions adjuncts could make by bringing their practicalexperience into the classroom. Also, their role in setting up linkages with industry which oftenleads to employment opportunities for
foundations, pavement design & materials, and concrete durability. His interests also include: contemporary issues of engineering education in general, and those of the Middle East and the Arab Gulf States in particular. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017How may Adjuncts Enrich Engineering Education? Challenges and Opportunities for Bringing the Practice into the ClassroomAbstract: The paper examines the status quo of adjunct faculty in engineering institutions today,and argues for the positive contributions adjuncts could make by bringing their practicalexperience into the classroom. Also, their role in setting up linkages with industry which oftenleads to employment opportunities for
studentsparticipating in IoT-based projects.In this project a team at two Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs), Texas A&M University-Kingsville and Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, has developed new materials addressingthe use of AI and taking into account cybersecurity. Using Python and appropriate Python libraries,pre-trained AI algorithms are added to Python coding which will allow more advanced featuressuch as image recognition to be included in the student projects. Information on cybersecuritystandards have been added to student project-related materials to introduce the student to anongoing design and operational concern for IoT-enhanced products and projects. An exercise usingAI has been added to the IoT tutorial materials previously
to secure a broad societies (every three years) education - Opportunity to participate - Ability to engage in life- in a co-op experience long learning - Knowledge of contemporary issues - Ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools Proposal of changes to full IMfgE faculty in faculty meetings (each year) Implementation of faculty
this work alone, therefore establishing an internationalteam with Afghan counterparts, and with an international funding resource, is needed toenable a comprehensive evaluation of the existing situation.5.2 TVE Staff TrainingThe creation of a TVE Faculty or College within Kabul University or Kabul Polytechnic ishighly recommended and is aimed to address the following issues: a. Train teachers for all TVE and agricultural high schools and two-year colleges in the country b. Formulate and develop training programs at TVE institutions for skilled labourers c. Provide the rules and regulations and certifications for technicians such as electricians, plumbers, and others.5.3 Areas of Immediate Concern for TVETwo types of
engineering investigators focusing on their own personal experience and observations, all related to growing concerns about student motivation and learning. These are summarizedbelow:(a) Even though there exists rich empirical evidence about the success of student-centered approaches (e.g. project-based, inquiry-based, active learning, etc.) in improving student motivation and learning [1-5], most engineering instructors at FAU continue to follow traditional method of unidirectional lecture-based instructions.(b) In an effort to improve teaching and learning, Florida Atlantic University has sponsored more than twenty five Faculty
mechanisms were in place to receive feedback from students in the program, from graduates and from alumni of the program.7. There were no long-term plans in place to improve the program.Process Used to Prepare for the 1998-99 ABET Accreditation CycleBeginning in the fall of 1996, concerned faculty began to meet on almost a weekly basis todevelop strategies and plans to overcome the deficiencies identified during the 1995-96 period.Significant progress was made, as evidenced by the following achievements.1. Thirteen CpE faculty members were identified—six from CSE and seven from ECE.2. With the completion of the new addition of the Engineering Building in 1996, all of the faculty members who previously had been located outside the Engineering
). These FLCs provide a collaborative arena inwhich faculty colleagues across disciplines and within disciplines have the opportunity sharetheir materials, participate in reflective practice, and be empowered to be change agents in theirdepartments and institutions. They also inspire cross-campus collaboration, which encouragesdevelopment of materials that are more universal and meet the needs of a variety of students.There are two levels of FLCs in this grant: campus FLCs and discipline FLCs. These two levelsenable faculty to discuss campus specific issues (e.g., specific challenges to students at differentcampuses) as well as to discuss discipline specific issues (e.g., how best to teach a specificcontent area). Overall, the FiTW grant has four
critical component that helped tomake so many of the department alumni successful.Other engineering schools have addressed this need for good writing in the classroom. In the lastfew years, the profession has thoroughly examined the issue of technical writing in engineeringeducation. Some articles present and articulate a genre approach. Others present a concept thatlinks with personnel in the English department to help with both writing instruction and gradingpapers. Some have developed programs that use writing centers. While these approaches offermany advantages, the department faculty sought better solutions.Development of a new approachThe department’s discussions of technical writing instruction led to thoughts about developing anew approach