and math and changes in their science and math teaching techniques to reflect amore culturally relevant content; 2) assess the impact on students, as reported byteachers; 3) describe the process of the formation, function and effectiveness of the Page 14.1314.5CAPs; and 4) assess the robustness of the program model to gauge readiness for widerdissemination. 4The professional development models and Community Advisory Panels (CAPs) weredeveloped in two American Indian communities: the Mexican Hat Elementary Schoolcommunity (located in the San Juan School District, and serving a student population thatis 99
thinking and making processes to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S. in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University. 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28 Full Paper: Tinkering and Making to Engage Students in a First-Year Introduction to Mechanical Engineering CourseIntroductionHands-on learning and tinkering activities play a crucial role in teaching introductory mechanicalengineering to first-year students. These activities immerse
Environmental Engineering and the Director of First-Year Engineering at the University of Delaware. She received her Bachelor of Technology degree in Civil Engineering from National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India, and her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from North Carolina State University. She is a teacher-scholar working in the intersection of undergraduate engineering education, sustainable infrastructure, and community engagement. She teaches the introductory engineering course for all first-year undergraduate students in the College of Engineering at UD. Her undergraduate teaching experience includes foundational engineering mechanics courses like statics and strength of materials as well as courses related to
development of aflexible and easy to use python program to measure the retention of students. Many schools donot have robust data systems to provide retention numbers and other data analysis required tomeasure the success of their programs. By developing these programs in house, in addition toproviding basic overall retention numbers, it allows for an expansion of the measurement ofretention into several categories and subcategories which helps to provide a more in-depthanalysis of student success programs.Initial findings over the first two years indicate that these learning communities are having asignificant impact on the retention of the students not only at the university level but also in thecollege of engineering. The software program helped
first semester in the AcES programbolstered the initial feelings of inclusion. 11The degree of inclusion a student feels in the broader engineering and scientific community isdependent on student engagement beyond the classroom. Students cited internship and co-opexperiences as contributing factors to feeling included in the broader engineering and scientificcommunity. This finding suggested that university resources should be allocated to preparingstudents for and helping students apply for internships and co-ops. Faculty and academicadvisors should strongly encourage internships as early as possible in an undergraduate’sacademic
advance a model of patientcentered care, and a similar focus on engagement and public welfare has also been recommendedfor educating engineers [10], [12], [13].The course described in this paper is a new course developed specifically to fill gaps thatcurrently exist between two required courses – technical writing, taught from an Englishdepartment, and public speaking, taught from a communication department – in the University ofDelaware civil engineering curriculum. The topics selected for this course have been identifiedfor civil engineering students who will work with a range of stakeholders (clients, co-workers,municipal governments, regulators, community members, and more) likely to be interested intheir projects. Through these course topics
knowledge and leadership,including engagement with student leaders [3]. Thus, serving the DRT advances the goals of thestudents, and the CoE the Equity Action Plan. The Equity Engineering Summit provided astructured method of unifying and engaging all stakeholders in equity action processes.The inaugural Engineering Equity Summit, “Evolving Behaviors to Make Strides in Policy,” tookplace in the spring of 2021. The two-day, virtual event consisted of discussions surrounding howthe CoE community could grow together to create a more equitable society based on bothindividual behaviors and societal polities. Topics included 1) being unapologetically yourself, 2)colorism, 3) allyship and, 4) policy change. The 99 attendees engaged in both virtual
authorized 2014-2015 as the Year of ACTION on Diversity, “whereinmembers will discuss, engage, and highlight individual and collective activities that serve toadvance the Society's diversity efforts and inclusivity.” [1] The 2015 Diversity Best Papersolicitation for nominations (Appendix) states that the award strives to enhance the visibility andsustainment of actions in support of diversity. It goes on to point out that “engineering isempowering society in unprecedented ways. It is at the core of innovation and can address GrandChallenges facing the US and the world. In order for the engineering discipline to reach its fullpotential, however, the engineering education community and the engineering profession mustbetter include all segments of our
, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.In particular, outcomes f, g, h, i and j are often supported with courses outside the engineeringmajor. Thus, as part of a degree
thirty Liberian and five U.S. female undergraduate engineering student participants. The goals of this leadership camp were twofold: (i) to empower the Liberian and U.S. women engineers with the skills, support, and inspiration necessary to becoming successful and wellrounded engineering professionals; and (ii) to strengthen the community of female engineers in Liberia by building crosscultural partnerships among female engineering students resulting in a global network of women engineers. The leadership camp was developed based on continued collaboration between the University of Michigan and Liberian Society of Women Engineers student organizations; their identification of specific Liberian engineering undergraduate women’s educational needs
engagementDiscovery has completed six terms of program delivery, with total secondary school studentparticipation now exceeding 500. Our previous analysis focused on beneficial outcomes tosecondary student participants [13, 14]. Concurrently, we now share the multi-factorialopportunities to teaching skill development through this model. Both qualitative and quantitativeoutcomes suggest Discovery is having significant impact both on graduate (and undergraduate)student instructor development of professional skills, as well as secondary school studentengagement in STEM.Instructor participationDuring the first 6 semesters of programming (2017-2019; Spring & Fall each year), 93 universitystudent trainees engaged as program instructors, with 24 trainees acting
predominantly identified their Community ofInquiry, which included their peers and instructor, as part of their positive “surroundings,”alongside the physical and environmental features that one might more readily identify as thesurroundings. Students identified this aspect of their surroundings as part of weekly reflectionactivity within a larger NSF-funded study to assess the impact of frequent and systematic reflectionon students’ metacognitive skills development (NSF Award Nos. 2020504 & 2019664).However, perhaps these results regarding the “surroundings” should not surprise us. A surveyconducted in 2016 provided evidence that students did not prefer specific physical features of theirlearning spaces other than the presence of (nearby) eating
on supporting non-dominant student populations. Her current research focuses on creating inclusive and equitable learning environments through the development and implementation of strategies geared towards increasing student sense of belonging.Emilia Mediavilla, Western Washington UniversityAsaki Nelson, Western Washington University Asaki Nelson is an industrial design junior at Western Washington University with minors in Sustainable design and UX design. As a student engagement liaison, she works to cultivate the student community and tackle systemic issues within the STEM field. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Cultivating community
and her Ph.D. in food process engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First-year Engineering program at Purdue, the gateway for all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated and taught in a required first-year engineering course that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implemen- tation, and assessment of model-eliciting activities with realistic engineering contexts. She is currently the Director of Teacher Professional Development for the Institute for P-12
), Darden College of Education, Old Dominion University, VA.Dr. Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University Dr. Vukica Jovanovic is a Chair of Department of Engineering Technology and Associate Professor and Batten Endowed Fellow in Mechanical Engineering Technology Program. She holds a Ph.D. from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technology, focuses on Digital ManufacturDr. Kim E. Bullington, Old Dominion University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Enhancing Student Veterans’ Self-Efficacy and Sense of Belonging in a Targeted Learning Community: Four Years of Qualitative ResultsAbstractEight semesters of qualitative data, collected over four academic years
Committee 6. Stream Corridor Protection Plan 7. Educational Campaign for a Stormwater Management Plan 8. Cost-Benefit Analysis to Compare Stormwater Management Strategies The feedback from students on the guest lecture (Table 1) wasoverwhelmingly positive (n=13/13). Many students expressed their admiration forthe intelligence and knowledge, highlighting the ability to deliver detailed andinteresting information about stormwater management. The students appreciatedthe real-life applications of stormwater management showcased and found thecontent about designing green infrastructure and different types of GIsparticularly engaging. Furthermore, the summaries uploaded by the students hadmore real-world practical applications as
value on thequalifications of each potential student’s scholarship application. The criteria that wasdeveloped, in order to mathematically rank each student, was the following: Admission Index or GPA Applicants must have achieved a minimum admission index of 2.40 (or 3.0/4.0 GPA). Note that this index may change according to the admission cycle. The effect of the admission index on the application is determined by the following formula: [Admission index (or GPA) – 2.40 (or 3.00)] x 10 = points added to applicant’s total Communication Skills: The Personal Biographical Essay Each applicant is asked to write a “personal biographical essay” of no more than 300 words. This is, as much as anything else
representatives instead of visiting the sites in person. The program wascompletely online during Summer 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Fast-Forward studentstake Calculus III, Statics, and a professional development course that includes a spatialvisualization curriculum.The Professional Planning with Spatial Visualization course involves resume writing, mockinterviews, team-building, professional communication, and spatial visualization. The spatialvisualization component of the course closely followed the Developing Spatial Thinkingprogram [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Developing Spatial Thinking is supported by ENGAGE; a projectfunded by the National Science Foundation that creates resources for Engineering Faculty to usein order to help their students
, communication, creativity, motivation, and teamwork were most critical in soft skills.Research completed at Purdue University surveyed alumni and students from an aeronauticalengineering technology program. Their results found a broad range of hard skills needed for acommercial space workforce [16]. The top-rated hard skills found were safety procedures, spaceindustry terminology, and clean rooms. A full accounting of the skills and their rankings weresummarized in Figure 1.Fig. 1. Comparison of topic ratings between commercial space industry professionals andaeronautical engineering technology students.Additional research, done at Embry Riddle Aeronautical University was completed by Mehta[17]. This research was focused on participants working in
onschedule, encourages consistent communication amongst students and professors. For mostprojects, the amount of work is so large that one person alone cannot handle it [9]. That is why ateam is required. A team’s success is also strongly dependent on team culture. A strong teamculture relies on effective communication, vision, and trust [10]. While educators recognize theimportance of project management and team culture, simply relying on the capstone experiencefor students to naturally develop, practice, and master this skill set may not be prudent. Studentteams regularly fail to meet faculty members’ expectations in terms of project management andstruggle to develop a productive team culture. This deficit can be addressed in many ways butfirst
nanotechnology measurements.9,16Encouraging first-year science students to get involved in independent research opportunitieswith faculty mentors, to participate in science learning communities outside the classroom(specifically Nano Club), and to attend an one-hour introduction to nanoscience seminar arethree techniques that an eastern state university has found useful in engaging their studentsthrough the appealing topic of nanotechnology.15 At an innovative eastern university, there is acourse consisting of primarily computer and electrical engineering students that challengesstudents to write a research paper about a nanoscale device of their choice.17 Kim, Kamoua, andPacelli (2005) indicate that this technique is a starting point and propose
. To date, 53 students have successfully com-pleted the course and another 12 are enrolled for the Spring 2012 semester. The enrollment inthe course will rise significantly to 100 students per year when it becomes a required course forthe University of Wisconsin—Platteville civil and environmental engineering curricula in fall2012. Assessment efforts have shown that the I2I course met its learning objectives.3Also under the CCLI grant, the I&S course was developed to satisfy a social science elective un-der UW-Platteville’s general education requirements. This course is a three-credit, non-technicalcourse. Emphasis is placed on comprehension of social and economic impacts from infrastruc-ture. While five sub-disciplines of civil
].The summer bridge program was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative data collectedthroughout the program and upon its conclusion tracking students’ reactions and levels ofengagement in each of the program components. This included a pre-survey, mid-semestersurvey, post-survey, and weekly journal prompts on Google Classroom. We also used theUniversality-Diversity scale [2] to measure any pre-post changes in students’ attitudes towardsdiversity. With regard to the workshops, an analysis of student responses indicated a high level ofsatisfaction and sense of accomplishment. Students reported they enjoyed getting to know eachother better and that the DEI activities were interactive, educational, and engaging.1.0 IntroductionIt is important
knowledge in that particular domain.However, this experience does not change teacher beliefs that their students could engage and besuccessful in similar rigorous and demanding practices. In addition, since the focus of these sitesis on teacher development, there is not a real effort to ensure that the knowledge teachers obtainis translated into classroom activities during the academic year. In contrast, the RET sites that Page 13.849.3focus on K-12 classroom activities develop in-depth curricular materials that can be implementedin K-12 science and math curriculum. In these sites, RET participants often do little hands-onresearch and are exposed to
-income,talented domestic students to pursue successful careers in promising STEM fields. Whileapplicants are not chosen based on their racial background, the lower income communities in thelocal county are represented by these scholars.The current CLC grant program intends to continue supporting these academic successes for theoverall Engineering and Computer Science (ECS) program at the college by targeting threeprimary objectives. Objective 1: Active recruitment of academically talented students withfinancial need into the NSF Scholars program will focus on both currently enrolled communitycollege students and students from area high schools. Successful recruitment efforts wouldincrease the number of female students and the proportion of
elements (i.e., peers, instructor, and in-class instruction) were discussed in 55% of thereflections as positive “surroundings.” Within the classroom ecosystem, feelings about positiveCoI “surroundings” balanced 54% of respondents who discussed the physical room attributes asnon-supportive to learning. Interestingly, when students identified their CoI as a type ofsurrounding, they less-frequently identified physical attributes of the classroom as non-supportive.Thus, the presence of a Community of Inquiry may have diminished the perception or impact ofphysical room features. Overall, our results preliminarily suggest the positive influence that aninteractive flipped classroom structure can have on students’ perceptions of their “surroundings.”1
were also more likely tovalue the services of a learning/tutoring center than were White students (again, after controllingacademic preparedness and gender). There was no significance difference between Asian andWhite students regarding the importance of tutoring and learning assistance services. Consistent with previous studies of engineering students 3-5, the P2P data showed thatwomen and historically underrepresented students’ perceptions of climate were, on average,more negative than those of men and White students, respectively. However, after controlling forgender and race/ethnicity, students who were more actively engaged in engineering-related clubsor programs for women and/or minority students (e.g., NSBE, SHPE, SWE, and WISE
wide variety oftechnology used in everyday life to help in engaging the student's interest. The course topicswere selected to represent the technologies most frequently encountered in everyday life andwere based partly on the results of surveys of student interests. The course follows an approachrooted in functional analysis and systems thinking.18-20 Course emphasis includes an elaborationof the general nature of technological systems.A comparison of the pre and post test results are shown in Figure 2. All but 3 of the 23 studentsshowed increases in the ability to explain the functioning of a technological device. The averagefor the group increased to 74. This is a statistically significant increase. It is reasonable toconclude that this
on engaging students of all ages in hands-on, innovative engineering education, especially focusing on several outreach projects reaching groups otherwise underrepresented within the STEM fields. Jenna is also leading the University’s STEPS (Science, Technology, and Engineering Preview Summer) Program, developing the curriculum, leading the staff, and working as the primary researcher. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017The Effect of Gender Groupings at an Engineering Summer Camp on Increasing Engineering Knowledge and Confidence The Effect of Gender Groupings at an Engineering Summer Camp on Increasing Engineering Knowledge and ConfidenceIntroductionThis paper
succeeded in the academic area. Students perceived they overcame theacademic challenges and made efforts to pursue well-being. Students reflected on theimportance of setting aside time for exercise, doing social activities outside the class, and restingto recover from the academic demand.Students’ responses have shown the impact of in-person interactions on building community andteamwork. Although, technology-based activities were not directly mentioned in their responses,all the participants actively engaged in the online tools on Canvas, such as the creation of videosfor final projects, introductions, and the creation of the mapping of lab teams using Plectica.Also, students suggested including content related games which seem to be an