AC 2011-39: THE EVOLUTION OF ENGINEERING AND ENGINEER-ING TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATESGeorge D Ford, Western Carolina University Construction Management at Western Carolina University. Dr. Ford worked for over fifteen years in the corporate world in plant engineering and environmental engineering positions and managed numerous construction projects as a plant engineer in the paper, plastics and rubber industries including warehouses, manufacturing buildings and utilities infrastructures.Aaron K. Ball, Western Carolina University Aaron K. Ball is a Full Professor and serves as the Graduate Program Director in Engineering and Tech- nology at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, North
first-year students: an embedded curriculum approach," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 253-259, 2007/06/01 2007, doi: 10.1080/03043790701276205.[27] E. C. Kalkani, I. K. Boussiakou, and L. G. Boussiakou, "The paper beam: hands-on design for team work experience of freshman in engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 393-402, 2005/09/01 2005, doi: 10.1080/03043790500114615.[28] J. Heikkinen and V. Isomöttönen, "Learning mechanisms in multidisciplinary teamwork with real customers and open-ended problems," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 653-670, 2015/11/02 2015, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2014.1001818
Teaching and Learning Program (ITLP) is located at the University of ColoradoBoulder, a large public research institution. Through workshops, laboratories, active learningspaces, and manufacturing and prototyping facilities, our ITLP team supports the College ofEngineering and Applied Science (CEAS) in growing students’ hands-on engineering skillsacross all disciplines in the college. In 2022, CEAS published strategic goals focused in largepart on improving the quality of instruction [13]. In support of students and to help achievecollege goals, our redesign aligned with key measures—including enhancing co-curricularopportunities, developing innovative educational offerings, and implementing inclusive learningexperiences to benefit students.In
are tackling the outrageous costs of textbooks and class supplies by promoting theadoption, adaption, and creation of Open Educational Resources (OER). OER are freelyaccessible learning materials for students to use and can be licensed for instructors to modify andredistribute. OER development in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)disciplines has primarily been focused on large enrollment introductory courses such asIntroduction to Mechanical Engineering or Introduction to Physics. A common complaint amongMines faculty is the lack of existing OER to support high-level courses or niche subject areas,such as groundwater engineering or advanced manufacturing. Recognizing the need forhigh-quality OER across the curriculum, the
authentic assessments that can enhance the transfer oflearning in engineering education can be identified as well. After all, students experiencingindustries such as engineering design process and manufacturing that require a mechanicalengineering skillset may be transferring their learning from their Year 1 and 2 modules.Results & DiscussionAfter the recruitment of the undergraduate engineering program of 126 students, removingincomplete responses, and pairing the remaining students, a sample of n=79 is left. Theirstatistical means are shown in Table 2, along with the respective p-values under the post-intervention scores. A significant difference in means was observed in items 1, 2, 5, 10, 11,and 14 (p<0.05), while the remaining items had
Technology Page 22.1428.2 The Academic Effects of Cooperative Education Experiences: Does Co-op Make a Difference in Engineering Coursework?IntroductionCooperative education opportunities have been a staple of engineering training for over 100years. An idea conceived at Lehigh University and first implemented at the University ofCincinnati, in the early 21st century over 150 engineering and engineering technology programsincorporate cooperative education opportunities into their curriculum. Cooperative education isa unique form of experiential education, and is traditionally delivered through either analternating model, whereby student alternate work experience and academic
Paper ID #13857Engineering Project Management Graduate Education in Integrated Soft-ware and Systems Engineering EnvironmentsDr. Radu F. Babiceanu, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Radu Babiceanu is an Associate Professor with the Department of Electrical, Computer, Software, and Systems Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, a M.S. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the University of Toledo, and a B.S. degree in Manufacturing Engineering from the Polytechnic University of Bucharest. His research
. Pertuze is a PhD student at MIT’s Engineering Systems Division (ESD). Page 22.1129.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Orienting engineering education towards innovation, entrepreneurism, and industry partnerships The case of the MIT-Portugal ProgramAbstractEngineering education has always served as a close nexus between academia and industry, andas a strong determinant of a country‟s innovative and economic performance. As manydeveloped countries are struggling with the loss of low-cost manufacturing to global competitors
armor .CNCMM Education and Workforce Development ActivitiesObjectivesCNCMM’s education activities enhance the materials science and technology knowledgebase of PSU. The student participants of this project are provided the opportunity todevelop academically by making available at the graduate level courses in the materialsarea with emphasis on nanocomposites and multifunctional materials. During the firsttwo years of this project, a committee of dedicated PSU faculty worked on thedevelopment of a materials science and technology curriculum and program. Thisinvolved a thorough survey and evaluation of available materials science and technologyprograms nationwide. The committee’s work identified already available, eligible facultyand courses at
situations where in-site, face-to-face training is achallenge. In the education sector, virtual experiences represent an attractive technological toolthat improves students' active learning. In this project, a virtual NASA expedition learningexperience of NASA's Experimental Fabrication Division Brach, a manufacturing, repairing, andmodification facility dedicated to supporting the aeronautics projects at the NASA ArmstrongResearch Center, is developed in terms of the design of the experience and the evaluation ofdifferent types of software resources.REFERENCESAllen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research
) section. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integrated Teaching Model in Graduate Aerospace Classes: A Trial With Compressible Flow Aerodynamics Sidaard Gunasekaran University of Dayton AbstractMost of the graduate aerospace classes are dominated by complex analysis and a plethora ofequations. As such, without proper context, it is very easy for a student to lose sight of thebig picture, which hinders them from critically thinking about the knowledge they gainedand its applicability in the real world. The recent surge of the modern pedagogical practicesat the
Session 1526An Integrated Approach to Educating a Diverse Population on Environmental Management Systems Murali Krishnamurthi, Harvey Smith, and Philip Carpenter Northern Illinois University AbstractThis paper describes the interdisciplinary learning modules being developed with the help of aNational Science Foundation CCLI (Curriculum, Course, and Laboratory Improvement) grant toeducate students from diverse disciplines about environmental management systems (EMS). Themodules are intended to enhance student understanding and
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @2005, American Society for Engineering Education Table 4 Course Coverage of EE Program Outcomes 3 Course Outcomes a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o MATH 1060 Calculus I x ENGL 1010, 1020 Fresh. English I, II x ENGR 100L Intro. To Engr. I x x x x x x x x x x CHEM 151 Gen. Chem. Eng x CHEM 151L Gen. Chem. Lab x x x x ENGR 115L Engr. Graphic Des
Engineering Technology, focus on Digital Manufacturing. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Pilot Course as a Step towards New Academic Programs in Renewable EnergiesAbstractThe challenges arising from climate change have never before in human history been morepressing for solutions. Addressing pollution and the transition to clean energies are essentialproblems to solve in the upcoming decades. The process of transitioning to renewable energieshas started already, with some states leading the process. As the development of industries sees afast growth, the supply of qualified engineers and technicians to
learning methods: Definitions,comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.[3] Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2–16.[4] Kaipa, K., & Kidd, J. J., & Kumi, I. K., & Ringleb, S. I., & Ayala, O. M., & Gutierrez, K., &Pazos, P., & Cima, F., & Rhemer, D. M. (2024, June), Reflections of undergraduate engineeringstudents completing a cross-disciplinary robotics project with preservice teachers and fifthgraders in an electromechanical systems course, In Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Portland, Oregon.[5] Aldabbus, S. (2018
Paper ID #42493Embodied Learning with Gesture Representation in an Immersive TechnologyEnvironment in STEM EducationMr. Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University I am a Graduate Research Assistant, and Lynn Fellow pursuing an Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Engineering Education majoring in Ecological Sciences and Engineering (ESE) at Purdue University, West Lafayette IN. I earned a Bachelor of Education in TVET Industrial Technology – Electrical from the University of Technology, Jamaica, and a Master of Science in Manufacturing Engineering Systems from the Western Illinois University. I am a Certified Manufacturing
ideas to solve those problems.In the rest of the paper, we present the proposed approach, a case study, and a conclusion. Keyfeatures of the proposed approach include hands-on experience, team-based project, and learner-centered education. A computer engineering course, offered mainly for senior and graduatestudents is used for the case study.Proposed ApproachA typical curriculum design consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, andevaluation activities, which are operationalized in specific tactics (Asaduzzaman et al., 2013;Dick et al., 1985; Gustafson et al., 2002; Hardre, 2003; Lunenberg, 2002; Richey et al., 2001,Seels et al., 1991; and Whitman et al., 2014). Six types of knowledge and skills, based onactivities in the
an importantdriving force for engineering education reform programs. As basic science and engineeringbecome increasingly intertwined in fields such as nanotechnology, molecular self-organization,molecular electronics, and microbiological synthesis13, students and professionals have to dealwith time scales from the nanosecond to tenths of years, and sizes from the single atoms tomachines many thousands of meters long14. Many researchers and industrial leaders in the field have been pointing out that reforminitiatives are falling short of those new challenges. Bazzo15 and Blikstein16 criticized the“banking” approach of simply adding new courses to the curriculum, and Hurst17 pointed out thatsyllabi and curricula were so overloaded with
, this classical course model is deficient, and mustchange if the future educational needs of our students are to be best satisfied, and our globalcommunity best served. Of particular interest in this context is the exposure of non-engineeringmajors (e.g., management students) to micro/nanotechnology, something they would generallynever encounter in a “normal” college undergraduate curriculum. We offer here an example of asolution to this dilemma by describing a new course introduced at Georgia Tech which dealssquarely with micro/nanotechnology at the undergraduate level, and importantly is intended toserve undergraduate students of all majors (e.g., management, engineering, sciences, etc.) and alleducational levels (freshman through senior).At
undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Rubaai is a Senior Member of IEEE, and past Chair of the Industrial Automation and Control Committee of the Industry Applications Society (IAS). Currently, Dr. Rubaai is the Chair of the IEEE/IAS Manufacturing Systems Development and Applications Department, and a member of the IAS Executive Board. Dr. Rubaai can be contacted at arubaai@howard.edu.James Johnson, Howard University James H. Johnson, Jr. received his B.S. from Howard University, M.S. from the University of Illinois and Ph.D. from the University of Delaware. Currently, he is a professor of civil engineering and Dean of the College of Engineering, Architecture and Computer Sciences at Howard
,” (2012), in which workers wereexposed to substances like beryllium in Cold War-era weapons manufacturing sites, in a workenvironment lacking transparency and freedom to report unsafe conditions.Safety in Engineering PracticeScholarship on sociotechnical engineering and engineering education has several links tooccupational health and safety. Starting in the field of human factors and ergonomics, scholarshave linked sociotechnical ideas to their process of design. In Clegg’s outline of sociotechnicalprinciples, they state how technocentric designs seek to “remove error-prone humans fromprocesses” rather than “viewing humans as assets who can be supported in meeting their goals”(Clegg, 2000, p. 466). Evoking sentiments from Frederick Taylor and
Professor of Systems and Industrial Engineering at the University of Arizona. Her research interests include additive manufacturing, geometric manufacturability analysis, design for manufacturing, and engineering education.Dr. Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona Vignesh Subbian is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineering, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation and promoting servingness in engineering, biomedicine, and computing, particularly at land
. Wilck’s research has been spon- sored by NSF, DOE, ORNL, NCDOT, and industrial partners. Dr. Wilck has held a faculty position at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Engineering at East Carolina University.Dr. Paul C. Lynch, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA Paul C. Lynch received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Lynch is a member of AFS, SME, IIE, and ASEE. Dr. Lynch’s primary research interests are in metal casting, manufacturing, and engineering education. Dr. Lynch has been recognized by Alpha Pi Mu, IIE, and the Pennsylvania State University for his scholarship, teaching, and
- sissippi’s Business Journal as Top 21 of Mississippi’s most wanted in technology. Additionally, she was awarded the IBM Women of Color Rising Star Award, Champion of Diversity Award, and LSU Rising Star Alumnus Award. Dr. Williams enjoys spending time with her husband, Dr. Byron Williams and their two daughters. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Update on Academics with Diversity Education and Mentorship in Engineering (ACADEME) Activities and FellowsAbstractGlobal competition, changes in manufacturing/automation and desire for more sophisticatedtechnology has increased the demand of graduates in STEM fields. Although the graduation
Practices in Engineering Education. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. 7. Aqlan, F., & Nwokeji, J. C. (2018, October). Applying product manufacturing techniques to teach data analytics in industrial engineering: a project based learning experience. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. 8. Bonfert-Taylor, P., Ray, L., Pauls, S., Loeb, L., Sankey, L., Busch, J., & Hickey, T. (2022, August). Infusing Data Science into the Undergraduate STEM Curriculum. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 9. Greer, T., Hao, Q., Jing, M., & Barnes, B. (2019). On the Effects of Active Learning En- vironments in Computing Education. Proceedings
engineering education from Texas A&M University. Her research areas of focus are faculty perspectives and growth through curriculum design and redesign, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, reflective eportfolios and professional development of graduate students related to teaching.Dr. Nate Poling, Texas A&M University As an educator and faculty developer, Nate is interested in leveraging the power of popular culture and multimedia to help facilitate effective learning. In a teaching career that has ranged from the K12 to the Ph.D. levels, he has always stressed the importance of using relevant material in motivating and engag- ing students in the learning process. At the Center for Teaching Excellence at Texas A
semesters. During the first semester,the design requirements were defined, conceptual designs explored, a preliminary designdeveloped, and a final design described in detail with manufacturing ready drawings. Thesecond semester entailed parts procurement, fabrication, assembly, testing, and refinement of theproduct. A thorough Operations Manual is created, as well as teacher lesson plans and studentworksheets appropriate for K-12 students. The aforementioned process has been previouslydescribed in detail13.Phase I STEM ToolAt the onset of the ALLIES partnership it was decided that the first STEM tool design effortshould not be too complex in order to aid a successful initial collaboration. Therefore, the PhaseI STEM tool was a table-top catapult
, North Dakota State UniversityDr. Peng Zeng, Auburn University Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn UniversityDr. Bo LiuDr. Peter He, Auburn University Dr. Q. Peter He is Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Auburn University. He obtained his BS degree in chemical engineering from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, in 1996 and MS and PhD degrees in chemical engineering in 2002 and 2005 from the University of Texas, Austin. Besides engineering education, his current research interests are in the area of systems engineering en- hanced data analytics with applications in manufacturing, renewable energy, food-energy-water nexus, and broad area of disease detection/diagnosis and
lessons to be learned is that most educational institutions are run by the goldenrule: “he (or she) who has the gold, rules.” If you are not willing to take an administrativeposition to control resource distribution, then your job is to make the department chairs, the dean,provost and president look good. In contrast, to my knowledge, no one has ever succeeded witha program by making a dean (provost or president) look bad. Another concept to learn is theposition of being “dead right” “Yes, you are right, your program would be great for our facultyand the students, but I am going to fund this other program instead.” The goal should be to lookfor ways to get what you both want. This often happens only with extended dialog.Since the program will
AC 2009-1745: USING DISTANCE LEARNING FOR CAD-BASED TRAINING ANDPLM EDUCATION OF INCUMBENT ENGINEERSDaniel Wittenborn, Boeing Company Dr. Daniel Wittenborn is a member of the Engineering Skills group within the Learning, Training and Development (LTD) organization at The Boeing Company. He is located in the DC Metro area and works out of Boeing’s Rosslyn office in Arlington, VA. His work at Boeing focuses on engineering and technical education research. He is the program manager of the Integrated Design and Manufacturing through Product Lifecycle Management Certificate Program that Boeing has co-developed with Georgia Tech for off-hours continuing education of Boeing employees. He is