board of directors for the Societyfor Computer Simulation International and has been actively involved in developing undergraduate engineeringdesign curriculum.SENAY YASARSenay Yasar is a Ph.D. student in Science Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction at ASU. She earnedher MA degree in Science Education at Arizona State University. Her BS degree is in Physics Education. Herprinciple research areas are inquiry-based learning and science and technology education. She teaches an elementaryscience methods course for undergraduate students. Page 9.397.12 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering
rating.VI. Project BackgroundLinear Axis Rapid Development Phase-II (fig1a, b, c): Page 15.541.5The Linear Axis RDS is used in teaching materials on control design/insertion in the MechanicalEngineering curriculum at a midwestern university in the U.S. It has a graphical user interfacewith three main modes: simulate, emulate, and implement. In the simulation mode the studentsimulates the linear axis system that includes their controller and detailed models of the interfacehardware and linear axis. In the emulation mode, the simulation is performed on the computerhardware that will implement the controller. In the implementation mode, the controller
papers2-7.The implementation of a high school engineering curriculum that is taught by teacherswith limited exposure to engineering curricula and concepts represents a particularsystem design challenge. In this paper, some of the knowledge that has been learned inestablishing such curricular activities in varied educational environments is shared. Inparticular, the following topics are discussed: • The role of and importance of partnerships with engineering and educational technology providers, • The curriculum design process and its relationship to technology development, • Issues related to curriculum design that affect teacher professional development and training, and • The process of community building for
based on a working knowledge of engineering science and analysis concepts.For each of these focus areas, a list of questions were developed based on the content covered inthe mechanical engineering curriculum at the authors’ institution. All questions, other than thegeneral information section, will use a sliding scale.SurveyThe questions that will be used in the survey are listed below.General respondent information: 1. What level of education do you have? 2. What is your major? 3. What industry do you work in? 4. What is your title? 5. How much experience do you have?Direct use of advanced engineering science and analysis techniques:In the last 5 years how much of your time has been focused on complex
ourafterschool Innovation Clubs. The Innovation Clubs use the LEGO® MINDSTORMS® NXTrobotics kits, augmented with other technical resources, to investigate solar and wind energy. Weintegrate additional hardware, such as solar panels, third-party sensors, and common constructionmaterials, and teach ways to apply new software techniques as students evolve theirprogramming skills. Overall, students are identifying and designing innovative engineeringsolutions to some of our world’s most pressing problems. The curriculum includes the details ofstructured LEGO® builds and specialized programming, curriculum design prompts, designchallenge mats, and professional development documentation. This paper describes examples ofthe curriculum to give the reader a
, that thestudents must be well prepared for this experience to maximize the benefits of university –school district partnership programs. The objective of this paper is to describe the trainingprogram that has been developed to prepare Clarkson students to work effectively in middleschool classrooms.The Clarkson students are trained for their classroom experiences during the summer before theyenter the classroom. They receive three credits for the training, curriculum development, andteaching efforts. It is expected that the students have the necessary background in science andtechnology to teach themselves the content and environmental relevance of the problem they willbe teaching. Lectures and workshops focus on how to transform this
department also hired a writing expert todesign, develop and teach the communication component of these classes; thus alleviating theneed for ECE faculty to direct and formatively assess student writing. After ten years ofemphasizing writing, at least in the senior year of the ECE curriculum, and in response to theABET 2000 requirement that program outcomes be measured, the department, in 1999, begandeveloping plans to design an assessment process capable of evaluating how well the ECEcurriculum was actually preparing our graduates to write for their future careers. In this paper,we will describe first the series of steps that led to the establishment of the assessment design,then present and discuss our observations from five years of this
Florida/University of Texas at BrownsvilleAbstractThe goals of the Minority in Science Program Project, “Working in Teams to Enhance Pre-Engineering Curriculum” are encompassed in the overall objective of increasing the success ofminority students in gatekeeper engineering and science courses. The mechanisms proposed toobtain this goal include the development of a number of instructional modules for pre-engineering and science courses that will specifically address many of the barriers encounteredby minority students in these courses.A number of instructional modules are being developed for each of the following college levelcourses, that have been identified as gatekeeper courses for minority students: Calculus, pre-Calculus I, Physics
in California) there is aneed for chemical engineers with related skills, such as microfluidic chip design,microfabrication, optical imaging, and programming languages for instrument control and dataanalysis. However, our current curriculum does not provide our students training for these skills.To address this, we initiated a course development project for two new elective courses,Introduction to Microfabrication and Microfluidics Technology and Microfluidics Technologyand Its Applications, along with corresponding hands-on lab sessions in Fall 2010. In thisproject, both undergraduate and graduate students were involved in the design of the labsessions. They helped to convert the experiments in our ongoing research projects into the
at the National Science Foundation and spent 12 years teaching science and engineering in rural and small town settings at the K-8 level. She is also a recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching. Dr. Hammack researches science and engineering teacher efficacy and student engineering identity development at the K-8 level.Dr. Nicholas Lux Lux, Montana State University, Bozeman Nick Lux is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education and is an affiliate in the Montana Engineering Education Research Center. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for over 20 years, and currently teaches in the teacher education program
• Quality Program based CEE Leadership Training curriculum development • Chinese translation • Presentations of training at CACEE in Beijing, China • 140+ CEE Managers took
are not well-known.Several factors motivated the effort to encourage scholarly teaching by engineering faculty. First,as with education in other fields, economic factors have led to governmental oversight for publiceducational institutions in order to show taxpayers that funds provided to higher educationimprove student learning [7]. Second, the ABET, Inc. accreditation standards changed to focus onstudent learning outcomes rather than the means and processes used to achieve them [8]. Thesenew criteria directly challenged engineering faculty to maintain a high standard and continuouscycle of curriculum development, student assessment, and improvement that furthers institutional
the collection of 2D images that are then translated to 3D byexternal reconstruction software.As with many computer engineering programs, students of the computer engineering program atUtah Valley University (UVU) conclude their degree programs with a semester capstone designexperience. The intent is for students to utilize competencies developed in the first three years ofthe curriculum in the solution of an embedded design problem. This paper summarizes theresult of an undergraduate capstone experience where the feasibility of utilizing ubiquitoustechnology (2D ultrasound) to mimic the functionality of enhanced but expensive 3D ultrasoundmachines is assessed.Capstone Projects at UVUThe goal of projects in our Capstone Design course is to
dark arts (of Cyberspace) universities are offering graduate degrees in cybersecurity,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 26–26, Jun. 2014.[2] M. Lloyd, “Negative Unemployment: That Giant Sucking Sound In Security,” Forbes, 21- Mar-2017.[3] B. NeSmith, “The Cybersecurity Talent Gap Is An Industry Crisis,” Forbes, 09-Aug-2018.[4] A. Bicak, X. (Michelle) Liu, and D. Murphy, “Cybersecurity Curriculum Development: Introducing Specialties in a Graduate Program,” Inf. Syst. Educ. J., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 2015.[5] S. A. Kumar and S. Alampalayam, “Designing a graduate program in information security and analytics,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information technology education - SIGITE ’14
Paper ID #23334Adaptive Expertise: The Development of a Measurement InstrumentDr. Janna H. Ferguson, Northeastern University Dr. Ferguson designs assessments and analyzes data related to student learning and its relevance to stu- dent success. Focusing on how experiential learning and co-curricular education works in conjunction with traditional academic environments, Dr. Ferguson works to develop, plan, implement, and evaluate meaningful assessments across multiple learning environments and provides support for projects related to institutional assessment.Jennifer Lehmann, Northeastern UniversityDr. Yevgeniya V
Paper ID #24878Development of a Bio-inspired Robotics CourseDr. Hamid Vejdani, Lawrence Technological University Hamid Vejdani, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineer- ing at Lawrence Technological University. His research interests include dynamical modeling, control and robotics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Development of bio-inspired robotics courseAbstractIn this paper, the development of a new senior level course and its outcome results are presented.This course was offered during spring 2018 at Lawrence
faculty develop the strategiesand understanding of the learning process that are necessary to develop a learning centered-classroom. 28 The program offered introductory and advanced workshops and on-goingbiweekly meetings. It reflected the belief that faculty needed to experience learning in alearning-centered atmosphere and to practice in their own classrooms with continued supportfrom their peers. Evaluation data showed that workshop participants that attend the regularmeetings (i. e., became part of the community) reported changes is classroom behavior; whilethose that did not reported marginal or no progress in implementing changes in their classrooms,emphasizing the importance of continued interactions.An extensive bioengineering curriculum
Session 1332 Development of an Undergraduate Course in Radar Systems Habib Rahman, Beshara Sholy Saint Louis University Saint Louis, MO 63103-1110AbstractThis paper outlines and presents the results of the development and teaching of a unique coursein radar systems to undergraduate students in electrical engineering and avionics majors at SaintLouis University. It also discusses the challenge of offering such a course, and proposes a coursecurriculum that is specifically tailored for undergraduate students.The important and
. Kinnas, S.A., and Hart, H., “Developing and Using Textbooks on the Web,” Brown bag seminars, Collegeof Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Nov. 1997. Liu, M., e-mail correspondence with author (Hart), 3 Nov., 1997.HILLARY HART, Ph.D., a Sr. Lecturer in the Department of Civil Engineering (CE) at The University of Texas atAustin, created and runs the CE program in Technical Communication. She developed an electronic writing lab thatpioneered the use of writing-process software in an engineering curriculum. Her research interests includeenvironmental communication as well as instructional technology and computer-mediated communication.SPYROS A. KINNAS is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at The
Session 2533 Vision Guidance Development for a Ground Robotic System Akihiko Kumagai, Shamala Chickamenahalli, Aju Mathew, Sanjeeve Sharma, and Robert Thompson Wayne State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes a student project that involved the design and construction of a groundrobotic system guided by a vision system. The project has been carried out by students inEngineering Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Computer Science. Theproject has served to meet the senior project requirement of several of the students in thedivision.The construction of
children are supposed to be learning. You need to consider the science and math curriculum being used in the schools and to go through the standards for teaching math and science in each grade. 2. Audience We try to reach students in all the grades, from 5-year-olds in kindergarten all the way up to 18-year-olds who are ready to graduate from High School. This vast spread of ages and abilities presents quite a challenge. Consider the audience for your outreach program—what age group will you focus on? It is very hard to develop a kit from scratch that can be used all the way from Kindergarten through 12th
11.1119.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Sequential Course Outcome Linkage: A Framework for Assessing an Environmental Engineering Curriculum Within a CE ProgramAbstractThe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering has recently adopted anexpanded set of fifteen program outcomes identified in the American Society of CivilEngineers Body of Knowledge and conducted work leading to development of commoncourse goals with appropriate levels of cognitive achievement based on Bloom’staxonomy. In addition, the department has adopted a holistic process for investigatingand analyzing the linkage of individual course goals in various discipline-specific areasof concentration within the
Mechatronics Actuator Education Platform for Active Learning CurriculumAbstractThis paper discusses the design and construction of a multi-actuator, open-source educationplatform to enhance undergraduate mechatronics laboratory curriculum experience in the topicarea of actuator technologies. Utilizing hands-on learning as the primary pedagogical approach,students gain applied knowledge in mechatronics by fostering the development of criticalengineering skills. The proposed laboratory curriculum encompasses an all-in-one mechatronicsactuator test platform for the study of fundamental actuator technologies, including a directcurrent brushed motor, stepper, and radio control servo motor that is generally taught in anundergraduate mechatronics
on Student Performance and Learning Perception,” International J. for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2, No. 2, July 2008.20. Elliot P. Douglas and Chu C. Chiu, “Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Engineering,” Advances in Engineering, ASEE, Winter 2013.21. Spencer Kim and Betsy Dell, “Transforming Materials Education in Mechanical Engineering Technology,” 2012 Faculty Institute on Teaching and Learning, RIT, May 30-31, 2012.22. Spencer Kim, “Materials Education for Green Plastics Manufacturing Technology (GPMT), 2012 Annual Conference for ASEE, San Antonio,” Texas, June 10-13, 2012.23. Spencer Kim, “Transforming Curriculum for Workforce Development in Green
Session 1353 Strategies for Developing Reflexive Habits in Students Lesley Jolly, David Radcliffe University of Queensland, AustraliaAbstractIt is widely accepted that engineering graduates should not only be technically competent butthey should also be skilled in communication and teamwork, have social and global awareness,be self-directed and have an expectation of life-long learning. However it is much less clear howthese "soft skills" are best developed in undergraduate engineers in the context of their studies.We have worked with over 350 students from freshman to seniors to
freshman to graduate levels. She has been active in academic program and curriculum development from the department level to the university level, where she served as co-chair of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) committee that determined the academic course of actions to be taken over the next accreditation cycle to addresses critical issues related to enhancing student learning. She is currently the Director of Undergraduate Programs and chair of the Curriculum Assessment and Implementation Team committee. She also has been involved in several professional developments that were provided by the Aggie STEM Center to Texas ISD teachers. Her research interests include structural health monitoring and control, structural
different lenses. About Campus, 4(6), 2-3.[13] Magolda, M. B. B. (1992). Cocurricular influences on college students' intellectual development. Journal of College Student Development, 33(3), 203-213.[14] Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123–155. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2943909.[15] Dalrymple, O., & Evangelou, D. (2006, July). The role of extracurricular activities in the education of engineers. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, San Juan, Puerto Rico.[16] Stassen, M. L. A. (2003). Student outcomes: The impact of varying living-learning
Session FA1-1 Helping Teachers Use Professional Learning Communities to Infuse Project Based Learning into the K-12 Curriculum James (“Jim”) R. Morgan, Luciana R. Barroso, Zachry Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3136 Kristin S. Huggins Department of Educational Administration and Human Resource Development Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4226 AbstractThe experiences from National Science Foundation funded
is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Prof. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of Learning in Engineering Education; The Human Side of Engineering, and Empowering Professional Teaching in Engineering. Together
not limited to, embedded technology, autonomoustechnology, edge and end-point technologies. Compared to cybersecurity in general, however,cyber engineering still requires further refinement in its curriculum coverage. The currentcurriculum for the cyber engineering program at our university is centered on cyber physicalsystems (CPS) and their security including device-level security, boot security, and attack-resilienthardware/middleware. As an engineering curriculum, cyber engineering also requires a variety ofhands-on laboratory-based learning as well. To better facilitate hands-on learning in a curricularsetting, we have been developing a 1/5th-scale autonomous vehicle as a framework of cyberphysical systems for a set of cyber engineering