designprojects each year. The course capstone project is an eight week design challenge thatrequires students to collaborate with a social agency on developing solutions to currentsocial issues in Calgary and around the world.The topic of this paper centers on the potential for simultaneous and multiple levellearning events by placing design and communication skill development in the social andcultural arena. At the Schulich School of Engineering, the first year design andcommunication course partners with local and international agencies that welcome theopportunity to benefit from the creative abilities of over 700 students collaborating in 200teams and to participate in the creation of engineers who are able to see the broad societaland cultural
, B., & Kay, R. (2016). The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 347-361.9. Pasupathy, R., & Siwatu, K. O. (2014). An investigation of research self-efficacy beliefs and research productivity among faculty members at an emerging research university in the USA. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 728-741.10. Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2009). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century (Vol. 11). John Wiley & Sons.11. Eagan Jr, M. K., & Garvey, J. C. (2015). Stressing out: Connecting race, gender, and stress with faculty
Herat UniversityAbstractIn 2007, the University of Hartford College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture, inWest Hartford, Connecticut began a partnership with the Faculty of Engineering at theUniversity of Herat, in Herat City, Afghanistan. The goals of the project are to use a combinationof curriculum revision and development, faculty development, distance learning andcollaborative projects, and local/internal partnerships to establish the Herat University Faculty ofEngineering at the preeminent Engineering program for Western Afghanistan.Once a part of Kabul University, the Faculty of Engineering became a permanent part of HeratUniversity in 2004. After functioning in Kabul for approximately 20 years, the Engineeringprogram was
focus. Throughthis instructional culture, students are increasingly well equipped to tackle complex, ill-defined problems and to develop the mindsets necessary for making meaningfulcontributions to society as confident engineers.PurposeThis work communicates the contents and design of a preliminary instrument suite with apurpose of enhancing student learning and development as engineers as informed by data.The data will span student- and faculty-generated assessments with a mind towarddeveloping a holistic view of learning, development, and performance in engineering anddesign. Innovation stems directly from identifying problems without known solutions andin spaces with current solutions that aren’t acceptable. This is how engineers
Executive Director of the Packard Center for Technology and Educational Alliances at Polytechnic Institute of NYU, Brooklyn, NY, where he also holds an appointment as Industry Professor of Humanities. At the Packard Center, he coordinates an extensive array of faculty development services, directs a consortium of colleges known as the Knowledge Workers Educational Alliance, and organizes varied hands-on scientific experiences and competitions for students in middle and high schools. He works closely with NSF-funded projects to connect them with the pre-college community and has won grants from the U.S. Dept. of Education, the NY State Education Department, and private foundations to improve
protocol or strategyused in the lab. Students summarize their findings in a 1-2 pages long NABC report, in whichstudents identify the important need the routing protocol addresses, the approach to address thatneed, and compare the benefits per cost ratio to competing strategies. This practice of using NABCmotivates them to focus on value creation, which is the core of EML.1. IntroductionEntrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML) is an innovative pedagogical approach designed toinstill entrepreneurial mindsets in students. In addition, EML prepares students to deal with real-world technical and innovation challenges with creativity and strategic thinking [1]. Moreover,this EML approach enhances students’ technical capabilities as well as develops
Session 1675 Personal-Professional Development: A Formula for Success on the Tenure Track Manoj S. Patankar San Jose State UniversityAbstractMost universities in the United States measure the performance of their tenure-track faculty inthree areas: teaching, research, and service. This paper presents a “formula,” based on personalexperience, which would enable new faculty to better prepare themselves for success on thetenure-track. The central construct of this formula is an understanding of the various factors thatcan positively
Paper ID #35576Valuable Professional Learning and Development Activities for Black STEMPostdoctoral ScholarsDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on effective faculty mentoring practices, broadening
development procedure for the Persistence of Engineers in the AcademySurvey (PEAS). Faculty are identified as the pivotal resource around which the outcomes ofpostsecondary education revolve; therefore, it is essential to understand who they are, what theydo, and whether, how, and why they are changing. As one critical component of the PEAS, thispaper details a procedure for the development of a scale to probe the factors that may affect afaculty member’s persistence in relation to gender/sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and SESidentities framed in intersectionality. Therefore, the PEAS includes a scale to measure constructsrelated to persistence and demographic items to capture the respondents’ various socialidentities. To create a valid measure
strategies in their classrooms.Results indicated that collaborative learning and problem-based learning were two most commonly usedactive learning strategies, while 1-minute paper and peer instruction were the least commonly usedstrategies. Participants agreed that active learning improved student learning outcomes, and motivatedstudents to participate in the class, but required an increased workload during the development ofactivities. The results of this study may inform future faculty development efforts on adoption of activelearning strategies in classrooms that were proven to improve student learning and retention inengineering education.IntroductionActive learning approach has gained increasing popularity in engineering education. The
education between U.S. institutions and international counterparts. • Provide international research experiences for U.S. students and faculty to prepare them to work effectively in the global research community. • Engage resources within and across institutions to build strong international partnerships. • Develop new replicable models for international collaborative research and education. • Raise the profile and increase the importance of international collaborative research and education within the U.S. research and education community.To respond to this opportunity we brought together a group of environmental engineers andscientists who are motivated by the vexing global problem of access to safe water supplies
students interested in teaching college-levelcourses. This paper will focus on the latter case where graduate students are mentored bydepartmental faculty to learn teaching skills and to implement change within the department.The mentoring program at our university is informal and involves pairing a graduate student witha faculty member who is teaching the same course. The faculty and graduate student workclosely together to develop learning materials, design exercises, and exams. Typically, thegraduate student offers new ideas and learning exercises for the classroom that add new energyto the course. The faculty member provides guidance regarding the design of exam materials andwhat works well in the classroom.IntroductionMichigan Tech
Engineering faculty at Tennessee Tech University. In mostcases, two teachers worked with one technical mentor. A Mathematics Educator also assisted theteachers in navigating the “engineering terrain” and by serving as a “translator” between theengineering faculty and the teachers. A faculty member from Nursing used her expertise to coachthe teachers in instructional design specific to the development of a Legacy Cycle (curriculummodule). The expectations of the RET experience were high, but teachers had ample support toaccomplish the goals in the timeframe allotted.Two applications of the Legacy Cycle were integral to the teachers’ RET experience: (1) theLegacy Cycle was used by engineering faculty as a vehicle to train the teachers to be researchers
classrooms and programming under the broad theme of improving the environment to improve people’s quality of life.Melissa M. Bilec (Associate Professor)April Dukes Dr. April Dukes is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL (Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. She leads local professional development courses and facilitate workshops on instructional, advising, and mentoring best practices for both current and future STEM faculty. I also work alongside faculty seeking to better the experiences of undergraduate and graduate students through educational research
the Future of Innovation in Society in ASU’s College of Global Futures. She practices Socio-technical Integration Research as an embedded social scientist who collaboratively works with technologists (STEM students, STEM faculty, and Tech Companies) to increase reflexive learning during technology development and implementation to pro-actively consider the impact of technology decisions on local communities and society at large. This work creates spaces and processes to explore technology innovation and its consequences in an open, inclusive and timely way.Laurie S. Miller McNeill (Director of Institutional Advancement )Mara LopezJuan R Rodriguez (Professor)Sarah Belknap (Instructor Of Mathematics)Elaine L. Craft
underemployed. A new goal of 150% capacity intwo years was set. A formalized five-step process was implemented to systematically developmore co-op employer-partners on an on-going basis. This process leverages the use of faculty“contacts”. Developing additional companies that accept engineering co-ops from UofL SpeedSchool of Engineering translates directly into more choices and a better fit for the student. Thesteps in this employer development process are straightforward:Step 1: Initial contact. Create an account with profile in the Career Services Managementsystem (Symplicity).Step 2: Meeting; share program information, confirm they are interested.Step 3: Create job posting in SymplcityStep 4: Send resume book of candidates.Step 5: Company
and the support services offered by libraries (Carlson, et al,2011; Borgman et al, 2015). This changing knowledge creation environment presents librarieswith an opportunity to become more integrally involved in the research workflow and scholarlycommunication lifecycle (Tenopir, et al, 2015).A number of instructional and training programs for engineering faculty and researchers havebeen developed and implemented (Carlson et al, 2011; Johnston and Jeffrys, 2014). Many ofthese programs are built around data management plan assistance (Samuels at al, 2015; Wangand Fong, 2015; Nelson, 2015). Zilinski et al (2014) have developed a program directed atundergraduate STEM students. Many libraries have established research data services and
opportunities to develop scholarly publications. Secondly, the teaching load of ETfaculty members is normally higher than engineering faculty, leaving them with less time to developresearch agenda and publish scholarly work. Finally, because the vast majority of ET programs areoffered at undergraduate level, ET faculty does not benefit from the interacting with graduate Page 7.704.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”students, thus limiting their opportunities for interaction
Engineering and Design, McGill University, Montreal ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 2025 ASEE Annual Conference Panel Discussion Developing an interdisciplinary Master’s program in sustainability in engineering and design Subhasis Ghoshal1, Jim Nicell2, Yaoyao (Fiona) Zhao31 Professor. Department of Civil Engineering, Director, Trottier Institute for Sustainability inEngineering and Design, McGill University, Montreal, subhasis.ghoshal@mcgill.ca2 Professor and Former Dean, Faculty of Engineering, Member, Trottier Institute forSustainability in Engineering and Design, McGill University, Montreal, jim.nicell
2230 Professional Development On-line: Ways of Knowing and Ways of Practice Sandra Shaw Courter, Cid Freitag, Mary McInery University of Wisconsin – MadisonAbstract“Ways of Knowing and Ways of Practice” is an on-line professional developmentopportunity for faculty and instructional staff at the University of Wisconsin – Madison.This pilot distance learning experience occurred during Spring Semester, 2003. Theproject was designed to help faculty 1) engage in reflection and continuous improvementof learning, both their own and their students, 2) facilitate conversations
juniors).BME 201 – Second-semester sophomores work on four-student, sophomore-only teams on asingle-semester design problem. One intent is to instill in them the confidence to complete thedesign process without upper-class mentors.BME 300 – First-semester juniors have the opportunity to teach the sophomores something theyhave learned — the design process. They also serve as big brothers/sisters advising the youngerstudents on curriculum issues. This develops a spirit in the students of being part of a group thatis bigger than their own class.BME 301 – Second-semester juniors start a design project that is chosen by the faculty to bedifficult enough that it cannot be completed in one semester. Goals are to do a pilot study thatleads to product
and context.This suggests that in any cooperative education experience multiple modal and contextualassessment methods are needed to evaluate learning as well as learning transfer within andbetween academic knowledge and the skills developed in the work place. Moreover, Bradford etal6 reported “a solid research” finding: To develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: (a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, (b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and (c) organize knowledge in ways to facilitate retrieval and application.They further emphasized that “[a]ll new learning involves transfer based on previous learning,”but that this transfer of learning across knowledge domains is
upper-divisioncoursework in engineering; and 2) from upper-division coursework to an entry-level STEMcareer.ASPIRE aims to achieve these goals by: 1) adapting and implementing the NSM Peer AssistedLearning (PAL) program in gateway engineering courses; and 2) developing the HornetLeadership Program which includes scaffolded opportunities for students to explore theirleadership capacity and develop leadership skills. The main research questions for this studyinclude: (1) Will the ECS PAL model and Hornet Leadership Program result in increasedpersistence and workforce readiness in STEM majors at a large, diverse university? (2) Whatattitude changes will this project have on students and faculty and the relationships betweenthem? The first question
master’s certificate program on circular economy from both theperspectives of faculty and students. A circular economy taskforce, supported by NationalCheng Kung University, was set up during the fall of 2016 to boost the ongoing efforts forsustainability, with an aim of developing an international and multidisciplinary certificateprogram to enhance students’ capacity for solving multidisciplinary problems through real-world issues and cross-disciplinary team experiences. The taskforce is represented by facultymembers from different departments as the university seeks for a holistic integrated approach.At various departments, courses are modified to shift focus to the circular economy approach;and new circular economy courseware is being developed
curriculum development experiences are shown from three perspectives; first from theperspective of the faculty member advising the development, second from the perspective of thestudent developing the material, and third from the perspective of students using the material forlearning.The actual curriculum developed from these experiences contributes well to the learning environmentsbut the major learning is taking place by the students doing the development.It is well known that teaching is one of the most powerful learning mechanisms. Mentoringenvironments facilitate the learner as a teacher. Future work of using undergraduate students todevelop curriculum suggest a move towards a faculty and peer mentoring environment.I. IntroductionThe use
Kecskemety, The Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University and the co-Director of the Fundamentals of Engineering Programs. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the research to practice cycle within first-year engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Initial Validation of Indirect
curricula provide few opportunities for students to interact with their peersin other disciplines. However, the engineering profession, and society as a whole, is becomingmore and more integrated requiring communication skills for discussing a variety of topics witha variety of audiences. Engineering students need opportunities to practice communicatingtechnical information with non-technical audiences. One way for engineering instructors tofacilitate these opportunities is to collaborate with faculty in non-technical disciplines.Developing and sustaining cross-disciplinary learning experiences requires collaboratinginstructors to model strong communication and team-working skills for their students. Theobjective of this paper is to discuss best
, and then an external review of the engineering division in 2011 allrecommended that additional structures be developed to encourage cross-disciplinary areas ofstudy within engineering and to better integrate engineering with the liberal arts environment ofthe college. However, other priorities, a reduction in total courses from 38 to 36, and a generallack of support from engineering faculty for new programs led to inaction on major curricularchange until the past three years. A new administration and strategic growth plan adopted by thecollege in 2016 provided a renewed opportunity to consider how the engineering division mightrespond to some of the recommendations of the earlier reviews. In this paper we describe thelengthy process of
status ofemerging technologies and research and provide informal instruction in research methodologyand science theory appropriate to the teacher’s research experience. During the summerprogram, the teachers participate in research activities in their faculty mentor’s lab. Each facultymentor has a teacher team which consists of two math and/or science teachers. The researchactivities are tailored to the teachers’ classroom courses, and each teacher develops a module oftheir research results into an activity or project for classroom implementation.Objective 2: In support of the second objective, the E3 RET program engages in severalprofessional development activities based on the National Science Education Standards (NSES),which asserts that
ImplementationAbstractThe knowledge associated with engineering education has grown considerably withefforts related to empirical research regarding the cognitive basis of learning and changesin student demographics and needs. Unfortunately, there has been a lag in the adoption ofresearch-based teaching approaches by practitioners. At the same time faculty are limitedin the development of their instructional practices to short courses, workshops,conference proceedings and publications. All of these developmental activities requiresubstantial time, effort, and funding with no guarantee of application to the classroomand university context of participating faculty. In addition, faculty feedback is generallylimited to student evaluations and periodic observations