use offossil fuels with their replacement with renewable and alternative energy sources. The roles forcolleges and universities in this educational process, while overlapping to some degree, addressdifferent educational requirements. Universities are educating researchers, engineers, designers,and architects while community colleges are educating students so they can further theireducation at universities, and they are educating the workforce to implement the designs andoperations provided by the engineers, designers, and architects.Curricula for Community CollegesThe need for such programs is supported by the rising cost of energy and depleting resources.Energy efficiency measures in the design of new buildings whether residential
the same way as on the home campus and according to thePurdue University Bulletin, School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI.3. Proposed standard:The curriculum "...includes content relevant to the needs of the students as defined by(the host institution)."About one - fourth of the students of the IUPUI / UNITEN program are Tenagaemployees. Others are recent high school graduates, many on scholarships requiring thatthey work for Tenaga if the company requests their services after graduation. During thefirst two years of study, all students are enrolled in at least one hands on technical coursedesigned by the host institution and related to the power industry. Furthermore, the hostinstitution arranges for a course in Malaysian history and
on the home campus and according to thePurdue University Bulletin, School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI.3. Proposed standard:The curriculum "...includes content relevant to the needs of the students as defined by(the host institution)."About one - fourth of the students of the IUPUI / UNITEN program are Tenagaemployees. Others are recent high school graduates, many on scholarships requiring thatthey work for Tenaga if the company requests their services after graduation. During thefirst two years of study, all students are enrolled in at least one hands on technical coursedesigned by the host institution and related to the power industry. Furthermore, the hostinstitution arranges for a course in Malaysian history and culture and
on the home campus and according to thePurdue University Bulletin, School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI.3. Proposed standard:The curriculum "...includes content relevant to the needs of the students as defined by(the host institution)."About one - fourth of the students of the IUPUI / UNITEN program are Tenagaemployees. Others are recent high school graduates, many on scholarships requiring thatthey work for Tenaga if the company requests their services after graduation. During thefirst two years of study, all students are enrolled in at least one hands on technical coursedesigned by the host institution and related to the power industry. Furthermore, the hostinstitution arranges for a course in Malaysian history and culture and
COLLEGE CHEATING – A SIX YEAR FOLLOW-UP Vance Poteat Departments of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Merrimack College vance.poteat@merrimack.edu Abstract According to various researchers, between 25% up to and in excess of 90% of all college students engage in some form of cheating. Traditionally, cheating includes inappropriate collaborations on a homework assignment, a cheat sheet hidden up a student’s sleeve or more recently on the back of a water bottle label, as well as those wondering eyes during an exam
An Extended Driving Simulator Used to Motivate Analysis of Automobile Fuel Economy Charles R. Sullivan and Mark J. Franklin Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth Session 2: Tools, techniques, and best practices of engineering education for the digital generationAbstract In a senior undergraduate/introductory graduate level interdisciplinary course in energyutilization at Thayer School, students experiment with “driving” a simulated car in differentstyles and measuring fuel economy. To enable this, we modified an open-source automobileracing computer game to include a realistic model of fuel
Paper ID #35554DEI Student Ambassadors ProgramDr. J. McLean Sloughter, Seattle University J. McLean Sloughter is an associate professor of mathematics at Seattle University. He completed his PhD in Statistics from the University of Washington. His research interests include statistical forecasting and modeling, energy poverty, mathematical pedagogy, and diversity in STEM.Brooke I Wynalda Brooke Wynalda (she/they) recently graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Biology with minors in Philosophy and English from Seattle University (’21). Brooke is proudly part of the first cohort of Diver- sity, Equity and Inclusion
in a study of 355 students at seven institutions that poor teaching (inadequateorganization, ineffective presentation, inaccessible faculty) was the most common studentcomplaint and was a cause for many to leave math, science and engineering programs. Inresponse to the need for faculty training, the American Society of Civil Engineers developed andfunded the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Teaching Workshop that istoday – in the summer of 2008 – celebrating its tenth year of existence. For the past decade,twenty-one ExCEEd Teaching Workshops (ETW) have been or will be held at the United StatesMilitary Academy, the University of Arkansas, and Northern Arizona University. The programhas 449 graduates from over 203 different
to have trouble landing positions in SAAS and hi-techcompanies. It worries me that if my white counterpart at Elon has this [trouble], how will I, as aperson of color, fare after graduation? (They did suggest applying for research positions to gainmore experience).” We also have feedback from non-white students that they feel isolated at theuniversity, and have difficulty with finding friend and study groups. This has been addressed inpart by including a list of demographic-specific engineering societies on the engineeringprogram’s webpage, which is referenced during conversations on professional development inGCE. It has also been addressed with the development of a student organization led peer-mentorship program. However, more work needs
the faculty saw thecourse as one without ownership. Normally, the faculty member assigned to the course viewed itas a teaching overload or as a service course which required significant preparation and did notcontribute materially to the generation of potential graduate students. In addition, it detractedfrom research. In short, the recurring problem with this course, independent of who taught it wasthat students did not like it. They saw it as an exercise in learning how to use CAD to producepretty construction drawings rather than a course that would improve their ability to address themany tasks, both technical and professional, that must be completed to produce a quality designand communicate with a client
AC 2009-1722: ENGINEERING ENERGY SOLUTIONS FOR THE INSPIRESCURRICULUMNichole Au, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Nichole Au graduated Cum Laude in 2008 with a BS degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She plans to finish her MS degree in Chemical Engineering also from UMBC in May 2009, after which she will pursue a career in industry.Julia Ross, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Julia Ross is Professor and Chair of the Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Her technical research interests are in the area of cellular engineering. In particular, her work focuses on bacterial
AC 2009-1209: INTRACOURSES: SYNERGIES IN COMBINING TWO COURSESTO MAKE A NEW ONEEugene Ressler, United States Military Academy Dr. Eugene Ressler is an Army Colonel, Professor of Computer Science, and head of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. His research interests include neural networks for signal processing and software engineering as well as engineering education.Michael Miller, United States Military Academy Dr. Michael Miller is an Assistant Professor in the computer science program of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the United States Military Academy. In
Physics and Engineering Physics at The University of Tulsa.Leslie Keiser, University of Tulsa Leslie Keiser is a graduate student in the School of Education at The University of Tulsa.Peter LoPresti, University of Tulsa Peter LoPresti is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at The University of Tulsa. His interests include the support of undergraduate participation in research, optical networks, fiber optic sensors, sensor networks, and artificial vision. He is a member of both IEEE and ASEE.Shirley Pomeranz, University of Tulsa Shirley Pomeranz is an Associate Professor of Mathematics in the Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences at The University of Tulsa. She is
from University of Illinois, Urbana. Her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering from University of California at Berkeley in 1992 and 1994. Following graduate school, Amy worked for Hewlett Packard in San Jose, CA and in Colorado Springs, CO. Amy’s research interests include microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices.Pat Pyke, Boise State University Patricia Pyke is Director of Special Programs for the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She oversees projects in freshman curriculum development, retention, math support, mentoring, and women’s programs. She earned a B.S.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from
proposed changes in teaching practices, but the litera-ture examining why large scale curricular changes succeed or fail is lacking. In regard to changesin teaching practice, researchers identified 18 categories of barriers and 15 categories of drivers[5]. The barriers and drivers were identified by interviewing faculty members and analyzing theirresponses to general questions about changes in teaching practice. In this study, however, weask faculty members about a specific curricular innovation that has been successful.The primary focus of this paper is on the sustainability of the curriculum and its effect on the fac-ulty members teaching it. See the appendix for a detailed discussion of the unique characteristicsof the Sophomore Engineering
Paper ID #12384Structured, Active, In-Class Learning: Connecting the Physical to the Math-ematical in an Introductory Biomechanics Course (Work in Progress)Dr. LeAnn Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania Dr. LeAnn Dourte Segan is a lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA. Her primary teaching focus is in the field of solid biomechanics at the undergraduate and graduate levels.Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Pennsylvania Sarah I. Rooney is a Ph.D. candidate in the Bioengineering department at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S.E. (2009) and M.S.E. (2010) in Biomedical
course is taught.Finally, we discuss the process by which the outcomes data are collected and presented. Anexample of the assessment is given to assist other industrial engineering departments wishing toassess ABET outcomes related to senior design.IntroductionOne of the two program criteria specified for ABET accreditation of industrial engineeringprograms by the Institute of Industrial Engineers is:“The program must demonstrate that graduates have the ability to design, develop, implementand improve integrated systems that include people, materials, information, equipment andenergy. The program must include in-depth instruction to accomplish the integration of systemsusing appropriate analytical, computational and experimental practices.”The
his Ph.D. heconducted research at the University of Cambridge, England. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1996 he was afaculty member of the University of Tulsa. Robert’s research is in the chemistry of gaseous pollutant formation anddestruction related to combustion processes. Nitrogen compounds are of particular environmental concern becausethey are the principal source of NOX in exhaust gases from many combustion devices. This research is focused onfirst deriving reaction pathways for combustion of nitrogen contained in fuel and second to use these pathways toreduce NOX production. Robert employs cooperative learning techniques in his classes. His teaching experienceranges from graduate level courses to 9th grade students in an
collection of additional information,consideration of external constraints, and thoughtful reflection on the solution process. Theseskills are recognized as crucial for future engineers in their daily professional lives. However,there are concerns from employers and researchers that undergraduate students may not beadequately prepared to address such problems upon graduation [1‒3]. To make things worse,courses in thermofluids require a robust understanding of mathematics and extensively utilizephysics to explain physical systems. Heat transfer, in particular, introduces complex subjects thatmay appear even more difficult for students studying engineering technology.There have been some attempts at addressing the students’ problem-solving abilities
Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationMuch of this dissatisfaction and disinterest in engineering was found to occur during the firsttwo years of an engineer’s education when they are exposed to the scientific concepts they willapply during their careers. Ninety percent of engineering majors who switched to anon-engineering major, and seventy five percent who persevered, described the quality ofteaching as poor overall. Seniors about to graduate in engineering made it clear their experiencein these introductory courses had given them a shaky foundation for higher level work.The National Science Foundation, in a recent call for proposals (Action in Engineering), hasidentified several needed changes to address these findings
at community colleges,and mature part-time students working their way through school. In response to this growinggroup of non-traditional students, many institutions are attempting to increase access to programsby experimenting with alternative educational delivery systems. Some courses employcorrespondence study, for instance, others one-way and two-way audio, video, or internet-basedlearning. Many are using a combination of both. In some cases, distance education may be asnear as the on-campus residence halls, the library, a student’s bedroom, or his or her workplace.One of the unique features of an educational program in a practice-oriented discipline such asengineering is that of the live, hands-on laboratory and design experience. If a
) designing automotive control systems. His research interests include nonlinear and intelligent control systems, dynamic system modeling, diagnostic and prognostic strategies, and mechatronic system design with application to turbines and automobiles. He has developed the multi-disciplinary Rockwell Automation Mechatronics Educational Laboratory which features hands-on robotic, programmable logic controller, electronic, and material handling experiments. He is a past Associate Editor of the ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control and IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, respectively. Dr. Wagner is a licensed Professional Engineer and Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers..Prof. Elham
technology in education; more recent research contributions include papers on learning outcome assessment in both lower-division core courses and in senior-level capstone design courses.Mark C Johnson, Purdue University Mark C. Johnson is the Lab Manager for Digital and Systems Laboratories at Purdue University. He is a Ph.D. graduate of Purdue University in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). He supervises the ASIC Design Lab, Computer Architecture Prototyping Lab, and Software Engineering Tools Lab. He also co-advises project teams in Digital Systems Senior Design. He supports and maintains many of the electronic design automation tools used in ECE, and is involved in the
effectively on a team, as the majority will be expected to workas part of a team upon graduation. The projects they will face during both their academic andpost-academic careers will involve problem-solving and critical thinking, and the unique skillsand perspectives of each team member are necessary to arrive at effective solutions. This paperintroduces a pedagogical boardgame aimed at simulating debates and negotiations within anengineering exercise, as well as the study planned to track the changes.A diverse team has people with different backgrounds, experience, and ways of thinking. Thiscan lead to a wider range of perspectives and ideas that can improve problem-solving anddecision-making. The wider pool of knowledge and experience of a diverse
Paper ID #37400Effectiveness of a Virtual-Physical Robotics TeachingPlatform on Engaging Middle-to-High School Studentsduring COVID-19 (Evaluation)Anurag Purwar Dr. Anurag Purwar's research interests are in bringing together rigid body kinematics and machine learning for design of mechanisms and robots. He has published 82 peer-reviewed conference and journal papers and his research has been funded by National Science Foundation (NSF), NY-state SPIR, NY-state Center for Biotechnology, Sensor-CAT, SUNY Research Foundation, industry, Stony Brook University, and SUNY Office of Provost. He received A.T. Yang award for the
too far from being true in undergraduate education in the United States wherein students arememorizing their way through most of the curriculum. In an US News and World Reportarticle2, “High School Students Need to Think, Not Memorize”, an Advanced Placement biologyteacher is quoted “Students go through the motions of their lab assignments without graspingwhy, and ‘the exam is largely a vocabulary test’”.David Perkins3, co-director of Harvard Project Zero, a research center for cognitivedevelopment, and senior research associate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, pointsout several observations in his article on “Teaching for Understanding”. (1) “The student mightsimply be parroting the test and following memorized routines for stock
together. The fatigue FE learning modules were designed based on the Kolb Cycleof learning experience progression. The educational value of the fatigue FE learning module isassessed by short quizzes administered before and after students use the module. The results ofthe pre-quiz and post-quiz are used to identify any Felder-Soloman learning style and/or Myers-Briggs personality type bias in the module. Statistical study of these assessment results willallow the content and presentation of the module to be improved to better suit engineeringstudents. Post-survey will be used as part of the module assessment process to include students’opinion.IntroductionFatigue is a material based phenomenon that causes failure in machine parts at stress
of a controlled research study. The projects andSII analysis are based on less than 30 students, two thirds of whom were in their first semester ofcollege. Thus, they have less academic and non-academic experience, and they might bereluctant to share honest, critical feedback, even anonymously.We are excited to explore some future directions. We plan to run the Startup Weekend forstudents once or even twice each year, and study how behaviors and outcomes change as theevent structure. We hope to run similar events for prospective students, either on campus or inother parts of Ghana. We might even partner with other institutions to organize larger, publicevents using the Techstars model. We plan to expand the set of co-curricular workshops
. M. Allen, “Essential Functions of Academic Advising: What Students Want and What Students Get,” NACADA Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 56-66, 2006.[5] B. J. Zimmerman, A. Bandura and M. Martinez-Pons, “Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 663-676, 1992.[6] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 366-395, 2016.[7] B. W. Smith, J. Dalen, K. Wiggens, E. Tooley, P. Christopher, and J. Bernard, “The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the
AC 2009-1755: ERROR TRACKING: AN ASSESSMENT TOOL FORSMALL-ENROLLMENT COURSESAnne-Marie Lerner, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Anne-Marie Lerner is a first-year assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin - Platteville collaborative program located at the University of Wisconsin - Rock County. Her research interests include assessment, engineering education, K-12 outreach, speech processing, and semiactive vibration control. She received her PhD in mechanical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology in 2008. Page 14.582.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009