Student Exchange, Faculty Exchange, and Faculty Collaboration – both instructionand research and development. We then share some of the key characteristics that make eachpossible and successful. Key factors, such as timetable matching and course equivalencymapping for accreditation and time-to-degree considerations, will be described and exampleprocedures and documents to these ends will be shared.This paper provides, not a conceptual exploration of what might be, but rather a practical, reality-based sharing of best practices that derive from our two institutions’ more than two year effort toevolve sustainable linkages. We are reporting on lessons learned from the real experience ofadministrators, faculty and students, not only exchanging but
, B., & Kay, R. (2016). The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 347-361.9. Pasupathy, R., & Siwatu, K. O. (2014). An investigation of research self-efficacy beliefs and research productivity among faculty members at an emerging research university in the USA. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 728-741.10. Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2009). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century (Vol. 11). John Wiley & Sons.11. Eagan Jr, M. K., & Garvey, J. C. (2015). Stressing out: Connecting race, gender, and stress with faculty
Session 1675 Personal-Professional Development: A Formula for Success on the Tenure Track Manoj S. Patankar San Jose State UniversityAbstractMost universities in the United States measure the performance of their tenure-track faculty inthree areas: teaching, research, and service. This paper presents a “formula,” based on personalexperience, which would enable new faculty to better prepare themselves for success on thetenure-track. The central construct of this formula is an understanding of the various factors thatcan positively
Paper ID #35576Valuable Professional Learning and Development Activities for Black STEMPostdoctoral ScholarsDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on effective faculty mentoring practices, broadening
development procedure for the Persistence of Engineers in the AcademySurvey (PEAS). Faculty are identified as the pivotal resource around which the outcomes ofpostsecondary education revolve; therefore, it is essential to understand who they are, what theydo, and whether, how, and why they are changing. As one critical component of the PEAS, thispaper details a procedure for the development of a scale to probe the factors that may affect afaculty member’s persistence in relation to gender/sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and SESidentities framed in intersectionality. Therefore, the PEAS includes a scale to measure constructsrelated to persistence and demographic items to capture the respondents’ various socialidentities. To create a valid measure
classrooms and programming under the broad theme of improving the environment to improve people’s quality of life.Melissa M. Bilec (Associate Professor)April Dukes Dr. April Dukes is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL (Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. She leads local professional development courses and facilitate workshops on instructional, advising, and mentoring best practices for both current and future STEM faculty. I also work alongside faculty seeking to better the experiences of undergraduate and graduate students through educational research
the Future of Innovation in Society in ASU’s College of Global Futures. She practices Socio-technical Integration Research as an embedded social scientist who collaboratively works with technologists (STEM students, STEM faculty, and Tech Companies) to increase reflexive learning during technology development and implementation to pro-actively consider the impact of technology decisions on local communities and society at large. This work creates spaces and processes to explore technology innovation and its consequences in an open, inclusive and timely way.Laurie S. Miller McNeill (Director of Institutional Advancement )Mara LopezJuan R Rodriguez (Professor)Sarah Belknap (Instructor Of Mathematics)Elaine L. Craft
Institute of Design(the d.school) at Stanford University, with its focus on interdisciplinarity, prototyping, socialresponsibility and the concept of ‘design thinking’, is a great role model for PIEp, as is the newProduct Design and Business Development Program at the University of Minnesota with theirfocus on med-tech products, and their ability to attract local companies as sponsors and projectowners.Why International Collaboration? - Learn from the Best!In this paper the activity field of education, PIEp Education, is primarily put forward. Activitiesof this field are organized in three target groups: teachers (faculty), doctoral students, and ‘other’students.Activities for doctoral students are organized in the form of a research school, the
opportunities to develop scholarly publications. Secondly, the teaching load of ETfaculty members is normally higher than engineering faculty, leaving them with less time to developresearch agenda and publish scholarly work. Finally, because the vast majority of ET programs areoffered at undergraduate level, ET faculty does not benefit from the interacting with graduate Page 7.704.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”students, thus limiting their opportunities for interaction
Engineering and Design, McGill University, Montreal ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 2025 ASEE Annual Conference Panel Discussion Developing an interdisciplinary Master’s program in sustainability in engineering and design Subhasis Ghoshal1, Jim Nicell2, Yaoyao (Fiona) Zhao31 Professor. Department of Civil Engineering, Director, Trottier Institute for Sustainability inEngineering and Design, McGill University, Montreal, subhasis.ghoshal@mcgill.ca2 Professor and Former Dean, Faculty of Engineering, Member, Trottier Institute forSustainability in Engineering and Design, McGill University, Montreal, jim.nicell
Vocational Teacher Educationproject aims to develop the use and management of virtual learning environments in the area ofvocational teacher training, drawing on a well established international partnership of institutionsproviding both technical and educational expertise. This paper gives an overall picture of resultsand products of the collaboration. We touch upon the aims, the assessments and the learningprocess of using “Multimedia and e-Learning: e-learning methods and tools” module in detail.The main cooperative and collaborative devices are presented in virtual learning environment.The communication during collaborative learning, the structured debate on forum and theefficiency of collaborative learning in VLE are interpreted at the end of
2230 Professional Development On-line: Ways of Knowing and Ways of Practice Sandra Shaw Courter, Cid Freitag, Mary McInery University of Wisconsin – MadisonAbstract“Ways of Knowing and Ways of Practice” is an on-line professional developmentopportunity for faculty and instructional staff at the University of Wisconsin – Madison.This pilot distance learning experience occurred during Spring Semester, 2003. Theproject was designed to help faculty 1) engage in reflection and continuous improvementof learning, both their own and their students, 2) facilitate conversations
juniors).BME 201 – Second-semester sophomores work on four-student, sophomore-only teams on asingle-semester design problem. One intent is to instill in them the confidence to complete thedesign process without upper-class mentors.BME 300 – First-semester juniors have the opportunity to teach the sophomores something theyhave learned — the design process. They also serve as big brothers/sisters advising the youngerstudents on curriculum issues. This develops a spirit in the students of being part of a group thatis bigger than their own class.BME 301 – Second-semester juniors start a design project that is chosen by the faculty to bedifficult enough that it cannot be completed in one semester. Goals are to do a pilot study thatleads to product
designprojects each year. The course capstone project is an eight week design challenge thatrequires students to collaborate with a social agency on developing solutions to currentsocial issues in Calgary and around the world.The topic of this paper centers on the potential for simultaneous and multiple levellearning events by placing design and communication skill development in the social andcultural arena. At the Schulich School of Engineering, the first year design andcommunication course partners with local and international agencies that welcome theopportunity to benefit from the creative abilities of over 700 students collaborating in 200teams and to participate in the creation of engineers who are able to see the broad societaland cultural
upper-divisioncoursework in engineering; and 2) from upper-division coursework to an entry-level STEMcareer.ASPIRE aims to achieve these goals by: 1) adapting and implementing the NSM Peer AssistedLearning (PAL) program in gateway engineering courses; and 2) developing the HornetLeadership Program which includes scaffolded opportunities for students to explore theirleadership capacity and develop leadership skills. The main research questions for this studyinclude: (1) Will the ECS PAL model and Hornet Leadership Program result in increasedpersistence and workforce readiness in STEM majors at a large, diverse university? (2) Whatattitude changes will this project have on students and faculty and the relationships betweenthem? The first question
master’s certificate program on circular economy from both theperspectives of faculty and students. A circular economy taskforce, supported by NationalCheng Kung University, was set up during the fall of 2016 to boost the ongoing efforts forsustainability, with an aim of developing an international and multidisciplinary certificateprogram to enhance students’ capacity for solving multidisciplinary problems through real-world issues and cross-disciplinary team experiences. The taskforce is represented by facultymembers from different departments as the university seeks for a holistic integrated approach.At various departments, courses are modified to shift focus to the circular economy approach;and new circular economy courseware is being developed
curriculum development experiences are shown from three perspectives; first from theperspective of the faculty member advising the development, second from the perspective of thestudent developing the material, and third from the perspective of students using the material forlearning.The actual curriculum developed from these experiences contributes well to the learning environmentsbut the major learning is taking place by the students doing the development.It is well known that teaching is one of the most powerful learning mechanisms. Mentoringenvironments facilitate the learner as a teacher. Future work of using undergraduate students todevelop curriculum suggest a move towards a faculty and peer mentoring environment.I. IntroductionThe use
Herat UniversityAbstractIn 2007, the University of Hartford College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture, inWest Hartford, Connecticut began a partnership with the Faculty of Engineering at theUniversity of Herat, in Herat City, Afghanistan. The goals of the project are to use a combinationof curriculum revision and development, faculty development, distance learning andcollaborative projects, and local/internal partnerships to establish the Herat University Faculty ofEngineering at the preeminent Engineering program for Western Afghanistan.Once a part of Kabul University, the Faculty of Engineering became a permanent part of HeratUniversity in 2004. After functioning in Kabul for approximately 20 years, the Engineeringprogram was
, and then an external review of the engineering division in 2011 allrecommended that additional structures be developed to encourage cross-disciplinary areas ofstudy within engineering and to better integrate engineering with the liberal arts environment ofthe college. However, other priorities, a reduction in total courses from 38 to 36, and a generallack of support from engineering faculty for new programs led to inaction on major curricularchange until the past three years. A new administration and strategic growth plan adopted by thecollege in 2016 provided a renewed opportunity to consider how the engineering division mightrespond to some of the recommendations of the earlier reviews. In this paper we describe thelengthy process of
ImplementationAbstractThe knowledge associated with engineering education has grown considerably withefforts related to empirical research regarding the cognitive basis of learning and changesin student demographics and needs. Unfortunately, there has been a lag in the adoption ofresearch-based teaching approaches by practitioners. At the same time faculty are limitedin the development of their instructional practices to short courses, workshops,conference proceedings and publications. All of these developmental activities requiresubstantial time, effort, and funding with no guarantee of application to the classroomand university context of participating faculty. In addition, faculty feedback is generallylimited to student evaluations and periodic observations
higher education equity and access, particularly within STEM.Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University Kara Hjelmstad is a faculty associate in Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University.Prof. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing
the late1990’s with the implementation of EC2000, and is now beginning the second round of visitsunder outcomes-based assessment. The transition from review of inputs to evaluation ofprocesses and outcomes has been the subject of a number of American Society for EngineeringEducation publications, engineering technology list-serve debates, and comments solicited by theTechnology Accreditation Commission (TAC) as the TC2K general program evaluation criteriawere developed. The present version of the TAC criteria adopted in November 2003 containseight fundamental criteria points. The bibliography includes citations for several publicationsthat the MET faculty used to learn about the changes to the criteria and develop plans foraccrediting its
Session 3270 Developing an Appreciation for Careers in Research Through the Texas Research Experience Program Andrea M. Ogilvie The University of Texas at AustinAbstractThe Texas Research Experience (TREX) Program at The University of Texas at Austin hasproduced valuable research opportunities during the academic year for more than 280undergraduate minority engineering students. TREX provides students with a uniqueopportunity to establish strong links with faculty, gain hands-on laboratory experience, anddevelop an appreciation for research careers
interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad programs. Additionally, he has worked for the Federal government, served on foreign language faculty, and led multiple study abroad programs. Tunno earned an M.B.A. at SDA Bocconi University (Milan, Italy) and a Ph.D. from Penn State, with his research focused on the development of global competencies through study abroad programs.Lori Miraldi, Pennsylvania State University Director of the Engineering Ambassadors Program College of Engineering Penn State UniversityDr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Stephanie Cutler has degrees in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. She is an Associate
focus. Throughthis instructional culture, students are increasingly well equipped to tackle complex, ill-defined problems and to develop the mindsets necessary for making meaningfulcontributions to society as confident engineers.PurposeThis work communicates the contents and design of a preliminary instrument suite with apurpose of enhancing student learning and development as engineers as informed by data.The data will span student- and faculty-generated assessments with a mind towarddeveloping a holistic view of learning, development, and performance in engineering anddesign. Innovation stems directly from identifying problems without known solutions andin spaces with current solutions that aren’t acceptable. This is how engineers
Executive Director of the Packard Center for Technology and Educational Alliances at Polytechnic Institute of NYU, Brooklyn, NY, where he also holds an appointment as Industry Professor of Humanities. At the Packard Center, he coordinates an extensive array of faculty development services, directs a consortium of colleges known as the Knowledge Workers Educational Alliance, and organizes varied hands-on scientific experiences and competitions for students in middle and high schools. He works closely with NSF-funded projects to connect them with the pre-college community and has won grants from the U.S. Dept. of Education, the NY State Education Department, and private foundations to improve
faculty members (2- and 4-year institutions) in the United States. The distance learningworkshops were primarily implemented using a synchronous video conferencing strategy.Project team members also used other media to allow attendees to download files related to theworkshops for pre-workshop preparation. As the workshops were conducted throughout the 1years, the research team found it challenging to provide all attendees with a secured account toaccess instructional materials. This led to the development of the virtual collaboration webportal.Virtual Collaboration – Phase one Effective distance learning methodologies consist of balanced utilization betweensynchronous and asynchronous
2016 ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference Developing Meaningful Input for Continuous Improvement in Undergraduate Engineering Education Thomas Fronk and Robert Spall Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Utah State UniversityAbstractThe continuous improvement process requires relevant feedback from well-informed participantswho share the same goals espoused by the educational institution. A variety of perspectives fromstudents, alumni, industries and faculty are necessary to ensure that educational improvementsare effective. The methods for collecting continuous improvement data from
Learning from the Past to Develop Future Engineering Education Innovations Monica F. Cox, Ph.D. Professor and Chair Department of Engineering Education March 31, 2016 DEPARTMENT of ENGINEERING EDUCATION• How do you define educational innovations in engineering education?• How might the engineering community expand the definition of educational innovation to include more than teaching?• What roles might Deans play in encouraging the development and dissemination of new instructional approaches in engineering and in rewarding engineering faculty for educational innovations? 2 Engineering
Paper ID #18237Self-Guided Professional Development as an Enabler for MultidisciplinaryProgramsProf. Jered H. Dean, Colorado School of Mines Jered part of the leadership team of the Capstone Design@Mines Program in the College of Engineering and Computational Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines. He worked for nine years in product development before returning to Mines to join the Faculty. During his time in industry, he worked on everything from children’s toys to complex electro-mechanical systems. With over 30 products under his belt, you can find products that he and his teams worked on in many stores including Toys