projects in anenvironment that mimics the real-world. It also provides students with management experiencesthat are uncommon in traditional computer science curricula. HGD is a part of a broader initiativeat Michigan Tech called the Enterprise Program which supports student-driven,multi-disciplinary, and hands-on courses.Besides giving students the opportunity to learn about video game development, HGD has fourprimary goals. First, HGD aims to have students gain first-hand teamwork experience on diverseteams. HGD is diverse because it includes freshman through seniors, includes students frommultiple majors, and attracts underrepresented students. Second, HGD seeks to use project-basedlearning to give students experience working on large multi
accomplishments, the AE minor program has grown in numbers andstrength. A number of large, medium and small Aerospace organizations have been facing a deficitof aerospace engineers [1] for years and this deficit has only increased in the recent years. The AEminor program continues to attract talented students and help fulfil the industry deficit. The AEROlab, established over summer 2019, complements the growth of the minor program. The labprovides a platform for students to apply the concepts learned as part of the minor in the form ofclass projects, research projects and capstone senior design projects. 4. Aerospace Related Laboratory EquipmentOne big challenge with starting the AERO lab was to acquire relevant equipment. Through internaland
used by such a large engineering population prior to this course, thecourse coordinators and teaching assistants worked in close collaboration with Alice developersat Carnegie Mellon, St. Josephs, and Ithaca College to develop Alice instruction material. All ofthe Alice lessons necessitated the use of laptop computers by the students. Each classroom hadnot only an instructor but also one or two undergraduate or graduate teaching assistants who Page 10.962.3were proficient in Alice programming. These classroom teaching assistants were required to “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and
are Computer Aided Design, Industrial Automa- tion, and his research Interests are globalized engineering/technology education, engineering technology innovative curriculum development, outcome assessments, and refining program accreditation procedures.Dr. Mauricio Torres, Northern Kentucky University Dr. Torres received a B.S. in Business Administration from City University of Sao Caetano do Sul, B.S. in Mechanical Industrial Engineering from Braz Cubas University, Brazil, M.S. in Engineering Manage- ment and Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Florida International University. He has over 30 years of experience in heavy machinery manufacturing industry and currently he holds the position of Assistant
ScienceFoundation (NSF) funding stream for Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU).Previous investigations of research experiences tend to focus on undergraduate studentsparticipating in actual laboratory research (Undergraduate Research Experience or URE) orcourses with designed research simulations (Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiencesor CURE). These studies rarely explore the experiences of graduate students. Furthermore, thisbody of research largely emphasizes learning outcomes of URE and CURE – how do they affectthe sense of professional identity and persistence in programs, knowledge of research practices,conceptual understanding of the subject matter communicating the nature of science, etc. – ratherthan trying to understand the
AC 2009-739: TRANSLATING AN ENGINEERING RESEARCH PROJECT BASEDON IMPROVING BUILDINGS’ RESISTANCE TO EARTHQUAKES INTO THEHIGH-SCHOOL CLASSROOM EXPERIENCENathalie Mukolobwiez, Saint Ursula Academy Nathalie Mukolobwiez is an 11th and 12th grade Physics Teacher at Saint Ursula Academy. She earned a PhD in Physics from the University of Paris XI and her teaching license through the Alternative Education License program from the University of Cincinnati. Her experiences include 4 years as a Post doctoral fellow (University of California, Santa Barbara and University of Cincinnati) and 7 years as a High school teacher.Michelle Beach, Midpark High School Michelle Beach is an 11th and 12th grade
affecting the company’s performance and could scale the implementation to meetthe needs of small, medium, or large organizations. ITIL is viewed as the easiest standard toimplement, mainly because of its flexible nature [19].Adoption of standards and proven practices could enable decision makers to deploy theimplementation of established processes and procedures quickly. Adopting a prescribed processmodel such as ITIL could also promote speedy delivery of services and product locally andglobally. Most research in 1980s and 1990s was conceptual in nature, and a single industry orfirm conducted the experiment rather than an IT organization [16]. Researchers had shown ITILas a best practice offering the opportunity to align IT with business [11][17
technology and engineeringcurriculum for Junior and High school aged students in developing countries. Thecurriculum has been developed over a two-year period and was recently implemented forthe second time in the Dominican Republic. Eleven technology and engineeringeducation (TEE) college students from the United States taught the curriculum to fourdifferent grade levels (students were grouped into four courses based on their age: 11 –12 year olds, 13 – 14 year olds, 15 – 16 year olds, and 17 – 18 year olds) during a 5-weeksummer internship program in the Dominican Republic. Various donors, the COSOLAprogram, and the U.S. University sponsored the program. This paper will: 1.) Outline and discuss pre and post findings of the DR studentsfrom a
and the remoteuser. The camera located on the robot is a pan-tilt-zoom camera for maximum visibilitywith the robot in a standstill position. The paper also elaborates the Pedagogicalframework in which the course is conducted.IntroductionPurdue University Calumet is a commuter institution that has a large percentage of parttime students. The part time student on the average takes between six to seven years tocomplete the requirements for the degree. The Electrical and Computer Engineering Page 14.1356.2Technology (ECET) department offers a two plus two program leading from an Associatedegree to a Baccalaureate degree. The student can also continue for
various evaluative instruments are presented along with adiscussion of some of the practical issues associated with creating and maintaining this particularinstructional delivery system. A brief background on the development of the courses ispresented along with a sampling of comments from student evaluations of the courses.BackgroundThe Bachelor of University Studies (BUS) degree originally was offered as an area ofconcentration within the University of Tennessee at Martin’s School of Arts and Sciences. As aresult of reorganization of the academic units in 2000, this program was developed into anindependent degree program under the direction of the Assistant Vice-Chancellor of AcademicAffairs. The BUS is an individualized degree program. It was
also serves as the faculty advisor to the IEEE student chapter and the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) at the University of Texas at Tyler. Dr. Ochoa is an electrical engineer with roughly seven years of experience spanning subjects as diverse as analysis of radar signals using Fourier and relativistic approaches; application of compressive sensing in chaotic radars; analysis of induced currents on a perfect electric conductor using the current tensor; and the analysis of large time- bandwidth product radar signals when high-velocity targets are considered. Dr. Ochoa has published a total of four conference papers in the field of engineering education. Two of the papers discussed the development of
socialgatherings with food.During the semester, these large school-wide events included guest lecture events, game nights,an end-of-semester pot-luck lunch held during finals week, and meeting together to writethank-you cards for healthcare workers. The engineering school also requires First-year studentsto participate in two service activities throughout the semester, so having peer mentors lead thesebrought students together. In addition to these school-wide events, peer mentors hosted small 4group events for their smaller group of mentees, exemplified by video game nights, movienights, bowling, and dinners.Participation in the peer mentorship program was required for all first year students during
problem using 3D modeling and design.For each challenge, teams are given a series of criteria and constraints that their design must follow,and then 3-4 weeks of time to iterate on their designs.This feature contains a large difference between the two Cornerstone projects, as the designchallenges are not shared. For the windmill project, the two design challenges are: 1) a mount thatallows for an AC motor to be connected to the geartrain of the rotating blades that can also hold asensor used to measure its rotational speed, and 2) a rocket launcher chassis used to supplycompressed air to a small rocket that must travel at a certain angle and distance. It may be notedthe rocket launcher design is the only (of the four different designs stated in
University of California, San Diego. Her approach to instructional design is largely shaped by her experience as a former public school teacher and her current volunteer work with youth. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Case Study on the Design of a College-Level Online Hands-On Engineering Course Offered to High School Students (RTP)Abstract This paper presents a case study of a pioneering online engineering course for highschool students, highlighting its innovative approaches and challenges. The course’s learningoutcomes and rigor are equivalent to the in-person college course. In addition, the course is a partof the Discover UC San Diego program, which aims to
empower our UGTAs to becomeinclusive peer mentors for first-year students. Co-created and co-facilitated by faculty, UGTAs,and GIDBEA experts at the institution, the program provides UGTAs with the ability torecognize and confront bias among individuals and within teams, helps them develop anunderstanding of power, privilege, and oppression, and equips them with the tools to employtheir knowledge in their professional lives.Project ApproachSetting and TimelineThis study is being conducted at a large private university with UGTAs of a first-year, project-based introductory design course. Between 300 to 350 first-year students enroll in the courseeach semester, and the university employs 100 UGTAs to support course instruction andadministration
were guided by specific pedagogicalprinciples: small-group work with trained facilitators, group-worthy open-ended problems todevelop critical thinking and interest-based design projects to connect students to the material.Curricular development was supported by regular collaboration meetings with expert guidanceon pedagogy and incorporating social justice content. Altogether, more than 1500 students wereenrolled in the first-year program during the academic year. A student survey each term resultedin an average of over 900 survey responses across the three-course series. Reflections were alsocollected from participating faculty. This paper focuses on the adoption of promoted pedagogicalprinciples by the faculty, and the resulting outcomes and
understanding of power, privilege, andoppression, and equip them with the tools to employ their knowledge as engineers throughdiscussions of inclusive design. Co-created and co-facilitated by faculty, teaching assistants, anddiversity, equity, and inclusion experts at the institution, the workshops feature short lectures bythe facilitators, individual reflection activities, and small group discussions, culminating in acommunity-wide discussion on lessons learned and actionable items to build an inclusivecommunity within our program. We seek to build our teaching assistants’ sense of agency in theclassroom by cultivating a positive self-concept, developing their understanding of sociopoliticalenvironments, and providing resources for action.To
First-Year EngineeringExperience at a regional campus of a large midwestern university. Challenges faced by studentsand faculty will also be presented in this paper along with some guidance and best practices. Manyuniversities invest their resources to explore teaching pedagogies that best fit the needs of theirstudents. Universities that offer programs at regional campuses ensure consistency of thecurriculum, however, there are challenges associated with offering programs with differentdemographics represented at the regional campuses. The purpose of this paper is to: a) presentsome of the challenges faced by instructors in teaching the first two years of engineering courses,b) share student attitudes and performance in core courses, and c
studentscan proceed at their own pace, with automatic programs used for monitoring,assessment, and communication.The future 3D virtual online classrooms will have instructors peering over theshoulder of students and transporting them to other environments. There will be amix of real and virtual students in the classroom and even virtual intelligentinstructors who are ideal combinations of optimal instructors. Educationalinstitutions should help define the frontier for the future in education by takingadvantage of the opportunities and charting the path towards truly globaleducation.7. ConclusionsWe are in the dawn of the turning point in education, as MOOCs, fast broadbandconnections, and new technologies come together to define a new phase
of Engineering. Her academ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025AbstractTesting and validating a survey to assess engineering self-concept is discussed in this completeresearch paper. Engineering self-concept is a multidimensional construct encompassing anindividual's perception of their abilities and competencies in engineering. It plays a crucial role instudent retention and success in engineering programs. Despite its importance, there is a lack ofrigorously validated instruments to measure this construct effectively within engineering. Thebroader research aims to address this gap by developing and validating a survey instrument toassess engineering self-concept among undergraduate students. This
project-based learning face-to-face. A survey was conducted to understand thestudents' perceptions concerning this methodology. The survey took place at the middle and endof the semester in conjunction with a small discussion group once the semester finished. Thestudent body values the activities in class, where collaboration and teamwork are encouraged.However, they perceive an additional burden by having to watch videos before class. This articlecontributes to Engineering Education by providing guidelines for implementing a flippedclassroom in a Cornerstone project-based learning (PBL) course.Keywords: First-year Program, Engineering Design, Project Based Learning, CornerstoneCourse, Teaching MethodologiesIntroductionCornerstone courses are
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Critical Thinking (Mis)conceptions of First-Year Engineering StudentsAbstractCritical thinking, an essential skill for engineers, is a cornerstone of effective problem-solving,ethical decision-making, and innovative design. Despite its recognized importance, research onhow early undergraduate engineering students perceive and understand critical thinking islimited. This study explores first-year engineering students' conceptualizations of criticalthinking at a large Hispanic-Serving Institution with Very High Research Activity. Using anopen-ended question embedded in a classroom assessment, this qualitative study analyzesstudents' definitions of critical thinking through thematic analysis
, Minneapolis, Jun. 2022. https://peer.asee.org/42104.[12] J. Petrovic and P. Pale, “Achieving Scalability and Interactivity in a Communication Skills Course for Undergraduate Engineering Students,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 64, (4), pp. 413-422, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3067098[13] R. E. Glaser, “Design and Assessment of an Assignment-Based Curriculum to Teach Scientific Writing and Scientific Peer Review,” Journal of Learning Design, vol. 7, (2), pp. 85, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i2.202[14] English Department. “Composition Program Outcomes.” University of Colorado Denver English Department. https://clas.ucdenver.edu/english/composition-program-outcomes (accessed
identityin the post-assessment of a summer bridge program [10]. However, the study was limited insample size and called for further research in engineering identity and the development ofmethods to emphasize the service-oriented side of engineering.In this context, our research seeks to determine how engineering identity can be improvedthrough students solving a sociotechnical problem, plastic pollution, with a service-learning litterpickup and data collection activity. The litter pickup project utilized in this study was discussedin prior research related to students’ perceptions of an engineer’s role in solving sociotechnicalissues [15]. Three surveys were administered using Godwin’s framework [8] to investigate tworesearch questions: (1) How is
courseclasses at [University], a space more conducive for teamwork, for example, with round ormovable tables, movable chairs, and a large screen with a computer setup.To allow more time for out-of-class teamwork on Application assignments, we plan to reduce thenumber of Preparation assignments and of reflection assignments to three in fall 2023.5.2.3 SubmissionWe plan to implement the challenge from the algorithmic thinking section of the course entirelyin code.org (e.g., Tsukamoto et al., 2017) or a similar codeless programming Web-basedplatform. Conducting the challenge using this kind of platform will provide students withimmediate low-level feedback from the program while they work through designing theirpseudocode, along with the higher-level
in the level of connection to the engineering college. We did not runstatistical tests for the last three items in 2022 due to the small sample size of transfer students(N=26), but available data suggests that there were not large differences in the level ofconnection to individual departments, or the degree to which transfer students feel they belongand feel welcome compared to first-time freshmen. Taken together, this suggests that althoughtransfer students feel significantly less connected to the broad university and local communitiesduring their first-semester, they feel equally connected and welcome in the engineering college.Discussion and Future WorkResearch Question 1: Overall Engagement Trends for 2021 and 2022 First-time
engineering courses at different types of institutions. Three courses – with enrollmentsof 18, 18, and 29, respectively – focused on equitable infrastructure and included the term insome form in the course title. These institutions include a medium-size private university in thenorthwest, a small private liberal arts college in the mid-Atlantic, and a medium-size privateuniversity in the northeast. The fourth course focused generally on civil engineering and includedequitable infrastructure within an array of topics aimed at introducing the discipline of civilengineering to first-year students. This course enrolled 53 students at a large, land-grantuniversity in the mountain west. Enrollments in these courses included not only studentsintending to
programsfocused on the education and workforce development in microelectronics and semiconductormanufacturing [4], [5], [6]. However, many of these programs are now inactive or discontinued,and limited research exists on their long-term impact.A recent study conducted by our team [7] found a significant increase in students’ awareness,motivation, and transformative experiences related to microelectronics after participating in afirst-year engineering course featuring microelectronics activities. A systematic review by Idemet al. [8] found similar outcomes, but found that several studies questioned the potential for thesemicroelectronics activities to be scaled to large-enrollment courses.This study explores the integration of microelectronics into a
this role, she leads the Men- torSHPE, InternSHPE, ScholarSHPE, SHPE Academy, and professional development programs. She is passionate about helping college students form meaningful, goal-aligned connections with peers, profes- sionals, and companies. To accomplish this, she uses a data-based approach to customizing best practices to fit the individual needs and goals of students and companies. Ashleigh has worked for a variety of higher education institutions (large, public 4-year; small, private 4-year; community college) in a myr- iad of roles and offices. This varied experience has provided her with a first-hand understanding of the challenges and barriers college students face related to success, persistence
this issue, acourse re-design was performed through participation in the Purdue IMPACT program with thegoals of increasing student engagement, competence, and attainment of course learningoutcomes by implementing the research-based pedagogies of collaborative learning, in which Page 26.41.3students work together in small groups to answer questions, and problem-based learning, whererelevant problems are introduced prior to the instruction cycle and used to provide context andmotivation. An additional important consideration of the course re-design was to preserve thehands-on engineering component of the course in which students participate in