that the hands-on natureand project selection motivates students to be creative and accomplish more than the minimum.IntroductionThe coupling of electrical and mechanical devices is all around, from cars, smart homes, and tofactories. Machines and industrial facilities constantly grow in complexity due to increasedcustomer expectations regarding their purpose and flexibility [1]. Consumers desire features suchas automatic controls and voice recognition. Mechatronic devices are all around and effectiveindustry leaders will be those that understand other disciplines [2]. Many students are users ofthese devices and interested and motivated to take mechatronic courses, due to their hands-onand project based nature [3].Mechatronics courses, by
projects within engineering courses toteach our students about the effects of technology on others. At LUC, this is possible because all27 U.S. Jesuit universities possess a core (general education) curriculum based on socialjustice. In 1974, Jesuit General Congregation (GC) 32 decided to take a more active role inalleviating poverty and injustice. In 2008, GC35 called on Jesuit universities “to promote studiesand practices focusing on the causes of poverty and the question of the environment’simprovement” [26, 27]. At the 12 U.S. Jesuit universities with ABET-accredited engineeringprograms, the mean number of core curriculum courses is 11 ± 2 courses. At 9/12 of these Jesuituniversities, including at LUC, a social justice-based ethics course is
will be taking.For the entire third year of the program, the students will study at an off campus architectureschool, where they will work on building design projects alongside architecture students. Thecurriculum for this new program has an emphasis on “communication, collaboration, anddesign”. This paper presents an overview of the program curriculum and discusses challengesencountered and lessons learned in the program development and implementation to date.Highlights of the challenges faced include issues such as: attracting students to a new programwhere there are relatively few current examples to point to (in Canada) of well-established careerpaths, marketing lower year students of this new program to prospective coop employers
important role in the success of our studentsin their future careers with blurred lines in diverse teams, and numerous studies show that it is askill that cannot be taught, rather developed through experiential learning in a curriculum thatvertically integrates problem-solving [16].Another challenge introduced by Industry 5.0 is that instead of designing a full discipline-specific product, engineers are increasingly acting as system integrators; therefore, engineersmust possess the ability to quickly learn and adapt material from other STEM and non-STEMfields. Industry 5.0 projects are complex, multidimensional, and fast-evolving, requiring criticalthinking and problem-solving abilities from engineers beyond their STEM foundation. Theengineers of
Research, Interactive Learning Environments, etc. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Service Learning Approach to Developing a Kinect-based Showering Training Game for Children Who Do Not TalkAbstractIn this study, we combined social inclusion with a curriculum design emphasizingservice learning to transform academic classroom curricula into meaningful services incommunity-based settings. In a service-learning curriculum at the junior and seniorlevels in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), we implemented a servicelearning pedagogy to engage students in a social context. The curriculum encouragedstudents to work with special education schools in joint projects that help children
engineering entrepreneurs, participated in a 3-day start-up weekend hosted by theuniversity’s Innovation Hub, attended engineering job fairs and two semesters of project-focusedseminars, and read entrepreneurial and/or leadership-related books. This included reading booksand providing oral reports of prominent entrepreneurs across various domains (to supplementdiscussions held during synchronous seminars). The students also met with mentors on a regularbasis. Furthermore, they engaged in intrapreneurial-focused curriculum activities that weredesigned to increase understanding of and engagement with intrapreneurship.Program component details:• Faculty mentorship: Students chose an Electrical and Computer Engineering faculty mentor. The student
. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41048[5] D. R. Johnson et al., "Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 525-542, 2007.[6] K. I. Maton et al., "Outcomes and Processes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program: STEM PhD Completion, Sense of Community, Perceived Program Benefit, Science Identity, and Research Self-Efficacy," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p. ar48, 2016, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0062.[7] M. E. Beier, M. H. Kim, A. Saterbak, V. Leautaud, S. Bishnoi, and J. M. Gilberto, "The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations
ideas on energy flow, materialscycling, and appropriate technologies for self-reliant living, water and waste management, andhow to organize local economies. International teams have worked on community projects, e.g.,Engineers Without Borders12 and MIT’s Solar Turbine lab13.Table 1:Sampling of issues and disciplines, showing opportunities for campuswide participationMRES issue Discipline/skill Home schoolsWind turbine aerodynamics Aerodynamics, Electric Physics, Chemistry,Wind turbine generator motors/generation. Policy, Environmental Sciences,Distributed Energy Systems economics, electric power AE, ME, EE, BioTransmissions Fluid and
explores broader implications for integratingadaptive expertise frameworks into first-year engineering curricula. It builds on prior research,such as Larson et al.’s [3] findings on project-based learning in upper-division courses,demonstrating the relevance of these principles for early engineering education.By adopting a multi-faceted approach, the study offers a comprehensive understanding of howfirst-year students can develop the creativity, flexibility, and problem-solving skills necessary forsuccess in dynamic engineering environments. This research aims to inform best practices inengineering education, providing a scalable model for fostering adaptive expertise at all levels ofthe curriculum.3. MethodsResearch Design and MethodsThis study
sustainability was promoted at Purdue University, with agoal to integrate sustainability into courses across the engineering curriculum [10]. The workbegan with a faculty workshop in summer 2009 that had participation from 26 faculty across 10different disciplines and with primary teaching responsibilities spanning first-year courses,engineering fundamentals, and senior / upper-level design courses. The 2010 paper lists 9courses where sustainability modules were added as a result of the workshop, but longer-termimpacts are unknown. As one example, Weber et al. [11] integrated environmental sustainabilityconcepts and sustainable development ideas into 2 of 16 sections of a first-year design-focusedcourse at Purdue University. The sustainability
districts do not and cannot provide any kind of financial support or sponsorship for teacher development.e. Schools fall into two categories: private and state-assisted. An alliance between the Church, government and parents is crucial to the survival of most state-assisted schools. The Church provides land to build on. The parents and the Church sponsor major projects such as building dormitories, science laboratories, classrooms, digging wells for water, and installation of solar electricity to enable night time study in the library, and to conduct science experiments if a laboratory is in existence. The government puts a majority of teachers on payroll, provide some science equipment and a small percentage of textbooks which are
concept and program that is at the core of thisinitiative. We then describe how the concept was promoted amongst engineering facultyand the success of that promotion in terms of the participation of faculty in each of the firstthree years of the initiative. We conclude with some examples illustrating the activities ofthe several study groups.The Faculty Study Group Concept and ProgramThe current Engineering Study Group Initiative grew out of the Faculty Study GroupProgram described in detail by Wildman et al.1 This campus-wide program was initiated atVirginia Tech in 1996 by the Center for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (CEUT).The faculty study group was envisioned by Wildman et al. as a means by which facultycould join with colleagues to
(4) research andrecognition from the NAE for their efforts, while typically requiring (5) interdisciplinaryonly one course beyond their standard degree program. curriculum. Figure 2. Five Components of GCSPThere is a strong infrastructure at UT Austin is comprised of professors, courses, and programsthat support Scholars in facing the Grand Challenges. Because of this wide array ofopportunities, we are able to design the GCSP to be a “light footprint” and complementary to a student’s educational plan. Projects for Underserved Communities (PUC) is one of the programs at our university that connects clearly with the GCSP. It provides students with
like code.org [31] and youthdigital [32]. Interesting sites for girls might be“Girls Who Code” [33] and “Black Girls Code” [34].Because middle school is an important time when students are forming their STEM identities[37,38], and in particular when girls may decide that they are not interested in STEM fields [18],we have designed a two-week intensive summer program targeting middle school girls andgender minority students, though inclusive of all gender identities. Our project-based learning(PBL) program will serve as an introduction to the fields of electrical and computer engineering,computer science (CS), and bioengineering and will emphasize the critical importance of the firsttwo disciplines in bioengineering, particularly in the realm
applications) by assessing the effectiveness of a novelcomputational and programming freshman/sophomore-level course introduced within theMaterial Science and Engineering department of a large, private US university. The keyconclusions of this study suggest that embedding engineering computational literacy i.e., the useof computer software and associated modeling and simulation processes within the curriculum,led to increased student engagement with disciplinary concepts, along with positive effects ontheir self-beliefs and academic performance.Preliminary findings from an analogous project conducted by Valenzuela, Smith, Reece andShannon (2010) to evaluate the effect of incorporating programming skills within junior andsenior year Industrial
CNC laboratory at the University of MassachusettsLowell (2) summarizes examples of hands-on projects using the CNC laboratory and (3) presentsthe results of a motivation study being performed to assess student motivation in traditional lec-ture based courses versus hands-on, project-based classes.2 Description of the CNC LabOver the past year, a teaching laboratory comprising ten desktop CNC machines has been de-ployed and integrated into several courses at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. A briefsummary of the laboratory setup process is presented here; however, a complete laboratory de-ployment is described in detail in Vaillant et al.5,62.1 Machine Selection, Setup and UseThe hobbyist maker movement has resulted in a proliferation
-based delivery tools and systems developed forrenewable energy education [2]. Hassan [3] reported the formulation of a Bachelor of Science inElectrical Engineering curriculum with a concentration on alternative energy. Somerton andBernard [4] discussed an alternative energy course at the Michigan State University which alsointroduced the related political, social, and economic issues. The course required students tocomplete a project on solar, wind, or fuel cell technology. Tamizhmani et al. [5] at Arizona StateUniversity offered an introductory course in fuel cell technology which incorporated a multi-disciplinary teaching approach. Shahidehpour and Li [6] proposed setting up a world-class smartgrid education and workforce training center at
. Page 22.1296.2IntroductionThis paper presents results from a National Science Foundation grant titled “Simulation andVisualization Enhanced Engineering Education”. The overall goal of this project (NSF-0530365)is to enhance student learning process by implementing an undergraduate curriculatransformation at Old Dominion University that integrates web-based simulation andvisualization modules in several engineering science courses. Although the scope of the projectis quite broad, encompassing a wide range of lecture and laboratory courses in three disciplinesnamely electrical, civil and mechanical engineering, the focus here is on efforts directed towardsdevelopment, implementation and assessment of web-based virtual laboratory experiments
Applications is motivated by three advances in digitaltechnologies.First, there has been significant developments in Building Information Modeling (BIM). BIM isone of the most promising advances in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction industries[5]. BIM is a simulation comprised of a three-dimensional model of building project with links toall the required information connected with the project planning, design, construction oroperation [6]. BIM models are the virtual equivalent of the actual building and can containengineering data including structural, mechanical, electrical, and material metrics and quantities,as well as other information [7]. The possibility of exporting these models into fully immersiveenvironment has opened numerous
National University of Tainan. Her re- search interests include mobile and ubiquitous learning, information technology-applied instructions and intelligent learning systems.Prof. Yueh-Min (Ray) Huang, Cheng-Kung University Dr. Yueh-Min Huang received his MS and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Arizona, respectively. He is currently a distinguished professor of the Department of Engineering Science and associate dean of Engineering College at National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan. His research interests include e-Learning, embedded systems and artificial intelligence. He has co-edited 3 books published by Springer Verlag and has published over 200 refereed journal papers. His works have
Fawwaz HabbalPre-Collegiate Program Background and Direct ObjectiveAs new experiments and design-based projects are envisioned, they must be evaluated andassessed before they become part of the curriculum. Initially, we introduced such new items to asmall group of the Harvard College students, but as the demands for new experiments increased,it became difficult to have a thorough evaluation through the small sample of students. Wedecided to engage a different student body of diverse backgrounds by establishing a pre-collegiate program. This program attempts to prototype and develop multiple new activelearning initiatives before integrating them into the full curriculum. Indeed, the program becamea valuable platform to develop, to experiment, and
the undergraduate level and the contentof undergraduate and graduate EM programs. Once again this work used general categories oftopics for the comparative analysis and did not examine engineering related credits. It foundsignificant differences in the EM programs but identified a shared body of knowledge between IEand EM programs as summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Common Curriculum between IE and EM (Elrod et al.13) B.S. in Engineering Management B.S. in Industrial Engineering General Management and Leadership Economics (Micro &/or Macro; Engr Econ) Accounting Probability & Statistics Economics (Micro &/or Macro; Engr Econ
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, with 110 faculty, 1800undergraduates and 1000 graduate students, employs a “lecturer and coordinator” who intervenesin three laboratory courses and a project engineering course.University of Texas at Austin:6 The Department of Mechanical Engineering with 60 faculty andover 1000 undergraduates has employed a senior lecturer (for over ten years) who offers onecourse in engineering communications as an “immediate” prerequisite to the Department’scapstone design course and then intervenes in the capstone design course itself.7Prior to Spring 2003, the UH College of Engineering had few options for their students in termsof technical communications instruction. The English Department at UH periodically
. In addition to sharing their teaching experience, participants read anddiscussed educational research literature. Second, the group aimed to support participants inlearning about and conducting educational research; participants’ educational research projectswere frequently discussed as part of the group meetings. During the second year, the group’sfocus shifted toward work on curriculum development for a new concentration in the department.In both years, there also was a significant emphasis on the creation and discussions of designmemos.Data sourcesThe primary data source was interviews with graduate student participants; these interviews wereconducted after each year of the project. A total of five graduate student interviews were used
Communications and in MechanicalEngineering Technology and share a common technical core in project management and inadvanced mathematics. The core control curriculum in the SCT track enables students to masterestablished system simulation and control technology implementation using classical and moderndesign and analysis techniques. Elective courses are offered in complementary fields so thatstudents select an industrial application of interest. Other electives may be chosen from anindustry-skills set to sharpen business-related competencies. The program includes a master’sthesis or a master’s project option. Table A-1 in Appendix A lists a recommended sequence ofcourses to complete the program in four semesters: Semester 1: the seminar serves to
curriculum that spans from the freshman to senior years andbridges the divide between freshman year computing and computing in upper-levelclasses, and (2) enable students to take computing competency to the next level, wherethey are able to perform high-level computing tasks within the context of a discipline.The first phase of the project entailed the establishment of an academe-industrycommunity in which stakeholders from a broad range of engineering disciplines convenedto discuss the challenges and opportunities inherent in transforming the undergraduatecomputing education and to identify creative strategies for implementation. To effectivelyfacilitate group communication within the “Computing Across Curricula” (CAC)community, the Delphi method
to enter and succeed intoday’s world, many leaders are turning to active learning and in particular to more experientiallearning [1]. Integrating experiences into the curriculum that have been traditionally outsidepresents many opportunities and challenges. Community engaged learning is a type ofexperiential learning that adds benefits of engaging students with underserved communitieslocally or globally. Within engineering, the engagement is typically through design projects [2].Community-engaged design experiences place students and universities or colleges inpartnerships with organizations that address needs of underserved people. These partners may bein the local community, within their region, or international. Together, they identify
microelectronics, renewable energy systems and power electronics. He has been working on thin film solar cell research since 1979 including a Sabbatical Leave at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in 1993. He has also worked on several photovoltaic system projects Dr. Singh has also worked on electric vehicle research, working on battery monitoring and management systems funded primarily by federal agencies (over $3.5 million of funding). Dr. Singh has consulted for several companies including Ford Motor Company and Epuron, LLC. He has also served as a reviewer for the US Department of Energy and National Science Foundation. Dr Singh has over 150 conference and journal publications and holds seven issued US patents
Paper ID #42024Inclusive Teaching Practices in Engineering: A Systematic Review of Articlesfrom 2018 to 2023Rajita Singh, University of Oklahoma Rajita Singh is a junior at the University of Oklahoma, where they are pursuing an English major with a minor in Psychology. Passionate about the improvement of education in all fields, they are involved in multiple projects centered on researching pedagogy. Their most recent involvement has been in engineering pedagogy, where they bring their writing skills and synthesis abilities.Dr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly
format. Most commonly, significantimprovements in exam scores are not observed, but students report preferring the flexible andinteractive nature of the flipped structure13,22. Applications of the flipped classroom environmentin engineering courses have also been observed and recorded25. In this paper, the curriculum assessment of the six discipline-specific topic lessons in E-GIRL is presented. In addition to topic lessons, E-GIRL components include a real-worldmultidisciplinary group project, professional sessions and university information sessions.Detailed descriptions and a general E-GIRL program evaluation are presented in Monaco et al.(2016a)16.MethodologyThe curriculum for E-GIRL aimed to promote interest in engineering among female