to present the faculty experiences in the 2021 ABET reviewand the new assessment program that arose in response to this 2021 ABET review in ourprogram. The impetus for this new program, the program details, and a summary of assessmentresults obtained over the first three semesters, are presented in this paper.The ABET conducted program reviews for the chemical engineering program at Texas A&MUniversity-Kingsville (TAMUK) most recently in 2015 and 2021. In 2015, the ABET programreview resulted in a concern that the topic of process safety and process hazards required greateremphasis in one or more courses in the chemical engineering program. This concern wasaddressed by incorporating process safety and process material hazards into two
continuous education of everyone on campus and beyond.Based on our shared experiences, we have concluded that the following are essential ingredientsfor success: (1) clear and effective communication of the value proposition; (2) involvement ofkey personnel directly affected by the initiative (i.e., administrators, faculty, and staff); (3) strongand effective leadership; (4) clear plans for addressing the issues of concern, such as capacityand student performance; (5) strong willingness to work to plan for growth; (6) high levels ofcommitment to, and a strong sense of belief in, the joint venture.Finally, based on our direct experience, we can only agree with the following: “Comprehensiveinternationalization is a commitment, confirmed through action
problems.We examined ways to initiate, maintain, and assess this process consistent with ABET. We reporthere our deliberations and findings from the workshop and subsequent feedback and effort. Theparticipants, drawn primarily from the active research community in fluid dynamics, evolved aconsensus “path forward” in which shared instructional resources were to be the primary outcomeof an organized, new collaboration among university and industrial colleagues. The presentcommunication details the issues considered by the participants and it presents the suggestions toenhance instruction in basic fluid mechanics.I. IntroductionWe organized an NSF-sponsored workshop of engineering faculty (and two industrialrepresentatives) to study ways to increase
these concerns, in 1996 a workshop5 for U.S.Mechanical Engineering Departments was organized to discuss these various issues and manyrecommendations were made, especially in terms of the wholesale curriculum integration.Based on many of the suggestions proposed at the MIT workshop, several faculty meetings wereinitiated in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the FAMU-FSU College ofEngineering to discuss the need for a paradigm shift and the faculty reached a unanimousconclusion: “we must make wholesale changes in our curriculum now.” The integrated MEcurriculum, briefly described below, has just completed its second year of implementation. Inthis paper, we are presenting our experience in implementing this new curriculum with anemphasis
revealed that older, male engineering studentsare more likely to return home than their counterparts. They recognized that some students intheir sample population might be sponsored and thus are obligated to return to their nativecountries, although this factor was not evaluated in their paper. Sponsored students have someadvantages over non-sponsored students. Khanal and Gaulee [2] found that navigating anuncertain future and handling immigration policies in the host countries are two significant post-graduation challenges for international students. Sponsored students with a promised facultyposition in their home countries do not need to be concerned with these issues. Interestingly,Agbonlahor et al. [6] found that doctoral students supported by
advisor. Thissection is specifically included to address the questions and concerns of other faculty who mightbe interested in helping students establish a student chapter at another university. Page 3.110.1Chapter InfrastructureThe following three sections describe important issues relating to the functional aspects of thePurdue University student chapter of ASEE. In the first section, details regarding theorganization of the Purdue student chapter are presented along with the responsibilities of thekey leaders of the organization. The first section also points out some of the lessons learnedregarding the organization of chapter programs. In the
integratecooperative education based learning within their teaching practices. Contomanolis[2] conducteda study of engineering faculty at the six largest engineering cooperative education programs inthe United States (Georgia Institute of Technology, Kettering University, Drexel University,University of Cincinnati, Rochester Institute of Technology, and Northeastern University) toassess their views concerning the academic value of cooperative education and the extent towhich they utilized teaching activities to incorporate student co-op experiences into theclassroom learning environment. The survey instrument used in the study was a questionnairethat allowed faculty respondents to use a five-point Likert scale to report their attitudes on theacademic value of
additional area of basic or formal scienceStakeholders expressed a wide variety of opinions on this subject. Some were concerned that thephrasing could require that probability and statistics must be taught by civil engineering faculty,and others advocated for a much broader treatment of risk and uncertainty, to include reliability.The Task Committee recognizes that this criterion, as initially proposed, might be interpreted torequire the teaching of probability and statistics within civil engineering departments. Therefore,the Task Committee moved these topics to the foundational, mathematics-related criterion. TheTask Committee also relocated the topic of risk, associating it with
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education• Human Genetics Building• New student dormitory building• Volker Hall expansion, shown in figure 4. This project was of interest becausedifferent construction operations could be seen on the different floors of the building. Figure 4: REU students tour Volker Hall expansion in 2002When the UAB REU site was renewed in 1999, an ethics program was added. Thisprogram has two components. Each year, one student project concerns ethical issues instructural engineering education and practice, and lessons learned from failures. Anethics seminar series is also included. The author is assisted in this seminar
of mostof the core engineering courses is well defined and consistent over time and across disciplinesand universities (i.e. Statics, Dynamics, etc.). However, engineering graphics is highlydependent on current CAD technologies as well as current engineering practices in industry.Engineering graphics courses are constantly evolving and universities are including new andinnovative topics based on current industry standards. These changes lead to new courses atuniversities and cause transferability issues with already existing courses in pre-engineeringprograms. Therefore, engineering graphics courses in pre-engineering programs need to changeto meet the new requirements of the transfer schools.At the University of Wisconsin-Marathon County
downsides of a shadowing program should bebalanced with metrics that prove that these programs are also beneficial to education and training.Our proposed program takes these considerations into account, as dealing with student informationcauses privacy concerns due to FERPA, as well as professional privacy concerns of departmentsand department politics.Guidelines were published to suggest an approach to shadowing in a pharmaceutical program [9].In this work, they outline considerations to remember when forming a pharmaceutical jobshadowing program. One of the focuses that can be applied to faculty shadowing details theimportance of faculty morale. For instance, department leadership should be on board andsupportive of the process to help ensure the
Factors in Design and Design for X 8 Modeling and Simulation in Design, FEA, Rapid Prototyping 9 Materials Selection, Materials Processing, DFM and DFA 10 Design for Reliability and Safety, Legal and Ethical Issues 11 Ethical Considerations in Design, Cost Evaluations and Estimates 12 Engineering Design Proposals, Detail Design and Bills of Materials 13 Communicating the Design, Written and Oral Communications 14 Course Discussion and Course EvaluationThe text used in the course is Engineering Design, Third Edition by George E. Dieter,McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000. A Guide to Writing as an Engineer by David Beer andDavid McMurrey, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1997 is also required
many are stillstruggling to navigate this new, but (un)familiar terrain.V. CONCLUSIONThe onset of COVID-19 was a disruptive force that dramatically changed the way traditionalschooling operated. Both faculty and students were challenged to devise new ways of coping andadjusting to a new reality, making efforts to continue learning and teaching effectively, whiletrying to curtail the threatening effects posed by COVID-19. Unfortunately, COVID-19 did indeedhave some negative and damaging effects to long-standing educational processes, systems, andmodes of operation. Moreover, the virus had deeply impacted personal welfare, mental health, andeconomic outputs of many individuals. This reality becomes more concerning for first generation,low-income
qualitative questions indicate that theUnlearning Series cultivated a high level of interest in DEI topics amongst student, faculty, andadministrators. Participants had particularly positive feedback about group discussions thatfollowed the brief lectures. This opportunity enabled participants to engage with individuals theyhad not met before in the CAED (with respect to department and role) in an engaging discourseabout personal experiences and social issues related to professions that impact the builtenvironment. The surveys have also provided a wealth of new themes for future DEI sessions,and further improvements to facilitate even more interactive discussion.Lessons LearnedTo conclude this paper this final section describes the lessons learned
engineering curriculum, each instructor is expected to include some ethicsmaterials in their course. This is usually done by incorporating ethical components or modulesinto the course materials. Problems with this method may arise due to lack of coordination overthe integration of the ethics across the curriculum (EATC). 7 But the majority of problems withEATC stem from three faculty objections.The first of these objections concerns comfort level. Faculty are unprepared to teach material inwhich they’ve had no formal training. They are uncomfortable going from the traditional lecturestyle format in the classroom to a more open discussion format that ethical problem analysisrequires. Second, faculty using this model have no ownership of the ethics
AC 2011-2186: SE CAPSTONE- INTRODUCING MULTIDISCIPLINARYDESIGN TO USCGARichard W. Freeman, U.S. Coast Guard Academy RICHARD W. FREEMAN has served as a lecturer in the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’s Electrical Engi- neering Section since 2008. Prior to joining the faculty, he taught fulltime for eight years. He also worked in the Telecommunications Industry for eight years. He earned BS and PhD degrees in Computer Engi- neering from Iowa State University and a MBA from Southern Methodist University. He is pursuing his Professional Engineering License.Contact: Richard Freeman, PhD, United States Coast Guard Academy (dee), 15 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT 06320, (860) 444-8536, richard.w.freeman@uscga.edu.Prof. Richard J
the development of educational programs concerning NAsecurity found that the systems required for training were comparatively lacking[3]. These resultsdemonstrate that students were unable to meet industry and governmental standards forperformance.Previous to NEITP, a study by Auburn University Engineers documented a multidisciplinaryapproach[4] to teaching Electronics Engineering (EE) of which many skills and methodologiesare required by NA educators. The substantial documentation of project requirements seeminglyspecific to engineering we found to be easily adapted and compatible to NA educational programs.A system that works pluralistically with engineering programs may be the new norm.Using a similar methodology, a multidisciplinary
serve on various campus and external committees; was open tolearning new skills such as grant writing; became an expert by seeking and asking to participatein workshops, conferences, etc. that allowed me to learn by association with experts; I readvoraciously everything related to all levels of diversity issues.DD: Plan for leadership by investigating the skills that are deemed desirable for these positionsand make sure you have these types of skills or can acquire them.Learn about leadership, what it is as well as what it isn’t, and then practice leadership principlesin your current position. Being a leader as a faculty member within your department is a greatplace to start.Accept leadership roles in your professional or social community as
analytic rubrics:one focused on technical criteria, and one focused on communication criteria (See sample rubricsin Appendix A). Each rubric assigned a proportion of the available points for theassignment—different assignments are weighted differently between technical andcommunication—and the oral and written reports received “Technical” and “Communication”points that were summed to make the final score.Faculty concerns about the analytic rubric approachOurs was a straightforward system, and one that (in theory, at least) allowed us to providestudents with a clear description of our separate expectations for their reports. However, it beganto be clear to the faculty team that this rubric model had troubling limitations for ourteam-taught, open
Paper ID #41924Empowering Students in Emerging Technology: A Framework for DevelopingHands-on Competency in Generative AI with Ethical ConsiderationsDr. Chun Kit Chui, University of Hong Kong Dr. Chun Kit Chui serves as the Director of the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). Innovation Wing aims to unleash students’ creativity by entrusting them to spearhead ambitious innovation and technology projects that will shape the future. The iconic facility is located at the heart of the campus, offering 2400m2 of space with state-of-the-art resources and a supportive
reasonablygood engineering backgrounds, it was felt that engaging the teaching faculty of the College ofEngineering would provide more interesting scenarios. In addition, the engagement might help toenhance attendance or provide additional information literacy opportunities, since workshopattendance has been a chronic concern and garnering any opportunity for student contact hasbeen challenging.Literature ReviewStandardization is the backbone of the modern world, enabling products and processes we takefor granted as everyday conveniences to exist. 1 Most industry employers expect engineering andtechnology college graduates to have experience with standards. 1 The Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) requires the integration of
promotion can be focused primarily on scholarly activity andespecially on the level of funding for that activity. Teaching may be viewed as being ofsecondary importance, able to influence tenure and promotion decisions negatively if inadequatebut unable to improve a faculty’s position greatly even if clearly superior. Thus, when makingdecisions concerning the appropriate allocation of effort, especially in light of increasingcompetition for decreasing funding resources, faculty may feel compelled to limit their allocationto teaching to that needed to maintain the average level for their academic unit or institution.Even in those institutions where the emphasis on research is less intense, the amount of teachingand service responsibilities may be
many political leaders in the U.S. As highlighted by the 2005American Society for Civil Engineers (ASCE) Infrastructure Report Card1, the United States’infrastructure is in very poor condition, and was given an overall grade of D. Because ofthese infrastructure needs, civil engineers of the future will need to be skilled at maintainingand upgrading in-place infrastructure in addition to the current emphasis on creating new in-frastructure. Unfortunately, the influence of civil engineers in infrastructure management andplanning has been waning in recent years.2To better prepare our students to participate in the planning and management of public works,we (the faculty of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at UWP) are revamp-ing
cultural group, cell and Man respond in a like manner, not only extending the self, but performing acts and making products that facilitate the growth of the organism as a whole.”For several years we have been concerned with understanding diversity, teachingdiversity and developing diversity skills [2]. Even those who understand the greatbenefits of diversity and passionately promote it will accede to the difficulty of movingforward with diversity issues. The complexities of diversity become apparent through thedifferences among people. These differences include visible components such as food,clothing, language and physical features; and invisible components like values, beliefs
effort, as a case study,towards academic collaboration among two universities from a developing country and a largeprivate non-profit university in the United States. This study also aims to highlight issuesregarding trust and expectation from both sides and lack of reliable technical, communication aswell as organizational infrastructure that may contribute to the inability to partner andcollaborate. These systemic issues sometimes also create a tension between partners in theirapproach to collaboration.Collaboration and MotivationCollaborations and signing Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) between universities is oneof the new trends. Generally, in case of international collaborations it may not only serve as atrend but it is almost an
inspiration, enablers, and challenges for innovation. In addition,issues related to innovation institutionalization (or sustainability) and to evidence gathered by thepanelists to assess and evaluate the institutionalizing process are discussed. Themes andcommonalities of the responses are presented and related to literature on the diffusion ofinnovation.1. IntroductionInnovation "is an idea, practice, or object that is perceived as new by an individual, [even if it isnot] objectively new as measured by the lapse of time since its first use or discovery."1 To gain asense of how innovation is occurring in current engineering education environments in thiscountry, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (hereafter referred to as
decision to integrate technology that the faculty is familiar withhelped decrease the learning curve for using the lecture capture systems in the classrooms. Themore accustomed faculty members are with the components of a new system, the lower thebarriers are that would prevent them from using the technology. Kopcha3 found that teachersoften report the lack of time, resources, and training as a leading cause of new classroomtechnology not g implemented in their own teaching styles 3. The use of an in-house solutionallows for greater degree of customization and flexibility that was not found by other turnkeysolutions that would specifically address the issues of time, resources, and training. The samemanufacturer that was already being used in
neighboring student c) Assigning practice problems for students to solve, and share with classmates. d) Giving topics for small group discussion. e) Mini presentation: students are asked to prepare a short presentation concerning the course material and present to the whole class.However, there have been challenges in applying these activities to CQUPT students especiallyfor the freshmen and sophomores. First, the students have difficulties understanding theengineering terminologies in English. Second, many students are reluctant to speak in English infront of their classmate, and they are concerned that they are not fully prepared to present theirEnglish skills. To solve these issues, NAU faculty worked closely with the fluent
order to accomplish theperformance of professional tasks. Furthermore, the practice of creating an ePortfolio promptsgraduate students to reflect on their actual achievements within each professional role, further Page 26.1608.2developing their identification within those roles. Applying ePortfolio practices to graduatestudents can open a new avenue for future research into graduate professional identitydevelopment practices.Introduction During the 1990s, a multitude of reports and conferences voiced concern over whetherand how American doctoral education should evolve to meet changing priorities. The NationalAcademy of Science, the
undergraduate education); and an overall concern with whether we are preparing graduateswith skills which will make them employable (since they will need marketable skills, thecommentators say, to pay off the staggering student loans). Reform suggestions abound, manyof them touched upon by Brooks in the New York Review of Books article cited above: abolishtenure, an increasingly rare commodity in a university landscape dominated by adjunct and part-time faculty; abolish top heavy administration with corporate-like paychecks attached; increaseretention and attainment; increase rigor (which might decrease attainment); drop the costs, whichmight not be realistic in the face of declining state support. Traditional university models arechallenged by brand