Paper ID #9982Student Perceptions of Project Mentoring: What Practices and BehaviorsMatter?Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com
lack of knowledge or skillin the receiving community. In some cases, the design may simply miss the real needs of thereceiving community. To design a more successful product, active inclusion of the end-user in the designprocess can help engineers from developed countries more fully understand the needs (bothspoken and unspoken) of users in developing countries. Leaders in low-cost product designadvocate this inclusion of the end-user as a means to more accurately identify and satisfy theneeds of people in these countries. 4-5 However, efforts by engineers to include the end-user, andultimately train them to lead future design efforts, often add an additional layer of complexitydue to differences in culture and in language among
Paper ID #14349Design as an integrating factor in an International Cross-Disciplinary Inno-vation CourseProf. Anders V Warell, Lund University, Industrial Design Bio Anders Warell Professor Anders Warell is Director of Research at the Division of Industrial Design, Lund University, Sweden. He received his PhD on Product Identity and Design Aesthetics from Chalmers University of Technology in 2002. After being part of the development of the Industrial Design Engineer- ing masters programme at Chalmers, he joined the School of Design at Massey University in Wellington, New Zealand in 2005, where he led the Industrial Design
andresponsibility while maintaining a framework for collaboration and milestones, and as suchcould fill the gap usually encountered in capstone design projects. In the 23-year history of year-long industry-sponsored capstone design team-projects at Seattle University, projects oftensuffered from the following shortcomings: failures to meet deadlines, poor contribution fromsome team-members, and incomplete use of available resources. Furthermore, advice from ourprogram’s industry advisors indicates that engineering graduates should have some projectmanagement skills and understand the importance and challenges of managing projects. Inresponse, we adopted MOPM to our senior design projects.The paper describes implementation of MOPM in our senior design
AC 2008-2759: EFFECT OF PROJECT DEFINITION ON THE SUCCESS OFSTUDENT TEAM DESIGN PROJECTSJohn Wesner, Carnegie Mellon UniversityMichael Bigrigg, Carnegie Mellon University Page 13.465.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Effect of Project Definition On the Success of Student Team Design ProjectsAbstractStudent teams carrying out sponsored engineering design projects achieve widely varying resultsin a single semester, ranging from research without any real design proposal, through one ormore paper proposals, all the way to a functional prototype. Comparing team results with theclarity with which the sponsor defined the
Paper ID #24701Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom in Structural Steel DesignDr. Brian J. Smith, University of Notre Dame Dr. Brian J. Smith, Ph.D., P.E., is an associate teaching professor in the Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering and Earth Sciences (CEEES) at the University of Notre Dame. He is also a concurrent associate teaching professor in the School of Architecture (SoA) at Notre Dame. Dr. Smith teaches struc- tural design courses within CEEES and SoA, as well as introductory engineering courses through the common First-Year Engineering (FYE) program. He was a recipient of the 2018 Rev. Edmund P
design teams and the electrical engineering teamsstruggled significantly with cross-team interaction. While it seemed opportune to force thegroups to interact and negotiate acceptable torque and speed parameters for their respectivecomponents, the level of understanding by both constituencies was not to a point where theycould effectively predict what was achievable based on either the project constraints or theiroverall designs. As such, the designs eventually evolved to the point where they occurredindependently. Through the initial communications, students from each discipline seemed togrow in awareness of the needs and limiting factors that affected the other domain; they simplydid not have the perspective or understanding to be able to
Paper ID #15679Designettes in Capstone: Characterizing the Impact of Early Design Experi-ences on Students’ Capstone EducationLt. Col. Cory A. Cooper, United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Cory Cooper is currently the Director of the Systems Engineering Program and As- sistant Professor of Systems Engineering at the US Air Force Academy (USAFA) in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He holds a PhD an MSc in Systems Engineering from the Technical University of Delft and the Air Force Institute of Technology respectively. He has held various developmental engineering and pro- gram management positions in the US Air Force, to
to step outsideof their core discipline and apply their knowledge to solving a problem in a less familiar area. Inthe end, although it required more effort to understand the problem they were able tosuccessfully complete the design and satisfy the customer’s requirements.The project was successfully completed in terms of meeting the design requirements that were bythe client and the design team. The students who participated in this study were able to gainconfidence in their ability to successfully solve problems that may come from areas thatoverlapped with their core mechanical engineering discipline, in this case from nuclearengineering. The primary issue the team faced was the restriction of certain sensitive andproprietary information
aspects of customer-interaction,needs finding and brainstorming that are not possible with the aforementioned models. Studentsnot only learn how to interact with people living with various types and degrees of disabilitiesbut in many cases build long lasting relationships with the clients. The experience also fosters thesocial responsibility aspect of the engineering and healthcare professions since in most cases, theteams have to understand and incorporate the socioeconomic conditions and cultural pretextsspecific to the client.The opportunity to have a direct impact on the quality of a client’s life is a driving force forstudent design. However, successful implementation of such a model requires significantplanning and close interaction between
academicenvironment with a degraded climate causing negative impacts to student learning andsatisfaction.3) Improved ties between theory and practice, as well as understanding of design methodology incontextAs with much of engineering education, there was a marked gap between the students mappingof theory to practice. The design methods taught in class along with the analytical tools coveredin previous courses were not fully integrated into the students' problem solving processes.Students are hungry to start cutting metal. In the past, the formal design methods wereintroduced to the students in a prescribed sequence. Each time a tool was introduced it was notput in context of a greater design process, only as something that had to follow the previousprocess
received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her research seeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 150 technical publications including over forty journal papers, and ten book chapters.Dr. Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University Astrid Layton is an assistant professor at Texas A and M University in the Mechanical Engineering depart- ment and received her Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta
the NSF, the EPA, and General Motors Corporation.Dr. Julie S. Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Assistant Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her research seeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 100 technical publications including twenty-three
are: (1) problem-solvers – able to frame and applyunderstanding to solve problems; (2) inter-disciplinary thinkers – able to think across disciplines;(3) self-reliant – able to set their own pace of study and work within specified time frames; and(4) technology-capable – able to understand and apply technology to master skills and to solveproblems. 11,12,13,14,15 These attributes parallel those of a successful engineering student.According to Wolff-Michael Roth, “The major educational goal in engineering design is thatstudents can develop two important kinds of knowledge necessary for making increasinglyintelligent choices and decisions: (a) deep familiarity within a specific domain [content]; and (b)strategies for bringing structure to
investigating thedifferences between experts and novices, researchers gain a deeper understanding of thedifferences in design thinking patterns between novices and expert designers (Kavakli & Gero,2002; Harlim & Belski, 2013).Among the engineering skills required, engineering design is fundamental for engineeringgraduates since engineering design is a major task in engineering practice. The use of designstrategies plays a significant role in engineering design, and a commonly used strategy isproblem decomposition/recomposition. It is frequently used by experienced engineers, especiallywhen dealing with complex engineering problems (Dym & Brown, 2012; Vincenti, 1990).Problem decomposition and problem recomposition is widely used in design
Institute of Technology to weavesustainable design principles throughout our civil engineering undergraduate curriculum, withthe expectation that the civil engineering students incorporate sustainable design principles in amore thoughtful and logical manner in their civil engineering projects.The CE Department has previously reported the incorporation of sustainable design principlesfrom freshman to senior years and its impact on our students’ understanding of sustainability.However, we found that many students still struggled to incorporate social sustainability in theircapstone project designs. In response, we created and implemented a community engagementengineering module for our Codes and Regulations course. The module consisted of
engineering ethics in a service learning design course.Where We Began Our goals from the beginning were to satisfy the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology(ABET)’s requirement that students havean “understanding” of ethical issues.But this is only a start, and since our program works so closely with the community, we mustalso go well beyond ABET, helping our studentsusetheir understandingof ethical issues to thenapply a process of practical moral reasoning, a process through which they can arrive at ajustifiable and feasible response to ethical dilemmas in their project work. Our goals are notsimply academic. Nor do we want to teach only ethics. Rather, we have aimed our efforts atteaching engineering ethics to students who must
Paper ID #8525Arab Idols: Multidisciplinary Mentoring Panel Critiques Design Team Per-formanceDr. Suzanne W. Scott, The Petroleum Institute Dr. Suzanne W. Scott is an Assistant Professor of Communication in the STEPS Program (Strategies for Team-Based Engineering Problem Solving) at The Petroleum Institute in Abu Dhabi. She is a former Co- ordinator of the EPICS (Engineering Practices Introductory Course Sequence) Program at the Colorado School of Mines under the directorship of Dr. Robert Knecht. Her research interests and publications focus on engineering design education in the Middle East and the US, intercultural
2002 ABET findings were aclear indicator that change was needed. In retrospect if a more traditional capstone design coursewere not developed and offered in the new curriculum, a deficiency was likely during the 2008ABET visit. While the motivation to initiate change may have been fear of ABET it has clearlybeen beneficial for the EM undergraduate studentsConclusions and RecommendatonsAs Engineering Management faculty, we teach the importance of continuous improvement andmaking managerial decisions based on data. Still it is difficult to implement change in anacademic department. Those who work in academic departments understand that personality,ego, and tradition are but a few of the factors (yet significant) that can impede change.Moreover
students. The new Engineering Plus degree has a core setof required foundational courses in engineering, a multi-year design sequence, and allows forself-defined pathways. The new curriculum also offers three defined degree pathways that havebeen chosen based on an examination of student “fate” data: secondary education, pre-medical,and environmental studies, with additional pathways planned for the near future. The fateanalysis examined the paths of students who were enrolled in an engineering or STEM major inone year and samples their major choice in the following year. This analysis maps the flow ofstudents into and out of the major with demographic slicers to more closely understand these in-migration and out-migration choices.This paper will
manned exploration of the red planet and subsequent colonization efforts byboth public and private entities [5] NASA’s journey into air and space has not only deepenedhumankind’s understanding of the universe but it has also inspired and motivated millions ofstudents to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Since1994, NASA has sponsored an annual competition for high school and college students to design,build, and race human-powered mars rovers. These collapsible vehicles must navigate simulatedouter space terrain, engaging students and providing valuable experiences in the technologies andconcepts that will be needed in future exploration missions [6] In April 2018, the team from theUniversity of the
on enjoying the diverse experiences in thecourse and the ability to choose their own project. Page 12.1272.10ConclusionsA core engineering design course has been developed and implemented for second semesterFreshmen engineering students to help develop their understanding and facility with sensors andtheir application in data acquisition systems as a foundation for realizing applications across theengineering spectrum. The course provides a vehicle to continue building systems thinking as akey competence for engineers. It also contributes to threads in teaming, communications, projectmanagement and creative thinking that permeate the design
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Twenty Years of Multidisciplinary Capstone Projects: Design, Implementation, and AssessmentIntroductionThe Quality Enhancement Systems and Teams (QUEST) Honors Program at the University ofMaryland unites undergraduate students with business, engineering, and science backgrounds inorder to promote a multidisciplinary, hands-on, learning experience. QUEST’s curriculumfocuses on quality management, process improvement, and system design. This curriculum isdelivered in the form of three required courses and two elective courses. The first programcourse introduces the concepts of innovation, design, and quality. Multidisciplinary teams workon a series of three projects
Division of ASEE in June 2012 for his accomplishment in engineering management education. Page 26.1690.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Using Transparent Factory Design Project to Enhance Engineering Management TeachingAbstractThe objective of this paper is to discuss the effect of using a transparent factory design project asa term project to enhance the teaching of engineering management principles and practices thatcan enrich students’ understanding of the current issues in engineering management and projectmanagement. This paper aims at
today!Those who teach design face the dilemma of needing to teach “old fashioned” equipment designmethods so that students will understand the fundamentals and also attempt to teach moderncomputer aided design techniques, knowing that most design engineers, who work for largecorporations may never use these “old fashioned” design methods again in their working careersand will rely heavily on modern computer technology. However, this is an environment wheresmaller organizations are probably different.Should we abandon traditional design methods and just teach modern methods or should we tryand pack both into already overloaded courses? The authors propose that students must get anappreciation of both traditional and modern design methods in some
behavior (impairment), and traffic safety culture. He is a national leader in the definition and advancement of traffic safety culture as a new traffic safety paradigm. Page 24.808.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Introducing Flexibility in an Engineering Curriculum Through Student Designed Elective ProgramsAbstractCalls from industry, non-profits and government consistently encourage engineering programs tocreate a “well-rounded engineer.” But what is meant by a well-rounded engineer? And how canuniversity faculty meet these requests
hiding of many of the details which underlie theelectrical, mechanical and software decisions that must be made to truly build a robotic system.In contrast, in the Robotics Engineering curriculum implemented at the Worcester PolytechnicInstitute, we have made a conscious choice to expose the students to these details. As a result,we have traded accessibility of the courses to students outside the Robotics Engineering programfor a deeper understanding of the comingling of technologies used to implement robotic systems.This, of course, has ramifications when teaching the design process in preparation for a capstonedesign project.Previous experience within the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department has shown thata course which focuses on
is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology at Georgia Southern University. Her main areas of interest include control systems, robotics, digital systems, microprocessors, and signal and image processing. Page 22.185.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 An Interdisciplinary, Team-Based Mobile Robots Design Course for Engineering TechnologyAbstractThis work describes the educational experience gained during a new course in mobile robots, afourth year elective course in the undergraduate
analysis—written assignments. Additionally,the “local groundedness [22]” of the data accurately reflects the student’s understanding of theconcepts under investigation. The conceptual framework, a common tool used in groundedtheory, shown in Fig. 2 locates this pilot test within the larger goal of preparing engineeringstudents to engage with wicked problems. preparing engineering students to solve wicked problems engineering design curriculum at Northwestern University first year engineering design course
) for all incoming engineering students presented an opportunity to strengthenstudents’ ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities and to make informedjudgments.EGR 101 is a project-based design course in which student teams are matched with clients in thecommunity to solve an identified problem. Through the work of creating the solutions to theseproblems, the teams learn about and apply the engineering design process. The design processconsists of seven steps: clarifying the team assignment, understanding the problem, definingdesign criteria, brainstorming solutions, evaluating solutions, prototyping, and testing. Steps inthe design process are taught using a flipped classroom method, in which students watch videosdetailing