persistence in STEM fields. We return to these constructs throughout this paperin developing strategies for educators to create more inclusive STEM classrooms.Table 1: Defining Common MetricsTerm Functional definition NotesIdentity For a given subject, identity is a “Science career aspirations in compilation of level of interest, self- eighth grade (i.e., early assessment of competency, and how identification) strongly predicted much recognition one feels with regard physical science bachelor’s to it10. degree attainment several years
programs. Luis is interested in exploring how students interact with new materials in multicultural settings.Dr. Greses Perez P.E., Tufts University Greses A. P´erez is a Ph.D. student in Learning Sciences and Technology Design with a focus on engineering education. Before coming to Stanford, Greses was a bilingual math and science educator at public elementary schools in Texas, where she served in the Gifted and Talented Advisory District Committee and the Elementary Curriculum Design team. As a science mentor at the Perot Museum, Greses locally supported the development of teachers by facilitating workshops and creating science classroom kits. She taught in bilingual, Montessori and university classrooms in Texas and
Channel coastal system. I currently works at West Texas A&M University in the Texas Panhandle, a semi-arid region. My activities there are applications of water engineering to benefit people and communities. The research and service span three areas. The first is the use of inexpensive biochar for preserving environmental quality in developing communities by using it as an adsorbent for agrochemical pesticides and nutrients. Second is the use of marginal quality water for irrigation to profit agriculture and maintain soil health. The third is the use of water footprint and blue-gray-green water categories to better understand the water impacts of food waste and strategies for its reduction. In the world of engineering
Curriculum, Teaching, and Educational Policy graduate program at Michigan State University in 2010. Her current research focuses on three key areas: (1) de- signing, developing, and conducting validation studies on assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) science; (2) examining and understanding validity issues associated with measures designed to assess science teachers’ instructional quality, including observational measures, value-added measures, student surveys, and performance-based tasks; and (3) extending and studying the use of these knowl- edge and instructional practices measures of science teaching quality as summative assessment tools for licensure purposes and as formative assessment tools
appointments in the Department of Curriculum & Instruction,the Department of Psychology, and the Wisconsin Center for Education Research. He is a member ofthe steering committee for the Delta Program (part of the national CIRTL Network), which promotesthe development of a future national STEM faculty committed to implementing and advancing effectiveteaching practices for diverse student audiences. Prof. Nathan currently is Director of the Center on Edu-cation and Work and Director of the Postdoctoral Training Program in Mathematical Thinking, Learning,and Instruction. He is an inductee and executive board member of the University of Wisconsin’s TeachingAcademy, which promotes excellence in teaching in higher education
will help them prosper in their engineering careers.Heidi A. Diefes-Dux (Professor) Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln (UNL). She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and now leads the Discipline-Based Education Research Initiative in the College of Engineering at UNL. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering
International Congress on Mathematical Software, 2020, pp. 386–392, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-52200-1_38.[28] D. H. Smith, Q. Hao, C. D. Hundhausen, F. Jagodzinski, J. Myers-Dean, and K. Jaeger, “Towards Modeling Student Engagement with Interactive Computing Textbooks: An Empirical Study,” SIGCSE 2021 - Proc. 52nd ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ., pp. 914–920, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3408877.3432361.[29] J. Reades, “Teaching on jupyter – using notebooks to accelerate learning and curriculum development,” Region, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 2020, doi: 10.18335/region.v7i1.282.[30] J. W. Johnson, “Benefits
Robust, Resilient and Flexible Networks Integrated Realization of Engineered Materials and Products Managing Organized and Disorganized Complexity: Exploration of the Solution Space His current education focus is on creating and implementing, in partnership with industry, a curriculum for educating strategic engineers—those who have developed the competencies to create value through the realization of complex engineered systems. Email URL http://www.ou.edu/content/coe/ame/people/amefaculty/mistree.html LinkedIN http://www.linkedin.com/pub/farrokh-mistree/9/838/8ba c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work in Progress - A Strategy for Assessing Learning through
passing on theory, they do little to promote creativity and may result in graduateswith limited creativity. In response to this and the recognized value of creative problem solvingtechniques required for innovation, many engineering educators have begun developing practicalmethods to incorporate assignments that encourage creativity into the curriculum and individualclasses while still emphasizing engineering fundamentals.Traditionally, engineering courses are structured in a deductive manner which begins withinstruction on theories and progresses towards application of those theories. Liberal arts courses,on the other hand, often rely on an inductive approach in which specific topics are introducedthrough case studies, observations, or problems
. Second, engineering administrators can use information gathered from the F-NSSE tobetter mentor new faculty member by: (1) seeing how faculty are incorporating innovations ininstruction and curriculum development; (2) helping to lay the groundwork for discussions aboutthe assumptions and values that underlie the role of new faculty members; (3) diagnosing facultymember’s strength and weaknesses; (4) developing professional development programming thataddresses identified teaching and learning issues; and (5) making fairer comparisons amongfaculty.The data collected from the E-NSSE and F-NSSE will provide all faculty members (both newand experienced) with: (a) tools to make them more effective teachers and (b) data which caninform classroom-based
focused primarily on thefollowing three areas: the History of Chemistry; the calculations aimed at demonstrate theLaws of Chemistry; and some selected chemical formulae functional to the demonstrationsand to develop the capability of solving rather simple mathematical calculations applied to anunknown subject matter. All these skills are very important but in many cases the knowledgegained in this way happens to be quickly forgotten, especially if it is not brought tocomparison with every day life. Such teaching practices can result in the fact that too manystudents tend to consider Chemistry as a possibly interesting subject, but of almost noconnection with their general education.The underlining idea of this work is that these shortcomings can
because culture influences what constitutesintelligence and intelligent acts [9, 10]. Indeed, conceptions of “smartness” in school often caterto analytical abilities, while ignoring other types of intelligence, such as creative or practicalabilities [11]. This emphasis on analytical abilities is magnified even further in engineeringschool, where math and engineering science dominate the curriculum. This cultural norm ofvaluing analytical intelligence above all else reflects white, middle class constructions ofintelligence. This reality contributes to the exclusionary narratives about who belongs inengineering as the qualities that are revered in academia (e.g., brilliance, rigor, seriousness,rationality, objectivity, etc.) are all traditionally
President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall objective of properly preparing individuals for their futures as civil engineers. An example is his staff leadership of ASCE’s initiative to ”Raise the Bar” for entry into professional engineering practice. Dr. Lenox’s awards include ASCE’s ExCEEd Leadership Award, ASEE’s George K. Wadlin Award, ASCE’s William H. Wisely American Civil Engineer Award, and the CE News’ ”2010 Power List – 15 People Advancing the Civil Engineering Profession.” He is a Distinguished Member of ASCE and a Fellow of ASEE. In January 2014, Dr. Lenox retired from his staff position with ASCE. He
their core knowledge. A case study of a large Chemistry forMechanical Engineering course (~400-500 students) at a German technical university utilized anonline platform to develop a direct competency model to assess students’ knowledge of corechemistry competencies. These competencies were based on the learning outcomes of the course.This model consisted of short review questions (2-3 per topic) that tested students’ understandingof the concept as well as pre and post self-assessments of these core competencies. Students thatscored higher on the direct competency questions showed higher mastery of the subject topicthrough achieving higher scores on correlated exam tasks and subtasks. Also the pre and post self-assessment showed that students
fellows were female and 52% were minority students – percentages that arewell above university averages for the primary partner university, North Carolina StateUniversity (NCSU). For more information about the demographic breakdown of the RAMP-UPprogram, see Figure 5 in the appendix. As a result of participation in this program, fellowsincrease their community involvement, improve their communication skills and explore manypost-graduate career opportunities.The National Science Foundation awarded the first GK-12 grants in 1999. Since then,universities have created dozens of programs across the country to improve student achievementwhile developing the service and communication skills of future scientists and engineers [7]. Dueto the hypothesized
decision. Student 5 also indicated interest inperforming certain tasks, but in addition, interest in a particular work process and function(software development). Student 8 indicated broad interest in engineering and science as amotivator. Student 12 has a desire to work in the automotive or aviation industries, and feltmechanical engineering was the best way to enter those fields. Student 13 indicated that aligningthe choice of field to a hobby was good idea and affected the decision. Student 14 indicated aninterest in the curriculum as well as potential to be employed (Importance). Two others (Students2 and 14) indicated that labor market demand and work potential drove their chocie of majordecision. There were surprisingly few indications for
Dale R. Baker is a Professor of Science Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at ASU and is the Co-Editor of The Journal of Research in Science Teaching. She teaches courses in science curricula, teaching and learning, and assessment courses with an emphasis on constructivist theory and issues of equity. Her research focuses on issues of gender, science, and science teaching. She has won two awards for her research in these areas. In this work she is responsible for developing assessments and overseeing data collection, analysis, and feedback to the project.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate
the students’ learning outside the classroom are goals of this work. The focus of the development presented herein is on the begin- ning portions of the course, concentrating on mathematical preliminaries and particle dynamics. Mathematica, frequently employed to teach a variety of topics, is used to parallel and illustrate the formal development of equations in a manner consistent with the textbook. Mathematica lends itself to this purpose, as its syntax is not unlike that found in textbooks. The software also allows for user input thus allowing students to vary the parameters defining the problem and to see the variations in the final results. In addition to containing dynamics problems, the
intriguingopportunity to reflect on how engineers imagine what engineering is and what its proper role insociety ought to be.This paper contributes one such reflection, carefully analyzing Grand Challenges as a way tointerrogate broader social and cultural meanings surrounding engineering, technology, and theirrelationships to major social and environmental problems. While sympathetic to the impulseunderlying the report, namely to direct engineering energies toward “the century’s greatchallenges,” 4 our analysis identifies key assumptions embedded in Grand Challenges that arelikely to constrain efforts to develop robust solutions. This paper argues that, in importantrespects, Grand Challenges relies on a problematic and increasingly outdated understanding
of Mechanical Engineering graduatedfrom General Motors Institute in 1986 and has been on the faculty at Kettering University since1996. Dr. El-Sayed earned her MSE (1989) and Ph.D. (1997) from the University of Missouri.Dr. El-Sayed's areas of expertise include manufacturing optimization, multi-disciplinary teamteaching, pedagogy, and curriculum development. In 2008-2009, Dr. El-Sayed was recognizednationally for her leadership when she was selected an American Council on Education Fellow inwhich she served her internship at Harvey Mudd College with her ACE mentor, President MariaKlawe. Dr. El-Sayed is currently the treasurer for the American Society of EngineeringEducators, Women in Engineering Division.The International Journal of Process
beginning of the student’s program, with the goal of developing their informationliteracy (IL) skills. In 2020, the librarians conducted a study based on course assessments,which revealed satisfaction rates of over 90% in terms of achieving this workshop’s learningobjectives. To build on these results, the team wanted to assess what students rememberedfrom the workshop and still used a few months after completing it. This article also seeks tofoster discussion regarding the lasting impact of library-based IL skills training.Purpose/Hypothesis: More specifically, the question this program evaluation activity attemptsto elucidate is: What are the impacts of CAP7005 on students’ information literacy skills interms of learning and putting them into
) (b)Figure 6: Students' feedback on the alignment of AI-generated microlearning content with actualcourse materials in (a) Discrete Mathematics and (b) Programming Language Principles.DiscussionIn 2005, Hug introduced a pivotal instructional framework for microlearning, which organizes itinto seven dimensions: learning time, content, curriculum, form, process, medium, and type.These dimensions, which cover crucial aspects of microlearning, such as delivery formats,content structure, and instructional design, serve as a robust foundation for developing effectivemicrolearning strategies [32]. While a variety of microlearning components have been exploredand utilized in different contexts [22], [12], [28], [29], this study focuses on those
coordinates the mechanical engineering senior capstone design projects and teaches senior design lectures and studios. Her research interests include engineering education and engineering design methodology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Writing Assessment Training for Capstone Design InstructorsIntroduction Technical writing is vital for professional engineers, but engineering students oftenstruggle to master written communication [1]. To help students develop the necessary writingskills for their careers, many engineering programs implement writing intensive courses
and opportunity in STEM education.Dr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University Dr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez is an Associate Professor and Graduate Program Coordinator in the Depart- ment of Construction Management at Colorado State University. His research, teaching, and engagement align with sustainable design and construction topics. He has received grant funding from federal and state agencies and private organizations. Rodolfo has taught multiple courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, and he is well-versed in the scholarship of teaching. His efforts in leading the Sustainable Buildings program were recognized with the 2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also
Paper ID #33312Competency Based Learning In ”Aerospace Structures I” In an OnlineEnvironment – Work in ProgressDr. Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University Maria Chierichetti joined the department of Aerospace Engineering as a full-time assistant professor in Fall 2019. Her interests lie in the field of aerospace structural design and vibrations, with particular emphasis on developing methodologies for combining finite element analysis and machine/deep learning for structural health monitoring and unmanned Structural inspections in the context of urban air mobility. Maria is also interested in investigating how
, University of Connecticut Arash E. Zaghi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his PhD in 2009 from the University of Nevada, Reno, and contin- ued there as a Research Scientist. His latest research endeavor is on creativity and engineering education, with a focus on the unique potential of students with ADHD. Supported by multiple grants from the Na- tional Science Foundation, his research was highlighted the American Society of Engineering Education’s Prism Magazine. He received a CAREER Award in 2016 to study the significance of neurodiversity in developing a creative engineering workforce.Ms. Christa L. Taylor
the assignedengineering documents and presentations delivered to the class, which have risen to thelevel of industry quality. As UTSA is the third largest Hispanic-serving institution in theU. S., the results are further underscored by the fact that 42% of the design students areclassified as ESL (English as a second language); 34% of the class is bilingual Spanish-English. Methodology of motivating minorities is discussed. IntroductionIn an effort to continuously improve the quality of education, the Electrical and ComputerEngineering Department (ECE) has made revisions to the curriculum for the capstonedesign courses required of all senior year ECE majors, which is a two semester course ofstudy, Design I
education. Specific areas of controls and signal processing research include the design and modeling of intelligent controls, Kalman filters, and automation. Engineering education research includes curriculum and laboratory development for these concepts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Society of Women Engineers (SWE) Welding and Machining Day: Women’s Confidence with Individual Hands-On ManufacturingIntroductionIn 2016, the collegiate section of SWE at Kettering University instituted a program to teachfemale students hands-on manufacturing skills. In this program, the students were taught skills ineither MIG welding or various machining
MotivationThe impact of traditional engineering education on the divergent thinking and creative potentialof future engineers has been a concern for many scholars over the years. Divergent thinking isthe creative process involved in exploring many possible solutions, whereas convergent thinkinginvolves using logical validity to find a single, correct answer to a problem. Although divergentand convergent thinking are required for innovative solutions in engineering design, many arguethat typical engineering curriculum has significant deficiencies in enhancing divergent thinkingcapabilities of students. Creative production is often correlated to divergent thinking to producemany different ideas; hence, for the engineering education domain, design
paper shows how I used graphical data presentation techniques in undergraduateMechanical Engineering Technology classes such as Materials & Processes, to improve studentsuccess, teaching effectiveness, and curriculum.IntroductionQuality management systems developed by the British Standards Institute and the US military inthe mid 20th century focused on outcomes and continuous improvement in manufacturing andservice industries. These quality systems and their successors, QS9000 and ISO 9000, becamemodels for ABET's EC2000 criteria in 1997, as ABET changed from its 70-year practice ofmeasuring inputs to measuring outputs. The key to a successful continuous improvement processis to link outcomes with root causes, and this linkage is not always