ABET/EAC visit under EC2000. In addition, we share how the insights gained willbe used for continuous improvement of our engineering programs.I. Important Differences Between Mason Engineering Programs and Traditional SchoolsThe undergraduate engineering degree programs in the School of Information Technology andEngineering of George Mason University recently underwent an ABET visit under the EC2000criteria. The four undergraduate degree programs that were assessed were: civil andinfrastructure engineering, computer engineering, electrical engineering, and systemsengineering. George Mason’s engineering program is non-traditional in several important waysthat influence the preparation for and compliance with the new ABET criteria. In this
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, Irvine and currently serves as a Lecturer in the joint program between the University of California, Irvine and the Dalian University of Technology.Prof. Liang Li Wu, University of California, Irvine Liang (Lily) Wu is an Associate Professor of Teaching at the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Irvine. She is also the Faculty Director of International Programs at the Henry Samueli School of Engineering. Her responsibilities include instruction and curriculum assessment to enhance and support the engineering education at the School of Engineering. Dr. Wu received her Ph.D. degree in
electronics concepts. The average correct answers for the pre-test were 63.0% and for the post-test were 85.4%; meaning that there was animprovement of 22.4% correct answers. Page 15.396.14 Pre-Test/Post-TestPart 1. True/False Questions1. T ; F ; Every bipolar junction transistor (BJT) has base, emitter, and collector.2. T ; F ; An on-off controller can be made with a comparator to activate or deactivate an electrical device.3. T ; F ; Voltages from a thermocouple are usually large.4. T ; F ; Small voltages can be increased with operational amplifiers.5. T ; F ; Resistors are used in circuits to limit electrical
bridge program centers on using the ALEKS (Assessment andLearning in Knowledge Spaces) software package for targeted, self-guided learning. Theprogram took place exclusively in an on-campus format, and also featured a required residentialcomponent and additional engineering activities for the students. The program’s duration was 4weeks, and students were expected to improve their math placement by at least one semester. Itis expected that improving their math placement will reduce the student’s time-to-graduationwhich should in turn improve retention rates and eventually graduation rates. Data from the2009 and 2010 cohorts have been collected and analyzed to judge the effectiveness of theprogram with respect to both improving the students’ math
. He continues to teach online courses in the sociology of education, criminology, and juvenile delinquency for the University of Colorado Denver. Rob earned his Ph.D. in sociology from Emory University in 1998. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Program to Integrate Mobile, Hands-On Experiments into the ME, AE, and ECE CurriculumAbstractThis research effort builds off of earlier work that made extensive use of hands-on mobileexperiments in the ECE Curriculum. Small, inexpensive platforms were developed which, whencombined with student-owned data acquisition hardware and laptop computers, could be used toconduct experiments without the need for a dedicated
, Bloom’s taxonomy emphasizes cognitive processes, while Fink’s additionally touches upon affective learning categories, such as caring and the human dimension. Similar to Bloom’s, Fink’s significant learning outcomes also help inform the educators’ processes as they set goals for a course.c. ABET Engineering Criteria In addition to the taxonomies mentioned, the seven engineering criteria of Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) guide educators in the design of curricular offerings and evaluation methods to ensure that engineering programs, including ECE education, meet certain standards [16][19]. Throughout this work, we address specific ABET criteria in relation to our use of the CARE methodology to assess
number of young people increases there will be aunique opportunity for the state energy office and DOE to promote awareness of energyconservation and offer training and educational programs to steer them toward technical careersin the energy sector [3, 4]. This project under the sponsorship of department of energy (DOE) is designed to addressthe specific issue of education and training of students for careers in the industrial energy sectorwithin the state of Arkansas. The partnership in this project will involve the University ofArkansas at Little Rock (UALR), a two-year college, Arkansas Energy Office, and large users ofenergy in this area.2. Goals of the Initiative The project is designed to enlarge the knowledge base of energy
typically large and not only costly to purchase, but also expensive to maintain. C. Computer Simulation or Programming Based Labs. This type of lab is common in Electrical or Computer Engineering Technology programs. There is no experience with equipment (other than computers). D. Small Component Electrical Labs. These usually centered around wiring chips on a breadboard. These are typically used in Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) programs, and incorporate the use of meters, oscilloscopes, and signal generators. E. Web Controlled Equipment Trainers Stationed Located at Host Site. These trainers are viewed over interactive
to lead outside the formal curriculum AbstractLeadership has historically been part of professional engineers’ work life, but until recently itwas not integrated into the formal engineering curriculum. With the support of the NationalAcademy of Engineering and Engineers Canada along with regulatory pressures from theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology and the Canadian EngineeringAccreditation Board, committed engineering educators with ties to industry have begun to takeup this curricular challenge in greater numbers. Unfortunately, many of these programs touchonly a small segment of the student body because they remain on the periphery of engineeringfaculties. As a result, we know little about the
small team exercises (Hensel, 2001) was incorporated as active learningactivities throughout the academic term. Three design teams were formed to perform activitiesrelated to the classroom widget design case study. These teams were used on several activitiesover a period of about three weeks. For example, each team prepared a needs assessment andmission statement for their widget project. Each team interviewed the professors in the role ofcustomer, and prepared a formal statement of work that was shared with the rest of the class inbrief presentation. The needs assessment role play was conducted within a one hour period, andstudents were given a homework assignment to return to class with a draft statement of work. As the course
Hadnagy, University of Washington Tacoma Dr. Emese Hadnagy is an associate professor and chair of the BS Civil Engineering program at the University of Washington Tacoma. Dr. Hadnagy received her Ph.D. at the University of New Hampshire. Her work falls in the broad areas of surface water quality assessment, physicochemical treatment technology development, and engineering education research.Dr. Sarah L Rodriguez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Sarah L. Rodriguez is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. Her engineering education research agenda centers upon engineering and computing identity development of
strategies to enable small communitycollege engineering programs to support a comprehensive set of lower-division engineeringcourses that are delivered either completely online, or with limited face-to-face interactions. Thebiggest challenge in developing such strategies lies in designing and implementing courses thathave lab components. This paper focuses on the development and testing of the teaching andlearning resources for Engineering Graphics, which is a four-unit course covering the principlesof engineering drawings, computer-aided design, and the engineering design process. The paperalso presents the results of the implementation of the curriculum, as well as a comparison of theoutcomes of the online course with those from a regular, face-to
funding in universities in Australia is through the enrolled students,therefore, there has been a tendency of universities in the last years to increase enrollment numbers whichresults in very high student to staff ratios [9]. Furthermore, students enrolled in engineering programs in largeUniversities in Australia have different challenges to develop the engagement and sense of belonging to theirengineering program. Large class sizes, low student attendance, and a higher education system structured tolimit student-academic and peer-to-peer interactions all present challenges for development of studentengagement in engineering schools and faculties. In engineering programs, there is also a culture that pushes forthe continuous involvement of
combined with aging workers and significantchallenges in hiring factory floor workers [3]. To address this need, partnerships have beenestablished between industry and academia through Wabash Heartland Innovation Network(WHIN) at Purdue University. In collaboration with Ivy Tech Community College, a series ofworkshops were developed to introduce data analytics, the internet of things, and basic machinelearning concepts to local small and large manufacturing companies. This study will describe thefirst of three short courses geared toward industry workers and professionals.2. Training DesignThe first short course is on the topic of energy savings and data analytics for Variable FrequencyDrives (VFDs). The main goal of this workshop was to introduce
determine whether goals are met. Assessment of theeffectiveness of the faculty workshops training sessions offered will be conducted anonymouslyusing pre- and post-surveys. Assessment data will be collected, analyzed, and used in continuousimprovement actions to be implemented in next offering. We will use a pre-test/post-test designand pre-survey/post-survey employing both direct and indirect measures of student learning.The indirect assessment instruments will also include questions regarding participants’satisfaction while direct assessment instrument will include a set small design problems andmultiple choices problems. IV. OutreachThe project objective is to increase enrollment in electrical engineering technology programs to
despite thedemands of their academic programs. These programs can be successful in developing studentcultural awareness and global engineering competencies [4]. The Rising Sophomore Abroad Program (RSAP) at Virginia Tech (VT) introducesfirst-year engineering students to global engineering with the combination of a semester-longcourse ENGE 1644 - Global STEM Practice: Leadership and Culture and a 2-week internationaltravel abroad experience. Coupled with the study abroad experience, the course is designed toemphasize the importance of culture and context in engineering practice and teach studentsglobal engineering competencies [5]. Student global competencies are assessed using the GlobalPerspectives Inventory (GPI) which consists of three
Engineers Qualification Pilot Program, University of Manitoba, CanadaAbstractThis paper presents the conceptual framework of the Internationally-Educated EngineersQualification Pilot Program (IEEQ) at the University of Manitoba, Canada, highlighting the rolethat engineering schools can play in facilitating the cultural and labor market integration offoreign-trained engineers in North America. IEEQ is a 12-month program combining academicstudy and a paid work placement, and key structural features are that it leads to foreigncredentials recognition, it relies on external partnerships with government and industry, and itshares common features with Minority Engineering Programs. Assessment and evaluation ofIEEQ is
-building and expert leverage of resources. As an entrepreneur in a not-for-profit organization, he has grown the NCIIA from a grassroots group of enthusiastic faculty to a nationally known and in-demand knowledge base and resource center. He currently serves as the Chair of the ASEE Entrepreneurship Division.Angela Shartrand, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance Angela Shartrand, Assessment Specialist, is an educational psychologist who has experience evaluating programs in philanthropic, community-based, and higher education settings. Prior to joining NCIIA, she evaluated programs in the areas of teacher education, youth philanthropy and leadership, and community-based
Motivation,Efficient Team Training, Faculty & Mentor Development, and Dissemination & Collaboration. Figure 1. An EM-Driven Framework for Undergraduate ResearchTo educate and aid faculty with integrating undergraduates in research, a series of initiatives arebeing developed to focus on student early exposure to the concept of research, training ofstudents in research topics, and helping faculty see the value of using undergraduates in theirresearch programs. For all initiatives, videos and accompanying activities will be available foruse at any university. The universities represented in this project are diverse. There are publicand private universities and both large and small universities as well. The challenge of theproject
design or entrepreneurial project each semesterdelivered in a 3-credit design class, repeated every semester in their 3rd and 4th years of theundergraduate program. The 1st and 2nd year students enrolled in an affiliated community collegecomplete “in-house” project. Teams in both programs are mentored by “facilitators”, who guideand direct project teams as they gain technical, professional, and design skills. Students areencouraged to develop self-directed learning skills throughout the four-year program, whichculminates in a Bachelor of Science in Engineering degree. Technical course class sizes are small,ranging from six to thirty students per instructor, class meetings are delivered in “learningconversations”, and students are guided to
accomplishments, modeling team building, and developingcommitment scales). Because of the small sample size that results from collecting data onstudents enrolled in an individual graduate program, the reporting of effect sizes are important asan indicator of potential effects to be investigated over time. The differences on the modelingteam building scale from year 1 to year 2 were fairly large, with an effect size of 0.43. Thesepreference values for the students decreased from 3.95 to 3.58 indicating that their preference formodeling team-working characteristics in the workplace environment had slightly declined. Theeffect size for the differences in inspiring accomplishments was also large (d = 0.43) for the
goodclass. We will focus on the key points necessary to kick-start a teaching career or to begin toimmediately improve a career. Over 300 workshop participants from over 170 CE programs havebeen touched by the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Teaching Workshops1999-2003, the ExcEEd 2004 (Excellence in Engineering Education) Teaching Workshop, andthe NSF funded predecessor “Teaching Teachers To Teach Engineering” (T4E) TeachingWorkshops 1996-1998. This does not include the Mechanical, Electrical, and Chemical facultymembers who have participated in T4E and ExcEEd. Five years of long term assessment datawill be summarized to demonstrate the effectiveness and benefit of these pedagogical basics tothe participants.I. IntroductionThe
teacher andclass to become more familiar with multiple engineering fields.The successful approach of the second year was expanded for the third and fourth years withgreater than 30 teachers representing more than 20 schools attending the teacher workshop eachyear. This resulted in many more requests from teachers for teams to visit classrooms. Toaccommodate these additional requests, the undergraduate teams were increase from fivestudents to as many as 14 for one team. This addressed another objective of the program,retention. Assessments during the first two years clearly showed that outreach participation andmentoring by college students plus the team and faculty interaction significantly increasedundergraduate excitement in engineering and had
, 2006 Evolution of the Electrical Power Technology Program at the University of HoustonAbstract A revised Electrical Technology (ELT) program, now designated as Electrical PowerTechnology (EPTE), was started in the College of Technology at the University of Houston in2003. The program will serve to not only electrical utilities, but also the large base of electricalcontracting, equipment manufacturing, and sales companies in the Houston area. This paper willtrace the steps taken by the faculty to change the program from Electrical Technology into theElectrical Power Technology program, and the steps that provided information for the resultingcurriculum
measure in lieu of revisingan entrenched undergraduate core engineering curriculum is to provide bioengineeringexposure to 9-12 high school students before they begin undergraduate training. To do thiseffectively also requires increased bioengineering knowledge in high school science teachers.To help foster an increased knowledge and understanding of Bioengineering among thegrades 9-12 student group and their science teachers in a large metropolitan area, wedeveloped a weeklong Bioengineering summer day camp program. The typically intense, but short instructional sequences of the camp provide an idealmeans for the introduction and immersion of 9-12 students and science teachers intobioengineering. Our camp had the following objectives: 1) To
linked.In other words, to be a “good” engineer, you must know more than technical information andcomputer programs. We teach students that in addition to the technical competencies required,they must also know how to communicate.While the CLEAR continuous, integrated approach appears successful, it is an innovativeprogram, and as such, there is little research on how this approach specifically influences studentperformance. The purpose of this paper is to describe and assess two distinct, integratedapproaches to communication instruction. Specifically, students’ writing improvement isassessed over time in two separate engineering departments that utilize two differentinstructional approaches: (1) the intensive, two-semester capstone experience in
times a week. It now uses a 2+2 format: two days of lecture per week,with each lecture day followed by laboratory time to facilitate material understanding by hands-on practice. Approximately 120 students attend a one-hour lecture in an auditorium. Thefollowing day, students attend a small lab session, usually 26 students, to allow more contactwith each student while s/he practices. There has been concern voiced regarding large lectureswith respect to attendance rates, effectiveness of large lecture instruction, and connectivitybetween the instructor and students15. To provide a more flexible learning environment and improve student learningoutcomes16-18, a blended learning approach was adopted in 2010 by approximately half of theEGR115
Paper ID #12185Comparing Engineering and Non-Engineering International Programs to De-termine Value and Future DirectionsDr. Holt Zaugg, Brigham Young University Holt Zaugg is the Assessment Librarian at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. His research interests focus on assessments and evaluations that improve student learning and integrate library services with other faculty courses.Dr. Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University Dr. Magleby is a professor in Mechanical Engineering and is the associate dean of the College of Engi- neering and Technology at BYU where he oversees international program
list different projects appropriate for first-year engineering students [5, 6,10, 18]. Most are team-based [18]. Many contain an element of competitiveness [6]. Someprojects cleverly integrate skills from different disciplines [5]: use a (provided) large slingshot to launch a softball to hit a target, design and build a data scanner to read and execute commands in binary format, design and implement a microprocessor-based controller to adjust flow into a mixture, or design and build truss-like structures to meet load and deflection specifications.Some engineering programs “book-end” their curricula by requiring freshmen to complete small-scale versions of senior capstone projects [10]. The authors intend to train
-program aggregate response report to Carnegie Mellon University. The response rate forsummer 2015 respondents from Carnegie Mellon University was 70.7%. Responses reflect self-reported learning gains for each construct andwere measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from very large gain (5) to no gain or very small gain (1).2.2 Efforts to build a communications program for summer undergraduate researchers throughbroad stakeholder collaborationIn 2010, the American Society for Engineering Education issued two reports on the future ofscholarly and systematic innovation in the discipline. Among their recommendations for success,ASEE urged those engaged in new pedagogies to be sure to gain broad, collaborativeparticipation among stakeholders