focused on the design and implementation of a course using a student-led laboratory method which supports the development of authentic and courageous leaders. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How Do Human Interaction Labs Contribute to Engineering Leadership Development?AbstractThis paper outlines the impact of a small group experiential learning course (Human InteractionLab) that cultivates authentic engagement between participants. Unlike many experientiallearning environments, this course is fundamentally learner-centered, where students designateboth the content of discussion and the norms that dictate
ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering X X X problems3f. an understanding of professional and ethical X X X responsibility3g. an ability to communicate effectively X X X3h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, X X X environmental, and societal context3i. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in X X X X life-long
spirit, create a sense of community and cooperation, andpositively impact the way that students see their career opportunities. Living and learning withother aspiring and practicing student entrepreneurs, enjoying ready access to mentoring andcoaching from experienced advisors and instructors, and gaining the skills to actually startcompanies combine to foster a rich entrepreneurial experience.Affiliate ClassroomAnik Singal is the founder and president of Affiliate Classroom, Inc., a leader in the affiliatetraining industry specializing in training entrepreneurs on increasing their online revenuesthrough affiliate marketing. The Company is focusing on bringing together reputable internetmerchants and webmasters who can successfully promote their
12.1335.3the following general process for performing assessment of program outcomes: • Develop program outcomes • Document constituency input • Identify where in the curriculum these outcomes are met • Establish performance measures for each outcome • Evaluate student performance against these measures and provide a rating • Make and document decisions and changes based on the resultsa. Develop program outcomes: Defining what your students can do at the time of graduation is animportant task that should not be done in a vacuum. Program outcomes should be consistent with themission of the college, the university, and the community it supports. The outcomes must also derivefrom the program
subsequentassignments, and if so, which ones? What new rhetorical moves are evinced?In spring 2016, a corpus of student project texts was collected and anonymized from fivesections of FYW and eight sections of TC. The FYW courses selected for this analysis includeda sequence of three student paper projects: a comparative genre analysis (CGA), a proposal foran original research contribution, and a final contribution paper. For the TC course, the first twoassignment genres were collected: a cover letter (part of a résumé and cover letter package for ajob application, a common assignment in technical communication service courses) and aproposal directed to a real decision maker (either a proposal to receive funding for a researchproject or a proposal to a campus
,prototyping, and fabrication techniques. The students had the opportunity to work with multipleexperts from both within and beyond the university community, with expertise in designethnography, making, and museum exhibit design and fabrication.The major design challenge for the course involved exploring how people interact with commonspaces in the engineering buildings on campus and designing something to make these spacesmore engaging or welcoming. The students developed two solutions to this design challenge, oneinvolving a small remotely operated rover display situated near the entrance of one of theengineering buildings, and the other was an interactive stapling station designed for a well-utilized study space in another engineering building. The
negatively impacts the finalproficiency of all students in the course. However, facilitating content and study environmentsthat enable students to practice formulating the equations to represent the physics and to relearnmath techniques outside of class has increased (anecdotal observation from a sample size of 15-20 students per year for >3 years) the proficiency and success of weaker students. The prevalence of cheating has been found to be as high as 80% with a higher percentageof students who cheat on assignments [1, 2]. After assigning and grading homework in the firstyear of this Advanced Transport Phenomena course, it became apparent that most students couldonly complete homework with the solutions manual open as a guide. Education
development.IntroductionWork-integrated learning experiences (WILs) have become a core aspect in the earlysocialization of engineers into the profession. As a result, students who engage in WILs enhancetheir understanding of the cultures, norms, and skills essential to support their success in theworkplace environment [1]-[5]. In addition, these experiences tend to strengthen their technicaland interpersonal skills, which in turn have the potential to translate into improved academicperformance [6] and a broadened network [7]-[8]. As students work alongside engineers in thefield, they can take ownership of important projects that can influence their communities anddrive innovation and growth in a company [1],[7]. The recognition of their impact fuels
) Design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) Function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) Identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) Understand professional and ethical responsibility (g) Communicate effectively (h) Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) Recognize the need for and engage in life-long learning (j) Have a knowledge of
focused on minority populations, however much of it is not publishedand nearly as available as the before referenced websites and programs. This clear vacancy is onethat the TORCH program seeks to fill in a unique way.TORCH philosophy and nicheThe primary purpose of the program relies on four key components: engaging content,mentoring, exposure experiences, and academic preparation. These aspects combined will likelyincrease technical literacy and increase the chances of the student participants to enroll inengineering or science in college. TORCH’s niche focuses on access to a large manpower basewith NSBE’s membership, many of whom are involved in some sort of community service in thename of the organization already. Matching the background of
engineering researchers at U of T and Waterloo are engaged in a diversearray of research activities involving multidisciplinary, multi-researcher teams. While bothlibraries offer a number of services that researchers expressed an interest in, promotion of theseservices is evidently lacking. This study highlights a need to improve communications andenhance services, especially in the training of graduate students. It also highlights areas wherethe library should continue to focus efforts, such as with research data management, open accesscompliance, and articulating research impact beyond traditional bibliometric measures. Some ofthese challenges are complicated, especially those related to research data management, andrequire a multi-layered
post-workshop feedback surveysStudents’ reflections on workshop impact. To understand the impact of the workshop onstudents, students were asked to reflect on which aspects of the workshop had the most impacton them. By far, the most common theme in students’ responses was an appreciation for the casescenario group discussion activity, which allowed students to engage with each other in smallgroups of six to eight people. Students noted that this activity sparked the sharing of ideas,ultimately resulting in a shift of conceptions about communication across cultures. Regarding themost impactful aspects of the workshop, one student reflected that the most meaningfulworkshop experience was “hear[ing] stories and perspectives from multiple people
explores the use of students’ own reflective practices to measure theirprogress toward program learning goals.ApproachWe developed an ePortfolio template using the Digication platform. Students were asked toreport four of their 10 mini projects using this ePortfolio tool. We then evaluated how effectivethe production of these ePortfolios was in engaging students on both cognitive and emotionallevels. To do this, we asked participants (n = 104) to complete an online questionnaire thatevaluated these engagement constructs. The completed questionnaires were evaluated usingdescriptive statistics and factor analysis.ImplicationsComprehensive ePortfolio platforms support and streamline student assessment in ways thatenrich their learning experience
engage in social entrepreneurial Ventures that seek to improve theQuality of Life of people in the (developed and) developing world by advancing high-tech, high-impact products and services.Mashavu41 is one example of a high-tech system being advanced towards a pilot implementationin Tanzania for Summer 2008. Mashavu enables medical professionals to e-adopt children in thedeveloping world using modern technology and communications infrastructure. Trainedoperators at Mashavu stations in developing communities collect essential medical informationincluding images, body temperature, lung capacity, blood pressure, and stethoscope rhythms foreach child on a regular basis. Web servers aggregate this information from various Mashavustations over a cell
ice-breaking sessions included in the forum, with 63.2% of surveyed studentsreporting that the ice-breaking sessions were helpful in bringing them out of their comfort zoneand facilitating their engagement with other students (Fig 3A).Post-GSF Analysis. Overall, GSF appears to have had a positive impact on its participants. At theconclusion of the forum 91.7% of interviewed subjects agreed that working in groups during theforum helped them to develop an appreciation for diversity in teams (Fig 4A) and 97.9% saidthat GSF was helpful to them in developing methods to overcome cultural/language barriers (Fig4A). The combination of these results show that GSF had a strong influence on its participants interms of learning how to gain an
advantage of opportunities to receive formal TCinstruction reported a significantly positive impact on their ability to function successfully asengineers. Their TC capabilities helped them advance their careers, often providing“differentiating” value to their employers.Moreover, as Figure 1 shows, the greater the amount and intensity of TC instruction and qualifiedfeedback, the greater the benefit. Those graduates with a high TC index8, 11 reported that their TCproficiency helped them obtain and adjust to their jobs, work well in teams, garner recognitionand promotion, and build confidence. Those who left college without good communication skillsreported they belatedly realized the importance of these skills—and recommended making thepresently
key finds at the other sites. 8. Explore the careers of select engineers to highlight how the progression can flow. a. Share stories on an inclusive gallery of engineers and activities so that any student might see themselves in the lives of the engineers presented. b. Students scroll through many engineering-based snapshots with descriptions to spotlight the vast reach of engineering roles. c. Student product is a multimedia creation of an aspect that they found inspiring. 9. Explore specific engineering activities, and look to the future. a. Provide multimedia presentations of engineering feats, such as “Dream Big” to include their inception and impact
losing 20% of its faculty. The remaining faculty were overwhelmed with the prospect ofincreased service load on top of new faculty mentoring. A grant team focused on URM student retentionexplored support options for the new faculty and discovered that a faculty training program atSacramento State had been successful. The purpose of that group was to help faculty learn technologicaltools to improve student learning. Participants were given a small, $1000 stipend to purchase hardwareand software, or to engage in conference travel/attendance (9). Given their success, this programinspired collaborators to create a faculty learning community program on a modest budget. Thefacilitators who developed this program were recently tenured and did not hold
nature of advanced manufacturing, and concurrent with this shift in materials and thecorresponding changes in design and manufacturing processes is the need to train the workforceof today and tomorrow in these technologies. This paper presents the collaboration betweenWayne State University and Washtenaw Community College on an NSF project to develop anintegrated curriculum in the emerging technologies surrounding lightweight materials properties,optimization and manufacturing processes. The goal of this project is to engage industry andeducators in developing a talent pipeline and initial curriculum addressing the materialproperties, design for manufacturability and manufacturing processes, as well as optimizationand manufacturing processes
. Gunawardena, C.N. and McIsaac, M.S., 2013. Distance education. In the Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 361-401). Routledge.2. Lubarda, M., Delson, N., Schurgers, C., Ghazinejad, M., Baghdadchi, S., Phan, A., Minnes, M., Relaford-Doyle, J., Klement, L., Sandoval, C. and Qi, H., 2021, October. Oral exams for large-enrollment engineering courses to promote academic integrity and student engagement during remote instruction. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.3. Jamieson, M.V., 2020. Keeping a learning community and academic integrity intact after a mid-term shift to online learning in chemical engineering design during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal
the societal impacts of engineering and that students should learnhow to identify and negotiate work related ethical dilemmas. Some differences were found in thefrequency that challenges and goals/opportunity-related themes were used between gender,tenured/tenure-track (T/TT) vs. non-T/TT, and institution types. The paper provides aninteresting view of faculty perspectives on teaching ethical issues.IntroductionThe meaningful inclusion of ethics in engineering education often seems to be a challenge inprograms which are already packed full of technical content. Previous work has pointed tosystemic barriers such as a prioritization of technical content, lack of emotional engagement bystudents, or inadequate preparation of faculty as reasons
were students. Faculty were supported with teaching resources and byattending three one-on-one hour-long sessions with the FLC facilitator. They also administeredthree “micromoment” activities (2-30 minutes) in their classes, which gave them an opportunityto start with simple implementations of EML in the classroom.With strong community support, immediate implementation of the pedagogy, and focus on valueto participants, the UNC-Chapel Hill KEEN FLC (UNC KEEN FLC) is a model for faculty toimprove their teaching and to create enriched student experiences. By making the pedagogicalchanges manageable, faculty are more likely to be successful in implementing and sustaining thispractice. In this paper, we describe how this three-year FLC was
division course because of the need forcompletion of all lower division requirements from the California Community College System. Page 22.212.2Six of the lectures are ethics, including one course introduction, the two Aristotle lectures, onelecture on the Code of Engineering Ethics, one lecture on ethical reasoning applied to casestudies and one class period for the ethics midterm. Given the brief time with the students, thepurchase of a textbook seems unnecessary, and the concepts of Aristotle are presented as afoundation for the code of engineering ethics.The learning objectives for the course related to engineering ethics are relatively low
aircraft engineer. Her research and professional interests include faculty development, innovations in engineering communication education, engineering student learning motivation, and nar- rative structure in technical communication.Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida Director of Undergraduate Laboratories, Faculty Lecturer, Department of Materials Science and Engi- neeringDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli, Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering and research associate professor of engineering education at University of Michigan (U-M), earned B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from U-M in 1988, 1989, and 1993, respectively. Prior to joining U
Page 13.673.6programmed with more flexibility. In these instances, the assessment processes and the learningjournals help spot the opportunity to introduce any given topic. For instance, it is foreseeable thatwhen the MT team members start observing project team meetings and providing feedback toteam leaders, some of these may contradict the feedback received and argue against the MT teammembers. Then, students are ready to be instructed on the “Giving and receiving constructivefeedback” topic.A Leadership Competency Dictionary has been created to support both this education processand the majority of assessment processes described in subsection III.2. In the first place, thisdictionary provides students with a framework of high-impact
Page 8.650.5 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationScience Teacher's Association (NSTA), and is available at a nominal cost from the websitewww.exploringphysics.com.According to Professor Chandrasekhar, the ingredients which have made this program acontinuing success included clearly defined themes, hands-on activities, and “take homegadgets” to engage student interest, and involvement of both parents and teachers who deal withthe students to influence attitudes and reinforce lessons learned by the children. Moreinformation about this program can be obtained from the project websitehttp
internships.This paper discusses some of the challenges in the program and some projects that arebeing used to enhance engineering education of the students. It discusses the impact theNASA-UMES Summer Internship Program has on the education of the engineeringstudents. It also covers a senior design project arising from this internship program.Furthermore, it discuses First Year Engineering Students collaboration with the AviationSciences Program, and a Doppler Radar Study project involving engineering students.Key Terms – Industry Partnerships, Tri-cycle training device, summer internship, seniordesign project, Doppler radar 1. INTRODUCTIONThe University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES), an Historically Black Land-grantUniversity, is a teaching
AC 2007-1602: FEMALE STUDENT VIEWS ABOUT IT CAREERS IN HIGHSCHOOL AND COLLEGECarol Burger, Virginia Tech Carol J. Burger, Associate Professor, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Virginia Tech, USA. She is the coordinator for the Science and Gender Equity Program at Virginia Tech. She is the founder and editor of the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, now in its 10th year of publication. She served as Senior Program Director, Program for Women and Girls, National Science Foundation in 1996. She has published over 50 immunology and SET equity research papers, book chapters, and monographs, and she is the co-investigator on several NSF-funded
marginalization in engineering spaces. Manystudents experience a chilly climate and feel the need to navigate engineering spaces using avariety of techniques, such as passing, covering, and compartmentalizing (Cech & Waidzunas,2011; Hughes, 2017; Farrell, 2017; Cech & Rothwell, 2018; Yoshino, 2006). This identity workcauses significant strain on LGBTQ+ engineering students, often resulting in a lowered sense ofbelonging in engineering, higher levels of anxiety and stress, less engagement with engineeringactivities, and poorer academic performance (Cech and Waidzunas, 2011). To alleviate this chilly climate, universities and engineering departments are creatingdesignated diverse and inclusive spaces that intend to foster community among
impacting students in other areas of lifecommon task for engineers. In a first-year engineering and school. One specific example that could be investigatedcourse, students were asked to track the time spent on is in teams with males and females are femalestheir design and build robot project. Students had disproportionately working on tasks like documentationdifferent category choices to select. Based on these rather than the other areas of the projecttimesheets the students were to use this data when This work-in-progress paper investigates students’reporting on their project. The results from the timesheet responses from a survey about completing the timesheets