the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered, professional and practice-oriented mission of Northeastern University.Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame is an Assistant Academic Specialist at Northeastern University. As part of her Gateway Faculty appointment she teaches freshman engineering courses as well as undergraduate civil engineering courses.Dr. B. Kris Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly Kris Jaeger, PhD has been a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a select group of full-time faculty
utilitywhich is one’s perceived value of the information towards future goals, (2) engineering programbelongingness which is one’s sense of connection to the engineering group, and (3) programexpectancy which is how well one expects to perform the engineering work. These constructs ofidentity are developed by “[students’] continued perceptions of engineering-related courses,motivational beliefs, choices and effort, and academic outcomes” [22, pp. 1342].The results of this work show that a student’s level of development of their engineering identitywas a significant predictor of whether students intended to persist into an engineering career.Jones et al. offers the example of a student who feels recognized in their engineering programbut does not
completed their Ph.D. in Engineering Education (’22) and M.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics (’21) at Purdue University, and two B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education at the University of Nevada, Reno (’17). Atop their education, Justin is a previous NSF Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 ASEE ERM Division Best Diversity Paper for their work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and food-insecure student, Justin is eager to challenge and change engineering engineering education to be a pathway for socioeconomic mobility and broader systemic improvement rather than an additional
http://www.fmb.org.ukFMS Federation of Materials Societies http://www.materialsocieties.org/Geochemical Society http://www.geochemsoc.org/Geological Society of America http://www.geosociety.org/HFES Human Factors and Ergonomics Society http://www.hfes.orgICSI Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement http://www.icsi.org/IEST Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology http://www.iest.org/IHI Institute for Healthcare Improvement http://www.ihi.org/INFORMS Institute for Operations Research and Management http://www.informs.orgSciences
interests re- lated to technology and society, gender diversity and engineering education.Dr. Marja Talikka, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology My research interest concerns the effects of brief, integrated information literacy education on undergrad- uate students’ research behavior. My teaching experience consists of over 30 years of information literacy education within higher education. Over the years, the content and educational methods have changed greatly. We have moved from library user education to teaching students to understand their information need as part of their research problem. Digitalization has changed teaching methods from plain classroom teaching to using a wide variety of different tools
manufacturers and educational institutions. The partnership betweenCBIA with the RCNGM was a significant foundation to build a statewide outreach initiative withand had the capacity to spearhead the expansion of the Waterbury pilot from a regional focus to astatewide program. Therefore, the idea of a statewide careers expo would provide momentum tothe existing campaign. With the support and leadership of several manufacturing associations,manufacturers and the COT-RCNGM, CBIA formed a Planning Steering Committee todetermine the feasibility of putting on this statewide manufacturing careers event.After several meetings, the Steering Committee decided that the most cost effective and efficientway to make the greatest impact would be to produce a
article is particularly important to the work described here. Like many peoplein the engineering education research community we are engaged in reform efforts throughoutour department, college, university and university system. We are well aware of the gap betweenthe development and deployment of effective practices in our community [5], [7]. As reformersseeking to be informed, we are drawn to this third category of literature in the hopes of avoidingcommon pitfalls and developing new practices.In a recent guest editorial in the Journal of Engineering Education Herman and Lowenstein(2017) distilled these findings into guiding principles for what they called “evidence-basedchange practices.” Citing a broad range of literature they argue that
, first to the end of 2016, and then into the2017 spring semester. During this time, one additional research group was added.Program AssessmentWhether in clinical or research settings, the literature notes the difficulties librarians haveencountered when trying to evaluate the impact of embedded librarian services. Previous reviewsof clinical librarian services have discussed the challenge of identifying direct impacts,suggesting that forming casual links between information services and impacts on majoroutcomes such as improved patient care is “difficult if not impossible.”52 However, Brettle etal.’s systematic review of the effectiveness of clinical librarian services concludes that clinicallibrarians have created a satisfactory service model
math and science (STEM subjects) …challenges facing education today in the U.S.include staying competitive, closing minority gaps, closing gender gaps and improving teacherpreparation” (para. 2). This decline has enabled many other developed nations to surpass the U.S.in degree attainment in STEM disciplines, especially in engineering, resulting in a significantgrowth in the science and engineering workforce in other countries (National ScienceFoundation, 2003). According to the National Science Foundation (2003), the U.S. currentlyranks fourteenth in the world in the percentage of students earning a first degree in a science orengineering discipline compared to its rank of third in 1975. In addition, while the overallnumber of students
to use our new understanding inthe process of improving pedagogy. Thus, the work described in this paper seeks to provide newunderstandings: (1) spanning multiple professions; (2) identifying the various concepts thatarchitecture and civil engineering students hold about the generation of new designs; and (3)describing how these conceptualizations compare within and between fields.This is a work in progress. Our first phase of study has been to run a pilot. To date, we havedesigned the study, gained approval to proceed from our ethics review board, collected three pilotinterviews, revised the study design and protocols, requested and received ethics approval toexpand the sample group in repose to findings of the pilot. In this paper we
it is solving complex societal problems when its professionals do notadequately represent the values and perspectives of our whole society. Fundamental to this paperis the belief that society at large will benefit from gender balance in engineering education.One practical problem exists. Simply put, we need to improve the rate at which girls select andsuccessfully complete certain prerequisite courses in high school (e.g., physics and math). Theseare gateways to post-secondary engineering programs. Our paper responds to the problem bylooking at why teenage girls with an interest in and aptitude for science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) opt out of engineering pathways. Our approach is to present a Toronto-basedproject that took a
, Game Theory, and Software Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Innovative Activities to Teach Computer Science Concepts Inside the Classroom and at Outreach EventsTeaching an introductory course in computer programming can be challenging. Additionally,introducing grade school, middle school, and high school students to computer science without acomputer lab seems impossible. The activities presented in this paper do not require a computerlab and can be done with a range of age groups, any number of people, and people with no priorcomputer experience. The goal is to introduce various topics using fun physical activities andeveryday experiences that are familiar
government to effect change in education and foster economic development.Luis F. Font, Ana G. Mendez University System Luis F. Font has a B.S. in Biological Sciences from University of Puerto Rico; and a M.B.A. in Marketing from Universidad Metropolitana of Puerto Rico. Luis has been working with students for his entire pro- fessional career. In 2005 he started as an Auxiliary Librarian helping and orientating students with their academic work. Later, he became AHORA Program Coordinator at Metropolitan University where he administrated the entire academic organization and execution programs in education, business and com- puter sciences. Luis has worked as Business Administration Professor where he teaches Marketing and
tasks and largely determine the usability, performance, and cost-effectivenessof a plant or unit. These in turn have a direct effect on the safety and environmental compatibilityof the plant or unit in subsequent operation.”3. An Approachable Process Model. The two-step FEED-Solution (F-S) design process modelis simple for students to understand, and as such, it is very likely to improve student learning. InFigure 2, we show the F-S model for the case of market pull. Since the market is the driver ofthis process, we refer to it as market driven. This is distinct from the case in which an invention(technology push), a spin-off (from say R&D), or public policy is the driver. None of thereferenced engineering design texts teach this F-S model
research method effectively to explore complexresearch questions, one must realize that the choice of place represents a crucial piece of researchdesign. The researchers must think about their purpose in order to inform the design of thisresearch. Moreover, not all data carries the same ease of collection. Without carefulconsideration of the inquiry’s purpose, researchers can easily create significant additional workfor themselves that adds no value to the results. One key way to add value to the study is toconsider relevance to a broader community, whether that community is a research community ora community of practice. Furthermore, knowing the audience allows researchers to generatelogically connected questions. The choice of place directly
Engineering Educationrecord of academic performance and a clearer understanding of “research”. However, if theexperiment of picking out a freshman succeeds, a wealth of positive effects ensues.The faculty member can work with this student for up to four years - which is about the timeequivalent of having a Ph.D. student - and this time span allows for serious progress. Facultymembers at primarily undergraduate institutions often complain about the lack of researchinteractions with students and successfully including freshmen and sophomores in their researchcan bring continuity to their group and an opportunity for more in–depth work.The student benefits by gaining individual attention and mentoring, as well as by learningoutside the classroom and
core subjects like science. Regardless of the grade level,course name, or area of expertise; engineering educators must carefully consider the tradeoffsand synergies of technology integration through the lens of broad, liberatory student outcomesthat move beyond academic achievement alone.Author positionalityEducation is political, and it can never be objective or neutral.3 Educational researchers inparticular need to interrogate our positionality4 by asking three questions. Why this? Why now?Why me? My unique identity constellation, my experiences, my values, and my context are allrelevant to this work. I am a woman with a privileged racial identity who is a graduate student ata predominantly white institution. I approach this paper from the
manufacturing being a dirty and non-technical career, allmanufacturing related education programs have experienced difficulty in recruiting students totheir programs1. Additionally, manufacturing’s increasingly technical methods, requiredinnovativeness, and the emergence of advanced manufacturing technologies have necessitatedcontinuous improvement of manufacturing engineering programs. Succumbing to thesepressures, some undergraduate manufacturing engineering programs have even begun to close,despite the high demand for the graduates of these programs. This paper will examine strategiesthat the University of Wisconsin-Stout has deployed to keep its manufacturing engineeringprogram one of the largest and most vibrant in the face of these
followingengineering disciplines were represented by the team: civil, architectural, industrial, chemicaland mechanical. The team performed a structural analysis of an historically significant buildingon campus, the Maybeck Chapel, designed by renowned architect Bernard R. Maybeck. Datacollection involved using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, tocapture aerial photographs of the structure for detailed analysis. The selected methodology forconducting the project was a typical Engineering Design Process used primarily as a teachingtool to demonstrate the value and effectiveness of adhering to a standard, structured method foridentifying the project objectives; collecting data; organizing and analyzing the accumulatedinformation; and
engineering education.Dr. Donald P. Gaver, Tulane University Donald Gaver is Chair of the Biomedical Engineering Department and Director of the Interdisciplinary Bioinnovation PhD Program at Tulane University. In addition, he directs research in Tulane’s Biofluid Mechanics Laboratory, which aims to develop an understanding of the interrelationship between the me- chanical and physicochemical behavior of biological systems. These investigations focus on the pul- monary system with the goal of developing improved therapies for pulmonary diseases such as infant and acute respiratory distress syndrome (RDS and ARDS) and the prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). At present, his research focuses on study of the
SwampSat, many students wereinterested in the payload (i.e., CMGs) for SwampSat. However, participants had a hard timeunderstanding the principles of angular momentum. Thus, SSG decided to develop a safe and aninteractive physical system for participants to understand the principles of angular momentum.Several proof of concepts and prototypes were assessed before the decision was made toconstruct the gyro-chair. The objective was for participants to sit on the chair and physically feelthe gyroscopic effects. With the objectives, operation plans, and requirements identified, theprocess began with a design and a prototype was developed. Upon initial functionality tests, theprototype was deemed unsafe and design improvements were engineered. The
provides a similar set offeatures. This work serves as an improvement to the earlier research and work done in thearea of mobile Laboratories under iLab.Keywords: Android, iLabs, mobile Service BrokerI. INTRODUCTIONOnline laboratories are experimental setups that can be accessed and performed over theInternet. With online labs, anyone can perform experiments from anywhere in the world atany time. Online laboratories have several benefits. By making labs sharable online, thenumber of users of online labs scale up dramatically, particularly with the fact that online labscan be performed round the clock with no need for a physical lab attendant present at the labfor each lab session. Hence with the rising cost of undergraduate laboratory
researchers and evaluators,practicing teachers and software engineers working together to develop the technologies as wellas curricular projects. Project development includes multiple cycles of usability testing andformative evaluation, with eventual implementation in middle and high school classrooms.Usability Studies To collect information about the effectiveness and usability of WISEngineering, studieswere conducted with a convenience sample of students enrolled in two college courses at anortheastern university. Usability testing was conducted to provide valuable information for theinstructional design and technology development32. Information on the interplay of the users,tasks, tools, and environment was gathered to see where users may
teams comprised of partners from different nations and cultural backgrounds;particularly in the emerging fields of nanotechnology research. The NSF-PIRE grant that fundsthe NanoJapan Program supports a U.S.‐Japanese partnership exploring terahertz (THz or 1012Hz) dynamics in nanostructures. The electromagnetic spectrum from 0.1 to 10 THz offers manyopportunities to study physical phenomena, with potential payoff in numerous technologies. Bycombining THz technology and nanotechnology, we can advance our understanding of THzphysics while improving and developing THz devices. Japanese universities are logical partnersfor our research and educational collaborations due to the heavy investments being made innanotechnology research in both countries
-driven conceptual structure ofengineering coursework. The two can be difficult to integrate into a single course context [14].One strategy for the integration of PBL into the civil and environmental engineering context canbe through its integration with data-science coursework using Geographic Information Systems(GIS). Visual and spatial thinking, such as sketching and drawing, are frequently referenced asvaluable teaching process for open-ended thinking [15]–[18]. Bringing together such spatialexploration with geographic and site-based investigation, GIS provides an opportunity forengineering students to interact with the site, integrate a community-focused lens, and leveragespatially-based thinking, all the while developing skills in new
, industry tours, tutoring, and internship preparation assistance,chosen to address the expected needs of the student population. To select students to enter theprogram, an application with four essays and demographic information was developed. In orderto select applicants from this pool, the team needed a method for analyzing these applications.Rubrics are often used to rate the quality of a submission, whether graded work submitted by astudent, a report or performance for a competition, a paper presented to a journal or conference,or myriad other situations. Faculty are often trying to improve rubrics, and engineering educatorsare no exception – there are 3869 results for the term “rubric” in ASEE’s PEER repository [8],ranging from apps to help
Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innoDr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is s Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technologyˆa C™s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education throughJoycelyn Wilson, Georgia Institute of Technology Joycelyn Wilson is an educational anthropologist and assistant professor of Black media studies in the School of Literature, Media, and Communication (LMC) at Georgia Tech. Her current area of inquiry focuses on hip
power electronics courses offeredat RPI. The goal of this exercise was to connect the circuitry and designs introduced in thelecture with physical components and to better utilize students’ time.The Laboratory Activities consist of two parts. The first part includes Magnetization and MotorExperiments such as the coin flipper which energizes a flat spiral coil. The resulting eddy currenteffect launches a coin more than thirty feet into the air. Various combinations and types of coinsare studied, allowing further discussion on the effects of conductivity and eddy currents. TheBeakman’s Motor project is prefaced with the segment from the humorous television episode[14], where the basic principles of how an electromagnet interacts with a permanent
Engineering from the University of Vir- ginia and she received her Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering from Texas A&M University, where she concentrated on Industrial Engineering and Management. Her research interests include: Broadening Participation, Faculty and Graduate Student Development, International/Global Education, Teamwork and Team Effectiveness, and Quality Control and Manage- ment. In 2003, she received the CAREER award from the Engineering Education and Centers Division of the National Science Foundation. Dr. Adams is a leader in the advancement and inclusion of all in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. She has worked with numerous of colleges and universities
program. Greg has serves on numerous non-profit boards and has consulted with local and regional industry in human resource training. Greg currently incorporates storytelling as a teaching pedagogy in his courses and he led K-State in a Diversity Storytelling Project Page 15.107.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Triple Play: Mathematics, Baseball, and StorytellingAbstractThere are many effective teaching pedagogies. One way we have found to produce results is tocombine the use of storytelling about baseball in mathematics classes. This paper will illustrate apositive relationship