Paper ID #37504Board 25: Work in Progress: Teaching Fundamental Design Principlesthrough Integration of Knowledge and Curriculum DesignDr. Adel Alhalawani, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Adel Alhalawani’s teaching interests include engineering design, biomechanics, statics and mechanics of materials, biomaterials and design of manufacturing. His research has focused on bio-glass based adhesives for orthopedic applications and dental-based adhesives.Prof. Renee D. Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Bill Weiner, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Alan Chiu, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
tobe difficult; small-to-midsize institutions may not have the funding available to outfit alaboratory with robotics systems that cost $20k or more per station. Following feedback fromour industry advisory board (IAB) members, as well as industry partners, a need was determinedto find a way to incorporate these topics into the curriculum with our already limited resources.Faculty members presented a solution by retrofitting several outdated robots, currently in ourpossession, with newer technologies. These 30+ year-old robots had been slated for disposal dueto age, but after some exploration, it was determined that they could be salvaged and updated.The project entailed reverse engineering motor driver circuits, developing new hardware
VLSI Design 2) Advanced VLSI Design 3) Embedded Systems Architecture 4) System-on-Chip (SoC) DesignThese courses were co-developed and are currently co-taught by full-time faculty and adjunctfaculty from industry. There are a number of key benefits associated with using both full-timeand adjunct faculty including timely access to state of the art teaching material, feedback onfuture directions in the design of complex silicon systems, support in developing new curriculummaterial and immediate feedback on the capabilities of the students. The course sequence hasbeen taught in this format for a number of years. To support this approach with a maximum ofefficiency yet allow teaching adaptability, the course sequence is being optimized
steps for implementing this model—based on overcoming the numerous obstacles many engineering schools now face.4. The General Model: Description and DiscussionIn view of these needs and experience, we propose the general model depicted in Figure 2. Thisfigure illustrates a roadmap our Center for Technical Communication is using as a basis forhelping the engineering school and its departments determine how and where to implement TCinstruction within the existing curriculum. Adapting a highly successful model developed by UB’s“Student Excellence Initiatives”15.5, we work together to introduce the TC knowledge sets andpractice scenarios that support the continuously increasing degree of difficulty students face as
2004-329 An Educational Multimedia Package for Integration of Photobioprocesses and Photobioreactors into the Biotechnology Education Curriculum Abdolmajid Lababpour, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan E-mail: 008d901n@y02.kobe-u.ac.jpIntroduction Biotechnology techniques influence every one’s life in the form of new foods, medicines andmany other products that some of which are obtained by Photobioprocesses [1,2,3]. Also, cultivation
develop curriculum that improve students’ contributionto society and that encourage students to seek opportunities to create value when designing. Thismodule has the potential to meet the need of higher-educational institutions’ mission to supportDEI initiatives on campuses.Keywords: student engagement, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), Entrepreneurial-MindedLearning (EML), Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN) frameworkIntroductionHigher education institutions are currently seeking new approaches to address the new ABETcriteria to include diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice in engineering education. Institutions arecurrently seeking methods to integrate DEI into curriculum, assessment, workplace climate,faculty practice and
creativeproblem solving and educational foci outside of traditional engineering disciplines, including ininterdisciplinary areas such as robotics and energy studies as well as in thematic areas thatotherwise could only be covered via electives such as community development, corporatesustainability, and STEM teaching. A “focus area” component of the curriculum was included asa mechanism for achieving these diverse goals.Our program’s first incoming cohort arrived Fall 2019, so those students suffered the disruptionsof the Covid-19 pandemic in the midst of their second college semester. Nevertheless, 17students graduated in May 2023—our first full cohort of program graduates. Despite thepandemic disruptions, we continued to iterate and improve our program
Professional Engineer (Alaska), Project Management Professional, LEED Accredited Professional in Building Design and Construction, and Envision Sustainability Professional. His research interests include engineering education; infrastructure; sustainable design; and clean, renewable energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Integrating Professional Credentialing in Sustainability into Civil Engineering Curriculum: A Case StudyAbstractThe concept of sustainable development rose to prominence with the publication of OurCommon Future as an output of the United Nations’ Brundtland Commission. Recently,increased emphasis on the impacts of climate change and globalization has
background inmathematics and simultaneously ensure its relevancy and technology advancement contemporaneousness.Students from different traditional engineering disciplines, such as electrical, computer and mechanicalengineering, and also from non-traditional technology-based disciplines have different courserequirements and depth in core mathematics, static systems, dynamic systems, systems modeling, powersystems and electronics. Developing a course curriculum which crosses over multiple programs anddisciplines and yet is relevant to a broad class of students is difficult. This paper describes some resultsfrom a concerted effort to accomplish the inclusion of a multi-disciplinary content in a new multi-department course series. The hybrid vehicle
. Students in the program take three courses before the beginning of their secondyear. One of these three courses is the Professional Planning with Spatial Visualization coursewhich implements the Sorby’s Developing Spatial Thinking curriculum. This paper addresses thequestion: What are the effects of the spatial thinking curriculum on the spatial abilities of low-income sophomore summer scholars?Students take the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R) and theRevised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test (RMPFBT) as a pre- and post-assessment for thisprogram. The PSVT:R is traditionally administered as a pre/post assessment of spatialvisualization in engineering majors. In this work, it was chosen to assess knowledge
Paper ID #37736MATLAB Curriculum Based in Experimental Setups withAuthentic Data Collection and Analysis ExperiencesBrian Patrick O'connell (Associate Teaching Professor) Brian O'Connell is an Associate teaching professor in the First-Year Engineering program at Northeastern University. His undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering came from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 2006. He then worked for Kollmorgen Electro/Optical as a mechanical engineer developing periscopes and optronic masts. In 2011, he returned to academia at Tufts University, earning his MS and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering for
AC 2012-4686: INTEGRATING ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATIONINTO AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM THROUGH SERVICE LEARN-ING AND THE LIBERAL ARTSDr. Katherine Hennessey Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering Katherine Hennessey Wikoff is an Associate Professor in the General Studies Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering, where she teaches courses in communication, literature, film studies, and political science.Dr. Michael Hoge Carriere, Milwaukee School of Engineering Michael Carriere is an Assistant Professor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, where he teaches courses on American history, public policy, political science, environmental studies, and urban design. He has written for such publications as the
how to assess their effectiveness inachieving instructional goals. Instructors are commonly led to believe that they must embracethe technology prior to seeing how to best position it in their classroom. This type of approachcan lead to improper utilization of media, instructor frustration, dissatisfaction, and low learnerretention of concepts. The use of rich media in the construction management curriculum isdiscussed and reviewed. An assessment tool is developed for the appropriateness, design,utilization, and refinement of this media in achieving instructional goals, taking inspiration fromthe prime leaders in the field of Educational Technology and Instructional Design, to allowinstructors in construction management to determine the best
of Engineering Education(BEEd), of the National Research Council in cooperation with the National Aeronautics andSpace Administration (NASA), the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Academy ofEngineering, The Boeing Company, and Xerox Corporation.For the authors, this report highlights emphasizing the view that engineering education shouldbe that of a systems perspective requiring fluid and continuous interaction among schoolfaculty, administration, professional societies, federal agencies, accrediting bodies and industryto produce the desired educational outputs.Pertinent to curriculum design issues we can extract the following points:- Development of a highly adaptable and flexible system- Integration of both fundamentals with exposure
students were also given a survey to assess their confidence in their choice of engineeringmajor and in their preparation for and ability in certain aspects related to an engineeringcurriculum. This paper examines the impact of spatial visualization skills as measured by thePSVT:R on the students’ confidence levels at the beginning and at the end of their first year in anengineering curriculum. Spatial skills of students selecting different majors are compared todetermine if spatial skills may be a factor in a person’s choice of major (e.g., do mostmechanical engineering majors have highly developed spatial visualization skills while morecomputer engineering majors have less developed spatial visualization skills?). These analysesare also
Paper ID #42540Is Curriculum Complexity Related to Study Abroad Participation? A Cross-MajorComparison at One UniversityDr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores the intentional design and assessment of global engineering programs, student development through experiential learning, and approaches for teaching and assessing systems thinking skills. Kirsten holds a B.S. in Engineering & Management from Clarkson University and an M.A.Ed. in Higher Education, M.S. in Systems Engineering, and Ph.D. in
researchprojects. The course already existed in the curriculum and the GCMs were introduced beforeteams started working together. The emphasis on competency focused on self-reportedintercultural communication skills development. Walter et al. [10] reported on an interestingmixture of synchronous and asynchronous resources that led undergraduate STEM studentsfrom four countries through a design based process to consider how to support healthinterventions in low resourced regions. Global engineering competency was collected froman ad hoc Likert scale survey focused on student attitudes to the collaboration experience.Alternatively, one can choose to integrate validated, but also intensive, case study tools. Forexample, Mazzurco, Jesiek & Godwin [11
helpEngineering majors acquire a strong foundation in core competencies; i.e., in: (1) analysis, (2)applications, (3) design and modeling, (4) communication, and (5) professionalism. Thecurriculum has also been designed to provide cohesiveness between the different courses in agiven term so that students can focus on common topics from the perspective of each of the fivecompetency-areas and see the interconnectedness of the material they are learning in all fiveclasses. Although, the integrated curriculum approach was developed in the late-80s, it has notbeen widely adopted due to various obstacles at the individual, departmental, and institutionallevels. Many of these obstacles are common to strategies that require major transformation in anengineering
two specific objectives: (1) to provide ECE students with fundamental and contempo-rary BME knowledge for future career and graduate study opportunities; and (2) to improve stu-dents’ interest in and comprehension of ECE concepts by acquainting them with engineering so-lutions to real world problems in medicine. These objectives are achieved by integrating a set ofexperiments – designed to demonstrate a wide spectrum of BME concepts – into core ECEcourses, along with a new elective providing a comprehensive BME overview. Expected outcome of this project is a learning paradigm, serving as a model for integratingnovel content into core engineering curriculum. If proven successful, the full development of thisapproach can serve as a building
construction curriculum will requiremore than its use in Engineering and Architectural design courses. It would need to find ways ofusing the broader capabilities for time and cost management, and the increasing use of electronicdata storage and retrieval. Page 25.1317.3 \\\\ Figure 1: The BIM Maze2A Definition of IPDThe development of IPD is hardly modern. Most of the principles underlying the integration ofthe project team are derived from W. Edwards Deming's work with Toyota in the 1950s. Hiswork on productivity improvement and optimization in management through the use of systemsthinking is
concepts into current manufacturing capability is quicklyleading to a demand for this knowledge and these skills when evaluating recently graduated,entry-level professionals. Integrating concepts related to the IIoT early in a curriculum will bebeneficial as we look to add related coursework throughout our programs. By establishing thisfoundation of knowledge early, we can build subsequent learning experiences with a level ofconfidence that students have a basic understanding necessary to support continued and morecomplex learning.For example, in this learning approach, students will explore the particulars of themicrocontroller boards such as the Arduino development environment. The learning journeybegins with hands-on experiences, guiding them
engineeringtopics and skills. Bucciarelli, Drew, and colleagues have developed example modules of thistype. One explores the historical development of the engineering of cantilever beam failure, alesson that brings together the history and philosophy of science with static mechanics. Eachmodule is problem-based and benefits from collaborative instruction. The LSE model has alsobeen suggested as a “transformative solution” to the persistent problem of low enrollment ofwomen in STEM majors and careers [10]. Although some courses and online modules in theLSE mold exist, the broader curriculum remains, according to the authors, a “sociotechnicalimaginary” useful for demonstrating to conventional engineering educators that real integrationwith the humanities is
school and college levels.Stacee Harmon, Oklahoma State UniversityRichard Bryant, Oklahoma State University Page 12.556.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Distinguishing the Art from the Science of Teaching within Research-Based Curriculum Development and AssessmentAbstract In order to create a researched-based discipline, the distinction between the art ofteaching and the science of teaching must be made. Without this distinction, there can be nodialogue to objectify teaching and allow it to be critically analyzed critically, separate from thecontent of the subject being taught. For the past
software simulation of dynamic systems funded by NASA Johnson Space Center through CACI company. Dr. Lin is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 1 Session XXXXFinite Element Analysis and Design as a Degree Requirement in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Shield B. Lin Mechanical Engineering Department Prairie View A&M University
component level • Create the project-based environment to foster the application of engineering principles at different levels of system integration • Link the courses taught across the four-year curriculum (vertical integration of ECE courses) • Engage the students in faculty research projects on the centralized platformBibliography [1]. V. Mahnic, “A Capstone Course on Agile Software Development Using Scrum,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 55, Issue: 1, pp. 99-106, February 2012. [2]. D.F. Rico and H.H. Sayani, “Use of Agile Methods in Software Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the Agile Conference (AGILE '09), pp. 174-179, August 2009. [3]. D. Damian et al., “Teaching a globally distributed
breakdown of the board specifics and programming languageare based on Xilinx or Altera technology. Several of the (VHDL or Verilog) used by the surveyed institutions is notvendors and universities provide laboratory curriculum to help currently available but planned for the near future. The overallcourse development. Table 2 is a list of the development goal of this paper is not to impose on faculty members theboards used at the institution to teach digital systems using the methodology to revamp the course. On the contrary, it isHDL approach. While compiling the information it became designed to serve as a repository of useful information in aclear that there is not a standard/preferred used for this
AC 2008-2136: INTEGRATING SENSOR NETWORKS IN UNDERGRADUATECURRICULUM: A MARRIAGE BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICEAnbu Elancheziyan, Drexel UniversityJaudelice de Oliveira, Drexel UniversityFernand Cohen, Drexel UniversityFredricka Reisman, Drexel University Page 13.766.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Integrating Sensor Networks in Undergraduate Curriculum: A Marriage between Theory and PracticeIntroductionWireless Sensor Networks are composed of small nodes equipped with sensor(s), a wirelessradio, and limited computational power. Sensor nodes are used as data collectors and also in dataforwarding. The nodes collect the sensed data and
Paper ID #25732FOUNDATIONS – Integrating Evidence-based Teaching and Learning Prac-tices into the Core Engineering CurriculumDr. Gail P Baxter, Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Gail P. Baxter is the Co-Director, Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. Baxter leads CIESE research and evaluation efforts on several na- tional and statewide K-12 STEM curriculum development and teacher professional development pro- grams and she manages a program to support faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices in the core courses in the
with physical tools [4, 5] are often adopted in different scenarios. Generally speaking,it is believed that both simulations and hands-on experiments can achieve two anticipated goals:(1) to provide “experimental data to guide them [the students] in designing and developing aproduct” and (2) “to determine if a design performs as intended.” [1] When evaluated under thethree learning domains (cognitive domain, affective domain, and psychomotor domain), bothapproaches can achieve similar learning objectives under the cognitive domain. However, it isalso recognized that simulation-based learning experiences may not provide as strong learning astheir hands-on counterparts in the affective and psychomotor domains [6].At East Carolina University, an
Paper ID #17143Implementation and Usage of an Online Environment in a Chemical Engi-neering CurriculumKyle Joe Branch, University of Utah Kyle Branch is a third-year graduate student at the University of Utah Department of Chemical Engineer- ing. He has helped develop and teach two freshman courses, using the materials and methods described in this paper. His main research interest is in engineering education, focusing on the creation and analysis of interactive simulations for undergraduate chemical engineering courses.Prof. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Assistant Professor (Lecturing