engineering laboratory course has evolved over several years to focus on serviceand ethics in the engineering profession. In 2016 a new laboratory module was designed for thecourse to encourage students to wrestle with ethical questions in the context of engineeringtechnical work. The module was developed as part of a larger pedagogical effort using backwarddesign across the full curriculum. The ethics implementation is also part of a curriculum-wideeffort to expose students to the broad facets of engineering ethics through courses.The new laboratory module was implemented as a low cost addition to the laboratory course.Students reported the new lung module significantly enhanced understanding of an engineeringcharge for ethical behaviors. They also
Paper ID #15103Capstone Design Projects: An Emphasis on Communication, Critical Think-ing, and AnalysisDr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Bayles, Ph.D., is a NTS Professor of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Petroleum Engi- neering Department at the University of Pittsburgh, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum development. c American Society for Engineering
picnic tables for the state fair. The product designs developed by the student teamsmust meet standards and regulations and cannot impose on a patented item. The product alsomust not already be manufactured by another similar non-profit organization and thus be incompetition for the spot in the “preferred” product catalog.Figure 2: Student work on a plan to assemble and charge fire extinguishers at the non-profitagency.In order to perform this design students must understand the “art and science of planning,organizing, allocating resources, and directing and controlling activities that have a technologicalcomponent” 3 which is the definition of engineering management according to ASEM. Studentsare introduced to some of these topics in lecture
to examine growth. Inaddition, we plan to integrate and expand the project into a course sequence and addressadditional engineering topics.ReferencesDym, C.L., Wesner, J.W., Winner, L., “Social Dimensions of Engineering Design: Observationsfrom Mudd Design Workshop III”, Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1). pp 105-107, 2003"Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education", American Library Association,February 9, 2015. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (Accessed December 10, 2019)Document ID: b910a6c4-6c8a-0d44-7dbc-a5dcbd509e3fBarron, Brigid JS, Daniel L. Schwartz, Nancy J. Vye, Allison Moore, Anthony Petrosino, LindaZech, and John D. Bransford. "Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project
AC 2007-1129: A SMALL-SCALE DESIGN AND BUILD PROJECT INBIOCHEMICAL TREATMENTMichael Butkus, U.S. Military Academy Page 12.114.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007A Small-Scale Design and Build Project in Biochemical TreatmentIntroductionEnvironmental engineers as well as engineers in other engineering disciplines, apply their skillsin a dynamic environment where single solutions are the exception rather than the rule.Additional “significant experiences” are required to help students develop a holistic appreciationfor professional practice issues and including open ended problem solving to prepare them forthe workplace.1 Such experiences should relate course material to
conceptstaught in the classroom. The competition added some extra elements to the course that otherwisewould not have been of such importance to the students. The competition pushed the students toconsider sustainable design, be innovative, professional and use the knowledge that they hadgained throughout their years as an engineering student. Gaining a better understanding ofengineering was important to the students as one of the students said, “I can finally put theknowledge that I’ve learned to use by applying it to the project and I can see how a group of Page 25.1380.8people would work together in the real world.” The competition allowed the
Paper ID #8673Online modules enable prerequisite review and mastery during design courses.Dr. Stephanie Butler Velegol, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Stephanie Butler Velegol received her BS in Chemical Engineering from Drexel University in 1996 and her PhD in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She taught for 2 years as a visiting Professor in Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University. She has been teaching Environmental Engineering courses in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Penn State University since 2009. She is pioneering the use of on-line courses for
LEGO Builds Bridge for Communication and Teamwork J.E. Miller-Young, R. Warrington, D. Patterson, C. Jefferies Mount Royal College, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaIntroductionIt is well recognized that engineering graduates require communication and teamwork skills inorder to succeed in the workplace. Unfortunately, the traditional model of lecture/tutorial/lab fordiscrete subjects emphasizes reliance on the instructor for the delivery of facts and well-established principles rather than teaching students what engineers really do – design, revise andtest solutions while analyzing and synthesizing the best available data and theories. Thus, theCanadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) and
culture of engineering to be more inclusive of diverse individuals and more in alignment with current research on decision-making. With a focus on qualitative research methods, she is working to better understand the ways in which undergraduate engineering students experience design and ill-structured problem solving. Her interests also include neuroscience, growth mindset, engineering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, Dr. Dringenberg is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve engineering education.Prof. Annie Abell, Ohio State University Annie Abell is an Assistant Professor of Practice at The Ohio State University in the Department
University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, formerly visiting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group at Stanford University. Barbara’s research focuses on four ar- eas: 1)grounding a blend of theories from social-cognitive psychology, engineering design, and art to show how cognition affects design; 2) changing the way people understand the emotion behind their work with the intent to do something new; 3) shifting norms of leaders involved in entrepreneurial-minded action; and 4) developing teaching methods with a storytelling focus in engineering and science educa- tion. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio: Barbara helps teams generate creative environments
few engineering curriculum reform in Taiwan to implement ABET EC-2000 intocurriculum planning.2. Features and Learning Difficulties of the Course “Mechanisms”The course “Mechanisms”, or used as another name “Kinematics” in curriculum of mechanicalengineering, belongs to a typical traditional course in comparison with the other courses onnewly developed technologies, such as “Biomechanics”, “MEMS” or “Nano-technologies” andso on. In general, the course “Mechanisms” is one of the “machine design” or “mechanism andmachine theory” series courses4. It and the other courses together, such as “Mechanics” and“Material Science”, provide the students fundamental knowledge and analysis abilities for“machine design” as Fig. 1 illustrated.The contents
architectural engineering from The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, in 2009, and his Ph.D. in architectural engineering from The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA in 2013. Dr. Solnosky is also a licensed Professional Engineer in PA. His research interests include: integrated structural design methodologies and processes; Innovative methods for enhancing engineering education; and high performing wall enclosures. These three areas look towards the next generation of building engineering, including how systems are selected, configured and designed. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Possibilities for Technology Enhanced Active Learning
and mechanical systems. Each of the focus classes has a significant design project.In the first semester, students are introduced to the design process through an open-ended projectin the Introduction to Engineering course. During the sophomore and junior years, thecurriculum develops specific skills (such as setting design goals and objectives, using analysisand testing in open-ended problems) as well as helping students understand the design process asa whole. In the final year, students are involved with a year-long culminating design project oftheir choosing. This incorporates all that they have learned about engineering design.This paper discusses the seven focus classes identified in Table 1. We will briefly explain thecontext of each
Paper ID #7575Interactive Bottle Recycler: A ”Green” Senior Design Project Case StudyDr. Ertunga C Ozelkan, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Ertunga C. Ozelkan, Ph.D., is Director and Associate Professor of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management, and the Associate Director of the Center for Lean Logistics and Engineered Systems at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Before joining academia, Dr. Ozelkan worked for i2 Tech- nologies, a leading supply chain software vendor and for Tefen USA, a systems design and industrial engineering consulting firm. Dr. Ozelkan holds a Ph.D. degree in Systems
Instructional Development: Students’ DataThe profile of students participating in our Graduate Nuclear Certificate program was discussedin section 2A and consists of industry personnel and/or graduate students who typically havesignificant experience and knowledge about the nuclear industry and are interested in building asolid understanding of nuclear engineering basics. The online version was developed usingWlodkowski’s2 five principles along with HPL criteria to accommodate these learnercharacteristics. In addition, course design took into account students’ survey responses fromthose who took the previous video teleconferencing version of the Nuclear EngineeringFundamentals course. Some of these responses included the following, “I have to say that
– humancentered design and engineering (HCDE) and computer science and engineering (CSE) – onefocused on understanding and designing around the human aspect of the problem, the otherfocused on the technical implementation of those human-centered designs. However, we alsobuild on the motivation and success of the work mentioned above in that the course focuses onprojects that have the potential to impact society in a positive way—in our case, in the context ofresource-constrained environments, and that it requires students to approach these projects inmultidisciplinary teams.Description of Course SequenceDuring the 2009-2010 academic year, we offered a variable-credit, three-quartermultidisciplinary course sequence coordinated between the computer science
- cluding long-term international assignments in Tokyo and Paris. These roles have provided a keen appre- ciation for the cross-disciplinary aspects of an engineering career in today’s global environment, includ- ing such things as business acumen, cultural sensitivity, communications, ethics, logistics, manufacturing and technology infrastructure. James’ doctoral research involved understanding the unique challenges of First-Generation Students and designing systems and pedagogy to remove unintentional barriers. James resides in Seattle with his wife and their daughters. James is a Certified Flight Instructor, and in his free time trains pilots through the Boeing Employee Flying Association at Renton Municipal
, printing andpublishing, steel manufacturing, and textile mill products. Technical services which account forapproximately one out of four engineering jobs, refer to companies such as Architect andEngineering companies that often design and construct local, state, federal commercial andindustrial facilities. Since engineering design is an essential activity in the product realization process [2],whether one designs products, processes or systems, graduating engineers should be reasonablycompetent in fundamental design methods and knowledge. A survey of industry was carried out Page 11.404.2in 2003 to better understand which specific topics
engineering and the professionalpractice of engineering, helping budding engineers understand that engineering is a helping,people oriented profession that underpins both our economy and our quality of life. This isaccomplished through introducing students to the design/build process in a team-based setting,supported by experimental testing. Course components include team dynamics andcommunications/social styles workshops and a comprehensive design project in which studentsexperience the complete design-build-test cycle of product prototype development. Manyprojects are developed for clients—introducing the ambiguity of evolving customer demandsinto product design specifications. The design/build cycle culminates in an end-of-semester
social aspects of sustainability,there is a need to further understand how they impact student designers’ ability to empathize withthose suffering the ill effects of unsustainable behavior, and consequently, adopt sustainabledesign.Empathy, or “the reactions of one individual to the observed experiences of another” ([19], p.113)”, has been shown to help students develop effective teamwork skills, better contextualizeproblems, and provide design inspiration [20]. As such, researchers in engineering educationhave become invested in studying empathy with more than 400 papers published on empathyfrom 1995 to 2018 in the ASEE annual conference proceedings [21]. In the context ofengineering design, prior research has found that empathy can be
research seeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 100 technical publications including twenty-three journal papers, five book chapters, and she holds two patents.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Robert Nagel is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. Dr. Nagel joined the James Madison University after completing his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. He has a B.S. from Trine University and a M.S. from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, both in mechanical engineering. Since joining James Madison
Paper ID #31059Interdisciplinary Mini-mester course on Rapid Prototyping for ProductDesignDr. Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jariwala is the Director of Design & Innovation for the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. His research interests are in the area of engineering design, and manufacturing process development for the polymer-based micro additive manufacturing process. Dr. Jariwala has participated and led several research projects from funded by NSF, the State of Georgia, and Industry sponsors on technology com- mercialization. At Georgia Tech, he is responsible for
viability. She is also working to understand how these methods affect students’ knowledge, skills, behaviors, and attitudes in regards to prototyping. Jessica is also working on a startup designing prosthetic limbs for individuals living in rural regions of developing countries. She has studied the design thinking process at the d.school in Berlin and holds design thinking workshops and classes for students and companies around Penn State.Dr. Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research
important results within the framework it is necessary tocontinue to build a comprehensive set of assessments which can be used to facilitateunderstanding of the role that variability plays in capstone courses. As the field ofengineering education strives to understand capstone programs, it is important to continueto address the innate challenges associated with assessing such a complex class.Bibliography 1. Bailey, R and Szabo, Z (2006). “Assessing engineering design process knowledge,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, Number 3, pp 508-518(11). 2. Dutson, A. J., R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby and C. D. Sorensen, 1997. A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project- Oriented Capstone
multi story concrete parking structure that compliedwith local building ordinances. Rather than an academic literature review, the team of civil andenvironmental engineering students, needed to understand building codes. Rather than bench-toptesting, the team needed knowledge of construction best practices and how to estimateconstruction costs. Moreover, the software necessary for a construction project is different andthe final results must be provided to the client in industry standard drawings rather than beingpackaged for publication in an academic setting. As a final example, consider a team working onthe Society of Petroleum Engineers Drillbotics competition. These mechanical and electricalengineering students designed a robotic system to
Paper ID #25477Teaming with Confidence: How Peer Connections in Problem-based Learn-ing Impact the Team and Academic Self-efficacy of Engineering StudentsMs. Marsha Maraj, Imperial College London Marsha has been an educator in higher education for over 14 years. She is currently a Senior Strategic Teaching Fellow in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Imperial College London (ICL) where she teaches mechanical design to third-year chemical engineering students. She is enthusiastic about using collaborative approaches and student partnerships in the scholarship of learning and teaching. Her current educational research
during the summer. Despite the challenge of fully understanding the process of Engineering research andimplementing the knowledge into their own curriculum, overall, teacher participants expressedtheir increased understanding of research in the field of engineering accomplishments with theirCAD program design and 3D printing skill sets. In the follow-up survey, one RET teacher statedthat he recommended engineering career to his students by introducing industry partners andtraining programs. Additionally, teacher participants found the program helpful by networkingwith fellow teachers and university faculty who actively conduct research. A male high schoolmath/physics teacher said, I have established important contacts with the
Paper ID #8175Designing the Design Experience - Identifying Factors of Student Motivationin Project-Based Learning and Project-Based Service-LearningMs. Lauren A Cooper, University of Colorado Boulder Lauren is a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder and an Assistant Teaching Professor at the Colorado School of Mines. Her research in engineering education is focused on understanding the impacts of project-based learning and project-based service-learning on student motivation.Dr. Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder Daria Kotys-Schwartz is the Design Center
understanding of themselves and of team dynamics.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science andTechnology, and the University of Toronto Open Fellowship Fund. Page 25.94.11References[1] ABET. (2011) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012 - 2013. [Online]. http://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation_Process/Accreditation_Documents/Current/e ac-criteria-2012-2013.pdf.[2] J. D. Bronzino, D. J. Ahlgren, C.-L. Chung, J. D. Mertens, and J. L. Palladino, "Design and Teamwork: A Must for Freshmen," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 184
acquire a deeper understanding of the subjectand its role in engineering. The approach was of just-in –time learning not differing muchfrom ideas explored by John Coates elsewhere 3.The subject development, specifically in chemical sciences, is outlined in two parts; prior andafter the introduction of PBL.SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO PBL INTRODUCTIONThe subject design had to meet some of the objectives which are common to education forprofessions. These objectives included: Ü The understanding and mastering of knowledge and skills of the subject matter; Ü The understanding the context of the subject within professional engineering discourse; Ü The development of communication skills; instilling skills in teamwork; Ü The