comprises software engineering will bepresented and the current state of international collaboration will be explored.The challenges in identifying and characterizing the content of the software engineering body of Page 7.1161.1knowledge were taken into consideration in the formulation and revision of Southern PolytechnicState University’s undergraduate and graduate degrees in Software Engineering. Our efforts in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationcurriculum design will be explored and the
Session 2260 International Collaboration in the Reform of Engineering Education Doris R. Brodeur, Edward F. Crawley, Ingemar Ingemarsson, Johan Malmqvist, Sören Östlund Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Linköping University/ Chalmers University of Technology/Royal Institute of TechnologyAbstractIn October 2000, with support from the Wallenberg Foundation, four universitieslaunched an international collaboration designed to improve undergraduate engineeringeducation in Sweden, the United States, and worldwide. This is a closely coordinatedprogram with
Session ____ A National Conference for Collaboration in Engineering Education Ronald Ulseth, Kenneth Gentili, Aaron Wenger Amy Hendrickson, Scott Klingenstein, Jim Richardson, Paul Gordy, Nick Nicholson, Thomas Grace, Don Moen Itasca Community College / Tacoma Community College / Itasca Community College / Eveleth Gilbert High School / Bismarck State College / University of Alabama / Tidewater Community College / Central Alabama Community College / Broome Community College / University of North DakotaStarting with the “George Report” to NSF in 1996 it has become increasingly clear that Two-Year Colleges(TYC’s
Faculty of Arts, Comenius University with the degree in Russian andEnglish Language and Literature. Since 1986 she has taught English for Specific Purposes (ESP) at the Faculty ofMaterials Science and Technology, Slovak University of Technology. She has participated in the BritishCouncil/Slovakia/ESP projects and has lead several ESP courses in Slovakia and abroad as a teacher-trainer. Page 7.1113.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
more practical and collaborative approach to problem solving Page 7.329.6and the work environment. They understand the cooperative nature of work in industry, i.e. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3213rarely are projects done by a solo problem solver/designer/engineer. Everything we do is done inteams, so people who have experience through their co-op, working in teams, working in
education includes projects which are: - Available for student participation all four years - “Real World” either in research or applications Page 7.1020.5 - Funded, preferably by industry. “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Multidisciplinary Engineering requires collaboration and teamwork - Of faculty within and across schools - Of engineers and non-engineers - Of studentsIncentives are to both faculty and students and include: - Rewards - Resources
assessment instruments in use in engineering education have not been well validated. Theysuggest what they refer to as triangulation or multiple measurements of an outcome to begin toimprove the validity of the assessment process. McGourty and De Meuse 4 propose a four-dimensional model of team behavior (collaboration, communication, conflict management and Page 7.234.1self-management) and use a 24-item self-rating scale to assess these theoretical dimensions. Data Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering
and researching in educational psychology and is working collaboratively with engineering educators concerned with quality teaching and learning practices. She has recently completed her doctoral studies in developing effective professional development. DILIP NAG is a senior lecturer in Civil engineering at the Faculty of Engineering, Monash University. He is course co-ordinator for the Double Degree Program and the Interdisciplinary Degree Program. He is currently teaching Engineering Management and Geomechanics, and researching in innovative approaches to teaching engineering subjects, and effective ways of assessing students
education. It is suggested thatAsia in general and Thailand in particular are becoming ever more important members of theglobal engineering education community and that opportunities for collaboration should not beoverlooked.IntroductionA penchant for science and engineering by Americans of Asian extraction has drawn attentionfor some time. It has been pointed out, for example, that minorities tend to be a much smallerproportion of scientists and engineers in the United States than they are in the total U.S.population. Asians, however, in 1997 comprised 10 percent of scientists and engineers in theUnited States although they were only 4 percent of the U.S. population.1 Students from Asiancountries tend to dominate the rest of the world on
main features of PBL in this way: · Learning is student centered, i.e., students make choices about how and what they want to learn. · Learning occurs in small student groups and promotes collaborative learning. · Teachers are facilitators or guides or coaches. · Problems form the organizing focus and stimulus for learning. · Problems are a vehicle for the development of authentic problem-solving skills. · New information is acquired through self-directed learning. 7 Page 7.940.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American
Session 2230 Suggestions for Establishing Centers for Engineering Education Trevor S. Harding and Cynthia J. Finelli Kettering UniversityIntroductionAt the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, a group of individuals gathered for a session entitled “ARoundtable Discussion of Best Practices for Developing Centers for Engineering Education,Teaching, and Learning”. The event was part of the Breakfast of Champions session, regularlysponsored by the Educational Research Methods division of ASEE. Eleven people directlyinvolved in existing centers for engineering education were invited to
Infusion of international issues into curriculum at participants’ home institutions Increased collaborative teaching, research, and service activities between Page 7.945.3 US and European engineering educators Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe electronic conferenceGearold Johnson, Academic Vice President of the National Technological University andRussel C. Jones, managing partner in World Expertise LLC, designed an electronicconference that took the form of a
Session 2793 Process Teaching and Learning in Engineering Education Sheryl Duggins, Ph.D. Associate Professor School of Computing and Software Engineering Southern Polytechnic State University Marietta, GA 30060 sduggins@spsu.eduAbstractThis paper explores the process-oriented constructivist theory of teaching and learning which hasits roots in cognitive psychology, philosophy, learning theory, and education theory. A processmodel
devices.AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National ScienceFoundation, Award #9950794 and Cartwright's National Science Foundation CAREERAward #9733720.References 1. Alexander N. Cartwright, "Design and Collaborative-learning in Lasers and Photonic Courses", American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Session 2632, 1999. 2. David R. Wallace, Philip Mutooni, "A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-based and Classroom Teaching", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 3, 1997, pp. 211-219. 3. URL: http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/2002-03EACCriteria.pdf 4. Pratibha Gopalam, Alexander N. Cartwright and Bina Ramamurthy, "Java Enabled Opto
Session 1526 Event-Driven Computing Projects for Software Engineering Education Marjorie Skubic and James LaffeyComputer Engineering and Computer Science Department / School of Information Science and Learning Technologies University of Missouri-Columbia skubicm@missouri.edu / laffeyj@missouri.eduAbstract There is a growing need in the software industry for the development of systems with adynamic, event-driven behavior, such as interactive human-computer interfaces, client-serverarchitectures
Session 2342 SUCCESS STORIES IN PARTNERING FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION Howard Eisner The George Washington University Washington, DC 20052Abstract: The George Washington University, with an Engineering ManagementDepartment that dates back to the fifties, and now one of the largest in the country,has developed and implemented new collaborative programs in engineeringmanagement and related areas. These programs have involved partnering with bothIndustry and Government in the fields of systems engineering and engineeringmanagement. The former
Session 2360 "CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES" THE NEW FRONTIER IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Robert T. Balmer Division of Engineering and Computer Science Union College Schenectady, NY 12308Abstract In recent years a wide variety of industries and technologies have been intersecting to createnew products and solve new problems. Since these new technologies typically occur at theinterfaces of science and engineering (producing new fields such as “nanotechnology”), we callthis phenomenon
Session 2002 Document: 2002-406 Division: Multimedia Managing Creativity: A Creative Engineering Education Approach Donna L. Shirley Assistant Dean College of Engineering University of OklahomaAbstractManaging Creativity is the title of a course originally developed by an experienced manager ofcreative teams for training industry
collaborative tools is that most offer a large degree ofoption for their specific vendor’s tool, but little or no support for other vendors' software.These packages work great when two or more workers will be collaborating on a projectusing software from the same vendor or from vendors “preferred” by the software of their Page 7.403.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 3238choice. Typically, this has been dependent
, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationto sponsor workshops at the leading institutions in four of its (5) Latin American countries wherethe company is establishing their strategic academic alliances (Argentina, Chile, Brazil, andMexico).The WorkshopsThe Learning Factory Workshops (Figure 2) go throughthe steps that helped MEEP develop this program: fromestablishing educational objectives to planning(resources, timetable, responsibilities) to curriculumdevelopment (courses, integrated laboratory facilities,industry collaboration), and finally to outcomesassessment (designing the assessment strategy
this situation. The NDSU College of Engineering and Architecture and the fiveTribally Controlled Community Colleges (TCCC) in the State of North Dakota are currentlyworking on a multi-year collaborative project to increase the number of NA-students enrolling topursue college education in mathematics, science, and engineering disciplines. Currently theproject is in its third year. Details of the proposal are reported in the Proceedings of the 2000American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference1. Activities for the 5-yearproposal period focus on attracting Reservation high school students to the tribal colleges,retaining them through the college, facilitating their smooth transfer to the university, andmotivating them for graduate
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe paper also opens up the broad and complex subject of college-industry collaboration that hasremained dormant and virtually unexplored for the majority of these colleges.It should be pointed out that the author in this endeavor draws largely on his own personalexperience as a previous faculty member in Qatar and earlier in Saudi Arabia. Other sourceshave come through informal discussions with colleagues, alumni and people from the industry.Background:Engineering education in the Arab Middle East had its early start after world war I. Colleges-orschools as they were referred to – were
Session 2561Environmental Engineering Education and Community Service: A Synergistic Partnership Christopher W. Swan, Paul Kirshen, John Durant Tufts UniversityAbstract Community-based service learning, the pedagogy of combining education withcommunity service, exists and has value in a number of academic fields. In the past few years,environmental engineering has become a field where community service learning has been foundto be synergistic, providing benefits to both the community and academia. This paper highlightsways in which community service learning can become
; Page 7.256.1 Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”course atmosphere (including competitiveness, time spent on course, the pace and workload)8; pedagogyused all too often in engineering schools, emphasizing competition, weeding outindividual achievement,and autonomous (as opposed to collaborative) work have been seen as contributing to a “chilly climate”for women in particular7, 9, 10,11, 12, leading to women’s dissatisfaction with the course of study,alienation, and beliefs that they cannot succeed or do not have the ability or knowledge to succeed in thescience, mathematics & engineering disciplines13,14,15. Satisfaction with their major is negativelyaffected by students’ feelings of social
7.575.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education § Telepresence for educational delivery and collaboration. § Development of educational tools and educational content to support GTREP's educational mission2. § Assessment of the pedagogical effectiveness of both tools and content. § Incorporation of Artificial Intelligence techniques in the online component of course and curriculum delivery, such as learner modeling and intelligent tutoring systems 3,4. § Providing support for ubiquitous education, including context-sensitive delivery of
A Colloquy on Learning Objectives For Engineering Education Laboratories Lyle D. Feisel, Ph.D., P.E., George D. Peterson, Ph.D., P.E. Dean Emeritus (Ret.), Watson School of Engineering, State University of New York at Binghamton/Executive Director, Accreditation Board for Engineering and TechnologyAbstractAs distance learning programs become more prevalent and as we begin to offer undergraduateengineering programs in a distance format, the question of laboratories and their role inengineering education becomes increasingly important. There is an ongoing debate aboutwhether a remote laboratory experience can really accomplish the
Session: 2677 Evaluation of a Flexible Simulator Structure for Nuclear Engineering Education Patrick A. Tebbe, Ph.D. Department of Engineering The College of Engineering Ewing, NJ 08628AbstractThis paper will explore the design and structure of a distributed, multi-code, simulation programdesigned specifically for educational purposes. A brief review of current nuclear plantsimulators will be covered. This will be followed by an examination of research aimed
well as stronger collaboration with faculty, staff and graduate students. An important benefitof strong collaboration with research activities and working with graduate students is thatundergraduates better appreciate the context of their work and can make more informed decisions Page 7.1128.10with respect to pursuing advanced degrees and prospective employers. Faculty satisfy not onlytheir teaching requirement but also advance their experimental research program while subsidizing Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society
Session 2160 An Attempt to Resurrect Engineering Education in Herat, Afghanistan M. Saleh Keshawarz, Bahadur Khan Khpolwak Associate Professor and Chairman of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA/Dean, Faculty of Engineering, Herat University, Herat, AfghanistanAbstractFormal Engineering Education goes back to 1956 when engineering courses were offered as partof the Faculty of Science. However, it was not until 1996, when Engineering College started itsoperation as an independent college. The new college was built through the
Session 1615 “Powerful Play: Using Toys as Tools in Engineering Education”AbstractAs engineering education has changed to reflect less of a traditional teacher-centered classroomand more of a learner-centered environment, new instructional methodologies have also evolved.Many of these curricular modifications look startlingly different from traditional engineeringeducation at first glance; however, a closer look reveals that some curricular modifications areable to glean the substance of the traditional lecture, mix it up with some learner-based,collaborative, hands-on activities, and integrate the new mandates for technical communicationand