in PHY 191 duringthe past 2 weeks? Please give your best estimate of how many times you've done each of thesethings. (Each item had a 7-point scale, with the points “Haven’t done”, “1 day”, to “More than 5days”.) ● Read the textbook● Reviewed slides or handouts from class● Reviewed your own notes from class● Attended class● Met with the professor outside class (e.g. office hours)● Met with the TA outside class (e.g. office hours)● Gone to a tutoring session for this course● Asked a question during class● Gone to a general study skills workshop● Had a study group with classmates● Done the homework for class● Done additional practice problems● Taken notes
support grit development in first-generationcollege students.Introduction First-generation college students face numerous unique challenges within higher educationthat offer particular opportunities for research and interventions to improve their enrollment andretention. This population has potential to add to the field of engineering as they bring with themunique lived experiences. First-generation college students have been described as invisibleinnovators [1]. Smith and Lucena [1] argue if first-generation college students’ funds of knowledgeare equally valued knowledge as that of the dominant engineering culture, these students’ can belegitimate creators of knowledge and contribute to innovative solutions in the engineeringenterprise
Paper ID #28172Welcoming Student Veterans to Engineering: An Interactive Session forFaculty and AdministratorsDr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former
professionals, and female undergraduateengineering students.Key TermsPresented below is a list of key terms that will be used in this presentation.1. Mentee: Female lowerclassman defined as freshman and sophomore studentsmajoring in engineering2. Peer Mentor: Female upperclassman defined as junior and senior studentsmajoring in engineering acting as mentors for the mentee students3. Industry Mentor: Engineering professions and/or alumnae of Cal Poly PomonaCollege of Engineering acting as mentors for mentees and peer mentors during groupmentoring sessions4. Engineering Faculty Mentor: Female engineering faculty at Cal Poly PomonaCollege of Engineering acting as mentors for mentees and peer mentors during groupmentoring sessions
: Connectedness. A fifth dimension for explaining the space of teaming prompts issomething we have called connectedness to capture the various ways in which a prompt can beconnected up to something larger. For example, prompt 3 (with the focus on attendance) andprompt 4 (with the focus on grading) were constructed based on ideas that came up in previousteaming sessions. The prompts about being back on campus (prompt 1), back in the classroom(prompt 2), and back to normal (prompt 6) were constructed to create continuity with worldevents and the general context. The prompts about something you'd like students to know aboutyou (prompt 8) and a situation where you felt cared for (prompt 9) were connected to broaderdepartmental goals.These dimensions are by
Paper ID #34970Creating a Diverse Next Generation of Technically- and Community-MindedSTEM Professionals (Experience)Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University Dr. Driscoll is an experimental social psychologist with ex- pertise in stereotyping and prejudice, attitude and persuasion, diversity and inclusion, and managerial and intercultural business communication. Her experiences as an academic, diversity consultant, and admin- istrator over the last 30 years have helped her integrate broadening participation and inclusion practices across research
hypothesize that an early project experience is a significant contributorrecruitment and retention of Scholars based on the supporting literature [20] and our ownexperience with past successful undergraduate project advising. Indeed, early exposure to projectsinvolving engineering problem solving with direct and clear benefits to society and the localcommunity have been shown to be especially beneficial to women and underrepresented minoritystudents [20, 21], and highly useful as retention tools. These projects are taken for a variablenumber of credits (1 to 3), and generally consist of teams of 3–4 students across all threeengineering disciplines, and fit within the existing project advising framework at the engineeringdepartment in one of three
-Napoca, Romania, 1991-present: Faculty member at the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania (professor since 2004) Manage- rial Experience: 2006 - present, General Manager of Digilent RO International Experience: 1999-2000, Visiting Professor at Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.Mrs. Monica Ignat (Bot), Digilent She graduated from Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Romania, Electronics major, in 2009 and has been with Digilent for 5 years. She organized five of the European Regionals of the Digital Design Contest in the past years.Mr. Alex Wong , Digilent, Inc.Joe Harris, Digilent, Inc
from highly detailed toa general gloss. Reproducing the results of these studies or translating them to othercontexts or programs in engineering education would be difficult. Similarly, there wasgreat variability in the extant to which engineering education concepts and curriculumswere described in the studies I reviewed. It would be difficult to offer broad implicationsabout BLEE as a practice because no scholarly community had set a norm about how todescribe the process (or what even technically constitutes BLEE).Implications from mapping the discourseThe identification of a large multi-disciplinary network within the scholarly discourse onBLEE suggests a relatively healthy area of study, drawing from a variety of disciplinesand applied
, have emerged as critical platforms for fostering creativity, problem-solving, andentrepreneurial skills among engineering students. These events not only provide participantswith opportunities to apply their technical knowledge and collaborative abilities but also exposethem to real-world challenges that mirror those faced by professionals [1]. A recent study alsofound that ICPs improved students self-awareness and open mindedness [2]. However, despitetheir potential benefits, ICPs are often accompanied by significant barriers that may hinder thebroad participation of all student groups, especially underrepresented students in STEM.Addressing these barriers is crucial for creating inclusive and effective learning environmentsthat address the
engineering graduates regularly provide theirperspective regarding the importance of skills beyond math and science for career success.Sometimes referred to as ‘soft’ skills or ‘professional skills’ these traits are also referred to in theliterature as ‘transversal competencies’3. In 2005, Martin et al. reported on a study with a small 1 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Educationgroup of chemical engineering graduates in South Africa who self-assessed their preparation inboth technical expertise and transversal competencies after
evaluation comments directed at confusion incomponents of the syllabus. Further, technical contract review in this assignment guided studentsin detail-oriented practices including compliance benefiting further academic progress and futureengineering roles. Students acquired knowledge through assessment allowing them to associateterms of the syllabus to terms of a conventional contract; these included observables, conditions,precise description, and formal representation (Farmer & Hu, 2018). The data from this studycannot be generalized in predicting success in an engineering course; however, previous studiesshow that students who have an increased understanding of course objectives and expectationshave increased learning outcome success (Ulmer
) graduates’ attributes and current employers’ expectations.Therefore, with the growing demands from industry, it has become vital for engineeringprograms to focus on equipping students with non-technical or professional knowledge and skills[1]. Brunhaver et al. explain that with technical knowledge and skills becoming “less central orless sufficient” for performing engineering work, professional knowledge and skills have becomemore significant [2]. As such, programs are now tasked with widening their focus towards notonly ensuring that their graduates obtain adequate in-depth discipline specific knowledge,decision making and problem-solving skills but also towards ensuring that graduates areacquainted with ample informal pedagogies to support the
Engineering Analysis course at the Engineering Technology (ET)department in the University of Houston – Downtown (UHD). Furthermore, to the best of theauthors’ knowledge, this is the first reported work where bayou water is used for powerproduction which is an inexpensive way to produce power.Keywords: Power, Bayou, Houston, Turbine, No head.1. Introduction: For most of the modern age, people have been getting most of the energy from coal, gas, andother types of fossil fuels. While people have used other forms of power generation, there hasbeen a substantial movement to find and use other forms of power generation where windturbines being the most well-known example. This work looks for alternate power generationthat has led to look at what
33 4 31 4 31 9 30 24 30 Ethnicity Native Am. & 0 0 1 8 0 0 1 8 1 3 3 4 Pacific Islander Black 2 15 5 42 2 15 7 54 16 53 32 40 Asian 4 31 0 0 3 23 0 0 2 7 9 11 Hispanic 3 23 1 8 2 15 5 39 10 33 21 26 White 4 31 5 42 6 46 0 0 1 3 16 20 First Generation College Student Yes 5 39 3 25 6 46 5 39 5 17
drying and straightening are examples of energy that are not typically examined in anengineering classroom. Research led by Mechanical Engineering professor Dr. Tahira Reid atPurdue University examines the heat transfer of hair care products [4]. The thermalcharacterization of hair dryers and straighteners is an area that may have more personal relevanceto female engineering students. This topic can connect to students’ everyday lives anddemonstrate technical aspects of energy, establishing the legitimacy of stereotypically non-maleproducts can have in engineering.Energy Distribution: Mini-grids in Developing ContextsRoughly 1 billion people across the globe are still without access to electricity [5]. TheInternational Energy Agency (IAE
Paper ID #14439Revamping Robotics Education via University, Community College and In-dustry Partnership - Year 1 Project ProgressProf. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev earned his bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering at Moscow University of Electronics and Automation in 1995. He obtained the Master degree in Physics from Michigan Technological University in 2004 and the PhD degree in Electrical Engineering
students. After the session, the researchercollected their worksheets and documented the whiteboard collaborative ideas, and a summary ispresented in Fig. 1. Fig. 1. Ideas generated by negative brainstorming workshop.The next step was for the students to develop and use the four-field matrix evaluation tool tounderstand and practice an evaluation process. The students were asked to determine what metricparameters and assessment levels they would like to use. The students determined that theywanted to use impact as one parameter, with the assessment levels of high-impact and low-impact. The second parameter the students selected was approval, and the two assessment levelswere if something needed official university approval or not
Pedagogy,vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–106.[4] Coffman-Wolph, S., & Gray, K. (2020, June), Work in Progress: Student-generated Materialfor Artificial Intelligence Course Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—35685[5] Miller, H. (2007). Designing effective writing assignments. Teaching with writing.University of Minnesota Center for Writing. Retrieved Mar. 8, 2021, fromhttp://writing.umn.edu/tww/assignments/designing.html[6] Coffman-Wolph, S., “Online/Hybrid/Flipped EM Learning in a Programming 1 Course andBeyond (2021 KNC Session).” Engineering Unleashed,https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/2403.
versionused in this study is widely accepted as a measure of chronic stress due to ongoing lifecircumstances and expectations about future events. In this format, responses to 10 questions, ratedon a scale of 0 (Never) – 1 (Almost Never) – 2 (Sometimes) – 3 (Fairly Often) – 4 (Very Often),are scored to yield a number which serves as a measure of the respondent’s stress level. Individualscores are then grouped to determine the average and standard deviation. High stress levels areconsidered to be indicated by scores more than one standard deviation above the mean in thisstudy.It is generally recognized that high stress levels, experienced over an extended period of time, willnot prove beneficial to successful academic performance. An effective
knowledge, skill, and experience are alsoleaving the workforce. The electric utility industry, like many others, is feeling the effect of babyboomers’ exodus to retirement. A variety of factors, including the growing retirement eligibilityand “…the generational shift in the traditional utility workforce…”1 is having an adverse effecton the utility industry.According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor, 46.2 million baby boomers, 46.9 million generation xand 46.4 million millennials were employed in the fourth quarter of 2014. Baby boomers beganto reach retirement age, 65, in 20112. All baby boomers will be over 65 by 2029 and will makeup more than 20 percent of the U.S. population3.To get ahead of the curve, EASi partnered with one of the largest electric
electrical circuits,” Am. J. Phys. 72 (1) 98-115 (2004); doi: 10.1119/1.1614813.26 R. Ross, E.P. Venugopal, G. Hillebrand, M. Murray, and M. Gonderinger, “Results of a Multi-Year Assessment of Inquiry-Based Second Semester General Physics Laboratory Activities,” in Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, (2014).27 R. Ross and P. Venugopal, “Inquiry-based Activities in a Second Semester Physics Laboratory: Results of a Two-year Assessment,” in Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, (2007).28 Kuder–Richardson Formula 20. (2016, November 18). In Wikipedia, The
. A. Alipour, and S. S. Ragavan, "Towards Characterizing Trust in Generative Artificial Intelligence among Students", in Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1: ACM, 2023. pp. 67-73.[11] D. Baidoo-Anu, and L. Owusu Ansah. "Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning." Journal of AI 7, no. 1: 2023. pp. 52-62.[12] N. Agarwal, V. Kumar, A. Raman, and A. Karkare. "A Bug's New Life: Creating Refute Questions from Filtered CS1 Student Code Snapshots", in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education Vol 1: ACM, 2023. pp. 7-14.
Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Understanding Student Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Technical WritingOpen generative artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) ability to craft human-like text concerns educatorswho fear students will complete assignments without meeting course objectives. Currently, AIdetection is unreliable, adding to educators’ concerns. While these fears are valid, we believe thebest way forward is to teach students how to use this powerful technology ethically andeffectively. Best practices for using AI
Cybersecurity.2.0 BackgroundThe two-fold goal of the NSF Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) S-STEM fundedAttracting and Cultivating Cybersecurity Experts and Scholars through Scholarships (ACCESS)program is: (1) to increase cybersecurity-related STEM degree completion of low-income, high-achieving undergraduate students with demonstrated financial need (including women andminorities) and (2) to generate knowledge about academic success, retention, persistence,graduation, and career pathways of these students to improve the education of futureCybersecurity-related STEM workers. Specifically, ACCESS aims to contribute towardsaddressing the tremendous governmental and industry need for highly skilled cybersecurityexperts by addressing the following
student, and then 1 studentin each of the following categories: SE Asian, E Asian, S Asian, and Middle Eastern orNorth African student. Pilot Results 33Furthermore, the sample was a little over half first generation college students (51%). Gender 34First we will walk through some of the scenario results by gender. Your first round of tests did not go well and your usual studying habits are not working Women’s top two choices: Men’s top two choices: 1. Spend more
After receiving our purchased mini generator via the postal mail, it was very apparent that the device was meant for water hoses and needed a significant amount of pressure to get the turbine spinning. No matter what faucet was used, the turbine would not spin and could not generate a voltage due to the small hole at the nozzle of theFigure 1: Generator components device. As a result, when 3D parts were
twoother distinction programs, 1) Distinguished Engineer and 2) Distinguished Designer, which areappointments that lead to being a Fellow. All 3 positions are at the executive level and areoften referred to as IBM’s technical executives and thought leaders. They are the company’s“most exceptional” technical professionals and visionaries who are recognized inside andoutside IBM as experts in their field. They have won five Nobel Prizes, five Turing Awards, andbeen responsible for nearly 10,000 U.S. patents. This pre-eminent community of technicalprofessionals has since been emulated by other organizations as well.Today, this community acts as the “technical conscience” of the company, responsible formaintaining IBM’s technical edge. They also
become partof the general high school curriculum. In the final sections, we discuss the integration aspectsand conclude the paper and offer some prospects for future work.Background and Related WorkWorkforce development requires providing relevant and up-to-date knowledge to students toprepare them to take on the various roles in the workforce. In STEM fields, this requires rigorouscurriculum and in-depth technical coverage in the fields of study. One of the problems collegesfacing is the lack of interest in STEM fields among high school students [1]. Another problem isthe under preparedness of these students for the rigorous college curriculum required in theSTEM fields. The discussion of why students do not go for STEM programs and what
Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 MESA Center Promoting Technical LiteracyAbstractIn 2007, the first MESA Center in Texas opened at our college. After twelve years, there is astory to be told and to be proud of it.MESA, which stands for Mathematics, Engineering, and Science Achievement, is a nationalprogram that originated in California in 1970 [1], [2]. Its purpose is to support educationallydisadvantaged students throughout the education pipeline to excel in math and science so theycan go on to attain degrees in the fields of engineering, science, and mathematics. Due to itsSTEM foundation, the MESA Center