methodologies for student motivation, I came started looking for aneffective course structure for STEM students and landed upon an interesting study [1] whichfocused on engineering courses but claimed to be equally applicable to STEM courses. Sincesuch course structure in STEM were not existent, I employed it in my courses to test itseffectiveness for science courses, specifically, to courses in chemistry. It became a success storyin terms of student learning and success, which motivated me to further think and innovate and Istarted asking students to make TikTok videos of the experiments performed by each lab groupin the labs. This proved beneficial for student engagement and learning.3.2 Examples of Teaching and Learning Changes Implemented:Lab
of Arkansas. She received her PhD in Chemical Engineering from Chemical and Biomolecular Department at North Carolina State University. She is responsible from teaching Intro- duction to Engineering course sequence, developing course material, and advising freshman engineering students. She also serves as the coordinator for the Honors Research Experience.Mrs. Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas Leslie Massey is an instructor in the First-Year Engineering Program at the University of Arkansas. She received her BS in Biological Engineering and MS in Environmental Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She previously served as a project manager at a water resources center, but returned to the
and Future”, Journal of Engineering Education; Washington Vol. 94, Iss. 1: 13-25, 2005.[11] K.A. Santora, E.J. Mason & T.C. Sheahan, “A Model for Progressive Mentoring in Science and Engineering Education and Research”. Innov High Educ 38, 427–440, 2013.[12] J. Watkins & E. Mazur, “Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors”. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41, 2013.[13] C.E. Wieman, “Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;111(23):8319-20, 2014.
Paper ID #40614Full Paper: Incorporating Academic Coaching in First-Year EngineeringProgram to Support Student Success and PersistenceDr. Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas Dr. Aysa Galbraith is a Teaching Associate Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at Uni- versity of Arkansas. She received her PhD in Chemical Engineering from Chemical and Biomolecular Department at North Carolina State University in 2006. She is responsible from coordinating the First- Year Honors Research Experience, teaching Introduction to Engineering, developing course material, and advising freshmen engineering students.Dr. Heath Aren
Paper ID #36388Lessons Learned from COVID That Have Been Transferred to Post-COVIDTeaching and LearningDr. Michael Cross, Norwich University Michael Cross is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering teaching classes in the areas of circuits, electronics, energy systems, and engineering design. Cross received degrees from the Rochester Institute of Technology and the University of Vermont and began his academic career at UVM where he taught courses in the areas of analog and digital circuits, electronics, semiconductor physics, power electronics, and engineering design.Dr. David M. Feinauer P.E
Paper ID #36350How Can We Make This Work? First Year Engineering Design TeamDevelopment in Virtual vs. In-Person EnvironmentsDr. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing
, oneengineering ed. faculty, and one engineering ed. undergraduate) recalled asking questions alongthe lines of “Where’s the Math?” Anecdotally, the engineering design challenges in which theyhad participated and observed seemed to heavily emphasize visual and physical modeling (i.e.,drawing and “building stuff”), but included minimal mathematical modeling. Thus, the team setout to systematically investigate if math is commonly used to inform decision-making in K-12engineering activities, as would be expected of professional engineers. Such insight is useful forcollege engineering instructors, particularly those that teach first-year coursework, to betterillustrate the authentic use of mathematics in their own curricula.Relevant LiteraturePlenty of
infrastructure, and community engagement. She teaches the introductory engineering course for all first-year undergraduate students in the College of Engineering at UD. Her undergraduate teaching experience includes foundational engineering mechanics courses like statics and strength of materials as well as courses related to sustainability and infrastructure. Her research interests are in foundational engineering education, sustainability in engineering curriculum, and green technologies in infrastructure.Prof. Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware Dr. Buckley is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Delaware. She received her Bachelor’s of Engineering (2001) in Mechanical Engineering from the
American Chemical Society, American Society of Microbiology and American Society of Engineering Education. In addition to teaching and research, Professor Brigham serves on the Wentworth Faculty Senate and the Biological Engineering ABET and Curriculum Development Committee.Dr. Afsaneh Ghanavati, Wentworth Institute of Technology Afsaneh Ghanavati received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Shiraz University, Iran in 1998, and the M.S. and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Northeastern University, Boston, MA in 2012 and 2018 respectively. She is currently an assistant professor in the electrical and computer engineering program, school of engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology. Her present
University of Maryland. He teaches students in courses centered around engineering design, design thinking, total quality management, making, and thermodynamics. 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30 Full Paper: Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT on a First-Year Engineering Design CourseIn this full paper we present findings from an exploratory study conducted to better understandthe impact of ChatGPT on the teaching, assessment, learning, and development of designsolutions within a first-year engineering design course (ENES100: Introduction to EngineeringDesign) at the University
willingly take up the approach, The freedom that students experience in becoming independent problem-solvers by applying their knowledge to relevant projects provides them the boost in their confidence fortackling challenges and value optimism in achieving solutions. Hence, application-based projects are a reliabletool for the overall development of the students in a learning environment. II. APPLICATION BASED PROJECTS The need for the inclusion of the application-based projects in the engineering curriculum, is best describedby a popular quotation: “Tell me and I forget, Teach me and I remember, Involve me and I learn.”The aim of this paper is to establish the role of the integration of application-based
strives to reduce the harmful effects of energy production and use. Teaching has always been his central passion. He started as a group tutor in college, which led him to his full time career as an Assistant Professor of Instruction at Temple University in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. He employs innovative instructional methods such as problem based learning, flipping the classroom, and teaching through interactive games. His research focuses on the transition to 100% renewable energy and effective engineering instruction using problem based learning, flipped classroom approaches, and design thinking. He spent 8 years at Delaware Technical and Community College in the Energy Management
Paper ID #36371First Year Engineering Student Definitions of Systems Engineering: AComparison Between Two InstitutionsMrs. Katrina L Carlson, Michigan Technological University Katrina Carlson is currently working with a team of researchers at Michigan Technological University as a PhD student in Applied Cognitive Sciences and Human Factors.Dr. Akua B. Oppong-Anane, Montana Technological University Akua Oppong-Anane is an Assistant Professor of Freshman Engineering at Montana Technological Uni- versity. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering, a master’s degree in Chemistry and a doctoral degree in
Education an educational software company focused on teaching sketching and spatial visualization skills.Dr. Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego Dr.Huihui Qi is a Teaching Assistant Professor at the University of California, San Diego.Dr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego and the President of eGrove Education, Inc. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project- based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, and is committed to fos- tering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large
Paper ID #36358Student and Instructor Reflections on Integrating ShortMindfulness-Based Meditation Practices into a First-Year EngineeringDesign CourseDr. Hannah Nolte, The Pennsylvania State University Hannah Nolte has recently completed her doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University specializing in human factors and ergonomics. Her research investigates the applicability of mindfulness interventions as a stress-management technique for engineering design to improve design outcomes and student well-being. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Physics and Psychological Science from Gustavus
Electronics Engineering, KLE Technologi- cal University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering ed- ucation, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published pa- pers in various
Paper ID #40608Full Paper: Engendering Engineering Inclusion through an InteractiveTheatre SketchDr. Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is a Teaching Professor in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University and an ASEE Fellow Member. As a mathematician and computer systems analyst, she collaborated in engineering teams to support energy research before entering higher education where she taught mathematics, statistics, computer science, and engineering courses, secured over $5.5M to support STEM education research, led program
Engineering where his research centered on supersonic civilian aircraft and bio-inspired flight. He has taught, or will teach courses, in Compressible Fluid Mechanics, Statics, and Dynamics, two of which are first-year engineering courses at Utah State. He is also the director of the Engineering Tutoring Center and Engineering Math Resource Center, which he founded in 2022 under the direction of the College of Engineering. He is passionate about teaching and mentoring students of all disciplines and walks of life and strives to create an atmosphere of respect and curiosity in his classrooms and in the resource centers of the Utah State College of Engineering.Dr. Thomas H Fronk, Utah State University Associate Professor of
Paper ID #36384Familial Influence on the Choice to Study Engineering: Insights from aCross-University Study.Miss Amanda Marie Singer, Michigan Technological University Amanda Singer is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State Univer- sity. Prior to attending OSU, she received a B.S. and M.S. in environmental engineering from Michigan Technological University. Her current research interests include understanding engineering identity and motivation in first-generation college students, online learning pedagogy, and service learning projects.Mrs. Katrina L Carlson, Michigan Technological
Paper ID #40637Full paper: Dr. Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University Dr. Djedjiga Belfadel is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Biomedical Engineering Department at Fairfield University in Connecticut. She earned her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2015. Dr. Belfadel’s research focuses on estimation theory, with a particular emphasis on practical applications like drone navigation and target tracking. Her scholarly contributions span various areas, including space-based infrared (IR)/electro-optical (EO) sensors, signal and image processing, machine
/Knowledge-based Systems: in particular, the ”task-specific” approach to knowledge elucida- tion and system building, function-based reasoning, explanation of reasoning. External support included NSF/CISE, DARPA, GE Aircraft, Boeing; Higher Education Research, Early STEM Education: in par- ticular PBL, inverted classroom approaches, cooperative learning, distance education. External support included NSF/CISE, NSF/DUE. His current research foci include pedagogy of on-line learning, learning at the confluence of Human Factors, systems thinking mindset, and AI-based knowledge representation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022
understand the mechanics of musculoskeletal soft tissues and human movement.Prof. Katsuyuki Wakabayashi, Bucknell University Kat received his bachelor of science in both chemical engineering and materials science and engineering from University of Pennsylvania, and he has a PhD in chemical and materials engineering from Prince- ton University. After a Postdoc position at Northwestern University, he joined the faculty at Bucknell University in 2007, where he is currently an associate professor of chemical engineering. His teaching interests range from first-year introductory engineering courses to industry-sponsored design courses. His research interests center around the application of a novel processing technique for
shown in Table 1. This set of requirements laysthe foundation for all engineering majors. Students matriculate to their respective engineeringmajor after completing the requirements and achieving minimum grade levels.Table 1: First-Year Engineering Required Courses Calculus I Calculus II General Chemistry I Ideas to Innovation I Ideas to Innovation II English Composition Fundamentals of Speech Communication Physics I (mechanics) Science Selective – (General Chemistry II, Computer Programming or Biology):The two engineering courses, Ideas to Innovation I and II, are designed and taught by faculty inengineering education. The four main content areas are design, teamwork, major exploration andcomputing
a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in the FPD, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers at Purdue University. He was the first engineering faculty member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engi- neering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He
; rather, responses should be unique to the student. The course instructor,not a teaching assistant, reads and grades each submission within one week after the deadline.Brief comments are included to acknowledge that their journal entries have been read. The toneis positive and encouraging, and when appropriate, includes personal reactions connected to theinstructor’s own experiences and information about departmental or campus resources related totheir goals. For students with incomplete submissions, written feedback provides a cleardescription of what was missing.3. Results and DiscussionA key question was whether students would engage in and commit to the process of reflectivejournaling for a 100-level engineering course. Figures 1 and 2