Student Designed Experiments in a Traditional Mechanics of Materials Laboratory Course Timothy W. Mays, Joshua T. Boggs, Thomas E. Hill, David B. Warren, and Pongsakorn Kaewkornmaung Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The CitadelAbstractCriterion 3 of ABET 2004-2005 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs1 requires that allengineering programs seeking accreditation manifest that their graduates have an ability to“design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data.” The ASCE CivilEngineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century4 supports this requirement and expands onits
Enhancing Machine Design Courses Through Use of a Multimedia-Based Review of Mechanics of Materials Dr. John J. Wood, Dr. Daniel D. Jensen, Dr. Kris Wood Department of Engineering Mechanics United States Air Force Academy/ Department of Engineering Mechanics United States Air Force Academy/ Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Texas at AustinAbstractOver the last seven years the Machine Design courses at the United States Air Force Academyand at the University of Texas, Austin have evolved through the
AC 2005-1039: MECHANICS OF MATERIALS: AN INTRODUCTORY COURSEWITH INTEGRATION OF THEORY, ANALYSIS, VERIFICATION AND DESIGNJoseph Rencis, University of ArkansasJr., Hartley T. Grandin, Page 10.931.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2005 Session 1368 Mechanics of Materials: an Introductory Course with Integration of Theory, Analysis, Verification and Design Joseph J. Rencis, Hartley T. Grandin, Jr. Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Arkansas/Worcester Polytechnic
Session 1348 Development of Multimedia Instructional Tools for Strength of Materials Jack Zecher, Justin Davis, Heather Deaton and Deric Pawlaczyk Mechanical Engineering Technology Department Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisAbstractThis paper describes a series of multimedia based instructional lessons that are being developedto enhance a Strength of Materials course. Use of these lessons will help students to morerapidly understand many concepts that are difficult to describe on the printed
Session 2166 Integrated Materials Science Lab Experiences in a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Chris Byrne Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green KentuckyAbstract This paper describes the ongoing efforts to teach materials science in two differentcourses within a mechanical engineering program at Western Kentucky University. The WKUmechanical engineering curriculum has several components that are integrated experiences overmultiple semesters. The objectives for integration of experiences is to provide an alternative tothe model where courses
TEACHING MATERIALS AND PROCESS SELECTION TO MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS Malur N. Srinivasan Department of Mechanical Engineering Lamar University Beaumont, TX 77710IntroductionMechanical engineers are often faced with the problem of selecting the best possible material andthe best manufacturing process for making a designed product using the material. One goodapproach to achieve this purpose would be to examine alternative materials available for makingthe product and choosing the best material based on the product service requirements. Once thisis done, the alternate
. Combined use of the computer-aidedsolution and the laboratory experimentation will maximize the students’ learning of thesubject taught in a lecture class. The web based tool may also be used for distanceeducation and for promotion of engineering education to potential future students. Page 10.974.6Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education7. Bibliography1. Gere, James, M.; Mechanics of Materials, Thompson Learning, 2001.2. Mott; Robert L., Applied Strength of Materials, Prentice Hall Inc., 1996.3. Esche, S
machines (structures with movable members) or frames (structures with no mov-able members). By letting the free body of a system undergo a strategically chosen compatiblevirtual displacement in the virtual work method, we can solve for one specified unknown at atime in many complex as well as simple problems in mechanics without having to solve coupledsimultaneous equations. The virtual work method may initially appear as a magic black box tostudents, but it generally kindles great curiosity and interest in students of statics. This paper pro-poses an approach consisting of three major steps and one guiding strategy for implementing thevirtual work method. It results in great learning of the virtual work method for students.I. IntroductionWork is
Session 1368 Learning About Stress and Strain Transformations by Comparing Theoretical, Experimental, and Finite Element Results Alireza Mohammadzadeh Padnos School of Engineering Grand Valley State UniversityOne way of teaching a new physical concept effectively to students is to arrive at that physicalconcept via different approaches. Stress and stain transformations, together with combinedloading and von Mises failure criterion for ductile materials, are among those subject matters insolid mechanics in which students have
CollegeIntroductionAs is the case with many educational institutions that offer a MET degree, an introductory coursein manufacturing materials and processes is required. At Penn State Erie, The Behrend College,we offer first-year Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) students the introductorymanufacturing materials and processes course. The course has both a lecture and laboratorysegment. During the lab segment of the course, students have the opportunity to experience:material testing, plant tours, manufacturing processes, statistical process control, andinspection/measurement techniques.With 10 PIM machines, 3 extrusion lines, 2 thermoforming machines, and 2 blow moldingmachines, Penn State Behrend has the largest educational plastic injection molding (PIM
Session 3102 Learning by doing: An innovative laboratory exercise to enhance the understanding of thin-walled Mechanics of Materials Gillian N. Saunders-Smits, Jan de Vries Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsIntroductionMechanics is widely considered to be the core of any type of construction engineering course inthe world, be it a mechanical, aerospace or naval architecture engineering course. Yet at the sametime it also considered by many students as one of the most difficult subjects in the course
software package. Thecaptured data was used to create images representing the test data. Manipulation of the data tocreate the images is described. The images were then animated to give the appearance of acontinuous dynamic test. The method used to create this effect is detailed. The authors examinepossible improvements to the method used and suggest other possible applications for thetechnique developed. The animation is used in strength of material classes for the purpose ofanalyzing mechanical failures of components subjected to severe tensile loading conditions. Theanimation allows the mechanics of the failure to be demonstrated in detail.IntroductionTensile tests are often used to determine the yield strength and ultimate strength of a
demonstration set-up in time for agiven lesson. Just like with lesson learning objectives, physical models might not be prepared Figure 5. Zero-Force Demonstratorbefore a course begins. Unlike lesson learning objectives which should be developed before thelesson is taught, you may not be able to develop a physical model for each lesson. However, aphysical model inserted every couple of lessons or at the start of a new block of material wouldbe a great start and over time more and more models and demonstrations can be included.II.D. In-Class Examples and ActivitiesWhenever possible, students should apply some of the theory and equations during class throughin-class examples, especially in the basic mechanics courses where
- Review of Engineering Materials, Basic Welding and Course IntroductionWeek 2 - Geometry of Welded Joints, Melting and Solidification, Heat TransferWeek 3 - Various Heat Sources for WeldingWeek 4 - Welding ApplicationsWeek 5 - Brazing of MetalsWeek 6 - SolderingWeek 7 - Chemistry Adhesive Bonding, Mechanical Properties of AdhesivesWeek 8 - Adhesive Bonding of Polymers and CompositesWeek 9 - Adhesive Bonding of Ceramics, Glasses and MetalsWeek 10 - Adhesive Bonding of Dissimilar MaterialsWeek 11 - Project Presentations and ReviewThe class meets three times each week as shown below.• One 90 minute class session which incorporates a small lecture and in-class discussion.• One 2 hour
could catch a ball. Even thoughcameras and computers could direct the robot towards a ball, robot's move in an Page 10.817.1awkward, lumbering fashion because conventional hydraulic valves cannot keep pacewith the commands of the computerized controllers. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAdaptive materials, such as magneto-rheological fluid, can “cycle” at a rate of 200 timesper second. As a result, this technology will allow devices that can operate instantly andwithout mechanical valves. Increased
A New Approach for an Undergraduate Mechanics of Materials Course that Integrates Theory, Analysis, Verification and Design Joseph J. Rencis, Hartley T. Grandin, Jr. Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Arkansas/Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstract This paper presents a description of a first undergraduate course in mechanics ofmaterials. Although many of the features of this course have been used by other faculty andpresented formally in textbooks, the authors believe they have united them in a way thatproduces a course that is unique and innovative. The title of the paper includes Theory,Analysis, Verification and Design to
” Page 10.579.9Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationRESOURCES FOR INSTRUCTORSFor instructors who are interested in augmenting existing fluid mechanics coursework withappropriate historical perspectives, supporting teaching materials are absolutely essential to success. Therefore, in addition to the timelines presented in this paper, an extensive listing of both recentbooks as well as current websites is provided below. These contain much historic information thatinstructors should find useful. Although only a few books have been found that specifically discussthe history of fluid mechanics and the
the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education4. University of Cincinnati Experiences:Silicon Chalk has been used in three College of Engineering classes at the University ofCincinnati (UC) over the past year. In the most recent instance, the focus of this paper, a sectionof Basic Strength of Materials (a fundamental mechanics course) was selected forimplementation. The 75-minute classes were held in the afternoon twice a week for 10 weeks. Atotal of 24 students were enrolled in the section (a second, conventional section taught by anotherinstructor was also offered during the same academic quarter). Students were
workcompleted in this early stage.BackgroundThroughout history, major advancements in technology have been marked by materials: from theStone Age to the Bronze Age to the Silicon Age. Each new technical innovation has requireddiscoveries in materials to surmount barriers and limitations. This leads to an overlap betweenmaterials science and almost every other engineering field. Electrical engineers use materialsscience and engineering to produce computer chips, lasers, and superconductors. Structuralmaterials such as concretes for roads and metals for buildings and bridges are crucial to civilengineers. Mechanical engineers must consider the strength and long term reliability of thematerials used in their designs. Light weight, strong materials are
different sections of our introductory materialsengineering course taught during the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 school years.Approximately 210 students have taken the inventory at the beginning and end of thecourse.INTRODUCTION TO OUR MATERIALS ENGINEERING COURSEWe created our introductory materials engineering course in 1998 during a time ofcurricula reform. The course is an interdisciplinary one, taken by four out of sixengineering programs at Louisiana Tech University—Mechanical, Civil, Biomedical, andIndustrial Engineering. This course replaced two discipline-specific materials courses.We have previously reported on our course in a previous ASEE Annual Meeting3. Themost important aspect of this course for the use of the Materials Concept Inventory
Introductory Material Science: A Solid Modeling Approach Gerald Sullivan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Military InstituteAbstractAs a means to enhance students’ abilities to visualize the three dimensional structure ofmaterials, solid model based exercises have been integrated into the introductorymaterials science curriculum at the Virginia Military Institute. The exercises includedexploration oriented tasks, where students used the viewing functions of the solidmodeling environment to examine models of materials, as well as problems wherestudents constructed their own models of materials. The intent of the exercises was toallow students to obtain a deeper understanding
temperaturegoes to 20oC.) Have students discuss which type of crystal system this crystal belongs.Have them discuss why it gives off heat as it solidifies (Is it ‘normal’?)d. Material properties – ductility, hardness, and tensile strength.Procedure: Each student is given a set of materials that can be broken, bent, twisted,scratched and pulled apart by hand. Each student is asked to rate all of the materials interms of ductility, hardness, and tensile strength.19, 20, 21Material list: Several soft/hard and ductile/brittle materials. Everyday objects, such aschocolate, taffy, hards, licorice, and fruit leathers make excellent choices.Timing: Discussion of mechanical properties.Goal: Students get a hands-on feel for how forces from their own hands can
Session 2568 Integrating fracture mechanics into undergraduate design Madhukar Vable Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological UniversityAbstractThis paper describes the work that is under progress to develop instructional material and a com-puter program that will automate linear stress analysis in two-dimension. The computer programcan be used in a variety of ways to educate students about the stress behavior near a variety ofstress raisers, though the initial effort will be near cracks and other stress raisers in
Session # INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING FRACTURE MECHANICS K.V. Sudhakar, Tadeusz Majewski, Hector Cervantes Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla, Santa Catarina Martir, Puebla 72820, MexicoAbstractAn elective course on fracture mechanics is planned to be introduced for the undergraduatestudents of mechanical engineering. At the present time, some of the topics on fracturemechanics are covered in a course on selection of materials. The present paper discusses specificteaching methods and relevant experimental
completed a course with anemphasis on materials and on the basic mechanics of materials involving stress, strain, anddeflection. Most of the students are also taking the one-credit manufacturing processeslaboratory course which has experiments in traditional machining, metal casting, welding andCAD-CNC machining. The industrial engineering students also have had a previous course withcost estimating and the mechanical engineering students have had additional mechanics ofmaterials instruction. The primary purpose of the design project is to integrate the use of material properties,mechanical properties, and material costs into a single project. “Traditionally the attitude ofdesigners has been we design it, you build it1” which then results
Same Course, Two Methods of Learning: Assessment of the Student’s Success Jean-Paul Baïlon(1) (Dept. of Mechanical Eng.), Bernard Clément (Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Industrial Eng.), Pierre G. Lafleur (Dean of Studies) Ecole Polytechnique, PO Box 6079, Station Centre-Ville Montréal (QC) Canada H3C 3A7Abstract: This paper discusses the implementation of a self-directed learning strategy forinstruction in an introductory materials science course. Student’s performance metrics aredirectly compared to those from a more traditional lecture-oriented course. The raw data revealthat the students who have
FRICTION PERFORMANCE OF COATINGS D. M. Pai, B. Kailasshankar, M. S. Konchady, X. Wang J. Mason, J. Sankar, and S. N. Yarmolenko Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures NC A&T University Greensboro, NC 27411IntroductionCoatings are thin layers of materials that are deposited onto a bulk material to achieveproperties not easily attainable with substrate alone. They have attracted considerableresearch interest because of their numerous technical applications. Coatings are usedwidely in optical, microelectronic, packaging and decorative applications as they impartgood mechanical, chemical
projectors can be difficult in realtime. The overhead material could be prepared in advance, but then we would have multipleinstructors individually spending time solving the same problem, whereas one universalpresentation would be more time efficient and could adhere to higher presentation standards.Description of the SoftwareTo address the above difficulties encountered in large lecture halls, the authors have begun thedevelopment of departmental lecture software for the mechanics service courses. The softwarecan be shown in any classroom with a computer-driven projector (typical is one large screen perroom), and it can be placed on the internet for student review. A typical module consists of aconcise review of the theory and one or more example
) per week, with four hours oflecture or, when the course requires, a lecture and a laboratory (both consisting of two hours).For basic design courses, where no laboratory is included or in-class activities are not required,the two-hour lecture blocks can be more efficiently utilized if part of the block is used for studentlearning of the material presented by the instructor instead of using the entire block just forinstructor presentation.This paper presents a simple idea for achieving this goal. The idea was implemented and testedin three distinct engineering courses, namely ME-309 (Vibrations), MECH 210 (Mechanics I –Statics), and MECH 310 (Mechanics III – Dynamics). For evaluation purposes, student feedbackand comments are included in the
Freshman Retention Study in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas Stephen B. Taylor, Darin W. Nutter, James A. Davis, Joseph J. Rencis Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701abstract Retention of freshman students has become a focal point for many engineering collegesthroughout the country. With many literary sources written on the retention of students inengineering programs, there are many references that address why some students leave withoutcompleting a degree and why other students stay to ultimately complete a degree. It is