undergraduate and postgraduate levels, together with some recommendations.2. The second part concerned best practices for the use of new technologies in EIE education in Page 21.17.2 Europe and proposed guidelines for e-learning and intensive course’s assessment.3. The last one proposed two demonstrators of good practice for enhancing LLL in EIE in Europe: Virtual Centre of Entrepreneurship (VCE) and International Curricula Network (ICN)In the following we present the outcomes and conclusions connected to parts one and three.Analysis of LLL in electrical and information engineering (EIE) in EuropeThe objective of ELLEIEC work was to identify
students so that it makesthem feel more at ease and comfortable because of this shared connection.The commitment to teach abroad require faculty to make personal sacrifices, leaving theirfamilies for weeks at a time, usually during the holidays. In Dr. Schattler ’s case, having madethe decision to travel abroad far in advance, she was not anticipating that this trip would occur inthe midst of moving to a new house with her new husband and other family medical emergenciesthat arose back in the US. Dealing with such personal issues long distance, coupled with theintensity of the program, balancing students’ needs inside and outside the classroom, classroomresponsibilities, and acquiring advanced time management skills, while immersed in
, “Robot Projects as Education Design Experiments”, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Education, 2005, vol. 2, p. 524-529.9. A. Friesel, “Learning Robotics By Combining The Theory With Practical Design And Competition In Undergraduate Engineering Education”, AutoSoft Journal, International Journal on Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing; Special Issue on Robotics Education.10. Norman S. Nise, “Control Systems Engineering”, Ed. Jonh Wiley & Sons, Inc, ISBN 978-0470-54756-411. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl, and B.S. Bloom, “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives”. New York: Longman, 2001.12. P. Race, “The lecturer's toolkit
project. Each teamwas charged to define the specifications for their own project that is compatible to the guidelinesset by the PACE Program.The biggest challenge was in forming a team across various time zones at the beginning of aproject. We managed our large team (29 undergraduate students and 5 faculty members) quitesuccessfully using the SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely-methodology of George T. Doran to evaluate our strategic plans and project milestones.We divided our team into eight groups comprising 4-5 members, having at least one industrialdesign and one industrial engineering student in each group. We elected a group leader for eachdevelopment area to help stay focused on the goals. Every two months, each