the problems of our society”.26 This curriculum directlyaddresses that concern, and is even co-taught by a female faculty member. In the second andthird courses in this series, students have the opportunity to practice real-life scenarios andwitness their impact first-hand.This curriculum can be directly integrated into undergraduate coursework to fulfill electiverequirements; furthering the potential impact of engineering education and careers. Whenintroduced to these issues and ideas as a student, the potential for impact can be long standingand far reaching. Page 21.18.9Resources 1. Abu-Ghaida, D. and Klasen, S. The Costs of Missing the
dilemmas. Proceedings from the 33rd AS EE/ IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.19. Stein, B., Haynes, A., Redding, M., Harris, K., Tylka, M ., &Lisic, E. (2009). Faculty driven assessment of critical thinking: National dissemination of the CAT instrument. Proceedings from the 2009 Internati onal Joint Conferences on Computer, Informati on, and Systems Sciences and Engineering, Bridgeport, CT.20. Johnson, R. L, Penny, A. J., & Go rdon, B. (2009). Assessing Performance: Designing, Scoring, and Validating Performance Tasks. New York: The Gu ilford Press.21. Noor, K. B. M. (2008). Case study: A strategic research methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, p. 1602-1604.22. Yin, R