Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, Arizona State University; Bethany B Smith, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

) expectation of success, and (3) perceivedimplementation costs (e.g., time, materials).Responses were collected from 286 engineering faculty members (207 male, 79 female) from 19institutions. Responses indicated frequency of use, perceptions of value, expectation of success,and cost (e.g., use of TA’s, materials) for these classroom strategies: 1. Formative feedback loops 2. Real-world applications 3. Facilitating student-to-student discussionsControlling for course enrollment and years of experience, several significant differences werefound. Gender did not differentiate reported use of the strategies, but there were significantdifferences (p < .05) related to the expectation of success when integrating formative