Paper ID #35904Studies on teaming experience through embedding psychological safety,motivational driver, and cognitive diversity into pedagogyProf. Mirna Mattjik, Colorado School of Mines Mirna Mattjik is a Teaching Associate Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division, Cor- nerstone Design@Mines Program. Mirna is also faculty in the McBride Honors Program, and faculty affiliate for Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Mirna’s formal education is in industrial technology, in- ternational political economy, project management and leadership. Her active research agenda is about improving teaching and learning for
Information Systems, 29(4), 195–216.Gius, G., Osman, A., Nevrly, M., & Lutz, B. D. (2020). Exploring the Influence of Team Gender Composition During Conceptual Brainstorming. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Pacific Southwest Division. Davis, CA. Retrieved from https://strategy.asee.org/36028Mileva, E. (2009). Effects of anonymity: discourse analysis of conversation in electronic brainstorming. Unpublished MS, Department of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University.Mishler, E. G. (1975). Studies in dialogue and discourse: II. Types of discourse initiated by and sustained through questioning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4(2), 99–121.Osman, A., Cuellar, E
Paper ID #35917Work in Progress: Developing Disambiguation Methods for Large-ScaleEducational Network DataMr. Adam Steven Weaver, Utah State University Adam Weaver is a B.S. Mechanical Engineering student at Utah State University. His research is focused on developing explicit disambiguation methods for large-scale social network studies. In addition, he works with applications of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), and wrote curriculum using PIV to teach energy conservation to high school students.Mr. Jack Elliott, Utah State University Jack Elliott is a concurrent M.S. in Engineering (mechanical) and Ph.D. in Engineering
Paper ID #35911Development of a precollege engineering outreach program during theCOVID pandemicDr. Claire Yan P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Okanagan Dr. Claire Y. Yan is an associate professor of teaching in the School of Engineering, UBC Okanagan campus. She received her B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China and Ph.D. degree from the University of Strathclyde in the UK. Prior to joining UBC in 2008, she worked as a research scientist at Ryerson University in Toronto. Along her career, she has been involved in various research projects in the area of CFD, heat and mass transfer, vapour
vectoractivities required students to create videotaped or written reflections with annotated picturesusing the models to explain their thinking around key concepts. Students made connectionsbetween abstract symbolic representations and their physical models to explain concepts such asa general 3D unit vector, the difference between spherical coordinate angles and coordinatedirection angles, and the meaning of decomposing a vector into components perpendicular andparallel to a line.The video and written data analyzed to inform the design of think-aloud exercises in one-on-onesemi-structured interviews between researchers and students that are currently in progress. Thispaper presents initial work analyzing and discussing themes that emerged from the
second time atthe end of the week to see if their initial strategies had evolved. TMCT scores were consideredhigh if the participant correctly answered 9 or more of the 12 problems. Scores of 3 or lowerwere considered low scores.Case DescriptionsThis case study [29] is part of a larger research project aiming to measure the spatial ability andidentify the spatial strategies used by BLV populations. Annually, thirty participants wererecruited from all areas around the United States for this larger study. The study spanned 5 yearsbut had interruption due to the Covid-19 pandemic. All participants were high school studentsranging in academic grade level from 9th grade to 12th grade. This paper presents a case study offour of the 30 total
, Heather develops apps for mobile devices, leads the Prescott juggling club, and helps local high school students compete in NCL cybersecurity competitions. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Using a Pokémon Go Style Game in Introductory Computer Science Courses Heather Marriott, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Neil Jordaan, Consultant, PrescottAbstractThe objective of this research was to see if introductory level programming students wouldbenefit from using an interactive Pokémon Go style mobile application. Students are notoriousfor using their phones all
analysis, academic outcomes, clustering1 IntroductionBased on the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, the six-year graduation rate forstudents who initiated their college education in 2012 is only 58%, with 42% of students eitherhalting enrollment or taking longer than six years to graduate [1]. Halting college is broadlyunderstood to impose irreversible mental, financial, and time losses to students [2].To date, numerous reasons have been identified to explain why students choose to halt theireducation; they include: financial problems, lack of interest in studies, lagged behind in studyprogression, and inadequate information and guidance [3]. In many cases, the reasoning is relatedto academic performance; however, the determination to
exploration ofthe experienced phenomenon. This guidance has been used in developing a semi-structuredinterview script which can be found in appendix A. The interview script contains four relativelyshort background questions (1-4) followed by five open-ended questions (5-9) focusing ondiversity, inclusion and leadership. These open-ended questions seek to: gain a participant’sperspectives on their own experiences in engineering student teams; understand if and how aparticipant’s identities played a role in their engagement in teams; and investigate what stepstheir respective teams could take to create more inclusive spaces for current and future membersalike.Prior to contacting participants, the research study received approval from the
focus on the full entrepreneurial process[11], ours focuses mostly on the ideation and stakeholders aspects of entrepreneurship, as will bediscussed later in the paper.Table 2. Sequence of key program elements in senior capstone course. EGR 4811 • Problem area research and interest survey Fall Quarter • Team formation, norms, contracts, assessments and reporting • Project ideation, research and development, mission/vision • Project refinement – customer design priorities, key characteristics diagrams • Risk Reduction Prototype – specifications, analysis, safety, project plan • Mid-term: Design Review 1.1 (like Initial Tech Review) documents
watched multipletimes and transcripts were reviewed by both researchers for the initial project-based purpose ofediting and curating shorter topic-driven videos for posting online. This process entailed athematic approach with inductive coding to identify granular topics [22], [23], [24]. Twelvedistinct topics of alumni advice and seven distinct topics of student takeaways emerged; they willbe presented and discussed in the next two sections.ResultsThe three student participants, Roopal, Isabel and Chris, interviewed the respective alumni:Willa, Ashley and Avery. Alumni advice ranged from broad observations to specific tips.Student takeaways expressed in their debriefing interviews were influenced by both the alumniadvice and the readings. The
projects and what strategies would be used to pursue theseanticipated projects.The study received behavioural research ethics board approval prior to contacting researchparticipants. Participants were contacted in August through messages delivered by email orsocial media to the executive teams at the twelve target groups. Messages were formatted in sucha way that they could be passed on to other group members. Participation was incentivized witha draw for $20 gift cards with one of these gift cards drawn for every 5 participants.Results and DiscussionOverall 12 complete responses were received. 17 partial responses were also received with manyof these partial responses ending at question 5 corresponding to whether they had been involvedin CEL
Paper ID #35817Analysis of barriers to graduation for transfer students in AerospaceEngineeringDr. Radha Aravamudhan, San Jose State University Radha Aravamudhan’s research interests include Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Community cultural wealth and their application to curriculum specifically with respect to undergraduate engineering educa- tion as well as creative Arts-Based Research and Documentary film making. She supports faculty research in the area of undergraduate STEAM teaching and learning with a focus on increasing retention and grad- uation rates of under-represented student populations in engineering.Dr
Informal, often comprised Formal team w/ team lead Structure of friends and assigned roles Scope Distinct projects that Requires 28 weeks to last 2 – 5 weeks attempt to complete 1 – 5 hours a week 10 – 18 hours per week 5- to 25-page reports 30- to 100-page reports Only 2 required EGR courses 5 – 8 presentations over include presentations 2 semestersPrevious research documented that students develop teamwork habits in pre-capstone
reuse and resource protection. She also teaches sustainability principles in civil and environmental engineering design, from first-year classes through capstone classes. Her primary research focus is advanced treatment methods for removal of emerging contaminants during water and wastewater treatment. At CalPoly, she works with both civil and environmental engineering undergraduate students to to expand her research into application of sustainable reuse of wastewater reuse, as well as effective storm water management via Low Impact Development techniques. She contributes to Sustainability Across the Curriculum efforts on campus as well.Dr. Amro El Badawy, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Paper ID #35890Proposed Curriculum for a Multi-Campus Educator Training CourseDr. Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Sielmann is an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of British Columbia in the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering supporting both Mechatronics and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams. His research interests including multi-campus instruction, decolonization in engineering, and engineering ethics.Dr. Casey James Keulen, University of British Columbia, VancouverMs. ANGELA Mercy RUTAKOMOZIBWA American
are coordinated with a communications course occurring the same term.Students submit project documents to both courses and receive feedback and a grade from eachcourse.The CCEL runs a fellows program where undergraduate students are hired on a part-time basis toassist in implementing CEL in a course. The cohort of CEL fellows participate in trainingworkshops on CEL in July and August and have cohort meetings during the main academicterms from September to April. During this project two fellows, being 3rd and 4th yearundergraduate students were hired to assist with program implementation.Principles of community-based action research (CBAR) informed the development of theproject. This included the engagement of a variety of stakeholders in