UNC Charlotte as Director of the Industrial Solutions Lab. Page 22.858.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Stimulating Broader Industrial Participation in Undergraduate Programs AbstractIt is common knowledge among college of engineering educators that while engineering andengineering technology students obtain solid academic knowledge during their college years, themissing component typically seems to be the knowledge of the engineering work-world that onlyindustry can provide. While common
AC 2011-2872: AN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP CASE STUDYPeter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University Peter Schuster is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. His areas of interest include design, stress analysis, and biomechanics. Page 22.176.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 An Industry-University Partnership Case StudyAbstractAt many universities, senior undergraduate mechanical engineers work in teams on industry-sponsored capstone design projects. These projects provide an excellent
Technology does nothave dedicated research lab space, nor a data center. The primary desire for the NCA&Tresearchers was to have a data center for research of innovative configurations and applicationsof enterprise computing, and an environment that is conducive to active undergraduate andgraduate student research participation. The research plan called for the equipment to be installedin classroom labs. The primary location shares space with an industrial controls lab, and has Page 25.24.3existing three-phase power and network connectivity. The cooling capacity of the lab is notsuitable for 24/7 operation of several racks of servers, but is
are to be placed into service for the state’s wind farms. The wind farms are atthe earliest stages of development. This industry is still exploring a range of both educationalneeds and employment options.Faculty Content Experts Coordination ResultsWith the information gathered from the respective solar and wind industry participants, the Page 25.208.9second meeting with the faculty content experts was held in late September 2011. At this secondmeeting, the faculty content expects committed to insuring the transferability of three specificadvanced and alternative energy programs of study. There was strong consensus that atransferable
registered Professional Engineer in the state of Texas. Page 25.1219.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Sustainable Engineering Internships: Creation and AssessmentAbstractEngineering Sustainable Engineers, a program sponsored by National Science Foundation (NSF),was designed to improve undergraduate student knowledge of and competency in addressingsustainability issues in engineering design and problem solving. The program involvescollaboration among faculty in Civil, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering at the University ofTexas at Arlington. One of the key program elements
this research was to explore the use of student internships as a means of benchmark-ing best practices in the construction industry while providing synergistic benefits for all stake-holders involved in the process. The objective was to design a model internship program involv-ing faculty, students, and participating companies that could actively introduce students to sys-tematic methods of inquiry and industry best practices while increasing their resourcefulness andvalue to companies during their industry experience. The model should also provide a platformfor engaging faculty by providing a means of gathering difficult-to-obtain data from industry thatcould be used for research purposes, and it should return that data in aggregated form to
LDDI began in early 2006 with the development of an advisory board andcontinued with statewide outreach meetings in four major regions of the state. The purpose ofthese meetings was to share the LDDI vision and recruit industry professionals to participate indevelopment of the land development design program at the University. These early efforts haveresulted in over 200 practitioners who now participate in this initiative, donating time, energy,and their firms’ resources to achieve LDDI priorities. Participation is kept active by the advisoryboard’s biweekly teleconferences and quarterly meetings, semiannual general membershipmeetings, email, a quarterly newsletter, and a collaboration website that enables sharing files,discussions, and a
. Page 22.485.6However, none of these changes would be possible without explicit cooperation with the utilitiesand professionals currently working in the industry. Their contributions range from assisting inthe development of the curriculum to providing facilities and internships for students, andgranting CEUs to current water and wastewater operators. In summation, their participation is asimportant to the success of the WTI program as a reliable internet connection. Without the latter,students are unable to participate in coursework. Without the former, the educational system willstruggle to remain relevant to industry needs. Therefore, continued partnerships with industrywill work to ensure that the Water Training Institute meets the water
AC 2008-1414: STIMULATING AND DEVELOPING REFLECTIVE THINKING INUNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSElizabeth Howard, Illinois Institute of Technology Elizabeth Howard is a second-year Ph.D. candidate in the Industrial/Organizational Psychology program at the Illinois Institute of Technology. She received her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2006. She is working with the IPRO program as a research associate.Daniel Ferguson, Illinois Institute of Technology Daniel M. Ferguson, MBA, MSIE, is a Senior Lecturer in the IIT Stuart School of Business, and Associate Director for Research and Operations of the Interprofessional (IPRO) program. He was
attract and retain new high-tech industries. According to the U.S.Department of Commerce (Langdon, McKittrick, Beede, Knah, & Doms, 2011)1 over the past 10years, STEM jobs grew three times faster then non-STEM jobs. Between 2008 and 2018, STEM jobsare projected to grow by 17 percent compared to 9.8 percent growth for non-STEM jobs. Theconcern for the U.S. is being able to supply a well-educated technical workforce.Education provides individuals with the 21st Century knowledge, skills and competencies that areneeded to fully participate in the New Economy. By 2016, four out of every 10 new jobs (40percent) will require some advanced education or training (Dohm & Shniper, 2007) 2. Fifteen of
AC 2007-2102: USING FLUID MECHANICS RESEARCH EXAMPLES TOENHANCE AND STIMULATE UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERINGEDUCATION: PART IIOlga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech Olga Pierrakos is currently a National Academy of Engineering CASEE AGEP Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher (PEER) at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Pierrakos holds an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her Ph.D. work pertained to vortex dynamics in left ventricular flows. She has served as faculty advisor to over thirty mechanical engineering seniors involved in biomedical engineering design projects and taught several mechanical engineering fluid
48responses from all of the students participating in an ME capstone project, 587 survey responsesfrom students in the ME program across all ME courses taken that semester, and over 20,000responses from students across the institution in all of their courses that term. The followingscale based upon a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (Table 1) was used for the students’ survey: Table 1: Assessment Scale 1 2 3 4 5 strongly disagree disagree neutral agree strongly agreeThe following assessments address the objective ratings above. Student comments anddiscussion on the student surveys
Paper ID #9384Exploring Engineering Education in Broader Context: A Framework of En-gineering Global PreparednessScott C Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott C. Streiner is a full-time doctoral student in the Industrial Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh. He conducts research in the field of globalized engineering, including studying offerings in international engineering education, and the extent to which these experiences improve global prepared- ness of engineering students. Currently, Streiner’s research focus is on how best to operationalize and evaluate global opportunities within the
developed as part of a multidisciplinaryundergraduate certificate in power and energy. The course was designed to address the policy,economic, and societal issues of energy, in order to complement the more technical coursesrequired as part of the undergraduate certificate. In order to minimize any additional credit hoursrequired of students pursuing the certificate, the course was also designed to fit within theUniversity’s new General Education requirements as a “Global Dynamics” course. The course isalso well suited to cover the broader “impacts” of engineering as required by ABET. The paperalso overviews class structure and teaching method to promote active student inquiry into thematerial. I. IntroductionIn Fall 2010, the University of
professional societies serving in various capacities.Dr. Pattabhi Sitaram, Baker College, Flint Dr. Sitaram is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering at Baker College in Flint, Michigan. He worked in the automotive industry, mainly at GM for fifteen years as a simulation and methods development engineer in crashworthiness. He hast taught extensively at both undergraduate and graduate levels in Civil and Mechanical Engineering disciplines. His research interests include Finite Element Analysis & Design, Crashworthiness, and Plates & Shells.Mr. Tom Spendlove, Baker College, Flint Tom Spendlove teaches Engineering, CAD, and machining courses at Baker College of Flint in Flint, Michigan
) encouraging professionaldevelopment in the technology context, and (2) promoting interdisciplinary scientific research.Pre-college and undergraduate student participation in the sciences, particularly in research, is amajor challenge that is addressed by this project. Diversity of scientific disciplines is encouragedunder this project. Some of the most challenging and exciting research topics today are found atthe intersections of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This grant established partnerships with STEMacademic departments, industries, and other projects and provided opportunities for students toengage in interdisciplinary scientific research projects within the broader domains of the arts andsciences areas at our institution.Needs Assessment
-reviewed publications. She has recently enrolled in the Human Social Dimensions PhD program in Arizona State University’s School for the Future of Innovation and Technology in Society (Fall 2020).Ms. Elaine L. Craft, Florence-Darlington Technical College Elaine L. Craft (Florence-Darlington Technical College, Florence, SC-retired) holds a baccalaureate de- gree in chemical engineering from the University of Mississippi and a MBA from the University of South Carolina with additional graduate studies in mathematics at Francis Marion University. Her experience includes working as an engineer in industry as well as teaching and administration at community col- lege and state levels. She served as Director of the South
” program. The program isstructured in a 2+2 model; students participate in a 2-year foundation curriculum that includes arange of courses across engineering disciplines, the sciences, mathematics, design andcomplementary studies. This is followed by a 2-year specialization curriculum, during whichstudents take one of 8 (at publication time) Majors. Curriculum integration and multidisciplinarythinking are emphasized as program goals.The Majors have a focus, although not exclusively, on emerging and rapidly developing areas ofspecialization within engineering. Some of the Majors that are offered within the EngineeringScience program are also offered in other institutions/programs (like Aerospace Engineering,Biomedical Engineering and Electrical &
AC 2012-5464: EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE BLOGGINGON STUDENT PARTICIPATION, QUALITY, AND THE ACHIEVEMENTOF COURSE OUTCOMES IN A FRESHMAN ENGINEERING COURSEMrs. Federica Robinson-Bryant, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Federica Robinson-Bryant is an instructor in Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’s Freshman Engi- neering Department. She is also a doctoral candidate at the University of Central Florida, studying within the Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Department. Page 25.620.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Exploring the
Session 2209 CREATION OF A BIOETHICS COURSE FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM E. Mowry, J. Collins, S. Brophy Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235Abstract “Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have…an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility….1” To address this need, we are creating anundergraduate biomedical engineering (BME) ethics course, which serves to raise awareness instudents and better prepare them for careers in medicine, research, and engineering. Theprinciples and methodologies of
projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element
similar interests in the education of undergraduates. The industrialcomponent of the advisory board was firm in their conviction that this class must focuson the cost impact of environmental decisions. Since companies will only stay inbusiness when they are making a profit, environmental decisions must be analyzed from acost-benefit perspective. The academic component of the advisory board shared commoncourses, programs and curriculum that exist on their campuses and offered words ofwisdom for the development of this new course. Members of the advisory board haveparticipated as guest speakers on campus. They also participate in an annual advisoryboard meeting held at various industrial locations throughout the state. This annualmeeting provides a
error.Program Climate from Junior/Senior Year (JSY) Student InterviewsWhere the first year students focused primarily on academic survival as key to developing abelief they belong in engineering, more senior students had a broader view of their programenvironment and engineering culture. Most undergraduate engineering programs in the UnitedStates are dominated by white, middle class, straight male students (and faculty) so they arethe main contributors to the social dynamic of the school’s climate. Those that are part of thedominant culture are better prepared to navigate through the social spaces and sometimes donot see the inequalities present [24]. For example, one JSY white male student described hisclassmates in the engineering program: it is
broader sector of the student population comprising students who are still in search of theircareer focus and objectives. Undergraduate research has received strong support from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) through the development and funding of many research opportunities,including Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU), Research in UndergraduateInstitutions (RUI), Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program(HBCU-UP), and Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Program. Whilethese programs provide serious avenues for research preparation for students seeking furthereducation at the graduate level, there is a need, as outlined above, for broader-reaching programs.Thus, many
. Infact, “the only difference between research and inquiry based learning is the prior state ofknowledge of the broader community. In research it is unknown by all; in inquiry it is onlyunknown by the learner” (Fortenberry1, 1998, p.54). This implies that learning through inquiry isfundamentally equivalent, in the student’s perspective, to conduction of research. To the studentthere is no difference.Institutional SupportUnfortunately “many faculty, departments, and institutions struggle with initiating, sustaining,and enhancing their research programs on campus despite the national attention given to thebenefits of undergraduate research,” (Karukstis3, 2006, p. 1744). Luckily this is not the case atEastern Washington University. In fact, quite
programs in science” (p. 28). Consequently, equity is equalopportunities for both boys and girls to succeed in science (Levin & Matthews, 1997). However,equity in science learning reflects broader responsibility, embodied by the social justice model:the obligation to prepare all students to participate in a postindustrial society with an equalchance at attaining the accompanying social goods—rights, liberties and access to power (Lynch,2000, p. 16). In order for the science learning to be equitable, it is necessary to have “full and activeparticipation in a contextually equitable classroom” (Krockover and Shepardson, 1995, p. 224).Lee (2003) posits: “from an anthropological perspective, science teaching should enable studentsto make smooth
institution, fostering a moreintellectually stimulating academic environment. This can help enhance a university's reputationas a center for research and learning and attract high-achieving students and faculty, therebyraising the overall academic profile of the institution. Furthermore, these programs can lead toexternal funding opportunities and collaborations with industry and other universities,expanding the institution's reach and impact [8]. The research conducted in these programsoften leads to publications and presentations, further contributing to the scholarly community[9].Finally, URPs contribute to student retention and success in STEM fields. Russell et al. [10]found that students who participate in undergraduate research are more likely
experiments; and opportunities to present the researchoutcomes to the broader community at professional settings.The REU participants will spend a total of 10 weeks in the program. In the first two weeks, thestudents are at the academic institution receiving training for the upcoming research activities.During weeks 3-9, the students will spend the first two days (Monday and Tuesday) at theacademic institution and the next two days (Wednesday and Thursday) in industry partnersworking on the research projects. On Friday, they will come back to academic institution forprogress reports and extracurricular activities. The participants will be back at the academicinstitution in week 10 to wrap up the program. Supplemental activities including student
Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Page 22.251.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Assessment of a Summer Undergraduate Research Program Focused on Biomedical Engineering and DiabetesAbstract Undergraduate research experiences have the potential to influence the careerplans and motivation of young engineers and scientists. However, the impact of theseexperiences on the students may depend on the nature of the interactions with their researchmentors and laboratory staff. From 2006-2010, 10-15 students participated annually in this 10-week NSF
manydifferent campus efforts. Feedback from companies to faculty informs curriculum developmentand promotes industry relevance [3]. In some cases, sponsorships from partnering companies canprovide direct financial support for project materials and equipment. Additionally, industrypartners can act as a part of the institution’s broader professional network to connect graduatesand alumni to employment opportunities. For partnering companies, capstone sponsorship can provide a meaningful way to engagewith the future of engineering. Their participation can serve as an investment in their futureworkforce, as well as an opportunity to access unconventional solutions from students andfaculty. In some cases, partnering companies can provide meaningful