theproblems.To protect students’ identities, no confidential or personally identifiable information wascollected, including previous grades or GPA information. However, each participant wasexpected to produce several distinct records: one response for each survey, an online submissioncovering both problems, and their scratch work. All of these documents needed to be associatedwith the participant that created them. To accomplish this, a double letter code system wascreated. The first letter of the code, either A or B, indicated whether the participant was in thecontrol (A) or experimental (B) group. This distinction was not explained to the participants. Thesecond letter of the code ranged from A to Z, accommodating up to 26 participants in eachgroup
effectiveness which was about the sense of presence(Fig. 4a). This was expected as a majority of the participants experienced the lessons in a non-immersive (computer display) environment due to Covid-19 protocols. The lowest average in theimpact dimension was for Q3 for the students experiencing the math lessons. This could beattributed to the fact that it pertained to interest in the subject and since the majority of the mathstudents were in pre-calculus algebra and pre-calculus trigonometry, such a response is typical. (a) (b) Figure 4a, 4b. Responses of all studentsThe overall percentage averages of all majors for all dimensions (usability, engagement,effectiveness, and impact) were about 60
conducted the redesign of the UAVusing SolidWorks and Fusion360 CAD software. To make the electric UAV fly on Mars, itswingspan had to be increased from 1.5 m to 3.8 m, yet weight needed to be reduced, so its ratherbulky fuselage was reduced in volume by 2/3rd, and a light-weight carbon fiber/epoxy compositewas used for all structural components. The current electric motor and batteries seemed toprovide sufficient power. During this 3-week project, the students were able to a) learn andunderstand the basic aerodynamic theory, b) learn the differences between Earth’s and Mar’satmosphere, develop & use Excel spreadsheets, and use the FOILSIM III software. c) Theyevaluated trade-offs between gross weight, take-off speeds, air density, wing area
/s11948-005-0006-3.[6] N. A. Andrade and D. Tomblin, “Engineering and Sustainability: The Challenge of Integrating Social and Ethical Issues into a Technical Course,” 2018.[7] A. Benham et al., “Developing and Implementing an Aerospace Macroethics Lesson in a Required Sophomore Course,” in 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2021, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637172.[8] A. Gupta, “A Practitioner Account of Integrating Macro-ethics Discussion in an Engineering Design Class,” Jul. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2–27498.[9] B. Jimerson, E. Park, V. Lohani, and S. Culver, “Enhancing Engineering Ethics Curriculum by Analyzing Students’ Perception,” Jun. 2013, p. 23.530.1-23.530.15. doi: 10.18260/1-2–19544.[10] Palmer
., Kajfez, R. L., Kecskemety, K. M. (2021, July),Development of a Direct Assessment for Measuring Students’ Ability to Make Connections.Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.10.18260/1-2--36956[9] Novak, J. D., and Gowin, B., “Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, NewYork,” NY pp, Vol. 36-37, 1984, pp. 93–108.[10] Kashdan, T.B., M.C. Stiksma, D.J. Disabato, P.E. McKnight, J. Bekier, J. Kaji, R. Lazarus(2017) The Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity andidentifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73:130-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011[11] Rumreich, L. E., & Logan, F., & Dix, Z., & Sattele, N
Awards, Grants, and Fellowships Awarded 7 6 Pursued Graduate Schoolb 8 - Invention Disclosures, Patent Applications 2 - N = 27 total students (17 Undergraduates and 10 Graduates) a Students enrolled as undergraduates during their first semester of the IRES program are considered as such within the scientific outcomes. b Only applicable to students considered as undergraduates at the start of the program. TABLE
Paper ID #39798Exploring Additive Manufacturing in a Space Environment - A CapstoneDesign Project ExperienceZain Zafar KhanZachary Alan SobelmanDr. Sharanabasaweshwara Asundi, Old Dominion University Sharanabasaweshwara Asundi, Ph.D., an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University (ODU), is an expert in space systems engineering and has en- gaged in the design, development of several space systems, facilities, including an amateur radio ground station and two magnet coil test facilities. He is a Federal Communications Commission licensed amateur radio operator. He is
Paper ID #37228Lessons Learned from Starting a Student-Led Rocket Club and theCollaborative Effort between the Club and a Rocket CourseJacob Michael Blocker I am currently a senior in aerospace engineering at Iowa State University. I have worked as an intern at NASA KSC for the past 2 summers (2021/2022) for the Launch Services Program verifying contractor launch vehicle engine performance, and will start full-time in summer 2023 as a propulsion engineer at SpaceX. During my time at Iowa State, I have been highly involved with the Cyclone Rocketry team, leading the propulsion team during the 2021-2022 academic year, and
Paper ID #39610Dissolving Interdisciplinary Barriers in STEM Curriculum ThroughUnconventional Hydrofoil Boat Educational Lab at the CollegeUndergraduate LevelDr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Kristi J. Shryock, Ph.D., is the Frank and Jean Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Profes- sor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Novel Unconventional Aerospace Applications iN Core Ed- ucational Disciplines (NUA2NCED) Lab and of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program and National Academy
Paper ID #39418Engineering doctoral student retention and persistence from anorganizational climate and intersectional perspective: A targeted reviewof engineering education literatureDr. Julie Aldridge, The Ohio State University My background and research interests are in organizational change, innovation, and leadership. My cur- rent work focuses on organizational climate to better support the retention of engineering doctoral students from diverse groups to degree completion.Dr. Nicole M. Else-Quest, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Nicole M. Else-Quest is Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Women’s and
)One-way ANOVA: Using the data collected, an alpha of 0.05, and one-way ANOVA (assumingequal variances) test to compare means, the researchers rejected the null hypotheses (p-value<0.001) that the mean taxi-out (and taxi-in) time was same across the number of hotspotson small hub airports. Note – there were no small hub airports with 3 hotspots in the data. Taxi-out time: Using the Tukey HSD post hoc and 95% confidence, two significantly different groups (A and B) of small hub airports emerged. The mean taxi-out time was significantly different between the small hub airports in group A (0, 2, or 5 hotspots) and group B (1 or 4 hotspots). There was no significant difference within groups. Taxi-in time: Using the Tukey HSD post
: https://peer.asee.org/23989. [Accessed Feb 22, 2023].[7] L. Howe and J. Holles. "An Undergraduate Research Methods Class: Results andExperiences from Initial Offerings”, 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis,MN, 2022, August. ASEE Conferences, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41321.[Accessed Feb 22, 2023].[8] B. Liaw and I. Voiculescu, “An Integral Analytical Numerical Experimental Pedagogy for ASystem Dynamics and Control Course”, 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu,Hawaii, 2007, June. ASEE Conferences, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/1696.[Accessed Feb 22, 2023].[9] D. E. Palmgren and B. B. Rogers, "A Subsonic Wind Tunnel Facility for UndergraduateEngineering Technology
facilities used for this project include 3D printers, CAD software,and other fabrication facilities. These and other required facilities are available in the AERO(Aerospace Education and Research Organization) lab at the host institution. Nine undergraduatestudents work on this interdisciplinary project under the guidance of one faculty member. Studentsworking on the project are from Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Mechatronics andComputer Engineering programs. The research team is divided into three main groups: a) AvionicsGroup, b) Structures Group, and b) Systems Group. The avionics group includes students fromMechatronics and Computer Engineering. The systems groups include students from Mechanicaland Civil engineering. The structures
designs andcapabilities in response to hazards, environments, and user performance [8] [9]. The projectyielded three key findings, including the implementation of standardized user interactions fordata discoveries and recommendations, the integration of complex systems and decisionstrategies to assess risk under operational conditions, and the exploration of rotorcraftperformance through standardized data collection methods to investigate flight parameters. Thethree (3) finding offered this project the ability to: a) Implement the capabilities and functional designs to standardize the user interactions regarding data discoveries and recommendations; b) UAS integration of complex systems and the decision strategies for mission driven
responded to the modified Rydell-Rosen Ambiguity Tolerance survey(RRAT) (Appendix A, [21]). Of the 154 respondents, 116 were freshman while 38 weregraduating seniors. The survey has 20 true/false items. The Godwin [22] Engineering Identity(EI) (Appendix B) survey was also administered to the students. The EI survey which measuresthe responses on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree (SA) =5; Agree (A) = 4; Neutral (N) = 3;Disagree (D) = 2, and Strongly Disagree (SD) = 1) has 11 items that measure three dimensionsnamely, Acceptance (3 items), Interest (3 items), and Competence (5 items). A total of 292freshmen and 35 graduating seniors responded to the EI survey. The data was collected usingGoogle forms. The surveys were administered to freshmen at
discussed above, a selection of B, C, and D motors were tested as possiblecandidates. After testing in the field, the Estes C5 motor was determined to be the best fit for thecourse. This was mainly due to its unique thrust curve (Figure 4).The thrust curve in Figure 4 displays a graph of thrust vs time. To overcome the limitations of aheavy rocket takeoff, we looked for engines with a high thrust in the beginning that would ensurea safe takeoff (if the rocket comes off the rail slowly, it is unstable). What also needs to beconsidered is the delay charge (time between thrust and parachute deployment). Afterconsidering the range of payload mass for the rocket, the optimal delay charge for all rockets wasthe best at around 3 seconds, therefore we use
University.References[1] S. Caldwell, “11.0 ground data systems and Mission Operations,” NASA, 16-Oct-2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa/ground-data-systems- and-mission-operations. [Accessed: 24-Feb-2023].[2] C. Simpson, A. Burjek, W. Patton, E. G. Hackett, and Charles O’Neill, “Ground Station and Infrastructure Development at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa,” The International Astronautical Federation (IAF)., 2019.[3] F.-B. Hsiao, H.-P. Liu, and C.-C. Chen, “The Development of a Low-Cost Amateur Microsatellite Ground Station for Space Engineering Education,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, 2000.[4] C. Davenport , “NASA looks to private sector for successor to the International
Heritage MuseumVincent Burnelli Burnelli CBY-3 New England Air East Granby, CT MuseumJim “Slug” LTV A-7B San Diego Air San Diego, CAKidrick Corsair II and Space MuseumLindell Hendrix Consolidated B-24 National Museum of Pooler, GA Liberator the Mighty Eighth Air ForceBen Rich Lockheed F-117 Museum of Aviation Robins AFB, GA NighthawkF-8 pilots Vought F-8 National Naval Pensacola, Crusader Aviation Museum
are covered. Introduces center of gravity theory, defines how to locate centers of gravity, and introduces weight and balance procedures for engineering technology, not covered by flight ground school [14].” In this course, students are introduced to electric propulsion nomenclature, applicable aircraft configurations, and applicable standards and federal laws for aircraft design. b) In AT 26200 Basic Aircraft Powerplant Technology, this course is “A study of the design, construction, and operating practices of aircraft reciprocating and small gas turbine engines. Laboratory exercises emphasize airworthiness evaluation, fault-isolation techniques, and standard service/maintenance practices [14
Paper ID #40039Using Free Software as Computational Wind Tunnels to Teach StudentsAbout AirfoilsDr. Jason Andrew Roney, University of Denver Dr. Roney is currently a Teaching Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. Dr. Roney joined the University of Denver (DU) in Autumn 2014. Prior to joining DU, Dr. Roney held both industry and academic positions. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Using Free Software as Computational Wind Tunnels to Teach Students About AirfoilsTwo-dimensional infinite airfoils are a fundamental concept in Aerodynamics and